Home
we had subs it was crazy

Primary links

  • About
    • $upport (lol)
    • Ethics
    • FAQ
    • Privacy Policy
  • Contact
  • MGoStore
  • MGoBoard
    • MGoBoard FAQ
    • Ticket spreadsheet
    • Michigan bar locator
    • Moderator Action Sticky
  • Useful Stuff
    • Depth Chart By Class
    • Unofficial Two Deep
    • 2013 Offer Board
    • Crude Bug Tracking System
    • Third Down Stats
    • Diaries, Windows Live Writer, And You
    • Michigan Future Schedules
    • User-Curated HOF
    • 2013 Recruiting Board
    • Where To Eat In Ann Arbor
Home

Navigation

  • Forums
  • Recent posts

User login

  • Create new account
  • Request new password

MGoElsewhere

  • @MGoBlog (Brian)
  • @aceanbender
  • @TomVH (Tom)
  • RSS Feed
  • iPhone App
  • Facebook profile
  • MGoKindle Store
  • mgo.licio.us
  • Brian @ TSB [Archive]
  • Brian @ AOL [Archive]
  • Sour Salty Bitter Sweet

Michigan Blogs

  • Big House Blog
  • Burgeoning Wolverine Star
  • Genuinely Sarcastic
  • Go Blue Michigan Wolverine
  • Holdin' The Rope
  • MGoFootball
  • MVictors
  • Maize 'n' Blue Nation
  • Maize 'n' Brew
  • Maize And Go Blue
  • Michigan Hockey Net
  • The Blog That Yost Built
  • The Hoover Street Rag
  • The M Block
  • The M Zone
  • The Wolverine Blog
  • Touch The Banner
  • UMGoBlog
  • UMHoops
  • UMTailgate
  • Wolverine Liberation Army

M On The Net

  • mgovideo
  • MGoBlue.com
  • Mike DeSimone
  • Recruiting Planet
  • The Wolverine
  • Go Blue Wolverine
  • Winged Helmet
  • UMGoBlue.com
  • MaizeRage.org
  • Puckhead
  • The M Den
  • True Blue Fan Forum

Big Ten Blogs

  • Illinois
    • A Lion Eye
    • Hail To The Orange
    • Illinois Baseball Report
    • Illinois Loyalty
  • Indiana
    • Inside The Hall
    • The Crimson Quarry
  • Iowa
    • Black Heart, Gold Pants
    • Fight For Iowa
  • Michigan State
    • The Only Colors
  • Minnesota
    • GopherHole.com
    • The Daily Gopher
    • I'm In Love With A Fringe Bowl Team
    • TNABACG
  • Nebraska
    • Big Red Network
    • Corn Nation
    • Husker Mike's Blasphemy
    • Husker Gameday
  • Northwestern
    • Sippin' On Purple
    • Lake The Posts
  • Notre Dame
    • The House Rock Built
    • One Foot Down
  • Ohio State
    • Eleven Warriors
    • Buckeye Commentary
    • Men of the Scarlet and Gray
    • Our Honor Defend
    • The Buckeye Nine
  • Penn State
    • Slow States
    • Black Shoe Diaries
    • Happy Valley Hardball
    • Penn State Clips
    • Linebacker U
    • Nittany White Out
  • Purdue
    • Boiled Sports
    • Hammer and Rails
  • Wisconsin
    • Bruce Ciskie

Links of Note

  • Baseball
    • Big Ten Hardball
    • College Baseball Today
    • The Baseball Zealot
    • The College Baseball Blog
  • Basketball
    • Ken Pomeroy
    • Basketball Prospectus
    • Midmajority
  • College Hockey
    • Chris Heisenberg
    • College Hockey Stats
    • Inside College Hockey
    • Michigan College Hockey
    • Hockey's Future
    • Sioux Sports
    • USCHO
    • Western College Hockey
    • CCHA
      • LSSU Hockey
      • Bronco Hockey Blog
  • Football
    • Smart Football
    • Every Day Should Be Saturday
    • Doctor Saturday
    • CFB Stats
    • Harold Stassen
    • NCAA D-I Stats Page
    • The Wizard Of Odds
  • General
    • Sports Central
  • Local Interest
    • The Ann Arbor Chronicle
    • Arborwiki
    • Arbor Update
    • Teeter Talk
    • Vacuum
  • Teams Of The D
    • Lions
      • Pride of Detroit
      • Fire Millen
    • Pistons
      • Detroit Bad Boys
      • Need4Sheed
    • Tigers
      • Roar Of The Tigers
      • The Detroit Tigers Weblog
      • The Daily Fungo
    • Red Wings
      • On The Wings
      • Behind The Jersey
      • Winging It In Motown
    • Michigan Sports Forum

Archive

  • May 2013 (48)
  • April 2013 (94)
  • March 2013 (104)
  • February 2013 (81)
  • January 2013 (93)
  • December 2012 (74)
  • November 2012 (142)
  • October 2012 (143)
  • September 2012 (107)
  • August 2012 (103)
  •  
  • 1 of 11
  • ››

Get Yer Tickets

Football Display Case

NFL Watches

Follow your favorite team with localtv-satellite.com: Click Here.

