I Will Set You Aflame For Personal Amusement Sometimes Comment Count

Brian

3/11/2016 – Michigan 7, Penn State 1 – 21-7-5, 11-5-3 Big Ten
3/12/2016 – Michigan 6, Penn State 1 – 22-7-5, 12-5-3 Big Ten

25757379365_9fe1ee411c_z

this will not go well for you [Bill Rapai]

This used to happen with some frequency: a not-bad team would walk into Yost Ice Arena and get hamblasted. By the second period of Saturday's game they'd have given up on everything except petty revenge, things would get increasingly sloppy, and at some point a combination of angry penalties would yield a 4-on-3 power play. We waited for the 4-on-3 every weekend, and got it most of the time.

Goalies were chased. Michigan replaced theirs voluntarily. The students chanted "goalie goalie sieve sieve sieve" at the various netminders they'd seen. People came perilously close to running out of fingers for the goal chant. Yost roiled; students right behind the opposition bench tried to get players to quit hockey on the spot.

I missed the Brendan Morrison-led heart of this era, when some local pizza marketer spent Michigan hockey games with his head in his hands moaning "why no why." Ten goals seems like a safely absurd number to offer free pizza after, and then this kid wanders out of British Columbia with the puck on a string and you go from business to charity overnight. I did catch the tail end. Even a slightly less rampant Michigan was electric. The Comrie-Cammalleri team was a ridiculous goal factory, and the subsequent Hensick/Porter or Hensick/Hilbert years didn't come up too far short of that ambitious mark.

Yost then was a revelation for someone raised on genteel Michigan Stadium, black as the ancient wood that held the stands up. People would scream things, terrible things. Yost got in people's heads. It was not uncommon for opposing players to squirt water in the vague direction of their most persistent hecklers. Lake State's coach tossed expletives back into the crowd like he was playing curse word tennis. Incidents where hockey parents lost their cool and tried to fight the entire section became so frequent they had to move the visiting team's ticket block across the ice.

The team was not responsible for the edge of danger that made Yost infamous, but they did inspire the utter lack of mercy with the product on the ice. I mean, I didn't get into Michigan hockey to the point where I started shaking uncontrollably during NCAA tournament games because things were reasonable and fair. I got into Michigan hockey because I wanted to see someone set on fire, and then taunted about how stupid and flammable they are.

------------------------------------------------

Michigan set Penn State on fire this weekend. PSU limped in down multiple skaters due to injury, but they are a good team, a well coached team, and Guy Gadowsky has assembled a bunch of guys who can fly. Michigan struggled with their speed early, especially on two early power plays where PSU's aggression hardly let them get set up.

That's the way to play Michigan if you can hack it. They're not great at breaking out of their own zone and can get disrupted by a fierce forecheck. Penn State just about managed it for a period and then faded a hair in the second, surviving for the most part despite a flurry of chances. Michigan was up 2-1 and I was concerned because the lead probably should have been larger. Michigan tends to  give up a lot of goals, you know.

Not on Friday. The third period featured one of those goal avalanches where Michigan turns a competitive game into a laugher over the course of three minutes. Kyle Connor snapped in another one-timer from his knees or his back or whatever. Like all Kyle Connor one-timers it was uncannily accurate and virtually unstoppable. That ended the competitive portion of the weekend; Saturday was about whether or not Michigan could crack a shot per minute. The 4-on-3 power play happened, of course, and there was even a brief period of 3-on-3. I can't remember the last time I saw that.

So you're looking at this team and Yost is alive, mean and angry, for the first time in a long time, and—oh right last weekend Michigan got swept by Ohio State thanks to an astounding 13 goals allowed, many of them resulting from Michigan turning the flamethrower on itself.

I hadn't been actually mad about a home game since I'd dialed it back after the Mac Bennett injury against BGSU. I'm into this team enough now to leave a game with Yosemite Sam smoke issuing from my ears if, say, they blow a 2-0 lead by allowing six straight goals of an increasingly clownshoes variety. Which they did.

