Hoops Preview 2016-17: Wrap Comment Count

Ace

Previously: John Beilein media day transcriptBilly Donlon media day quotesMGoPodcast 8.7Point GuardsWings (Part I)Wings (Part II), Bigs

Alex's team previews: IllinoisIndianaIowaMarylandMichiganMichigan StateMinnesotaNebraskaNorthwesternOhio State, Penn State, Purdue (last couple still to come)


New uniforms, new defense, same Beilein. [Marc-Gregor Campredon]

You're forgiven for not feeling basketball fever this year. The football team is in the midst of a magical season. The hoops squad has followed an outstanding three-year run with KenPom finishes of 74th and 50th the last two years. Tonight's season-opener is against the #275 team in the country, isn't on television, prefaces a huge road game for the football team, and falls during a week in which basketball hasn't been at the forefront of many people's minds.

Yet there is reason to be very excited about this season. Michigan brings back the core of last year's tournament team, one which overcame the loss of their best player to come within a half (and, yes, a subsequent game against a 14-seed) of making the Sweet Sixteen. While the Big Ten has a number of decent teams, it's unclear if any are capable of dominance.

And, of course, the program has undergone its biggest offseason of change since 2010. That summer, John Beilein overhauled his coaching staff after a 15-17 season. In came Lavall Jordan, the point guard whisperer, and Bacari Alexander, who molded Jordan Morgan into an impact big man. This summer, both Jordan and Alexander moved up to head coaching jobs, and Beilein had an opportunity to mold the staff as he saw fit again.

[Hit THE JUMP for the Billy Donlon overhaul, info on tonight's opener, and Alex Cook's projected Big Ten standings and all-conference teams.]

Beilein could've added guys who fit his style and proceeded with the status quo, but he knew better. While Beilein is rigid in certain regards, he knows when it's time to adapt. Michigan made it back to the tournament in 2011 in large part because, with Jordan's help, he embraced the high ball screen as a significant part of his offense. It's been a staple of the system ever since.

This time around the system change is on defense. Michigan's defenses have, on average, ranked 94th in country (KenPom) over the last three seasons. Billy Donlon, inexplicably fired by Wright State after a 22-win season, coached a much less talented team to a 71st-place finish on defense last season, and a down year in 2014-15 was preceded by two straight years in the top 50. Beilein has ceded control of the defense to Donlon, who's installed a "gap" defensive system similar to the pack-line.

The team's success this season may hinge on Beilein's willingness to cede control to Donlon, whose defenses generate a lot more turnovers but also commit a lot more fouls. Very early returns are positive: at media day, Beilein expressed an openness to rethinking his rigid autobench policy. The foul issue may not be as significant as first thought, either; the dreaded hard hedge was nowhere to be found in last week's exhibition game, and it was no coincidence that Michigan's talented but foul-prone big man, Moe Wagner, made it nearly to the midpoint of the second half before picking up his first personal.

The 2010-11 team flourished because Beilein adapted his system to fit his team's strengths and the ever-changing game of college basketball. The 2016-17 team could fit much the same narrative. With Beilein making Donlon his right-hand man and de facto defensive coordinator, they may already be well on their way.

Mini Game Preview: Howard

THE ESSENTIALS

WHAT Michigan (0-0) vs
Howard (0-0)
WHERE Crisler Center
Ann Arbor, Michigan
WHEN 9 pm ET, Friday
LINE M -21 (KenPom)
TV BTN Plus (subscription only)

Right: James Daniel, the nation's leading scorer last year, will test Michigan's perimeter defense if he's healthy enough to play. [Photo via Las Vegas Review-Journal]

THE THEM

Michigan eases their way into the season against Howard, a team that finished 330th on KenPom last year and starts this season projected to rank 275th.

They may be without their best player, James Daniel, who took advantage of an astronomical 35.4% usage rate and 37.1% shot rate (5th and 2nd nationally, respectively) to lead the country in scoring last year despite posting shooting splits of 42/33/85 (2P%/3P%/FT%). Daniel is two weeks into recovery from an ankle injury that was supposed to cost him four to six weeks, but as of last Friday he insisted he'll be in uniform:

Daniel avoided serious injuries in his first three years. But he suffered a high ankle sprain during practice two weeks ago. Nickelberry said the injury could keep Daniel out between four and six weeks.

Daniel disagrees.

“I’ll be back for the opener,” he said. “I’ll be ready for Michigan” on Friday.

Howard really needs him; the freshman slated to be his backup is definitely out with a broken foot.

The other player of note is 6'11" senior center Marcel Boyd, a very good rebounder who drew five fouls per 40 minutes last season. At the very least, he should test Moe Wagner's ability to stay out of foul trouble.

For a much more detailed look at tonight's game, Dylan has a full preview over at UMHoops. I'll be there tonight to provide coverage and a recap.

Alex Cook's Big Ten Outlook

Since I'm still transitioning from football mode, Alex Cook was kind enough to help me out with the preview. In addition to the team previews linked at the top of this post, he took a stab at predicting the final Big Ten standings and all-conference teams.

Projected Standings

Tier 1

1. Wisconsin
2. Indiana
3. Purdue

Tier 2

4. Michigan
5. Michigan State
6. Ohio State
7. Illinois
8. Maryland

Tier 3

9. Iowa
10. Northwestern
11. Minnesota
12. Penn State
13. Nebraska

Tier 4

14. Rutgers

Wisconsin’s the consensus favorite to win the league and while they do have great continuity and experience, the other Tier 1 teams might have higher ceilings – especially Indiana. If Michigan State had Gavin Schilling and Ben Carter healthy, they’d definitely be in that tier, but now it seems like there’s plenty of variance in potential outcomes for them. They’re very young.