Site Search

Diaries

  • New
  • Popular
  • Hot
  • A Cynical Take on Why Expansion May be Dead for the Forseeable Future
    maizeonblueaction - 17 hours ago
  • LIGHT IT UP, AGAIN. WALLPAPER
    jonvalk - 1 day ago
  • Using Rivals' Star Ratings To Look At Big Ten Football Recruiting: 2002-2013
    LSAClassOf2000 - 1 day ago
  • UMich NFL draft history, Part III
    blueheron - 1 day ago
  • More Milford Men Than Michigan Men: Comparing the 11-12 and 12-13 Hockey Teams
    MGoBlueline - 4 days ago
  •  
  • 1 of 4
  • ››
more
  • Big Ten Recruiting Rankings 5-15-13
    Ace - 1,541 views
  • Future Non-Conference Opponent Recruiting Watch
    EGD - 790 views
  • More Milford Men Than Michigan Men: Comparing the 11-12 and 12-13 Hockey Teams
    MGoBlueline - 679 views
  • Using Rivals' Star Ratings To Look At Big Ten Football Recruiting: 2002-2013
    LSAClassOf2000 - 654 views
  • UMich NFL draft history, Part III
    blueheron - 638 views
  •  
  • 1 of 2
  • ››
more
  • Big Ten Recruiting Rankings 4-30-13
    Ace - 81 comments
  • Big Ten Recruiting Rankings 5-15-13
    Ace - 51 comments
  • Using Rivals' Star Ratings To Look At Big Ten Football Recruiting: 2002-2013
    LSAClassOf2000 - 18 comments
  • Future Non-Conference Opponent Recruiting Watch
    EGD - 15 comments
  • LIGHT IT UP, AGAIN. WALLPAPER
    jonvalk - 12 comments
  •  
  • 1 of 2
  • ››
more

MGoBoard

  • New
  • Recent
  • Hot
  • OT: I love High School football
    17 replies
  • OT? Graduatin' Season. Who had the Worst Commencement Speaker?
    51 replies
  • 2015 QB Josh Rosen offered
    21 replies
  • Charles Woodson signs with Raiders
    30 replies
  • (Ole Miss) Hugh Freeze seems to be claiming BCS titles now
    38 replies
  • OT: NBA Draft Lottery
    68 replies
  • Complete 2013-14 M Hockey scheduled revealed
    24 replies
  • How much do you really hate ohio?
    123 replies
  • Our footballs are made in the USA but not in Ohio
    27 replies
  • Gardner updates the recovery of Fitz & Countess
    38 replies
  • OT-Two new Wolverine Fans have joined us (UPDATED WITH PHOTOS FROM TONIGHT)
    62 replies
  • Pizza Pizza Bowl Fires Back!
    26 replies
  • Are TV sets the only reason for RU and MD?
    52 replies
  • Rivals 250 notes
    56 replies
  • ESPN: Michigan BBall article featuring GRIII.
    6 replies
  •  
  • 1 of 7
  • ››
  • 2015 QB Josh Rosen offered
    21 replies
  • OT? Graduatin' Season. Who had the Worst Commencement Speaker?
    51 replies
  • Complete 2013-14 M Hockey scheduled revealed
    24 replies
  • OT: I love High School football
    17 replies
  • How much do you really hate ohio?
    123 replies
  • (Ole Miss) Hugh Freeze seems to be claiming BCS titles now
    38 replies
  • Charles Woodson signs with Raiders
    30 replies
  • OT: NBA Draft Lottery
    68 replies
  • OT-Two new Wolverine Fans have joined us (UPDATED WITH PHOTOS FROM TONIGHT)
    62 replies
  • OT - Kickstarter opportunity to create new college football video game
    46 replies
  • ESPN: Trey Burke Articles/Video/Fluff/Etc.
    13 replies
  • Speight and TomVH on Peppers
    115 replies
  • Gardner updates the recovery of Fitz & Countess
    38 replies
  • 5 star 2013 DT may not be enrolling at Notre Dame
    82 replies
  • Are TV sets the only reason for RU and MD?
    52 replies
  •  
  • 1 of 7
  • ››
  • OT: Red Wings vs Hawks Game 3 Open Thread
    203 replies
  • OT: Red Wings vs. Blackhawks Open Thread
    201 replies
  • Jabrill Peppers Announcement Date Set
    169 replies
  • UM 2014 Conf schedule football
    123 replies
  • How much do you really hate ohio?
    123 replies
  • Brandon on Uniformzzz
    119 replies
  • Speight and TomVH on Peppers
    115 replies
  • OT: Red Wings @ Hawks Game 2 Open Thread
    114 replies
  • Prayers for Moore, Oklahoma
    112 replies
  • Alex Bars to Notre Dame
    96 replies
  • 5 star 2013 DT may not be enrolling at Notre Dame
    82 replies
  • ESPN 30 for 30 on the Bad Boys
    77 replies
  • Michigan Softball vs. Cal Open Thread
    75 replies
  • Michigan has #1 recruiting class on ESPN now.
    73 replies
  • OT: Advice on moving to Ann Arbor
    72 replies
  •  
  • 1 of 7
  • ››

mgo.licio.us

  • Former Arkansas QB Brandon Mitchell transferring to NC State

    so much for that

    0 comments
  • The B1G List: Ranking the State Fossils of the Big Ten

    This list is completely arbitrary and not a genuine analysis of the relative merits of state fossils.

    0 comments
  • Trey Burke turns to inner circle to prepare for NBA draft

    will be michigan's highest pick in a while

    2 comments
  • B1G assistant coach salaries on the rise

    money has to go somewhere

    0 comments
  • Tim Hardaway Jr. is motivated by his critics and doubters, and supremely confident in his ability

    I am only motivated by people who have no opinion about me.

    0 comments
  • Big Ten football procrastinates on parity-based scheduling, and nothing ever changes

    the just released schedules were a flat-out statement that the B10 doesn't believe SOS will matter in playoff selection

    1 comments
  • Michigan's Glenn Robinson III, Mitch McGary ranked inside top 20 on ESPN's 2014 draft board

    but I thought that draft was supposed to be incredibly loaded?

    1 comments
  • Tim Hardaway Jr. turning heads, viewed as a first-rounder by some teams, analyst says

    If you're gonna go please be in the first round.

    0 comments
  • Michigan-Ohio State once, Indiana-Purdue once? The Big Ten has to protect its hoops rivalries

    another delightful side effect of a 14 team conference

    0 comments
  • Beilein on transfers: All should have to sit a year, regardless of situation

    I disagree.

