In the Iowa game he was not always in the best position and when he was -- like the video -- a lineman was there along with Weisman.
spoiler alert: i linked this
Lloyd Carr approves of this quote in the Michigan locker room. Via Rittenberg
A long time ago there was a thing called foot-ball that was so important we'd spend a month or two talking about foot-ball team practice that happened months before the foot-ball team played a foot-ball game. This was called "spring" no matter what happened to be happening out your windows.
I have just been informed by other parts of my brain that the "spring game" will be held tomorrow, and will still be called that despite a forecast of 43 degrees and a 22 mile per hour wind. This will be the last opportunity to get data on foot-ball until fall, whereupon excitement will descend upon the land again.
Here's everything I threw in a post because I was too busy with the Final Four run to do them any justice, and just in time.
It's a working title. Shut up.
Denard Robinson has graduated. This is a terrible event for a lot of people, but probably not Al Borges. Borges can now stop jamming his brain into a spread coach's and do what he wants to do without everyone getting mad at him (until it doesn't work once). Lewan:
"I feel like (offensive coordinator Al) Borges is much more comfortable running this kind of offense than he’s been running for the last however many years."
What this will look like is still unknown even after Devin Gardner's five-game run as the starter, because…
Earlier in spring, Borges referenced the innovative stuff they were doing at places like San Francisco and Seattle—yes in fact just like that annoying NFL fan you know who dismisses the read option as gimmickry.
“You have to look at some of the stuff that [the NFL is] doing. Particularly because it’s pro football and running quarterbacks by design has not been a really popular thing to do in pro football over the years."
The upshot of this is scattered bouts of read option, a lot of it on the playside (ie: inverted veer), and a pistol package that could be anything from a quickly-discarded experiment to essentially the base offense depending on how well it works. There will also be fullbacks. : /
Andy Staples visited Ann Arbor and came back with an excellent article on the transition process that started immediately after last year's Nebraska game. It is unfortunately light on details.
We do know that Al Borges knows chick dig the long ball, and that Gardner is quite adept at unleashing the dragon.
"I kind of know sometimes what they're doin' before they do it," Gardner said of the defense. "I don't think (defensive coordinator Greg) Mattison's very happy about that."
Safety Thomas Gordon affirmed Gardner's take, saying the quarterback has had his way with Michigan's secondary at times -- a secondary that ranked fifth against the pass last year.
"Devin, he'll let that thing fly," Gordon said. "With him back there, he can throw it, he can roll out. He can do everything. You never know with Devin, so you always have to be on your P's and Q's.
"He can pick you apart. He's been testing us so far this spring, and (secondary coach Curt) Mallory has been on the DBs' heads."
It's going to be a Tyler Bray kind of thing out there.
talking with Jack Miller
Michigan returns both tackles, who will be great. They replace the three other guys on the line. Since that portion of the line was so bad a year ago—try to gain a yard, anyone not named Denard Robinson, moohaha—no one's freaked out about this. But it would be nice if the new guys were better.
If facial hair is any help, by God they will be.
They're calling themselves "The Muzzy Maulers". And they're building chemistry one mustache at a time.
"What are we calling this?," Miller shouted to fifth-year senior left tackle Taylor Lewan, who like an older brother was watching his young center take on his first media pack of the spring. "The 'Muzzy Maulers'. That's kind of the new nickname. There's a mustache thing going on and Taylor's already taking advantage of it. I haven't yet because I have a boy mustache."
Jack Miller is picking up both the hirsuteness baton and the quote machine baton, which bodes well. In that article he notes that a bunch of the offensive linemen have gone so far as to live together in an effort to operate as one mind, describes Kyle Kalis as "a man" for his mustache-growing ability, and contains multitudes in an answer to the question "what did you learn from David Molk?"
"What did I learn from David Molk?," Miller laughs at the question.
Let me fix that for you, Mr. Miller.
What did I learn from David Molk that I can repeat to a reporter without causing Brady Hoke to explode?
And then there's… oh hell just read the whole article, I can't blockquote everything interesting that Miller says. The upshot is that Miller is larger and 70% as mean as David Molk on a scale ranging from Molk to Mealer. It sounds like he has a strong grip on the job, which is what I was hoping for with just walk-ons and incoming freshman Patrick Kugler backing him up:
Talked with offensive line coach Darrell Funk this morning about his group, which has to replace three starters in the middle. He mentioned that Jack Miller has been the most consistent interior lineman so far this spring, but he's being pushed by Joey Burzynski and Graham Glasgow. He said redshirt freshmen Kyle Kalis and Ben Braden have come a long way. And it sounds like it's a little easier to have youth inside than at tackle.