So I don't know, man. I've been saying I don't know what to expect from this team on a nightly basis and in response they've decided to up their amplitude even further. We know they're in. We know what they look like when they're locked in. They look like the apocalypse on skates. We know what they look like when they're thinking about something other than the opponent in front of them. They look like a man playing spin-the-bazooka.

We don't know what Michigan looks like against a tourney team. The last time they played anyone likely to get an at-large was when they travelled to BU sometime in the 1860s. I fear that a disciplined ECAC team comprised largely of 24-year-olds may be a shock to the system, but equally anticipate than anyone going up against the kind of wheelin'-dealin'-saucer-passin' magnificence the CCM line comes up with will inevitably be left consoling a goaltender and possibly a pizza marketer.

It is almost time for the most terrifying thing in sports, and we are approaching it with a team that could do literally anything. If this is the last team Red Berenson ever coaches he dies like he lived: charging headlong into death or glory with flame in his eyes.

Bullets

Dang, Nieves. The Boo Nieves we saw this weekend is the best-case version of Nieves. He was big, fast, agile, and deft with the puck. He drove a ton of play. That's the guy we were hoping to get when he was a second-round pick.

It's not that he's been necessarily bad; he's been a scoring-line player for the duration of his career and he has put up points. But he's never seemed to outclass his opposition. This weekend he did, maybe for the first time. Better late than never.

Where did this passing come from? Over the past couple months of the season Michigan has become an incredibly slick passing team when they are on the attack. Alex Kile had the sweetest pass of the series when he backhanded one from behind the net that fooled every Nittany Lion on the ice and resulted in a goal. It was one of many chances generated by Michigan's vision.

This hasn't happened in a long while: I got frustrated at Michigan for over-passing in certain situations. That used to be a common refrain when Michigan had an off night back in the rampant days. That it's back is, in the wider view, a great sign.

I would still prefer it if Werenski shoots when he's in the slot, though.

Downing: still sane. Haven't had much to complain about with him for a while now, even during the OSU series. I think the switch has flipped there. I haven't seen him generate an opposition odd man rush with excessive aggression much, if at all, since that MSU game he was horrendous in.

Boka: offensive upside. Michigan's been activating their D more over the past few weeks and Nick Boka has been a beneficiary. Not so much on the scoreboard but in terms of gaining and keeping the zone and handling the puck, Boka has given some indication he can help fill the shoes Werenski is likely to vacate next year.

25757375595_c69f3951c2_z

Shuart is a luxury as a fourth liner [Bill Rapai]

Skill down the roster. Max Shuart's goal on Saturday saw him stickhandle through a couple guys and lift a backhand over the goalie; on Friday Tony Calderone scored a slick breakaway goal five-hole. Most years

Pairwise stuff. Michigan slides up just one spot to seventh. Right now they'd be bracketed with Harvard in the first round and (probably) Quinnipiac in the second, which would mean they get shipped east.

The committee does have leeway to move folks around in a seed band in an effort to bump attendance so Michigan might get swapped into Cincinnati anyway—although if I was the committee that wouldn't make much impact on me either way since attendance in Cinci is always a disaster no matter who is in that regional. If the committee really gave a crap about attendance a Cincinnati regional would not exist.

Michigan is locked into the field now, BTW. There is not a scenario amongst the three million or so possibilities remaining that drops them out. They are about 90% likely to be #7 or #8. No other Big Ten team has a chance at an at-large; Michigan Tech has a faint shot at an at-large if they lose in the WCHA title game. Michigan's playing for the banner and the banner only in St. Paul.

Big Ten Tourney stuff. Annual rant: this is the dumbest format for a sporting event that isn't the actual NCAA tourney. They will never get attendance anywhere when they have six teams so spread out for a niche sport like hockey. I do not understand why they don't just have best two of three series on home ice. More games, better for fans, more money. Anyone who doubts this must not have watched the various home-court basketball conference tourney finals, which are always played in tiny gyms that are losing their damn minds.