    0 comments
  • Julie Hermann takes over as Rutgers AD, won't try to spend like Michigan

    GOOD PLAN

    2 comments
  • Jay Harris says no to Michigan State, decides to become a rapper

    hahahahaha

    0 comments
  • The Difference Between A Good Fan And A Bad Fan

    thoughtful piece from Jacobi on middle finger lady

    3 comments
  • Michigan's rising recruiting profile exciting John Beilein, who remains true to his scouting form

    Their high school coaches and AAU coaches have probably a better appreciation of Michigan than maybe they had before," Beilein said. "It's a tough balance right now. Tim Hardaway and Trey Burke weren't really high-profile players, nor was Darius Morris, and all were high-profile players. "We're still looking at 'who is the best fit.' "

    0 comments
  • Charles Barkley discusses Michael Jordan, Dream Team and more - NBA - Jack McCallum - SI.com

    "When I call somebody a midget, clearly I'm not trying to insult f---ing midgets. I'm just using basketball terminology."

    0 comments
  •  
  • 1 of 2
  • ››
more

Let's Not And Say We Did

By Brian — March 24th, 2011 at 3:26 PM — 320 comments
Filed under:
  • brady hoke
  • brady hoke is the one true notriguez
  • column-type things
  • frank beckmann
  • pro-style fit
  • spread n shred

 denard-robinson-04jpg-6399aa0c7cd519fe_large bj-askew
Michigan's ground game stopped being effective in 1995.

I'm not sure if Jon Chait was reacting to the latest MANBALL quote from Brady Hoke or not, but when an article titled "You Can't Go Home Again" pops up the day after Michigan's new head coach says this:

"Once we get the power play down, then we'll go to the next phase. You know, because we're gonna run the power play."…

"We don't have a lot of fullbacks." Hopkins works out well at FB "for a lot of the old 49ers stuff" with split backs. Hoke wants fullbacks to block so hard they "come in at about 6-3, and leave the program at 6-1." …

It's hard to think otherwise. Of course, even ESPN folk have picked up on Hoke's love affair with the word "toughness"—the article could have been spurred by anything Hoke's said over the last three months. There are consistent reports that Hoke makes condescending comments about the spread at alumni events. Manball? Manball.

Some people love this. In my mind they all look like this…

image

yes, that's the Beckmann aficionado

…and could be coaching Purdue. I would not want to get in a conversation with any of these people because they would have very strong opinions about things they know nothing about. They would repeat inane aphorisms as if those were the final word on any subject, and they would regard any dispute as evidence of a diseased mind. I have talked to these people on the radio some. It's not fun. I close my eyes and imagine the exact dimensions and color of their mustaches. They are boringly consistent.

My hope is Hoke is a brilliant, innocent-as-snow delegator or a con man. He's got a quarterback who was an All-American as a true sophomore last year because of his legs. He's got an offensive coordinator whose track record suggests he prefers to air it out and that things get desperately bad when MANBALL advocates push him away from his mad bombing ways. He's got a set of running backs best described as underwhelming, a center who can teleport his way into tough reach blocks, and a guard who can block Manti Te'o twenty yards downfield. If the offseason could be spent fixing whatever it is that causes Robinson to turn the ball over willy-nilly, Michigan's offense would be insane. According to statistical things it already is.

Switching to an actual pro-style offense would be doing exactly what Michigan did last year when it installed the 3-3-5 despite the total unsuitability of its personnel for the scheme. It would be exactly as stupid. It can't be as bad statistically because instead of true freshman two star Ray Vinopal backed up by a duck, next to a walk on, and vaguely in front of more freshmen you have ten returning starters and Denard Robinson, but it would be just as dumb. If Hoke's bravado about being a bunch of tough bastards who love grinding out four yards on a power play is true I'm worried for the immediate and long term future of the program in the same way I was when hiring Greg Robinson caused me to dig out a picture of Tweek.

On the other hand, Beckmann aficionados love that stuff, and so do the newspapers that are no longer read by anyone other than Beckmann aficionados. English has developed lingo to distinguish words meant to be true from words meant to produce inoffensive newspaper blather: the latter is coachspeak. Rich Rodriguez was beyond awful at coachspeak. Hoke is a grand master. When IBM develops "Jim" and challenges Hoke to a duel, Watson-style, Hoke will destroy his opponent so badly smoke will come out of its nonexistent ears like that robot asked to rhyme something with "orange" in a story I read when I was eight. Hoke will lament Jim's lack of toughness.

This is a real skill the last three years have shown is way more important than you'd think. It's a relief when every press conference is Hoke being gently tickled on the belly and fed peeled grapes, and telling everyone you're establishing a mindset of toughness is fine. It's something that will help the program in the long run.

As long as you don't believe yourself. It won't help as much as winning a crapton of games, and even if the defense gets vastly better the best way to do that next year is to have an offense that puts up points, and the best way to do that is to very gently shift the offense towards your long term vision while still keeping Denard in the Heisman race.

This isn't 2008, when Michigan was screwed no matter what offense they put in. Getting Michigan's offense to go from explosive but inconsistent to world-destroying is a matter of getting a kicker, finding a good running back, working on Denard's reads and accuracy, and leaving everything else the hell alone. Michigan can't reasonably do that because they've got new coaches, but how hard is it to run a QB lead draw and follow that with QB Lead Oh Noes? The secret of Michigan's 2010 offense is that the zone read was hardly used. The other secret is it was a power running offense, one more effective than anything Michigan's run in at least the last decade and probably a lot longer.

