Home
i'm an actor, not a reactor

Primary links

  • About
    • $upport (lol)
    • Ethics
    • FAQ
    • Glossary
    • Privacy Policy
  • Contact
  • MGoStore
    • Hail to Old Blue
  • MGoBoard
    • MGoBoard FAQ
    • Michigan bar locator
    • Moderator Action Sticky
  • Useful Stuff
    • Depth Chart By Class
    • Hoops Depth Chart by Class
    • 2017 Recruiting Board
    • Unofficial Two Deep
    • MGoFlickr
    • Diaries, Windows Live Writer, And You
    • User-Curated HOF
    • Where To Eat In Ann Arbor
  • Schedule/Tix
    • Future Schedules (wiki)
    • Ticket spreadsheet
Home

Navigation

  • Forums
  • Recent posts

User login

  • Create new account
  • Request new password

MGoElsewhere

  • @MGoBlog (Brian)
  • @aceanbender
  • @Misopogon (Seth)
  • @Aeschnepp (Adam)
  • @BISB
  • @EUpchurchPhoto
  • @FullOfTwitt (Fuller)
  • Hail to the Victors 2016
  • MGoFacebook
  • MGoPodcast
  • WTKA
  • Instagram

Michigan Blogs

  • Big House Blog
  • Burgeoning Wolverine Star
  • Genuinely Sarcastic
  • Go Blue Michigan Wolverine
  • Holdin' The Rope
  • MVictors
  • Maize 'n' Blue Nation
  • Maize 'n' Brew
  • Maize And Go Blue
  • Michigan Hockey Net
  • MMMGoBlueBBQ
  • The Blog That Yost Built
  • The Hoover Street Rag
  • The M Zone
  • Touch The Banner
  • UMGoBlog
  • UMHoops
  • UMTailgate
  • Wolverine Liberation Army

M On The Net

  • mgovideo
  • MGoBlue.com
  • Mike DeSimone
  • Recruiting Planet
  • The Wolverine
  • Go Blue Wolverine
  • Winged Helmet
  • UMGoBlue.com
  • MaizeRage.org
  • Puckhead
  • The M Den
  • True Blue Fan Forum

Big Ten Blogs

  • Illinois
    • Illinois Loyalty
    • Illinois Baseball Report
  • Indiana
    • Inside The Hall
    • The Crimson Quarry
  • Iowa
    • Black Heart, Gold Pants
    • Fight For Iowa
  • Michigan State
    • The Only Colors
  • Minnesota
    • GopherHole.com
    • The Daily Gopher
  • Nebraska
    • Corn Nation
    • Husker Max
    • Husker Mike's Blasphemy
    • Husker Gameday
  • Northwestern
    • Sippin' On Purple
    • Lake The Posts
  • Notre Dame
    • The House Rock Built
    • One Foot Down
  • Ohio State
    • Eleven Warriors
    • Buckeye Commentary
    • Men of the Scarlet and Gray
    • Our Honor Defend
    • The Buckeye Nine
  • Penn State
    • Slow States
    • Black Shoe Diaries
    • Happy Valley Hardball
    • Penn State Clips
    • Linebacker U
    • Nittany White Out
  • Purdue
    • Boiled Sports
    • Hammer and Rails
  • Wisconsin
    • Bruce Ciskie

Links of Note

  • Baseball
    • College Baseball Today
    • The College Baseball Blog
  • Basketball
    • Ken Pomeroy
    • Hoop Math
    • John Gasaway
    • Luke Winn/Sports Illustrated
  • College Hockey
    • Chris Heisenberg (Class of 2016)
    • College Hockey Stats
    • Michigan College Hockey
    • Hockey's Future
    • Sioux Sports
    • USCHO
  • Football
    • Smart Football
    • Every Day Should Be Saturday
    • Matt Hinton/Grantland
    • Football Study Hall
    • Football Outsiders
    • Harold Stassen
    • NCAA D-I Stats Page
    • The Wizard Of Odds
    • CFB Stats
  • General
    • Sports Central
  • Local Interest
    • The Ann Arbor Chronicle
    • Arborwiki
    • Arbor Update
    • Ann Arbor Observer
    • Teeter Talk
    • Vacuum
  • Teams Of The D
    • Lions
      • Pride of Detroit
    • Pistons
      • Detroit Bad Boys
      • Need4Sheed
    • Tigers
      • Roar Of The Tigers
      • Bless You Boys
      • The Daily Fungo
      • The Detroit Tigers Weblog
    • Red Wings
      • Winging It In Motown
      • On The Wings
    • Michigan Sports Forum

Beveled Guilt

Site Search

Diaries

  • New
  • Popular
  • Hot
  • Thirteen unlucky minutes (TL;DNR-This is a bit of rant about the refs)
    docwhoblocked - 2 weeks ago
  • Fan Satisfaction Index End of Season Bball Survey
    OneFootIn - 2 weeks ago
  • How likely are we to revert to the mean?
    Bo Glue - 2 weeks ago
  • It's time to avenge Villanova's 1985 NCAA tourney upset over Michigan
    Communist Football - 2 weeks ago
  • 14 Months Ago: The Fire Beilein Threads.
    stephenrjking - 3 weeks ago
  •  
  • 1 of 2
  • ››
more
  • It's time to avenge Villanova's 1985 NCAA tourney upset over Michigan
    Communist Football - 11 comments
  • ‹‹
  • 2 of 2
  •  
more