The holdup is that Wisconsin and Ohio State don't want to reserve their buildings for three weeks because high school state championships use them. Which is fine. If neither school wants to take hockey seriously that's their problem. (In Wisconsin's case their objection is even more absurd since there's another arena the same damn size in Madison that can take the high school events.) That shouldn't prevent the Big Ten from running a much better tournament in every way.

Oh: Michigan gets the winner of Penn State-Wisconsin after a bye. Given the results of the last two weekends that's better than facing the MSU-OSU winner. Minnesota would likely await in the final.

I don't want to get ahead of myself, but… I have heard that Compher will return for his degree, and I'm guessing Motte comes along with him. Werenski is almost certainly gone, but if they get those two guys back Michigan is waiting on Connor and just Connor. If he comes back… hoo boy. I mean, I don't think he's back. But man.

Comments

Eberwhite82

March 14th, 2016 at 5:34 PM ^

I was missing a good Brian hockey recap. I know it has been a strange year, and living out of the area I sometimes struggle following the team I grew up on (yeah, more than the football team... I was a Yost rink rat and played for Ace Hardware and Bimbo's in my PeeWee years.)

Thanks for these, Brian. They really mean a lot to what I imagine is a pretty hard core group that frequents the site from points outside of the area.

RHammer - SNRE 98

March 15th, 2016 at 10:18 AM ^

from the perspective of those of us who were able to be there during the Turco-Morrison-Knuble-Muckalt-Madden-et al. era but now live out of town, hearing that Yost is rocking on the level of yesteryear is music to my ears... and from a pure written word perspective that captures that era, this is pure gold: 

"I got into Michigan hockey because I wanted to see someone set on fire, and then taunted about how stupid and flammable they are."

many thanks

WCHBlog

March 14th, 2016 at 5:36 PM ^

How good is Penn State really though? They've played six games against the top 15 and have a 1-5 record, and 3-8-1 record against the top 20. They put together a competent record against an abysmal schedule, but they're not great.

Also, how does Michigan go entire season and only play three games against teams in the top 15? That's an embarrassing schedule.

 

Alton

March 14th, 2016 at 5:43 PM ^

It's an embarrassing schedule because it's a conference full of teams playing embarrassing hockey right now.

On the bright side, if Michigan loses to Minnesota in the conference championship, there's a chance that they will then have played 8 games against teams in the top 15.

Alton

March 14th, 2016 at 5:59 PM ^

It was pretty average, especially taking into account the number of teams that refuse to play Michigan even home-and-home.

Fortunately, it was a very RPI-friendly schedule:  the way to "game" the RPI is by playing the best teams in the worst conferences--getting 2 against Robert Morris and 1 against Michigan Tech meant we played the best teams in the two worst conferences.  Two at Boston University and two more at the Albany-area teams (RPI & Union) were good games; unfortunately, those 4 were all on the road.

Dartmouth was a pretty good team, but nobody seems to care about the ECAC around here.  They are better than Miami is this year, and everybody would have been all over a Miami series.

Michigan Arrogance

March 14th, 2016 at 6:09 PM ^

this. everyone sees the home schedule and complains (rightfully so - the balance was awful due to the B10 schedule) but the overall schedule was pretty decent. people in MI just don't care about a series in NH, Boston or Albany.

gwkrlghl

March 14th, 2016 at 6:01 PM ^

The answer to your question is: because Michigan is in the Big Ten. Not our fault everyone in the league is terrible. I'd expect - being that you all are gopher fans - you would understand this.

And top 15 is a convenient number because Michigan's non-con also features:

  • #19 Robert Morris (twice)
  • #21 Dartmouth (twice)
  • #25 RPI
  • and Union - which was certainly a good program when that game was scheduled

If Minnesota didn't absolutely crap the bed in the non-con, Michigan could've been 2-2 against another top 15

Alton

March 14th, 2016 at 6:04 PM ^

Picking on the number of "top 15" games absolutely smells like cherry-picking data.  Hockey blogger Adam Wodon (an inveterate Michigan-hater at some college hockey website whose name I forget and won't bother to look up) started it Saturday night in an attempt to downplay Kyle Connor's chances for Hobey.