Michigan YPC Career Leaders Since 1949 (min: 100 carries)

# Name Att Yds Yd/Att TD Lng From To
1t D. Robinson 325 2053 6.3 19 87 2009 2010
1t Jon Vaughn 226 1421 6.3 9 63 1989 1990
2 Kerry Smith 154 950 6.2 5 29 1980 1983
3 Tyrone Wheatley 688 4178 6.1 47 88 1991 1994
4 Tshimanga Biakabutuka 472 2810 6 24 60 1993 1995
5 Rob Lytle 557 3307 5.9 26 75 1973 1976
6 Allen Jefferson 175 1002 5.7 14 70 1987 1990

Michigan YPC, Team, Since 2001

# Year YPC
1 2010 5.58
2 2009 4.52
3 2006 4.27
4 2003 4.25
5 2007 3.97
6 2008 3.91
7 2005 3.89
8 2004 3.83
9 2002 3.82
10 2001 3.59

Borges should install his passing game immediately and Michigan should start running power schemes more frequently—power did feature occasionally last year—if they want to, but lining up under center to hand it off to Vincent Smith isn't going to be any better of an idea in 2011 than it was in 2010.

You can run a "pro-style" offense, but run it from the shotgun and run downhill using Denard Robinson as one of three primary tailbacks. You can't get rid of the scare quotes because he's Denard Robinson. If you do run a no-scare-quotes pro-style offense he's not Denard Robinson anymore. He's the guy handing off and you're walking back into the days where Michigan averaged less than four yards per carry and ran 65% of the time.

I think Borges knows this, but Hoke's coachspeak is going to make this the most terrifying spring game of all time.

  • Login or register to post comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
March 24th, 2011 at 5:31 PM | I'm not responding to you (Score:1)
Michael
Joined: 06/30/2008
MGoPoints: 489

I'm not responding to you specifically, Mr. Ornery, because you are apparently a child. I'd just like to clear up my argument for the adults.

My argument about talent was not intended to be disparaging. I'm simply pointing out that, if the goal is to win national championships, we simply have not recruited on the level of the SEC teams that have won them recently.

And when you're (perhaps perpetually) dealing with a paucity of talent, it makes sense to use schemes that minimize the effects of this talent deficit. Brian is saying that given our talent, now and in the future, we cannot win games by simply lining up and out-executing teams like Ohio State, USC, and the top tier of the SEC because they simply have better players.

 

c/o 2008
GO BLUE!

  • Login or register to post comments
March 24th, 2011 at 5:35 PM | Denard taking "most" of the snaps from under center (Score:1)
wolverine1987
wolverine1987's picture
Joined: 07/07/2008
MGoPoints: 2928

(Hoke's words) is not the same Denard we saw last year. That IMO is Brian's point. His options are more limited from under center, unless he takes off from under center and runs the option-which we aren't running.

"Everyone gets dumped Gabe. Let me give you some advice: a little coverup on your Adams Apple will make it appear smaller. Which will make you appear less like a transvestite." 

  • Login or register to post comments
March 24th, 2011 at 10:45 PM | Are you fucking serious? (Score:1)
bleedzblue
bleedzblue's picture
Joined: 09/03/2009
MGoPoints: 1146

You're right, Roundtree, Stonum, Hemingway, Molk, Lewan, Schilling and Patrick Omameh were all scrubs. All of these players have a chance to play at the next level, you don't have a clue if you really think these guys haven't proved anything. You are such a terrible terrible poster. 

HAIL TO THE VICTORS VALIANT, HAIL TO THE CONQUERING HEROES!

  • Login or register to post comments
March 24th, 2011 at 3:55 PM | I don't know if Hoke is an (Score:1)
gordie bell
gordie bell's picture
Joined: 03/15/2009
MGoPoints: 7962

I don't know if Hoke is an incompetent, dumb, lovable, coachspeaker or not. What I do know; 3 years under RR sucked, soooo.. I'm going to sit back and judge Hoke on what he does, not on a pile of stats designed to persuade me how awesome we are, when my eyes tell me we suck(ed).

  • Login or register to post comments
March 24th, 2011 at 4:05 PM | I imagine your moustache to (Score:1)
gbdub
gbdub's picture
Joined: 02/16/2010
MGoPoints: 2468

I imagine your moustache to be majestic, yet well-groomed. After completing the above post, you took a long sip of your Manhattan and then carefully dabbed your dignified facial hair with a 600-thread count mongrammed Egyptian cotton napkin.

Please say hello to Jack for me.

  • Login or register to post comments
March 24th, 2011 at 4:24 PM | My point was not that Gordie (Score:1)
gbdub
gbdub's picture
Joined: 02/16/2010
MGoPoints: 2468

My point was not that Gordie actually is like that, only that he perfectly epitomised the attitude Brian was talking about, namely "I don't care what actually happened, I KNOW our offense sucked". Nevermind that we gave even the good defenses in the league (e.g. OSU) some of their worst outings of the year.

The 2010 offense was a statistical monster (even against good competition) plagued by inopportune turnovers and lack of a non-Denard rushing game. No more, no less. It certainly didn't "suck" and it certainly wasn't a "disaster". It's extremely difficult to see how running V. Smith up the middle 20 times a game will improve on it.

The defense both sucked and was a disaster.

  • Login or register to post comments
March 24th, 2011 at 4:42 PM | I don't know that are offense (Score:1)
gordie bell
gordie bell's picture
Joined: 03/15/2009
MGoPoints: 7962

I don't know that are offense sucked but I am perfectly confident that under 3 years of RR, our team sucked.

My nephews, senior in HS and soph in college, would text me during games, "this is embarrassing". Never once did they text me, exhorting our  dominance in some obscure metric.

It doesn't matter how awesome our offensive metrics looked on paper, our team sucked for 3 years. It really is that simple, no fucking metrics needed for this discussion.

Y'all who continue to apologize for RR, bought into the same ponzi scheme I did, I stopped investing, you true believers are still pouring money into a worthless investment.

  • Login or register to post comments
March 24th, 2011 at 5:23 PM | Our team was mediocre (Score:1)
gbdub
gbdub's picture
Joined: 02/16/2010
MGoPoints: 2468

Our team was mediocre ("sucked" is pretty strong for 7-6, unless you think the team "sucked" in 2005, but w/e) last year because the defense was atrocious. Please explain how huddling up and placing Denard under center fixes the defense.

