Hokepoints: Time to Drop the Zero from Snoop? Comment Count

Seth

During a wee hours period break of a wee hours Wings game last weekend, I ended up in a conversation about the #1 jersey and who might be the next player to wear it. The guy was really high on Chesson or Drake Harris or some future giant; I was like thatsracist.gif because the best receiver since Braylon is on the roster RIGHT NOW

 IMG_5154

Upchurch

Unless you’re just categorically against changing numbers for seniors (which I totally understand in all circumstances but this), if we’re truly honoring elite receivers with the 1 jersey it could be time we give it to Jeremy Gallon. The case against: is 5’8, has always been just mediocre at returning punts and kicks, is 5’8, took some time to work his way up the depth chart, would ideally be a slot receiver because he’s 5’8. The case for: is secretly 8 feet tall, among his various Inspector Gadget peripherals is a cloaking device that saved Under the Lights I, and the WAR stat for receivers says he’s the best in the conference by a wide margin.

When I was doing the receivers pages of HTTV last week I went looking for some more advanced stats to put in tables aside from the usual Bentley things like receptions, yards, TDs, games played, and what you can get by dividing those things together. I remembered cfbstats’s Marty Couvillan last year made all of those targeting data available to the public, with an assist from Bill Connelly of Football Study Hall.*

What Marty did is took that play by play ticker information that the NCAA makes available, and through some ninja text-to-columns work, managed to pull out data for when each receiver was targeted. This is groundbreaking work in receiver stats, knowing what happens whenever a ball is thrown in the direction of a player. It still doesn’t say how well it was thrown, how deep if it wasn’t caught, or how many defenders had to be shooed off, but until we have official scorers UFR-ing every game this is about the best we can get. Guys like Bill began building their own stats out of the new data and came up with YRPR, which formula is:

  • The % of your team’s targets you receive
  • Times how many yards you average per pass thrown in your direction
  • Times an adjustment for the rest of your team’s passing game so we don’t just get the guys with great QBs and lines
  • Times an adjustment for how often your team passes, so that we don’t just award wide open receivers on run-heavy teams, e.g. Roundtree 2010.

And what it said was…

2012 Big Ten Receivers by YRPR:

Rk Name Targets Catch Rate School Rk (FBS) YRPR
1 Jeremy Gallon 79 62.0% Michigan 14 169.56
2 Jared Abbrederis 71 69.0% Wisconsin 22 149.32
3 Kenny Bell 77 64.9% Nebraska 34 134.55
4 Allen Robinson 126 61.1% PSU 36 133.27
5 Roy Roundtree 58 53.4% Michigan 51 118.63
6 Corey Brown 85 70.6% Ohio State 52 118.22
7 Devin Smith 58 51.7% Ohio State 73 109.21
8 Cody Latimer 65 78.5% Indiana 80 107.02
9 Shane Wynn 95 70.5% Indiana 124 86.15
10 Kofi Hughes 81 53.1% Indiana 129 84.95
11 A.J. Barker 46 65.2% Minnesota 150 79.71
12 Antavian Edison 92 63.0% Purdue 165 76.67
13 Quincy Enunwa 69 60.9% Nebraska 180 73.28
14 Keenan Davis 88 53.4% Iowa 193 70.45
15 Kevonte Martin-Manley 81 64.2% Iowa 196 70.20
16 Drew Dileo 30 66.7% Michigan 206 67.70
17 Jamal Turner 53 60.4% Nebraska 216 65.02
18 Jacob Pedersen 49 55.1% Wisconsin 221 63.33
19 Ryan Lankford 63 58.7% Illinois 237 59.96
20 Kyle Carter 52 69.2% PSU 240 59.30
           
27 Devin Gardner 37 43.2% Michigan 271 54.41
           
33 Devin Funchess 28 53.6% Michigan 324 47.86

I know what you’re thinking: that top five includes three of the receivers I drafted in last year’s Draft o’ Snark, and my fourth is in the Top 10. That and our tiny receiver who looks like Snoop was best in the conference and 14th in the nation. Not “one of the best after Allen Robinson and Kenny Bell and Jared Abbrederis and those Ohio State and Indiana guys,” but best-best.

Nationally Gallon was one spot behind West Virginia’s Tavon Austin, also a 5’8 mite, also the first receiver taken in this year’s NFL Draft. In fact most of the guys above Gallon were drafted this year—only USC’s Marqise Lee, SJ State’s Noel Grigsby, Bama’s Amari Cooper, Vanderbilt’s Jordan Mathews, and Fresno State’s Davante Adams return among those who finished above Jeremy Gallon in this metric.

