Infamy Is Immortality Too Comment Count

Brian

11/8/2014 – Michigan 10, Northwestern 9 – 5-5, 3-3 Big Ten

large[1]

College football is for remembering. It stands alone in its brevity—even the NFL has you play your division-mates twice. Every year you play a team and then you have glory or death until next year. You can pick any game of remote interest and your friend will say "oh, THAT game" because it is also lodged in his brain.

This happens in other sports but as you add in more and more games, more and more of them are thrown down the memory hole. Hell, even last year's highly memorable basketball season has a number of events in it that I couldn't tell you anything about without looking it up. We beat Stanford? I guess we did.

In football the only things that disappear like that are the tomato can games. Others are notable only in the context of some guy's career. If I say "the Jerome Jackson game" you know it's that Iowa game Michigan won in overtime. "That one time Alain Kashama did something" was the Citrus Bowl win over Ron Zook's Florida. There are of course the titanic battles whose aftershocks rattle down the centuries, and depressing blowouts and fun blowouts and etc.

And then there's this game. This game will also rattle down the centuries, for… reasons. You will poke your buddy and say "hey man remember the M00N game," carefully enunciating the zeroes, and your buddy will either laugh or give you a sharp punch on the arm, depending on his mood.

Immortality comes in all kinds of ways.

-------------------------------------

15743410241_601992c4bf_k

FFFFFFFFFFFFFUUUUUUUUUUU [Bryan Fuller]

Well, I'm in this to be entertained. And I cannot deny that Saturday was highly entertaining.

By the time the teams had exchanged boggling turnovers at the end of the first half I was giggling. The field goal block sent me into chuckles. The fumble of off Funchess's hip got me up to a guffaw, and when Northwestern followed a boggling Gardner interception by going backwards 30 yards and punting into the endzone I had to lie down and remember to breathe.

It was disappointing when M00N ceased being a potential final score, but at least it came on a terrible error—a muffed punt. Anything skillful breaking the deadlock would have been unjust. My wife was peeved, because she is not a True Fan™ and wanted to see a 0-0 regulation. I kind of did, too. Not every day you see something like that.

It is every day that Michigan finds itself in a football game hardly recognizable as sports. When you bring up the M00N game to your buddy you will probably be making a point about the descent into unwatchable dreck that was the last two years of the mercifully short Hoke era.

This is Hoke's version of RichRod's gloriously futile 67-65 win over Illinois. Both games were narrow, pyrrhic victories over bad opponents punctuated by two-point conversion stops. Both showed off the abilities of the team's good unit against an overmatched opponent and the total lack of ability of the team's miserable unit. And both were the same kind of delirious fun that sees you wake up naked in a haystack the next morning, with no idea where you are or even what month it is. Or where your hair is.

Nothing about that Illinois game changed Rodriguez's trajectory, and this won't move any needles either. Michigan's been plunged into a disaster of their own making and shows no signs of climbing out. That they've encountered a couple of teams even more BIG TEN(!) than themselves of late says more about the league than this outfit. It's no surprise that the other two teams Michigan's beaten in Big Ten play faced off in one of the ugliest games of the year immediately before M00N.

At least we've got a symbol now. Any time anyone wants to reference how far Michigan's come since they led the nation in TFLs allowed and somehow got worse the next year just needs two letters and a couple zeroes.

HIGHLIGHTS?

Via MGoVideo:

[After THE JUMP: but what if Hoke wins out?]

OTHER BITS

15744863215_8052586b79_z

Hoke back? Pat Fitzgerald handing out hot dogs has an equal chance of being Michigan's coach next year [Bryan Fuller]

Par for the course. With much of last week given over to insider types saying But What If Hoke Wins Out (Or Makes A Bowl), I guess we have to talk about But What If Hoke Wins Out (Or Makes A Bowl).

It doesn't matter. Or, at least it shouldn't matter.