The buzz has been within in the sunnily positive range:
"This is by far the best spring start (they've had) since I've been here," fourth-year quarterback Devin Gardner said.
As of two weeks ago, Joey Burzynski was still running with the ones—that'll be something to watch for at the Spring Game. No offense to Burzynski, but I think everyone's hoping Kyle Kalis locks onto the right guard job with the jaws of death.
Meanwhile, the other guard spot is Ben Braden's to lose.
It’s hard to get a read on the young interior linemen right now, but one name that’s constantly floated by coaches and players is Ben Braden.
"He's going to be a hell of a guy to get around when he's coming downhill at you," Lewan said.
Lewan said he's excited about Michigan's offensive line looking more like the lines of old.
"The tradition of mauling people up and down the field is really cool, and it's fun to see people give up on the other side of the ball, not us," Lewan said. "Everybody's got a nasty streak. These guys really get it."
While I don't think anyone's making an explicit comparison to last year's collection of nice guys who had trouble consistently identifying the middle linebacker, my mind immediately goes there. "It's fun to see people give up on the other side of the ball, not us" is kind of a brutal shot at last year's interior line, right? Am I crazy?
In any case, the meanness here and the options at the guard spots should provide Michigan more consistent production, and by that I mean "any production."
Michigan's got a couple of good receivers in Drew Dileo and Jeremy Gallon; they'll need a couple more to fill out Gardner's targeting array. With a zero-receiver class in Hoke's first year and a collection of sleepers in year three, the onus falls heavily on second-year guys Amarah Darboh (a sophomore) and Jehu Chesson (a redshirt freshman). Both have come in for considerable buzz. Darboh is in the Avant mold; Chesson in the Edwards mold.
"Jehu, in one-on-ones, he’s just flying by people with his speed. Doing all these amazing things. You can tell he’s learning." -- Receiver Jeremy Gallon
Chesson also made a ridiculous diving catch in the scrimmage video (at about 2 minutes):
Chesson looks like the football team's Caris LeVert—earlier in that video he gets a ball he should catch raked out by a defensive back. He's probably not going to be too good at getting off jams or dealing with bump and run yet, but that's what stacked formations are for.
Meanwhile, the siziest catchist, Devin Funchess, is calling himself a "pretty boy." In a negative way, not like he's a parrot:
"I was like a pretty boy that didn't want to get hit," he humbly admitted on Thursday. "Now I know that I have to change many aspects of my game, change my mindset. Now I just go in there and stick my head in as much as possible.
"I believe I wasn't ready for the Big Ten because it was a tougher game."
While everyone else was staring at the box score, circling his lack of receptions and wondering why he wasn't being targeted more, Funchess and the coaching staff were more concerned about his blocking.
"I have to help the team win," Funchess said of his offseason reprograming. "I learned that because at the end of last year I missed some blocks, some key blocks. And it hurt the team."
That is accurate. I am a bit concerned that he hasn't added any weight—seems like Michigan would like him at 250 if he is going to be a Y TE. It doesn't matter how good of a blocker you are at 230 pounds, you are just an oversized wide receiver.
"I hang out with all of them, but I can't hang out with the lineman too much because I can't grow facial hair," Funchess said. "I'm just a young lad; can't really grow it."
This site has been hyping up James Ross since midway through last year when every time I'd look at tape, Ross would be getting to the right spot at the right time. Sometimes he had issues despite that, as in the Iowa game when Mark Weisman ran over a perfectly-positioned Ross repeatedly.
a history of nonviolence
If Ross can just go from the above to wrecking people, he'll be all-conference. At least. What's that, Devin Gardner? You've decided to put some practice clips of Ross wrecking people on the internet?
I'll be peering at him for hints of the above tomorrow—and this site's breakout player prediction is no secret. Michigan is moving Desmond Morgan to MLB for a reason. Ross has to start.
Lo and it came to pass that there was a man who had not really done much so far in his career who entered spring practice a different man and was called exciting things.
Both [starting tackles], asked open-endedly which defensive lineman provides the most difficult matchup in practice, offered the same answer: Frank Clark.
"He’s just so quick. He’s got such a quick step, it's hard to handle him. He's a freak," said Schofield, who wasn't the only Michigan player to invoke the F-word.
Added senior defensive lineman Jibreel Black: "Ever since Frank came in here, he's been a freak athlete. It's just a matter of putting it all together."
And this always worked out and never did not work out. Amen.