I’ve talked myself into Michigan being good; we haven’t seen how much experience and continuity can add value in some time. Ohio State will reap the benefits of that as well but Michigan has a better roster. I think Illinois will surprise some people between Malcolm Hill and the players they’re getting back from injury. Maryland and Iowa are sort of in the same boat with each having lost four starters but returning a very good one.

Northwestern looks decent enough to me on paper, but: Northwestern. Penn State has some promising young players and Minnesota is adding good transfers, though frankly I can’t see either making it onto the bubble. I’m not sure how long Tim Miles will last at Nebraska based on how things are trending for them. Rutgers is Rutgers.

Projected All-Conference Teams

First Team

PG Melo Trimble
W Peter Jok
W Malcolm Hill
W OG Anunoby
C Thomas Bryant

Second Team

PG Bryant McIntosh
W Zak Irvin
W Miles Bridges
W Nigel Hayes
C Ethan Happ

For the first team, Melo Trimble and Peter Jok are going to put up big numbers on what might be bubble teams; they’ve been two of the better players in the conference and now they’ll get even bigger opportunities to showcase their skills. Malcolm Hill is the most underrated player in the league, has consistently improved, and should receive more attention on a better Illinois team. OG Anunoby and Thomas Bryant are two players I’m particularly high on as NBA prospects and they could be dominant together.

For the second team, Bryant McIntosh was a tough choice over Derrick Walton as the second-best PG but he seems to have more room for improvement than Walton does. I think Zak Irvin will be Michigan’s best player (unless Moritz Wagner fulfills my wildest hopes for him). Miles Bridges has looked good enough in exhibitions to allay my concerns about efficiency and he’ll be the focal point of State’s offense. Ethan Happ might be better than Nigel Hayes but they both deserve mention here.

Comments

Zenogias

November 11th, 2016 at 3:24 PM ^

"Michigan brings back the core of last year's tournament team, one which overcame the loss of their best player to come within a half of making the Sweet Sixteen."

As much as I wish this were true, Michigan lost to Notre Dame in the first round of the tournament last year. The win over Tulsa was a play-in game.

ST3

November 11th, 2016 at 3:37 PM ^

You are correct, but Notre Dame's next game was against #14 seed Stephen F. Austin. Even though ND only won that game by 1 point, we likely would have been favored and had a less difficult path to the sweet 16 than if we had to play #3 seed West Virginia.

Zenogias

November 11th, 2016 at 3:42 PM ^

Yes, of course. :) But being a half away from the Sweet Sixteen and being a half away from being favored to make the Sweet Sixteen aren't really the same. Especially since SFA only lost by a point to ND.

Hail_Yes

November 11th, 2016 at 3:38 PM ^

I think what Ace is referring to here is the fact that Notre Dame went on to play a 14 seed after beating us, and that if it weren't for the dreadful 2nd half we would've had an excellent shot at the Sweet 16 with only a 14 seed in the way.

Zenogias

November 11th, 2016 at 3:52 PM ^

While the second half was indeed dreadful, I think it's also fair to note that the first half was *unbelievable*, probably unsustainably so. It was far and away the best half of basketball Michigan played all year, especially defensively, and the second half was more mean reversion than abberation. Michigan was unable to get any stops, and without the defense generating any momentum, the offense also ground to a halt. It was what we'd seen from the team most of the year. The first half was the (glorious) exception, not the second.

I don't mean to be a total downer: I'm actually an optimist when it comes to Michigan basketball. I think people are underestimating what a really experienced team is capable of because we haven't see one in a while. But let's not sugar coat what happened last year. It's not fair to say that this team was one unfortunately timed bad-half from being in the Sweet Sixteen. They struggled just to make the Tournament, and were only in position to make the Round of 32 because they played out of their minds for a half against a better team.

WindyCityBlue

November 11th, 2016 at 3:38 PM ^

That's a big stretch, but I'll take it.

Some insider information I've recieved has been pretty "meh" about this team.  I don't know if "meh" equals 4th or 8th in the big ten.  I guess we'll see.

Besides getting into the tournament, I really would like to beat MSU this year, which I doubt will happen.  We haven't beat them in a couple years and it sucks.

Zenogias

November 11th, 2016 at 4:01 PM ^

Stephen F. Austin finished the year at #41 on Kenpom, nine spots ahead of #50 Michigan. Let's not act like SFA was a pushover just because they got a #14 seed from the NCAA selection committee. I would have liked Michigan's chances too, but it's a bit disingenious to act like that team was *thiiiiiiiiiiis* close to a Sweet Sixteen appearance. They weren't.

Again, I don't want to be a dick about this. I'm optmistic this year too. I'm not one of the haters that seemingly every Michigan basketball loss brings crawling out of the woodwork around here. But we gotta be realistic: last year's team was *not* that close to a Sweet Sixteen bid.

OkemosBlue

November 11th, 2016 at 5:56 PM ^

This team has to prove itself, but, having said that, it stands a chance to make it to the upper division.  So much depends on the development of the young players and to Zak and Derrick meeting the expectations that they had as freshmen.