Michigan's wins this year are over Appalachian State, Miami (Not That Miami), a sanctions-crippled Penn State, Indiana down to its fifth string QB, and now Northwestern. They have been blown out in four of their five losses, with the fifth coming against Rutgers. There is no combination of results left that looks like anything other than a huge regression in year four, and nobody is going to buy the narrative of improvement after wins like Saturday's. Even if Michigan plays like an entirely different team against Ohio State and beats the Buckeyes, it's still over.

I can guarantee none of this. The last time I guaranteed anything based on common sense I was promising everyone Brady Hoke had a 0.0% chance of being hired. Not so much. And we know nothing about Jim Hackett.

But you know what just went out? Season ticket deposit letters. You know what's not getting sent back immediately? Way more of those than usual. That more than anything else will demand a change.

In case you're Marcus Ray. Ohio State just annihilated Michigan State's defense to the tune of 49 points to take a commanding lead in the division race. They did this with:

  • A redshirt freshman QB
  • Two sophomores in the backfield
  • An OL with 11 collected years on campus compared to Michigan's 10

The only area in which OSU is more experienced than Michigan is at WR, where they have a couple seniors in Evan Spencer and Devin Smith plus a fifth-year TE, and even there Michigan has third-year players.

This is not Rodriguez's fault. Hell, the OL has gone two weeks without allowing any pressure at all. And it's not Devin Gardner's fault that there's no quarterback on the roster who's even vaguely plausible as a replacement.

The final play. Michigan had it dead to rights. Clark bolted for the corner on the snap; the America's-rollout-out guy was bracketed, and Delano Hill had the throwback option to the tight end:

qtbhxtop2jad7qsjmbiv[1]

Northwestern had run a similar play on a third down conversion earlier and had a two point attempt in last year's game that was pretty close; Michigan was prepped for it. Mattison has pulled out the right playcalls in critical situations against Northwestern—remember the weird 3-3-5 that stuffed Northwestern's triple option a couple years back?  

WTFunchess. Two flat-out drops that hampered the Michigan offense even more than usual. He doesn't seem to be there mentally… though I can't say he's 100% checked out after watching a replay of the second Gardner interception and seeing him run 80 yards just to hit Campbell as hard as possible. But he's not playing at all like the guy who's supposedly a first round draft pick.

OL tho? No sacks and very little pressure for a second straight week; the run blocking was okay. I did not think the OL had a good outing against Indiana on the ground, but they did pick up a ton of six man pressures. I don't think that's going to mean too much against OSU's rampant DL, unfortunately.

15746637662_d36c825d22_z

Smith undoubtedly ground out three more yards here [Fuller]

Smith vs Johnson. Michigan's battle of the running backs with the generic names went to Smith. Smith's prime ability is grinding through piles of limbs to pick up two more yards after contact than is reasonable to acquire and it was on frequent display in this one. He's real slow and has those vision issues, but he was pretty effective in this game.

I don't really blame him for the fourth down stuff since he's in a situation where he needs six inches and a bounce, while profitable in retrospect, is much more variable. If AJ Williams doesn't fall over we aren't talking about this because Michigan gets a first down. Yes, he's slow. He can't do anything about that.

Meanwhile, Michigan tried to get Johnson outside. He got a lot of counter stuff and other plays that test the edge as Michigan deployed his speed. That was dubiously effective once Northwestern figured it out, and then Johnson fumbled.

Hayes disappeared again and like… whatever man.

Interceptions. The Butt one wasn't the worst thing in the world. Ryan's pick was pretty horrendous on Siemian's part, and then Gardner's second interception was just… wow. Northwestern had busted hard and left Bo Dever wide open just next to Canteen; Gardner did not read it.

The play of the game. Mason Cole got over to cease Campbell's INT return, thus saving Michigan a full seven points despite that tackle coming on the 20.

Frank Clark & Jake Ryan. Hi guys. Sorry you have to be on this team instead of one with a functional offense.