When Brian gets to the receiver previews later this offseason he will undoubtedly point out that Gallon blew up after Gardner stepped in, projecting to Braylon-like numbers if you extrapolate the Gardner starts across an entire season. Well, the advanced stats guys took his entire year and said he’s Tavon Austin.

* [Where’s LSAClassof2000? Follow those links and stop writing personal diaries.]

[After the jump, how Gallon’s 2012 compared with those of past M receivers, and how the Big Ten has fared against the others]

GALLON: BEST RECEIVER SINCE BRAYLON?

Fuller-8215118343_3fefd93cd6_o

Fuller

Since the stats go back only to 2005 we don’t have any target stats of #1s to compare Gallon to. But what we do have is all three years from 86 and 16, a senior 8, a couple of 15s, and Junior Hemingway. Gallon’s 2012 was the best of them:

Michigan Receiving Seasons Over YRPR of 50.0, 2005-'12

(hover over the headers for explanation of stats):

Player Tar Cth Yards CthRt YPTar T% YPC RYPR Rk (Year) Rk (All)
Gallon 2012 79 49 829 62.0% 10.5 27.1% 16.9 169.6 14 124
Avant 2005 126 82 1065 65.1% 8.5 32.6% 13.0 155.1 24 185
Manningham 2007 142 72 1174 50.7% 8.3 35.8% 16.3 151.6 21 208
Hemingway 2011 58 34 699 58.6% 12.1 21.7% 20.6 143.8 39 252
Roundtree 2010 107 72 935 67.3% 8.7 26.4% 13.0 140.4 34 280
Roundtree 2012 58 31 580 53.4% 10.0 19.9% 18.7 118.6 51 455
Arrington 2007 115 67 882 58.3% 7.7 29.0% 13.2 113.9 68 518
Manningham 2006 64 38 703 59.4% 11.0 20.4% 18.5 108.4 75 614
Breaston 2006 87 58 670 66.7% 7.7 27.8% 11.6 103.3 87 689
Stonum 2010 80 49 633 61.3% 7.9 19.8% 12.9 95.0 110 824
Gallon 2011 42 31 453 73.8% 10.8 15.7% 14.6 93.2 103 866
Hemingway 2010 56 32 593 57.1% 10.6 13.8% 18.5 89.0 123 952
Arrington 2006 58 40 544 69.0% 9.4 18.5% 13.6 83.9 142 1074
Roundtree 2011 49 19 355 38.8% 7.2 18.4% 18.7 73.0 164 1389
Roundtree 2009 46 32 434 69.6% 9.4 15.1% 13.6 68.0 203 1538
Dileo 2012 30 20 331 66.7% 11.0 10.3% 16.6 67.7 206 1548
Manningham 2005 48 27 442 56.3% 9.2 12.4% 16.4 64.4 198 1664
McGuffie 2010 39 39 384 100.0% 9.8 9.6% 9.8 57.7 239 1947
Mathews 2009 55 29 352 52.7% 6.4 18.0% 12.1 55.1 272 2068
Gardner 2012 37 16 266 43.2% 7.2 12.7% 16.6 54.4 271 2116
Odoms 2008 90 49 445 54.4% 4.9 29.7% 9.1 52.7 273 2222
Koger 2011 35 23 244 65.7% 7.0 13.1% 10.6 50.2 302 2359

Better than any Manningham campaign. Better than Avant’s senior year. Better than Roundtree’s 2010 season. Seeing Tree all over this chart however does give you pause, since we are all consensus’d that while Roy was an effective guy we were quite happy to have, the nature of the offense created a lot of his stats, and putting him on the list with legendary #1s might have been a bit of a stretch. With Roundtree you can see the dip from 2010 to 2011 in catch rate: two thirds of balls thrown in his direction were receptions his last year under Rodriguez, then he caught less than two in five his first year in Borges’s offense. But then Northwestern!

You also might think a guy wearing the 1 jersey would have something like Manningham’s 36% or Avant’s 33%, but I think that’s more a mark of the offense than the player; I would rather there be other targets. Anyway I’m sick of the #1 being de facto retired while we hand out 21 to guys nothing like Desmond Howard. Meanwhile my brain doesn’t need to do backflips to process 10 as 1 (like it did when Roundtree went to 21 and Gardner went to 12, and I was constantly all “when did Roundtree gain 40 lbs and 4 inches?”). And it’s not like people are gonna say “Nice Gallon jersey” if you’re wearing 10 around the stadium, you know?