Jake Ryan's ACL tear makes finding some more pass rush—already priority one for a defense that was pretty good in all other aspects—absolutely critical. Fortunately, hulked-up WDE Frank Clark is far and away your Grady Brooks Memorial Spring Hype Award winner. Por ejemplo:
What they're saying: "I feel like he’s more focused, just to become our No. 1 pass rusher. I feel like he’s definitely proven he can do that. I think he’s realizing he’s older now, and wants to step up, especially now with Brennen moving. He’s among the quickest defensive linemen I’ve ever faced, and he’s got a nice little bull-rush too. He can mix it up on you." -- Right tackle Michael Schofield
I've heard that Lewan and Clark have a nice little practice rivalry going. To have one of those means you're evenly matched, or at least close. Lewan is hyping and hyping:
"I think, no doubt in my mind, he's an All-Big Ten player -- if not more," Lewan said Tuesday of the weak-side defensive end. …
Clark claims he's gotten the best of Lewan in practice.
"Perception is reality," Lewan countered. "If he wants to perceive it that way, then yeah."
He's seen his share of pass rushers, from Tom Gholston to Jadeveon Clowney. Michigan would like Clark to end up closer to the Clowney end of things, though obviously not particularly close because holy pants that guy.
Grady Brooks didn't do anything at all after his spring hype; guys like Breaston did. Let's go Breaston.
In other pass-rush hope, early-enrollee Taco Charlton came in at 6'6", 265 and is getting buzz of his own. Gardner:
He's huge to begin with. He comes in big enough to play. He's fitting in. He doesn't look like a freshman. He knows what he's doing out there.
Mario Ojemudia is in there too, though he's by far the smallest of the available WDEs and may be restricted to nickel rush duties.
Jordan Kovacs is gone. While Marvin Robinson still seems to be taking most of the first-team snaps, if you made me guess I'd say Jarrod Wilson would push past him to start. Wilson enrolled early and was the third safety a year ago. He knows what was the most important part of the tao of Kovacs:
Even with all the extra work he puts in, Wilson might consider himself first and foremost a student of Kovacs.
The former captain has been in and out of Ann Arbor this winter, dropping by Schembechler Hall periodically for workouts, and though Wilson really hasn’t had the opportunity to pick Kovacs’s brain, the year he spent observing Kovacs while on reserve has given him insight into the kind of safety he’s striving to be.
“His instincts and what to expect even before the play has even started,” Wilson said of what he’s picked up by watching Kovacs. “He could come out and tell you what the offense was going to run due to line splits, wide-receiver splits, quarterback and everything. I pretty much learned pre-snap reads from him.”
That reminds me to put Kovacs on my future Michigan coach wish-list. Oh hell yes.
This article was based off a dumping-ground where I put ever article that flipped past me during Michigan's tourney run, and as I finish it I notice that certain things are absent. Quick take time.
Running back. A murky mess with no clear leader. Drake Johnson has come in for some coach hype; I've heard Justice Hayes is looking good; everyone's waiting for Derrick Green and DeVeon Smith to rumble into camp in fall. Biggest thing might be seeing whether Hayes or Norfleet can lock down the third down back role.
Tight ends. Can AJ Williams block now? Is he a downfield threat after the weight loss? I don't know.
Defensive line. Are they really going to roll with 276-pound Jibreel Black as the starting three-tech? How's Pipkins doing? Who will start at SDE?
Linebacker. Cam Gordon, please be good.
Cornerback. Countess is still limited so some uncertainty is still there even though the top three spots appear to be taken by quality players.
In the Iowa game he was not always in the best position and when he was -- like the video -- a lineman was there along with Weisman.
Please tell me someone else read the caption on the second picture in Archer's voice.
Damn, I swear I had something for this
I'm excited to see what Taco can do. When I saw him last fall and he absolutely had the physical tools. The sky is the limit for him; just a matter of time until he gets the cerebral part of the game down.
Plus his name is Taco. So he's got that going for him.
Never saw those video's of Ross. That man has the makings of a star. Reminds me of Ernie Sims. Undersized, but fast and packs a punch.
Brian's clearly looking for a James Ross meme. There already is one. (Back from his HS days)
JAMES ROSS IS BOBA FETT JAMES ROSS IS BOBA FETT JAMES ROSS IS BOBA FETT
DAMMIT MGOBLOG JUST PICK UP THIS MEME ALREADY
Why no hype of Quniton Ross?
i believe he plays bball for Ohio State
Quinton Ross is a basketball player though...used to play for the Mavs.
LaQuinton Ross plays for Ohio.
Random basketball sidenote...Zak Irvin somewhat reminds me of LaQuinton Ross with a more consistent jumpshot (good thing).