HERE

Best And Worst:

It was just a terrible game.  And it just sucked all around for both teams, particularly on offenses.  Devin Gardner had the worst passing performance this year against the Wildcats, and that includes an under-fire Christian Hackenberg, the yipp-tacular combined efforts of Wisconsin QBs, and whomever was the 8th-string walk-on Poli Sci QB who took the last three snaps of NW's preseason scrimmage.  He threw 2 really bad INTs, had a couple more passes that should have been picked (including one that should have been taken to the house to end the first half), and never looked comfortable with any of his receivers.

I cannot stress how bad of a performance this was; I will always defend Devin Gardner in aggregate, but in this game Michigan could have replaced him with a trebuchet made out of Gatorade bottles, athletic tape, Ro*Tel cheese, and Haas avocados and gotten a more complete performance out of a field general.  I hope something comes out during this off week that he's injured, that he lost a contact in the first quarter and didn't have a free pair, that an international cabal is holding someone he cares hostage, something to explain how he went 11/24 for 109 yards and 2 interceptions, resulting in a QBR rating of 5.2.  To put that into perspective, Joel Stave's 8/19-115 yards-1 TD/3 INT performance against NW was a 10.1.

Inside the Box Score:

Michigan's defense held Northwestern to 95 yards total for their first 13 drives. 95 yards in 51 plays; that's less than 2 yards per play. (I is good at math.) One drive lasted 9 plays. One drive lasted 7 plays. No other drives lasted more than 6 plays. So, of course, on Northwestern's last two drives, they go 95 yards in 19 plays and 74 yards in 14 plays. 169 yards in 33 plays. That's better than 5 yards per play after demonstrating complete futility all game long. Of course that happened, because this was the Michigan-Northwestern game.

ELSEWHERE

Hoover Street Rag:

In the end, Michigan won.  Michigan has lost just four times to Michigan in their last 35 meetings.  I have clear and vivid memories of each of those four losses:
2008: Fandom Endurance III
2001: A-Train Fumble
1996: We just lost to you LAST YEAR!
1995: Luther Van Dammit
The only other team that I have this precise a memory of losses to is Minnesota, and that is mostly Jug related.  If you'd like to make the argument that Michigan should be 0-3 against Northwestern over the last three years, you'd very well be on to something.  And yet, here we are.  Football is a strange game, deserving to win does not assure that you will.  Northwestern did everything they could to give this game to Michigan, and Michigan did everything they could to give the game back to Northwestern.

M Go Girl:

It's that love/hate/respect fine line you could feel during the Schembechler years that we're missing now. I don't feel we need a carbon copy of Bo or Woody or Bear or Ara to be great again. We need someone who's going to be tough, sometimes hated, often loved, and always respected. Who that is, I don't know. Jim Harbaugh would certainly have some of those traits. I'm sure there are others who would, too.

Touch The Banner:

Offensive line improvement. Michigan fans may not like to hear it, but this offensive line is getting better. The Wolverines did a good job of keeping pressure off of Gardner, and they were opening up decent-sized holes in the running game. Northwestern did not get a ton of penetration, and while they don't have any huge playmakers on the defensive line, this still represents a step forward for Michigan. Fans who want head coach Brady Hoke and offensive line coach Darrell Funk gone after this season are not gathering convincing evidence on the field from the offensive line. Of course, Michigan's skill players aren't doing much with the holes provided, either.

Sap's Decals:

DE’VEON SMITH – Now you know why coaches like Bo and Bill Parcells loved to have a strong running game. When you can close out a game, or at least milk the clock, it puts pressure on the opposing team to either use all their timeouts late in the game or drive the length of the field to win. Smith has given the Michigan offense the strength and stability it desperately needs – especially when U-M’s QB is basically playing on one leg.

The Daily's Alexa Dettelbach:

…most glaring of all, in Michigan’s ugly, ugly, ugly 10-9 win Saturday, was that Brady Hoke wasn’t doing much clapping during the game. And when Hoke isn’t clapping, you know you have a problem. The players certainly seem to recognize that much.