But seriously (honestly), also explain how putting Denard under center improves the offense,  because I truly don't see how it will.

  • Login or register to post comments
March 24th, 2011 at 5:31 PM | This is what I don't (Score:1)
El Jeffe
El Jeffe's picture
Joined: 07/07/2008
MGoPoints: 6711

This is what I don't understand about the anti-RR crowd. They can't get this excellent point you made. Instead, they just lump everything together and say: "we just plain sucked. Now hand me my mustache comb." (btw: the mustache meme is already a huge success, because mustaches).

The truth is that our offense was excellent, and would have been more excellenter with a better defense. The truth is also that our defense fucking sucked, and would have sucked even more without such an excellent offense. Both of these things are true.

It is also true that Rich Rodriguez deserves much of the credit for the offense and much of the blame for the defense. I don't understand the painting with the brush that is broad.

  • Login or register to post comments
March 24th, 2011 at 5:47 PM | Excellent Offense? (Score:1)
romeyjdogg
Joined: 11/11/2009
MGoPoints: 1207

You're talking about Auburn right?

  • Login or register to post comments
March 24th, 2011 at 5:54 PM | I get his point, but his (Score:1)
gordie bell
gordie bell's picture
Joined: 03/15/2009
MGoPoints: 7962

I get his point, but his point is irrelevant. The team sucked for 3 years, it doesn't matter if they put up some nice offensive metrics.

Did you see the bowl game, the OSU game, the Wisconsin game? Did you see 2009, 2008? Those years were awful, you are not going to find many people lamenting the loss of a coach, who put that product on the field for 3 years. I am not anti RR, supported him for 3 years, but understood and accepted his firing.

The majority opinion is RR needed to go, Brian thought so as well, but when Harbaugh wasn't hired, the shit hit the fan. The only proper substitute for the be all, end all, spread, was the be all, end all, Harbaugh, and when that didn't happen, Brian went on a months long temper tantrum.

  • Login or register to post comments
March 24th, 2011 at 6:07 PM | The problem with your (Score:1)
CWoodson
CWoodson's picture
Joined: 09/15/2009
MGoPoints: 1338

The problem with your argument is that only you (and seemingly your nephews, and possibly your moustache) are the arbiters of "what matters" and is relevant.  Our overall record was not necessarily indicative of the quality of our offense.  While we all agree that there need to be defensive changes, many think tossing out the whole offense throws the baby out with the moustache coloring solution, if you will.  Not unreasonable.

Also love the revisionist history.  The people annoyed with the Hoke hiring didn't like 1) the STRONG sense of cronyism it suggested, based on his apparent qualifications and 2) the fact that coaches like Patterson at TCU were seemingly not considered.  If anyone has gone on a temper tantrum the last few months, it's "RR WAS TERRIBLE AND STATS ARE MORE TERRIBLE" crowd.  A change had to be made, hopefully this was the right one, but it's not a justification of MANBALL for MANBALL'S sake.

IGotARashMan

  • Login or register to post comments
March 24th, 2011 at 6:40 PM | Not really (Score:1)
gordie bell
gordie bell's picture
Joined: 03/15/2009
MGoPoints: 7962

Not really

  • Login or register to post comments
March 24th, 2011 at 6:09 PM | I think RR had to go after (Score:1)
gbdub
gbdub's picture
Joined: 02/16/2010
MGoPoints: 2468

I think RR had to go after the bowl game. I don't think handing off from under center will improve our offense. These are not incompatible opinions.

Again, please explain why you believe more pro-style sets will improve the team, given the personnel at hand. This is an honest, and totally relevant, question.

  • Login or register to post comments
March 24th, 2011 at 6:57 PM | Yeah, Gordie? (Score:1)
MichFan1997
MichFan1997's picture
Joined: 08/04/2008
MGoPoints: 6235

How about this situation. If you lead the American League in runs scored for an entire season, but missed the playoffs because you had one of the worst pitching staffs, would you go out and fix the pitching by getting more hitters? Oh, you wouldn't? Wanna know why? BECAUSE THATS NOT THE REASON YOU'D BE LOSING?

Understand? Probably not. Now go comb that moustache.

Follow me on Twitter @gfraley05

  • Login or register to post comments
March 24th, 2011 at 7:06 PM | After 3 of the worst seasons (Score:1)
gordie bell
gordie bell's picture
Joined: 03/15/2009
MGoPoints: 7962

After 3 of the worst seasons in franchise history, it was time for the GM to go. RR was responsible for all of it, no matter how hard he tried to distance his meddling hands from the defense and special teams.

Why would I trust RR on his 3rd DC, when he fucked up the first 2 chances in a monumental fashion

  • Login or register to post comments
March 24th, 2011 at 7:19 PM | oh my Lord (Score:1)
MichFan1997
MichFan1997's picture
Joined: 08/04/2008
MGoPoints: 6235

I never said anything about RR staying or not. My point was that the new coach shouldn't come in and start running "MANBALL" because what we had wasn't our teams problem.

Follow me on Twitter @gfraley05

  • Login or register to post comments
March 24th, 2011 at 7:25 PM | Tigers are on Fox:) Inge just (Score:1)
gordie bell
gordie bell's picture
Joined: 03/15/2009
MGoPoints: 7962

Tigers are on Fox:) Inge just turned a sweet double play.

My overall point is to judge Hoke on his performance not on his rhetoric. For Brian to feign outrage over Hoke's rhetoric is yawnable.

  • Login or register to post comments
March 24th, 2011 at 7:27 PM | I think it's completely reasonable (Score:1)
MichFan1997
MichFan1997's picture
Joined: 08/04/2008
MGoPoints: 6235

for one to be skeptical when a proven coach came here and failed and then is replaced by a coach with a losing record at mid-major programs.

