Jaylen Brown To Cal Comment Count

Brian

Uh, okay?

The lesson, as always, is that Tennessee is bad at having college sports. It would have been real, real nice to grab Brown but Michigan is still looking at a very deep roster that should see them have a nice 2015-16. C'est la vie.

Comments

991GT3

May 2nd, 2015 at 12:28 PM ^

training camp for his tranfer to the pro's. Michigan and Kentuckyn are high profile schools with big expectations. He isn't interested in publicity and team record. I doubt he believes Cal will make it to the final four.  He wants to develop without pressure and knows the pro scouts will be monitoring his progress. 

This could be the rationale for his decision to go to Cal.

 

Stay.Classy.An…

May 1st, 2015 at 10:53 PM ^

At least Cal is an Adidas school though.....whatever! Best of luck to the kid. I'm sure joining the #5 recruit played into it. Maybe he just liked Cal better!? I can't waste any more time thinking about the decisions of an 18 year old kid, none of us are meant to understand it.



Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad

BeenBlueSince82

May 1st, 2015 at 10:55 PM ^

... at how we all seem to be confused. Isn't academics a part of the "Michigan difference"? Don't we love to talk about Michigan's academic excellence? Don't we LOVE it when recruits pick schools because of the high quality level of education??? The kid just picked the top ranked undergraduate public institution in the country. Would I rather it were Michigan?? Heck yeah! Am I confused at why a high schooler would choose to go to arguably the best public undergraduate institution? Not in the least. Congrats to Mr. Brown. I hope we face Cal in the tournament and show him what he's missing out on!

BeenBlueSince82

May 1st, 2015 at 11:12 PM ^

No one is "just as good" as the #1. That's why they are #1, because they're better than the rest. Would you call Wisconsin "just as good" as Duke in basketball? No, you wouldn't. Also, you're quite confused about Cal basketball. While they haven't been top tier they definitely have a history of good basketball players. They also have a McDonald's All-American on the roster as well as another top 5 recruit besides Brown. They had a winning record in their conference last year whereas Michigan did not and they also had a winning record overall whereas Michigan did not. Seems like he made a well thought out choice to me

OccaM

May 1st, 2015 at 11:21 PM ^

Considering California's higher education budget crisis going on atm. I think it is very fair to say Michigan and Cal academics are a wash. 

And in basketball, not even close. You mention history of Cal basketball players as if it even means anything in terms of Michigan's. Jason Kidd is I think their only relevant player... 

Not to mention Beilein > Martin. I'm gonna toss this one up to weather, campus and girls. 

BeenBlueSince82

May 1st, 2015 at 11:27 PM ^

to call it a wash just cause you think so. We often (and rightfully so) find consternation at recruits who say education is important and then pick a school like 'Bama over us. Many here did with DeShawn Hand. It's not fair, they're number 1, we aren't. Let's not act like that isn't the case because someone chose them over us. And my mention of Cal's player history was not to compare it to Michigan's, I agree that laughable. It wasn't a stand alone point, please don't try to make it seem like it was. Context, as we know, is important. And yes, Beilein WAY over Martin everyday of the week.

Pinky

May 1st, 2015 at 11:26 PM ^

I like that you think USNews rankings are an objective, irrefutable indicator of educational quality, as if somehow there is any measurable difference between schools a few spots apart.

And no, Cal doesn't have a history of good basketball players.  They have a history of awful team play with the occasional individual standout.  They have one conference title since 1960, which is also the last time they went to the Final Four.  They're a terrible basketball program and have been for a very long time.

delmarblue

May 2nd, 2015 at 1:07 AM ^

Sorry to break the news to you, but the reality is, that my alma mater Michigan is a back up school for CA hs kids who cannot get into Berkley or UCLA.  that wasn't the case back in the 80's when I attended as a CA resident, but it is now.  Wish it was not true, but it is.

bronxblue

May 2nd, 2015 at 11:01 AM ^

I've met a number of Cal/UCLA grads here in NYC who said they had considered Michigan before those schools but chose the local ones due to financial/logistical issues.  

Most people I've met who listed UM as their "backup" school were turned down by the Ivy/Duke/Stanford schools, and frankly in most of their cases they weren't likely to have gotten into those schools but felt pressured to apply.

Regardless, let's all just admit that Cal/UCLA/UM/UVa are all some of the best public colleges in America and not focus on what 1-2 semi-arbitrary ranking systems say.

I wish Brown the best, but he's not going to be at Cal long enough to take advantage of their world-class education, and from an NBA preparation standpoint their is no comparison between UM and Cal.

WolverBean

May 2nd, 2015 at 11:21 AM ^

The question isn't really whether a fellow message-board poster is taking US News rakings too seriously. The question is whether a high school student who hasn't actually spent multiple semesters on each campus is taking the rankings at face value. Having degrees from both institutions, I can speak with some authority in saying that academics are a wash. (And at that level, how good an education you get has far more to do with you personally and what opportunities you take advantage of than how many Nobel laureates are in residence on campus.) But I wouldn't expect a high school senior to know that. The attitude that "#1 is #1" may indeed be exactly the attitude a competitive high school athlete would take.

It's funny, actually: US News rankings are a lot like recruiting rankings. They're accurate in broad strokes, but if you take the exact numerical order too literally, you're missing the forest for the trees, and could easily come away with a false impression.

[Edit: this post was supposed to be a reply to Pinky above]

Umich97

May 2nd, 2015 at 8:13 AM ^

Bro...this isn't the drinking thread. Post this psycho-babble in the right thread. Cal the #1 academic school...seriously? If that was his criteria his should have gone to Harvard....and if he wanted academics and good basketball, he should have gone to Michigan. Bottom line...the kid just liked Cal. Good for him. I personally think it's a bad choice, but it's his life, not mine. Good luck to him, but my gut says we probably won't hear much about this kid anymore.



Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad

Don

May 2nd, 2015 at 8:20 AM ^

That's what I'd like to know. Crystal's balls have as much insider knowledge as all these idiots.

Anybody who was following Brown's decision process would have known that he and his inner circle were extremely tight-lipped about their thinking, and the people making confident predictions about this school or that school based on "trends" were just pulling it out of their asses.

eth2

May 1st, 2015 at 11:38 PM ^

Well this sucks and quite surprising. I believe in Coach B but am baffled we aren't closing out at a higher rate on our targeted recruits.



Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad

Coldwater

May 2nd, 2015 at 12:18 AM ^

Beilein is not good at closing the deal on elite talent. He's a tremendous in-game coach with a great basketball mind. But the proof is there for everyone to see. The best recruits are, for whatever reason, telling Beilein NO

Why all the NO's? That's something to look at.