 

Alton

March 14th, 2016 at 6:26 PM ^

Oh, yeah; Arizona State.  I spent all season thinking there were 59.

The point, though, is Mr. Wodon picked (and you picked up on) "top 15" not because it was 25 percent.  He would have picked "top 20" if it had made Kyle Connor and Michigan look worse.  But it didn't; it made them look better.  So he picked "top 15." 

If Minnesota moves up to #15 after this weekend, he will be talking about Connor's record against the top 12 (or the top 14) instead.

gwkrlghl

March 14th, 2016 at 6:25 PM ^

so I guess you believe Michigan should be aware of which teams will be in the top 15 2-3 years from now and schedule all of them for home-and-homes which also skips the possibility that schedules don't work out, teams are booked, etc. even if Michigan did somehow know.

You're largely glossing over the fact that the Big Ten is awful and Michigan has no control over that

enlightenedbum

March 14th, 2016 at 5:51 PM ^

Still think Connor should come back, unlike Larkin.  I mean he's probably gone because Hobey favorite and everything, but I feel less like he is individually dominant as much as that line is cohesively dominant, if that makes sense.

Michigan Arrogance

March 14th, 2016 at 5:57 PM ^

As the resident oldt hockey guy, the pizza place was Cottage Inn and the offer was 1/2 off any medium pizza if the team scores 5+ goals.

When they got to 5 (which was every night basically) the crowd would chant, "half-off piiii-zza"

When they got to 10 (which happened 2-3 times a year in those years) the crowd was facetiously chant, " free-eee piii-zza"

gwkrlghl

March 14th, 2016 at 6:04 PM ^

maybe I'm misremembering, but I feel like Connor has been more dominant this year than Larkin was last year - though Connor's line probably has more chemistry than Larkin's did. I still think he'll look at Larkin and his career vs. his career on the Wings and will conclude the NHL is the place to be.

bklein09

March 14th, 2016 at 6:14 PM ^

Most horrifying thing about single elimination hockey is the possibility of your goalie and/or defense losing their mind for half a period and ending your season - see Billy Sauer vs ND.

A goalie standing on his head is another possible source of heartbreak or elation, but it's hard to see any goalie being able to do that against this offense. Guess we'll find out next week.



Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad

jrobs7777

March 14th, 2016 at 7:08 PM ^

Man.  Those first six paragraphs.  They brought back memories.  I was there for the end of the Knuble era and the rise of the Morrison, Botterill, Luhning, Legg, Herr, Muckalt et al. run.  Yost was so freaking awesome during that stretch.  And the players were so down to earth - Morrison, Botterill and Luhning were all in both my Accounting and Economics classes in Soph? Jr? years so I exchanged friendly hellos to them on a regular basis,  I definitely miss THAT Yost and THAT CCHA era.  Yost was a crazy old barn with no creature comforts at all.  The student section was a mad house.  I still can hear all those old familiar chants.  What a great era ... hopefully this group can put together a nice run although I understand Yost is not nearly as intimidating as it once was.

ppudge

March 14th, 2016 at 7:10 PM ^

Love this post. Excellent writing and if Brian is correct on Compher and Motte returning - and Connor at least being a possibility - that's icing on the cake. One question would be - does a new coach change that? Would the CCM line be more apt to return if Red comes back for a year or is it a done deal that this is Red's last year and a coaching change would have little to no impact because the players are already aware of it?

k.o.k.Law

March 14th, 2016 at 7:11 PM ^

as at Minnesota, they turn another corner, Ohio at home.

So, did we turn yet another corner last weekend?

At this point, I don't care.  I am sucked into my fandom again. 

I saw my first game the last year of the Coliseum, Angie Moretto on a terrible team.

Leading up to the OT title game loss to WIsconsin at Olympia, in 1977, after coming back from being down 5 -2 after two periods.

That team could score goals.

Then the LONG dry spell until Red.

I will make the road trip to Cincinatti, if we are there.