Follow me on Twitter @gfraley05

  • Login or register to post comments
March 24th, 2011 at 7:41 PM | Me too, but Brian doesn't (Score:1)
gordie bell
gordie bell's picture
Joined: 03/15/2009
MGoPoints: 7962

Me too, but Brian doesn't have to go all Glen Beck everytime he hears a snide about his beloved, deceased Spread.

Spreads dead baby, Spreads dead

Actually I have no issue with the spread, just the pussification of a spread team, in its Michigan incarnation.

The team was soft

  • Login or register to post comments
March 24th, 2011 at 7:44 PM | Um okay? (Score:1)
MichFan1997
MichFan1997's picture
Joined: 08/04/2008
MGoPoints: 6235

So the offense gained a lot of yards because they were "pussies?"

Or did you mean we had a weak defense that made the team look weak which has nothing to do with offense at all because it's a different side of the ball, which in turn means it has nothing to do with the spread?

Follow me on Twitter @gfraley05

  • Login or register to post comments
March 24th, 2011 at 10:10 PM | You must have missed it - (Score:1)
CWoodson
CWoodson's picture
Joined: 09/15/2009
MGoPoints: 1338

You must have missed it - he's a troll and worse, not a funny one.  No reason to continue to respond to his idiocy.

IGotARashMan

  • Login or register to post comments
March 24th, 2011 at 8:48 PM | inge (Score:1)
umchicago
Joined: 02/05/2009
MGoPoints: 3532

why would i not be shocked that you would be a big inge fan?

  • Login or register to post comments
March 24th, 2011 at 7:58 PM | Where your analogy breaks down... (Score:1)
The Barwis Effect
The Barwis Effect's picture
Joined: 06/30/2008
MGoPoints: 2244

Michigan essentially went out and hired the best "pitching coach" in the game.

"[T]here were a lot of people predicting glorious heights for Rich; mostly the same people who are predicting doom and gloom [for Hoke]. Excuse me if I doubt their prognostication skills." -- M-Wolverine

  • Login or register to post comments
March 24th, 2011 at 8:02 PM | Yes (Score:1)
MichFan1997
MichFan1997's picture
Joined: 08/04/2008
MGoPoints: 6235

however, the entire premise of this entire article was that the author was worried that the hitting coach is gonna change something that creates fewer home runs and slugging percentage.

Follow me on Twitter @gfraley05

  • Login or register to post comments
March 24th, 2011 at 10:36 PM | Unfortunately, the bulk of (Score:1)
The Barwis Effect
The Barwis Effect's picture
Joined: 06/30/2008
MGoPoints: 2244

Unfortunately, the bulk of their "home runs and slugging percentage" numbers were stockpiled against the likes of the Brewers, Royals, and Nationals.  I'm content with smaller overall HRs and SLG numbers if their new hitting coach can help them amass increased and more consistent HRs and SLG numbers against the likes of the Cardinals, Yankees, and Red Sox.

"[T]here were a lot of people predicting glorious heights for Rich; mostly the same people who are predicting doom and gloom [for Hoke]. Excuse me if I doubt their prognostication skills." -- M-Wolverine

  • Login or register to post comments
March 24th, 2011 at 7:49 PM | I'm glad that you're using (Score:1)
El Jeffe
El Jeffe's picture
Joined: 07/07/2008
MGoPoints: 6711

I'm glad that you're using the content of your nephews' text messages as the metric by which to judge our football team's success. That makes total sense to me. And the ponzi scheme metaphor? Say what?

I simply prefer sensible arguments in my arguments. More than one thing can be true at the same time--our offense was great, our defense was horrible, our team lost too many games, and Rodriguez deserved to be fired given the level of expectation for winning at Michigan. Punto.

Brian's concern, if that is at issue, is that Hoke won't see the trees for the forest and will decide to RETURN TO POINTING MICHIGAN DOWNHILL RUNNING TOUGHNESS FOOTBAW for no other reason than he is, as the tag says, the "Notriguez."

FWIW, I do not share this concern. I think Borges is every bit the coordinator that Mattison is, if for no other reason than it is impossible to tell how good a coordinator you are when you have Lewis, Reed, Suggs, and Ngata on your team. I think it would take a colossal idiot not to realize what fell in your lap when Denard falls in your lap, and I do not think Hoke or Borges are anything approaching colossal idiots.

  • Login or register to post comments
March 24th, 2011 at 8:04 PM | Overall you approve of what (Score:1)
gordie bell
gordie bell's picture
Joined: 03/15/2009
MGoPoints: 7962

Overall you approve of what RR accomplished. Hope I'm not overanalyzing here

  • Login or register to post comments
March 24th, 2011 at 8:14 PM | What? He said "Rodriguez (Score:1)
03 Blue 07
03 Blue 07's picture
Joined: 07/01/2008
MGoPoints: 1729

What? He said "Rodriguez deserved to be fired." I would think THAT is incompatible with "overall you approve of what RR did here."

  • Login or register to post comments
March 24th, 2011 at 8:22 PM | Please tell me that you did (Score:1)
El Jeffe
El Jeffe's picture
Joined: 07/07/2008
MGoPoints: 6711

Please tell me that you did not read my entire post (the one you replied to) and this was your interpretation of what I wrote: "I, El Jeffe, approve of what RR accomplished."

My whole point in this thread has been that Brian's concern, while perhaps overheated and overly snarky, is simply a babby and bathwater kind of issue. If I thought that Brady and Al would try to turn this team into Badgers 2.0, with Denard as Bevell/Bollinger/Tolzien, I would share his concern. I do not share that concern, because I believe that Brady and Al are not morons.