Pat Fitzgerald is feeling some heat now. Northwestern fans are wondering about kicking the field goal from the four, for one. At least the third down wasn't, like, supposed to be a checkdown:

Fitz said that the seemingly inexplicable short throw on third-and-goal before the field goal was a max blitz and Trevor Siemian checked it down. Siemian confirmed it was a checkdown. "Probably should have just thrown it into the endzone and given our guys a chance."

Lake The Posts:

By now you can imagine how nuts my own wife thinks I am. After tailgating all morning and lugging our three girls to a marathon of a Northwestern-Michigan game at Ryan Field she has had more than enough. My 9-year-old daughter turned to me before the start of the fourth quarter and said “Daddy, I think these are two pretty bad teams playing a very bad game”.  I didn’t know what to say other than “I agree”.

Michigan is playing with "nothing to lose," which is… accurate. More on the last play from Clark.

Basketball? Basketball.

Comments

howmuch

November 10th, 2014 at 12:45 PM ^

I felt like Michigan's D had NW's number for nearly all game, then went into prevent defense near the end and gave them their shot at the endzone. Better offenses will take even more advangate of the short yardage the defense hands over.

maizenbluenc

November 10th, 2014 at 1:27 PM ^

Marcus Ray thinks Michigan should keep Hoke to preserve the recruiting class. If Hoke doesn't turn the corner next year, then go after Harbaugh or Butch Jones and deal with the recruiting fall out then.

Our projected recruiting class this year is what 15? And the damage is already rampant. Add to that it seems Harbaugh may be in a poach-able state now.

So if we followed Marcus' logic: this year's class is weakened,  we hold onto Hoke, Harbaugh gets a job somewhere else for sure, and if Hoke doesn't work out next year's larger class is a disaster too.

If we follow that route: waiting until 2015 ensures whoever is hired is facing the same exact dip down the road Rodriguez and Hoke faced - a recipe for continued suck.

There was also the bizarre comment that he didn't think spread was a good idea, but he thought Harbaugh - a pro-style coach - would get us competing for B1G championships, but not into the playoffs, however Butch Jones - a spread coach - would get us to the playoffs.

I really think the Hoke supporters are weaving the BS as fast as they can to try to buy one more year.

Other Andrew

November 10th, 2014 at 1:25 PM ^

I think I said that the Illinois game was "like good sex with a bad person."  It was thrilling even though there was every reason to feel awful about it. I don't know what the hell to call this.

CLord

November 10th, 2014 at 1:30 PM ^

Correlating this Moon game to the 67-65 UM/IL game under RichRod is the type of brilliant insight that sets Brian apart from the rest.  So perfect.  It's only fitting that Hoke complete his Ying of futility to RichRod's Yang by having his quintessential game.

Talk of the O line improving is meaningless at this point, other than speaking to the fact that next year, the new coach might walk into a decent O line to run a new offense.

Watching this offense is like as if someone put a giant, hairy wart on Amber Heard's nose.  

If Michigan is on, I will watch.
If I see Amber Heard, I will look.

The Michigan offense initiates my gag reflex 10-15 times a game.
Amber's hairy nose wart would do the same.

I still couldn't take my eyes off of either one...

I am hoping James Harbaugh is skilled in the art of plastic surgery and eager to expunge a giant, hairy wart from what is otherwise a thing of beauty.

Hannibal.

November 10th, 2014 at 2:28 PM ^

That 2010 Illinois team wasn't terrible.  They blew out Penn State in Happy Valley and they blew out Baylor in their bowl game.  I'm having trouble making a comparison because this is easily the most inept win that I have ever seen.  This one blows away the 1995 Purdue game, in which we outgained them 283-113. 