In both the Ross Mini vids. Gibbs, whoah.
I hope to everyone's God that Gardner stays healthy. I am a pretty positive person but I feel that if we lost Gardner for whatever reason the season would go downhill really fast. I also hope Morris lives up to the hype.
You are correct. We've seen how walk-ons and talented but unready freshmen perform at QB.
That being said, we shouldn't overstate our QB depth problems. Most teams would be screwed if they lost their starter, and most teams manage to keep their starters healthy all year. Especially since Devin won't be running as much as he did last year, and nowhere near as often as Denard ran. Two great tackles will help as well.
Oh you said Lewan and Clark. Sorry.
There is also this Lewis and Clark
LOVE the talk about the OL. If we can get the run game going this team is going to be very, very good. You know the defense is going to be stellar with experience in the system and Mattison at the helm making in-game adjustments. Just have to be able to pound it on offense sometimes to slow things down and limit turnovers. A rested defense will lead us to the promised land. I think this team will be better than 132, even if the record doesn't show it (then who cares right?).
And I loved the guys on last years interior line, they all seemed like really nice young men...but I wouldn't have been afraid of any of them. Barnum-Mealer-Omameh all represented Michigan in the highest fashion and should be very successful in life, however, not one had a mean streak like we a Michigan line of old.
Braden, Kalis and Miller seem to have that. I think our line is going to be A LOT better. Especially when you consider that they have all summer/fall to gel and the 3 guys on the inside are all young so they're all going to progress and get better. If not, I'm sure Lewan will take care of them personally.
Okay, not a real depth chart...and not including everyone. But a prediction on the roation of guys who would actually play.
QB: Devin Gardner
RB: smh...(but calvary coming)
FB: Joey Kerridge
2. Sione Houma
WR1: Jeremy Gallon
2. Amara Darboh
WR2: Jehu Chesson
2. Jeremy Jackson
Slot: Drew Dileo
TE: Devin Funchess
2. AJ Williams
3. Jake Butt
LT: Taylor Lewan
2. Erik Magnuson
LG: Ben Braden
2. Joey Burzynski
C: Jack Miller
2. Joey Burzynski
RG: Kyle Kalis
2. Joey Burzynski
RT: Michael Schofield
WDE: Frank Clark
2a. Mario Ojemudia
2b. Taco Charlton
NG: Quinton Washington
2. Ondre Pipkins
DT: JiBreel Black
2. Quiton Washington
WLB: James Ross
2. Desmond Morgan
MLB: Desmond Morgan
2. Joe Bolden
SLB: Cam Gordon
2. Brennen Beyer
CB: Blake Countess
2. Courtney Avery
CB: Raymon Taylor
2. Courtney Avery
NB: Courtney Avery
2. Delonte Hollowell
FS: Thomas Gordon/Jarrod Wilson
SS: Thomas Gordon/Marvin Robinson
Because in most cases you've got highly regarded youth coming in to to compete and/or provide depth.
QB is really the only issue, and it's obviously a big one. That said, stay healthy and it's the smallest one because you're not looking to rotate bodies at that position.
RB should be fine, of the guys we have, at least ONE of them should break out. Then you have Fitz, Smith and Green added to the mix. I'm not worried.
WR looks "meh" now, but Darboh and Chesson will continue to progress over the summer and you have 3 guys (all over 6'2) coming in. I'd expect at least ONE of the incoming freshman to make an immediate impact. That gives you between 4-6 quality WRs.
If Miller can cement his place at C, the OL is fine, depth is on the way. Burzynski showed last year he's the perfect 6th man to come off the bench and fill any of the 3 interior positions. Miller is the key to this offense (behind Gardner's expected progression as a QB).
WDE is fine, love the excitement around Clark.
NG is interesting --- I would've thought we'd play Q and Pipkins alongside each other...but I go back to what Mattison always says "we want to have 8-9 starters on the DL and rotate guys." NG is a big mans positon and if Q can't play every down, maybe you don't want Ash or Henry as next up....Maybe Q + Pipkins = 1 All-B1G Level player since they'll be rotating. That's fine by me, keep them fresh!
DT now becomes interesting. I wonder if we can rotate 3 guys for 2 positions like we do in basketball? McGary, Morgan, Horford for the C and PF positions. Washington, Pipkins and Black for the NG and DT positions. Obviously Black can't play NG unless it's 3rd and 20+. But maybe you go big with Q and Pipkins to give Black his breather, then put him back in and take one of the NGs out. It could certainly work.