To the extent that I have had anything to say about RR, it is this, and this time I'm going to use bullet points so you'll be able to understand it better, hopefully:

  • The 2010 offense (note the bold) was among the best in Michigan history, via every conceivable metric that measures how good an offense can be;
  • The 2010 defense was among the worst in Michigan history. Just awful. Some due to youth/injuries, some due to scheme/leadership, but in all, just awful;
  • The confluence of these led to disappointing (though not awful, at least in 2010) results in the W/L column; and
  • Given the way things shook out, it was probably best for RR to be fired. Unfortunate, but probably for the best in the short- to medium-term, which is about all you get these days.

K?

  • Login or register to post comments
March 24th, 2011 at 8:28 PM | Yeah I know, I'm just fucking (Score:1)
gordie bell
gordie bell's picture
Joined: 03/15/2009
MGoPoints: 7962

Yeah I know, I'm just fucking with you, tired of this arguement now. Just wanted to see if anyone was still paying attention.

  • Login or register to post comments
March 24th, 2011 at 4:28 PM | I think the iPad is actually (Score:1)
bryemye
Joined: 09/14/2009
MGoPoints: 2374

I think the iPad is actually designed with old people in mind.

My Blog

  • Login or register to post comments
March 24th, 2011 at 4:06 PM | No Comments (Score:1)
Ziff72
Joined: 07/07/2008
MGoPoints: 5142

Gordie I thought you were waiting to kick off to speak?  Oh wait you wanted me to shut up.  My bad. 

This is pure coachspeak I am 99% sure of that.   If it isn't the new MANBALL offense will last exactly until halftime of the ND game at which point Borges, Hoke, Denard, Molk, Lewan and Dave Brandon will all nod their heads without anyone speaking a word and start the 3rd qtr in shotgun and Denard will go into the huddle "QB Power on 2, I'll call which direction we go after I read the d just go back to the line we're running this all the way down the field until they put 9 in the box at which point Junior and Daryl will run slants" .

The media tour is targeted right towards the old fucks with lots of money that Brandon swears he wasn't influenced by when he fired RR but actually really was.   This is perfect PR and hopefully he keeps it up.  I'm scared of Hoke's x and o's because he's never been a coordinator or really influenced anything that breeds confidence, but I like the fact he seems to know that and has hired smart guys to do it for him. 

 

  • Login or register to post comments
March 24th, 2011 at 4:27 PM | I agree. 9 wins or bust. (Score:1)
bryemye
Joined: 09/14/2009
MGoPoints: 2374

I agree. 9 wins or bust.

My Blog

  • Login or register to post comments
March 24th, 2011 at 5:10 PM | Really? (Score:1)
michgoblue
michgoblue's picture
Joined: 11/16/2009
MGoPoints: 11210

This whole 9 wins or bust things sounds stupid to me.   It is an unrealistic expectation given a coaching change and a shift in philosophy. 

My measuring sticks for Hoke: 

1.  RR went 3-9 his first season.  I expect Hoke to do better.  This would be a success as compared to RR.

2.  RR went 7-5 in his best season.  I expect Hoke - even given the transition to a new offense - to at least match or best that.  That would be a success.

3.  I would like to score more than 7 against OSU, while at the same time holding them under 40.  I do not expect a win, but a competitive game that I am not fast-forwarding by halftime would be an improvement, and staying within 2 scores would be a success.

4.  I would like to beat MSU.  Not come close, not put up a metricton of yards - I would like the number of points that we score to be more than the numbe that they score.  That would be a success.

5.  I would like to have a winning record in the B10.  Last year - in RR's best season running his zone read, option offense (as opposed to that horrific MANBALL), we were 3-5 in B10 play.  With all of Hoke's talk of Red Letter Games, and countdown clocks, I would like to be 5-3 in the B10.  This would be a massive success, as it would just about guaranty us a NYD bowl. 

6.  I would like to see a coaching transition in which a ton of talent does not transfer out.  I expect some attrition, but I do not want a redux of last time.  That would be a success.

7.  I would like Hoke's first full recruiting class to contain some 5* talent, and be made up mostly of 4* talent.  On this note, I would like to win 2/3 of the recruiting battles with MSU and at least 25% of those with OSU.  I expect that last number to increase overy year until we are back to 50%.  That would be a huge success.

 

  • Login or register to post comments
March 24th, 2011 at 5:24 PM | So... (Score:1)
Hail-Storm
Hail-Storm's picture
Joined: 06/07/2010
MGoPoints: 2382

9-3 or bust?

"Always do right. This will gratify some people, and astonish the rest." -Mark Twain


 

  • Login or register to post comments
March 24th, 2011 at 4:43 PM | delete (Score:1)
antidaily
antidaily's picture
Joined: 05/21/2009
MGoPoints: 1337

delete

---

“ The best way to predict the future is to invent it.” — Alan Kay

  • Login or register to post comments
March 24th, 2011 at 3:57 PM | manball posterboy (Score:1)
Wazoo
Joined: 07/10/2008
MGoPoints: 47

Poor Jack Sharp had no idea what he was in for when he responded to Beck, err Beckmann's, tweet.  I look forward to him being the posterboy for so many blog posts in the future. 

  • Login or register to post comments
March 24th, 2011 at 4:03 PM | I just get so warm and fuzzy (Score:1)
micheal honcho
Joined: 10/27/2010
MGoPoints: 300

I just get so warm and fuzzy when people trot out our offensive stats from last year. Then I generally vomit on them.

 

Jesus H. Christ, If me and Bill Gates are the only 2 people in a room, what is the average salary in that room??

We ran raped ape on patsies and got ass raped by real defenses(and some not so real). No amount of stats will make this any less a fact.

What was our "go to" play?? If we needed 4 yds on 3rd down(which never happened because we were at least 3rd and 7 a.k.a. 3rd and Rod) what play will you pull out and run that you just know gives you a better than 80% chance of converting?? Keep in mind your facing OSU or Wisc not UMass.