Alton

March 14th, 2016 at 7:52 PM ^

Unlike many other Michigan people, I see absolutely no reason to think that Michigan will end up in Cincinnati.  The NCAA, for the most part, tries to keep the 1-8, 2-7, 3-6 and 4-5 matchups in the quarterfinals.  I can't even remember the last time they didn't keep the 1-8, 2-7, 3-6 and 4-5.

They will play around with the #3 and #4 seeds, sending them to places to help attendance, but they don't play around with #1 or #2--they all go where the PWR says they go.  So if Quinnipiac is #2 and Michigan is #7, Michigan ends up in Worcester.  If North Dakota drops back down to #2, and Michigan is #7, Michigan ends up in the Twin Cities for the third time in five weeks.

Also, Michigan fans don't travel very well to hockey regionals.  Whether Denver or Michigan is the #2 seed in Cincinnati, the attendance will be very close to the same--maybe an extra 100 or 200 fans if it's Michigan, no more than that.  There is no reason at all for the selection committee to deviate from their usual procedures.

Most likely outcome right now is Quinnipiac v Northeastern and Michigan v Mass.-Lowell in Worcester, Mass.

gwkrlghl

March 14th, 2016 at 8:22 PM ^

we played that regional in Fort Wayne right after the emotional CCHA tournament run and there were still about 50 people in the building. Michigan doesn't have a large 'die hard' hockey fanbase (as compared to NoDak, Minnesota, Wisconsin, etc) nor is it the premier sport like at many other schools.

Jpnets54

March 14th, 2016 at 10:08 PM ^

It makes sense for Compher to return for his senior season.  He's in the prestigious Ross School of Business and it makes little sense to walk away from Michigan when he's only one year away from a BBA degree.

WFNY_DP

March 15th, 2016 at 8:54 AM ^

"The holdup is that Wisconsin and Ohio State don't want to reserve their buildings for three weeks because high school state championships use them."

If we're talking about HS hockey, Ohio State can't even use that as an excuse. The Ohio Frozen Four was last weekend, and it was played at Nationwide Arena (where the Blue Jackets play) and NOT at OSU's arena. The Columbus region of the whole tournament was also played at the Blue Jackets' practice rink (attached to Nationwide Arena).

OSU has no real *hockey* reason to block this; the only possible problem would be their own basketball schedule (since they share their building with basketball), though considering the time of year (B1G basketball tourney is already done) that shouldn't be a holdup.

Alton

March 15th, 2016 at 9:08 AM ^

Value City University hosted the state wrestling tournament two weekends ago, they hosted the state girls basketball tournament last weekend, and they host the state boys basketball tournament this weekend.

Those are the 3 weekends over which a real Big Ten hockey tournament would take place, and the arena is not available on any of those weekends. 

WFNY_DP

March 15th, 2016 at 12:49 PM ^

True, and very fair points taken. That said, there is still Nationwide Arena ice not more than 3 miles from OSU. OSU has played there (against UM earlier this month). It wouldn't be hard to "host" it there. I think the fact that Columbus inexplicably has two 18,000+ seat arenas within five miles of each other should make it doable.

(And yes, I realize I'm largely arguing a moot point...)

alnike

March 15th, 2016 at 11:25 AM ^

Some of the best Michigan lines since my mom sent me to college in 1989...

Felsner-Dave Roberts-Ouimet

then came Stewart-Wiseman-Oliver

then Botterill-Morrison-Knuble

then Botterill-Morrison-Muckalt

Mike Comrie was kind of a one-man team

then a sophomore season of Hilbert-Cammalleri-Ortmeyer

then Porter-Hensick-Tambellini

Pacioretty-Porter-Kolarik

(Hagelin, Rust, Caporusso rarely put it together at the same time)

Connor-Compher-Motte

 

I will enjoy the next 2-3 weeks of action, but in addition to the three seniors, I am expecting Michigan to lose up to 5 players this offseason.   I would be happy if two of them returned.   I think there are 7 signed recruits for next year, good luck trying to find a spot to stash the NTDP players for a year after they finish high school.