BONUS: BIG TEHNNN!!!?

861569DEANTHONY-ARNETT-thumb-320x452-98832IMG_4601

While we’re in here I wanted to see how the conference fared, since early last season I wrote a pretty scathing preview of the Big Ten’s receivers in this space. Here’s a comparison by YRPR the Top 30 receivers in each conference last year:

Average YRPR of Top 30 Receivers in Each Conference, 2012 season:

Conf Top Ten 11-20th 21-30th Top 30-All
SEC 166.61 94.53 77.53 112.89
Big 12 157.99 94.26 55.38 102.54
ACC 128.57 82.41 63.23 91.40
Pac-12 143.23 75.00 53.18 90.47
Big Ten 121.09 68.56 55.91 81.85
Sun Belt 112.19 73.35 50.46 78.67
MAC 109.36 73.43 48.45 77.08
Mountain West 110.67 68.38 51.99 77.01
Big East 109.97 68.25 47.74 75.32
C-USA 99.03 66.09 51.07 72.07
WAC 116.06 55.99 32.58 68.21

Worst of the Big Five conferences by a good margin, and far closer to the Sun Belt, the MtnWest, or the MAC than the ACC or Pac12. Our top group of Gallon, Abbrederis, Bell, A-Rob, Tree, two Bucks and three Hoosiers was a little less productive than the ACC’s equivalent, but then the ACC got nearly the same production from their 25h best guy as the Big Ten got from our 16th most effective guy, who incidentally is Drew Dileo. In a down year for receivers across the country, Big Ten receivers sucked.

This seems to have just been a down year, not a trend. The data go back to 2005, over which period the Big Ten is 2nd to the SEC in this statistic:

Receiverchart1

Upchurch - 8194560134_6b1d9b5365_o
Conference 2005-’12 avg
SEC 109.0
Big Ten 97.3
Big 12 93.6
Pac-12 92.7
ACC 87.2
Mountain West 85.4
C-USA 84.3
MAC 80.8
Big East 74.7
Sun Belt 61.8
WAC 47.5

Of 2011’s Top 10 players in YRPR, the conference returned the best (Abbrederis) and the 10th (Keenan Davis). Lost were Nick Toon (235.37), Marvin McNutt (196.27), B.J. Cunningham (190.33), Jeremy Ebert (167.16), A.J. Jenkins (161.01), Junior Hemingway (143.81), Da’Jon McKnight (142.24) and Keshawn Martin (113.85), plus everyone at Penn State. Gallon was 11th.

Comments

Blue boy johnson

May 14th, 2013 at 2:35 PM ^

Here is an interesting article detailing Jeremy Gallon's struggles with academics both in high school and college and his perseverance overcoming them.
"
"I struggled," said Gallon, a redshirt junior wide receiver for the Wolverines. "Things just seemed a little hard for me at times so I gave up. I didn't have the self-esteem that other students had. I wasn't motivated. I couldn't relate.
"My mind was not on school, period."

http://articles.orlandosentinel.com/2013-01-19/sports/os-hs-jeremy-gall…

trueblueintexas

May 14th, 2013 at 3:16 PM ^

I appreciate the efforts to quantify sports beyond the traditional stats. Personally, I think it is much ado about nothing. For instance, the stats cited in this piece (I loved it, by the way, no offense) don't account for touchdowns. To me, that is an important stat in a game where the primary purpose is to outscore your competition. That leaves us with the good ol' fashioned eye test. To me, Gallon deserves either #21 or #1.  If he wants it. He's talented, he's proven himself, he has made a few big plays, he seems like a team player. Simply looking at stats takes away from the true aura of the jersey number and the player. I.e. you all remember Desmond's diving fourth down catch against ND, his punt return against Ohio, and his 21 TD's in one season, but can anyone instantly quote his catches, yards, and YPYR??? off the top of their head?

Unfiltered Manball

May 14th, 2013 at 8:21 PM ^

aspects of Gallon's game is Gallon himself.  The guy is stout.  Most mention him being only 5'8, but he's a thick 5'8.  Cornerbacks that he just doesn't zip around aren't able to knock him off his routes because he strong enough to absorb the jam and continue on his way.

Worthy of the #1?  If he was running out of the tunnel wearing it for the opener, would not have a problem with that.

the Glove

May 15th, 2013 at 3:14 PM ^

They just need to give him the damn number 1 jersey. I would rather see it on the field than just talk about how great somebody has to be to wear it.