The offensive line has quietly improved to being what would probably be a middle of the road Lloyd Carr unit.  This year our top 4 tailbacks have combined for 5.3 yards per carry.  Just to provide some perspective on how that compares to some of Carr's more average or mediocre units, the top 4 ball carriers on our 2004 team averaged 4.8 yards per carry.  In 1997, that number was 4.4 yards per carry.  Last year, it was 3.7 ypc (excluding Gardner).  The running game has quietly improved massively.  Mason Cole has quietly not been a liability.  It's horribly depressing to realize that if the cornerbacks didn't suck balls and if Gardner hadn't regressed to his 11th grade level of football, this woudl easily be an 8-2 team right now, heavily favored to beat Maryland. Unfortunately, Hoke completely destroyed Gardner's career.  Or Gardner quit.  I don't know what it is but his regression is staggering.  This is one of those rare cases where pointing the finger at the quarterback for losing games is appropriate. 

AZ-Blue

November 10th, 2014 at 3:21 PM ^

Gardner has so deeply regressed, I don't see how he gets drafted.   Recall earlier in his UM career comparisons were being drawn to Kaepernick.  Not even close now.  He's missing reads left and right and has done so painfully often over the last several years.  Any NFL team taking him on would be starting from scratch.  The more apt comparison would be to Dennis Dixon, unfortunately.

uminks

November 10th, 2014 at 1:34 PM ^

It will probably be one of those close games, since I do not think Maryland is a good team. If we win we get to play in one of the garbage bowls.

We don't stand a chance against OSU. If the defense plays well it could be under a 20 point loss. Hoke should be fired right after the OSU game. I wish Michigan would hire a new AD before the OSU game. We need to hire Jim Harbaugh! If Harbaugh wants to remain in the NFL, then at least hire Miles!

PeterKlima

November 10th, 2014 at 1:43 PM ^

I know it is difficult to write these, but I don't think anyone is going to remember this as the MOON game except Brian and the hard-core followers. 

 

It was aforgetable game, but in line with every other NW game in recent memory.

 

As for the old saws Brian keeps addressing, both are starting to lose their luster:

 

1. Comparing Hoke to RR.  If this is like the Illinois game, shouldn't we be asking if we should keep Hoke for that reason.  TIme has shown the RR is a very good, or even great, coach.  Maybe this is really an argument not to be so short-sighted when your (one side of the ball) guru fails early in his tenure only on the other side of the ball?  Sorry, we f'ed up in how we reated RR and this just makes me think doing the same to Hoke won't save anything.

 

2. Comparison to the young OSU offense.  This is getting really tired.  Meyer is an acknowledged offensive genius.  He could probably take a DII team out there and score a lot of points.  He turns around EVERY offense he touches instantly .  He is unique.  The inability to develop the offense as fast as him doesn't say much.  Hoke is a defense first guy.  I would love it if there were other examples, but saying only one of the highest paid, offensive-first minds could do better.....doesn't really cut hard against Hoke.

 

I know Hoke is gone.  I think he should be (since Utah I have felt that way), but these two points are not very well thought out IMO.

Amutnal

November 10th, 2014 at 3:21 PM ^

Hoke is not a one-side of the line guru. He is a good even excellent positional coach. Guru of clapping?Maybe. He is a guru of nothing when it comes to X's and O's. Get that straight.

Mattison is not a genius either. Playing that last drive soft when the entire game we dominate with the other game plan drives me nuts. And the one thing he tried to avoid, a touchdown, happens anyway.

With Nuss, I think the jury is still out. But with each game it looks like he's stumped, at least with michigan team 135.

Regarding the Meyer argument...we aren't even close to being as competent as OSU. If we were in the same ball park your argument would hold water. There is no reason to be this atrocious at a place like Michigan. So Brian is correct in the whole youth argument being a lame excuse.

readyourguard

November 10th, 2014 at 1:44 PM ^

I'd like to see the replay, but I could have sworn the receivers were open on the 2pt conversion, and if Clark isn't there, NU wins.  Look at Countess in the gif above.  He's 2 yards behind the motion man who is heading for the flat.  Semien connects and it's game over.

Man do we suck on so many levels.