SDE is a big question mark, but we've got options. Wormley, Heitzman, Black, Godin, Strobel and Poggi could all factor in there. 6 bodies for 1 position...I'm guessing at least 2 will rise to the top. That said, all but Heitzman could end up at DT before it's all said and done.
All LB spots seem cemented. Bolden may pass Morgan, but that's it. WLB is #clamps for "Biggs" Ross.
Not worried about CB if Blake is healthy. Depth is on the way...very disappointed in the lack of mentions for Richardson and Hollowell.
Safety seems set, 3 man rotation.
Darboh will be the #2 WR and Chesson will backup Gallon at #1. Willie Henry and Ash will see time at 3-tech behind Black. Godin will likely start at SDE with Heitz and Wormley working in some. I think RJS has been backing up Ross at WLB this spring so far and it's been between Marvin and Wilson at FS I think with Gordon moving down to SS.
When I say WR1 and WR2 that's just the two WR spots, it's not ranking the players, it doesn't mean one is better than the other. It's just too confusing to use X, Y, Flanker, Slot, Split End, etc. so to me it's 2 outside WRs and a slot. Truthfully, we line WRs up all over the place.
Henry's played NG (even though I thought he was recruited to play 3-Tech DT). I'm not disagreeing, I've always felt 3-tech was for him, but I don't see him every day so it really doesn't matter. Ash hasn't seen the field ever, I'm not saying it's impossible, but there are only so many meaningful snaps.
RJS has been practicing at all 3 LB spots trying to find a home.
Marvin is almost exclusively a SS, so if you think he starts, then Gordon would remain at FS where he's played most of his career. Robinson would just replace Kovacs at SS, where both played last year.
If you think Wilson starts, then Gordon moves to SS and Wilson plays FS. This was confirmed in a recent presser and it was said that Gordon can play either.
If you ask me, I think it'll depend on if they can trust Wilson on the back end as the last line of defense. If yes, I think he wins. If not, Robinson wins by default.
Also, Bo and Lloyd both won conference titles in their third seasons...
No jinx intended.
Won his first season. I was a frosh in 1969!
Isn't #29 Drake Johnson?
I briefly met Jack Miller at the Women's Football Academy. He is mean, in the best possible sense. In the same way Molk was mean.
...he was quoted as saying that Molk was somewhat of an idol/role model and he was going to model his game after Molk because he thought David was the best center he'd ever seen.
Guys like Molk, Mike Martin, Ryan Van Bergen truly changed the tide for Michigan football.
The set the stage of Lewan, Roh, etc. who are going to pass on this level of expectation to these young guys who are crazy talented and have been recruited to be Michigan Men.
The program is in good hands for sure. This is where it truly gets fun.
I don't see any way that talking to Steve Everitt about football can be anything but good.
Which is just one reason I love David Molk.
And Jack Miller is wayyyyy wise beyond his years. He will go far, whatever he does.
I don't get the "he hasn't done anything" comments about Clark. Last year he posted 9 TFL, second on the team behind Ryan and better than #3 by a significant margin. For a guy who split time and was still a true sophomore (and didn't play all that much as a freshman), those numbers are about as good as it gets. He also knocked down three passes (tied for 2nd on the team with Ryan). The dude has been making plays. If he is bigger/stronger and just a little smarter about diagnosing plays, I think we can/should expect big things.
You can't really measure up Clark by his stats. He was always an all-or-nothing player. When he made plays he made them like whoah, but when he didn't, he was a non-factor in the play. It wasn't like he posted nine TFL by constantly getting in the QB's face until the QB was terrified to take the field. He more cleaned up broken plays where he got through clean. This is a very ad hoc and harsh way to put it, but to clarify the point by exaggerating it, you can think of it as 9TFL from Frank Clark means he was relevant for only nine plays last year. That's not good production from a DE. Jake Ryan made the offense account for him even when he had no stats to add to his line; you really have to watch the plays to see it.
Why is Fitz so far under the radar? Is he not expected to be 100% by August? At his worst, he did about as well as every other running back last year, and the offensive line this year should not be as anemic.
Or is he not very well-suited for Borges' scheme?
I sense everyone just trying to not burden Fitz with unrealistic expectations. He's coming back from a major injury. The interior line is untested. And while everyone hopes for improvement, defenses weren't scared of him last year. I'd rather undersell the guy and see him shock the world than overhype him early and add pressure to disappointment. Also, Hoke has maintained from day one that no one on the team is entitled to a position. That's not punishing Fitz; it was always the case.
Also, Fitz started really slow last year. It took him most of the year to hit his stride and then the injury happened. I could be wrong but he looked about 7-10 pounds heavier last year than 2011.