I cant WAIT to see 2nd and 6, 3rd and 2......FIRST DOWN!! rinse and repeat. I cant WAIT to see a team in winged helmets go out and ESTABLISH SOMETHING for the love of God. Other than that we've got a really fast guy with dreads and untied shoes that, if he doesnt fumble and your linebackers are quick to overpursue(inexperienced) he'll rip off 80yds.

Give me Hoke, Give me wins against OSU, keep your damn heisman.

You coach the TEAM not a SCHEME.

  • Login or register to post comments
March 24th, 2011 at 4:11 PM | 3rd and Rod (Score:1)
Blue Mind and Heart
Blue Mind and Heart's picture
Joined: 12/31/2010
MGoPoints: 101

I will use that in the future but promise to footnote you

  • Login or register to post comments
March 24th, 2011 at 4:12 PM | Not Smart (Score:1)
Ziff72
Joined: 07/07/2008
MGoPoints: 5142

I was waiting for you.   OSU last year on defense gave up over 400yds of offense to 1 team (Arkansas) the next highest total was generated by Michigan and Miami who tied.   We performed this task with our qb playing 1 half. I'm sure if you look at Iowa and Wisconsin you will see similar stats.

If you don't take into acoount yards per play, returning starters, ST and turnovers into your assessment of the offensive scheme and potential for this year( not last years results or random point totals) than you are either not smart or ignorant of advanced stats and  continuing a discussion or dialogue is pointless as Brian pointed out. 

  • Login or register to post comments
March 24th, 2011 at 5:02 PM | Stats and more stats. GREAT!! (Score:1)
micheal honcho
Joined: 10/27/2010
MGoPoints: 300

Stats and more stats. GREAT!! I just love to stand around my OSU, MSU, & Wisc. buddies and compare stats. They are usually laughing to hard to hear me though.

 

 I've demonstrated before how Hawaii & Air Force have often been top 10 in the stats that some michigan fans had resorted to holding up as their case for the previous coach. So, continuing a dialogue with those who are so smart they can rationalize a loaded set of stats into an accurate measure of a team is indeed pointless. I use wins against quality opponents, something you are clearly to "smart" to understand.  

You coach the TEAM not a SCHEME.

  • Login or register to post comments
March 24th, 2011 at 5:52 PM | Sometimes it's good (Score:1)
wolverine1987
wolverine1987's picture
Joined: 07/07/2008
MGoPoints: 2928

to have 2 o's in a word. (sorry, grammar nazi). I do have some sympathy for your argument however. But IMO it's not correct to look at the bad losses and completely ignore the fact that we indeed did move the ball quite nicely against good teams--then fucked ourselves with turnovers. Just because we fucked ourselves with turnovers and had no defense to fall back on doesn't mean we had a bad offense. We did have a bad team. So maybe the change was warranted. But the cupboard is not bare on offense. And scheme continuity does make sense when you have a QB like Denard coming back. Putting him under center the majority of time, as Hoke has stated, is worth being concerned about IMO

"Everyone gets dumped Gabe. Let me give you some advice: a little coverup on your Adams Apple will make it appear smaller. Which will make you appear less like a transvestite." 

  • Login or register to post comments
March 24th, 2011 at 6:52 PM | Bad Team? (Score:1)
Ziff72
Joined: 07/07/2008
MGoPoints: 5142

Not great, mediocre, unfulfilled, but not bad.  We played on New Year's Day for jimminy crickets sake.

  • Login or register to post comments
March 24th, 2011 at 7:33 PM | Your words are better (Score:1)
M-Wolverine
M-Wolverine's picture
Joined: 10/04/2009
MGoPoints: 38797

But with another NYD Bowl added, it's an undervalued achievement. And yeah, it was bad by Michigan standards. Doesn't 2005 have a nickname around here....?

"I love him, he's a great coach, he's a great mentor, he's a great friend. He's every single thing you want a college coach to be, and he does it flawlessly." -David Molk

  • Login or register to post comments
March 24th, 2011 at 4:12 PM | Half your salary (Score:1)
WillieMaizeHayes
WillieMaizeHayes's picture
Joined: 10/04/2010
MGoPoints: 101

Bill Gates is retired and doesn't have a salary so the salary in the room would be half of your salary.

  • Login or register to post comments
March 24th, 2011 at 5:06 PM | Thanks for pointing that out, (Score:1)
micheal honcho
Joined: 10/27/2010
MGoPoints: 300

Thanks for pointing that out, please substitute any member of the Walton family for Bill Gates. I bet the point is so much clearer now, we all owe you a brownie button.

You coach the TEAM not a SCHEME.

  • Login or register to post comments
March 24th, 2011 at 6:06 PM | I don't believe heirs collect (Score:1)
03 Blue 07
03 Blue 07's picture
Joined: 07/01/2008
MGoPoints: 1729

I don't believe heirs collect salaries, either.

This place used to be so much better. Also, please learn the difference between "too" and "to."

  • Login or register to post comments
March 24th, 2011 at 7:00 PM | You need to shave (Score:1)
MichFan1997
MichFan1997's picture
Joined: 08/04/2008
MGoPoints: 6235

Follow me on Twitter @gfraley05

  • Login or register to post comments
March 24th, 2011 at 5:13 PM | What was Lloyds career (Score:1)
micheal honcho
Joined: 10/27/2010
MGoPoints: 300

What was Lloyds career winning % against Ohio st?, MSU?, Wisconson?? How many conference chamionships?? How many National Championships??

Now.

How about Richard Rod??

Lloyld wouldnt be my preference(he's too old now) and certianly not with his final staff(they were stagnant) but...His career makes your boy look like a flavor of the month. Dont ever forget that.

You coach the TEAM not a SCHEME.

  • Login or register to post comments
  • « first
  • ‹ previous
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • next ›
  • last »
Powered by Pressflow, an open source content management system
Theme provided by Roopletheme; sidebars adapted from Chris Murphy.