 

creelymonk10

November 10th, 2014 at 2:08 PM ^

Watch it from the main view again. Countess had help from Wilson, the motion man was blanketed. Jourdan Lewis was all over his guy, and Taylor was step for step with his man on his inside slant on the back side. The only hope was the throwback and even if somehow Semien had time to throw, Hill was all over it. Very well played on UM's part.

 

RagingBean

November 10th, 2014 at 1:55 PM ^

Do we think there's any chance Funchess returns next year? The way the year has played out has had to have hurt his draft stock and a new coaching staff could actually make him into the star playmakers he could be.

Hannibal.

November 10th, 2014 at 2:05 PM ^

I'm not convinced that he's gone.  He has sucked lately and any GM who would spend a first round pick on a player who clearly takes plays off and isn't surehanded would be stupid as hell to do it.  He is also a relative newcomer t the position and requires more development.  I would say that he could improve his draft stock by staying, but that assumes that NFL GMs are rational people who know what they are doing.  If he leaves early, he might luck out and get a team like the Lions to pay him a bunch of money.

Unfortunatey, we are "stupid player left too early" U, so it's probably a good idea to not get emotionally invested in him sticking around. 

ST3

November 10th, 2014 at 3:35 PM ^

he's tied for 70th right now in the NCAA for receiving yards. You would be drafting him on potential only, not on production. Is that his fault or Gardner's? It's probably a combination of both with injury issues thrown in. He may be back next year. It might depend on what he hears from the pre-draft analysts and whether or not he listens to them.

Hannibal.

November 10th, 2014 at 1:59 PM ^

I wish that I could agree that this win doesn't change the narrative, but there is still some potential for lunacy here. 

I wish that you could have done your weekly spot on wtka where Craig Ross said that he would give Brady Hoke a contract extension if he beats Maryland (but still loses to OSU) and that he would take Tom Herman over Harbaugh because he wouldn't want to pay the money for Harbaugh. 

Clarity is still not yet achieved with 100% of the fan base. 

Michigan9

November 10th, 2014 at 3:04 PM ^

We are lacking offensive creativeness.  I don't know if its due to a new system or if Nuss is having a hard time adjusiting to the types of players he has now compared to what he had at Bama.  We have to fight for every yard we get and our receivers get zero seperation.  Our playbook seems to be barrowed from Tecmo Bowl 89 only we don't have Bo Jackson or Lawrence Taylor.

#GOBLUE

Sam1863

November 10th, 2014 at 3:57 PM ^

Sometimes the only fun in these M00N-like games is the person you watch it with. I watched the last quarter with my girlfriend. While she doesn't understand all the technical aspects of football, she fully appreciates the drama of the moment. And while she knows that someone has to lose, she never wants to see these young men embarrassed on the field. (She always remembers that they all have mothers who are watching at home, and she can relate.)

When Siemian went down on the final play, she felt bad for him - she feared that he'd feel he'd lost the game by himself. She was relieved when replay showed that Clark made the perfect play, and would have made the tackle on Siemian if the ground hadn't made it first.

So we both felt better at the end of this one: Me, because UM managed not to lose; and her, because she knew that Siemian going "whoopsie!" like a kid on a wet playground didn't cost NW the game.

In a season like this, you gotta take the good where you can find it.

 

kzoomgr

November 10th, 2014 at 4:20 PM ^

I'm at a loss for how to assess Nuss's performance.  I watch these games, and see the plays he calls show something - a lane that the OL creates and the RB doesn't follow, open receivers that Gardner can't find, etc. - and wonder, what's he supposed to do with that?  He's the QB position coach, and we can all agree that isn't going well, but as far as play callling, it looks to me like he's setting the players up well and they aren't executing.  

KC Wolve

November 10th, 2014 at 5:19 PM ^

I'm sick of hearing about OSU winning with these young players. Tom VH just tweeted about it. I don't know how these reporters get their information because as everyone knows and has said time and time again around here, you have to be full of juniors and seniors to be good. Just bad reporting all around.

Mannix

November 10th, 2014 at 6:11 PM ^

"It is every day that Michigan finds itself in a football game hardly recognizable as sports. When you bring up the M00N game to your buddy you will probably be making a point about the descent into unwatchable dreck that was the last two years of the mercifully short Hoke era."

Among other great lines, I enjoyed this one. Good job, Brian.


Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad

johnvand

November 10th, 2014 at 6:40 PM ^

Bowl Game watch:

B1G # 7 plays PAC12 #4 in the San Francisco Bowl.

Michigan is currently #8 in the B1G.  Will presumably move ahead of Maryland with a win to #7.

Arizona is currently #5 in the Pac12.  Needs some wins and some help to reach #4.

The masochist in me is rooting for this to happen.

M-Dog

November 10th, 2014 at 7:33 PM ^

As are the TV networks and the bowl committees.  They want eyeballs.  This will bring eyeballs.

I would be concerned about our pride, but we already scheduled App State II this year just for eyeballs, so we've shown we don't have any.

Mgodiscgolfer

November 10th, 2014 at 9:10 PM ^

He sat back in the pocket with enough time to go to the bathroom during a UM -Ohio State game at the big house ten years ago. Then as Bo Dever got himself so wide open my wife could have thrown it to him. He promply waits till he was covered then threw it to the Northwestern player who almost turned it into pic 6. I think that pass (near the end of his fifth year) says alot about what the offense has had to endure this year. I know this is a team sport but that was the entire team doing their part  and one player with his head buried up his @$$ inexcusable. 

One last thing that scares the hell outta me is Hoke and co. have not prepared another five star (red shirt freshman or true sophmore) QB that can come in and replace him. Talk about John Navarre! give me a break. " I cannot stress how bad a performance this was". Amen Brian, Amen.

Roc Blue in the Lou

November 10th, 2014 at 11:42 PM ^

Rough crowd for a great defensive victory in historically poor conditions, what with the ice storm and 50 mile an hour winds...[edit interuption:  what's that dear?  Uh huh...2 or 3 inches, frozen sleet and sheet of ice...at Northwestern, dear...oh, shit, no ice???  no 50 mile an hour winds??]

 

nevermind.

GoBlueTal

November 11th, 2014 at 3:56 PM ^

Today on your blog, Seth wrote about the death of Al Renfrow.  A man who when his team was down didn't go into a pathetic teenage huff and stop supporting them.  A man who decided when his team was down to GET UP AND CHEER THEM.  

You guys decided to stop handing out stars to the football team because you don't like things.  You whine in every article about "the mercifully short Hoke era."  Instead of paying attention to the realities of what's wrong, you note them - YOU ACTUALLY SEE THE PROBLEMS, and then ignore them, and instead go on to do your pseudo-statistical blahblahblah "proving" that your way is the right way and to hell with the program.

You're fairweather fans, and should ALL be ashamed.  YOU, gentlemen, are what's wrong with our program.  Far more than Hoke, far more than Brandon.  At least they actively want the program to succeed.  You get more readers because you've gotten so damned good at whining and crabbing and OMG WHOA IS BLUE, whatever shall you do you helped run off a coach you didn't like to get the coach you wanted... who then proceeded to explain to you why he couldn't succeed instead of doing something about it ... and then got replaced by a good man who's a better coach than you give him credit for - who doesn't whine to you and you hate him for it - who actually is trying to fix the embarassing debacle that was Rod's offensive line recruiting.  But no, he can't fix it fast enough to save himself from the anti-Blue on this site.   

Grow up.  All of you,  I'm avoiding using a lot of the words I'd like to use, but then you could too easily take the pouty children's way out and delete the post "for cause".  I assume you will anyway, because you're cowards who are so full of your own hubris - arrogant assumption that you're right to the point that you're blind to other perspectives - that anyone who challenges your Henri the Otter routine must automatically be wrong. 

Go Blue, gentlemen, hope some day one of you actually sees the gaping chasm that is between all of you and Mr. Renfrow, RIP.