MGoBoard

  • New
  • Recent
  • Hot
  • The Evolution of Commerce - What Industries are Dying, What's Thriving?
    7 replies
  • Softball Wins Series Opener Over Maryland, 6-0
    5 replies
  • OT: How do some student-athletes finish a bachelors so quickly (to transfer)?
    54 replies
  • OT: Avicii dead at 28
    60 replies
  • Chase Young becomes highest drafted Michigan lacrosse player
    20 replies
  • Podcast discussion on the conference
    31 replies
  • Matthews Declares WITHOUT agent
    44 replies
  • OT - Jalen Hurts possibly looking to transfer
    109 replies
  • Game Day Condos - who's gonna buy one?
    69 replies
  • OT: Arsene Wenger set to retire from Arsenal FC
    51 replies
  • OT: The Cube Inaccessible Until Fall 2019
    22 replies
  • It’s Friday - Time to POSBANG!!
    79 replies
  • RIP Earle Bruce
    47 replies
  • Final 2018 Basketball COMPOSITE Rankings
    34 replies
  • OT: Map of college stadiums that sell alcohol
    89 replies
  •  
  • 1 of 6
  • ››
  • The Evolution of Commerce - What Industries are Dying, What's Thriving?
    7 replies
  • It’s Friday - Time to POSBANG!!
    79 replies
  • OT: Avicii dead at 28
    60 replies
  • Podcast discussion on the conference
    31 replies
  • Softball Wins Series Opener Over Maryland, 6-0
    5 replies
  • OT: How do some student-athletes finish a bachelors so quickly (to transfer)?
    54 replies
  • Karsen Barnhart - did we cool on him?
    92 replies
  • OT: Arsene Wenger set to retire from Arsenal FC
    51 replies
  • Game Day Condos - who's gonna buy one?
    69 replies
  • Chase Young becomes highest drafted Michigan lacrosse player
    20 replies
  • OT - Jalen Hurts possibly looking to transfer
    109 replies
  • Apparently, the NCAA has already received a response from MSU about Nassar
    62 replies
  • Matthews Declares WITHOUT agent
    44 replies
  • Belleville coach Jermain Crowell mad at UM again
    244 replies
  • RIP Earle Bruce
    47 replies
  •  
  • 1 of 6
  • ››
  • Why should we be optimistic about 2018 M football?
    273 replies
  • Belleville coach Jermain Crowell mad at UM again
    244 replies
  • Police investigating Elysee Mbem-Bosse for death threat against Harbaugh
    224 replies
  • "Being Not-Rich at UM" Guide
    168 replies
  • Buckle Up
    159 replies
  • Scouting the Enemy: Ohio State QBs are Good
    158 replies
  • Semi-OT: What sports would you fix?
    158 replies
  • Elysee Mbem-Bosse disturbing tweets
    157 replies
  • Whats the Best Way to Make Flight Arrangements?
    149 replies
  • Wagner to NBA
    141 replies
  • Urban Meyer throws more shade at Michigan
    141 replies
  • FB new Nutrition plan under Herbert is well received by players
    132 replies
  • What past season would you have liked to see an Amazon-style documentary on?
    121 replies
  • OT: best-selling musical artists by state of birth
    120 replies
  • The Ice Storm Cometh - And Your Favorite Winter Storm
    119 replies
  •  
  • 1 of 6
  • ››

Support MGoBlog: buy stuff at Amazon

Hokepoints is On Notice

By Seth — November 12th, 2013 at 11:51 AM — 104 comments
Filed under:
  • 2013 nebraska
  • al borges denard devin gardner fusion cuisine
  • al borges denard fusion cuisine is not made to order
  • al borges devin gardner prostyle cuisine
  • al borges hates clarity
  • al borges hates me
  • al borges i don't even know
  • al borges too cute
  • hokepoints
  • offense
  • offensive line
  • rich rodriguez maybe isn't in the past after all
  • tight ends
  • 2009 recruiting
  • 2010 recruiting
  • 2011 recruiting

on-notice

Incompetence on a level that Michigan unlocked against Michigan State and Nebraska cannot be achieved by one man or even one team (MSU is good at defense, and hey, Nebraska did some good things). There's still the possibility that Borges and his charges  are sabotaging themselves, but since that's impossible to prove let's permit that they do in fact wish to progress the ball forward, and parse out how much responsibility lies in the various inadvertent factors.

I thought I'd take us back through a timeline of the events that led to the state of the offensive roster, picking up blame on the way.

I wish we could blame this whole thing on the old coach. Wouldn't it be the most ironic thing if the great guru of offense was really at fault for Michigan's offensive woes? There are really three things I think we can lay at his feet, in order of importance:

  1. Hired DCs he couldn't work with and made them run defenses they didn't understand, thus dooming Michigan to another coaching transition.
  2. Recruited just one OL in the 2010 class.
  3. Didn't recruit a single tight end or fullback, nor a running back who can block except Smith, whom he didn't redshirt.
    404
    Michigan's 2009-2011 tight end recruits.

Tight End, Briefly

We've had #1 out, and #3 is debatable: Y U NO RECRUIT THE BREAD AND BUTTER OF BORGES'S OFFENSE, GUY WHO INVENTED THE OFFENSE THAT MADE BORGES'S OFFENSE OBSOLETE? I can't blame him for skipping fullbacks or running backs who can block since he had a track record of developing fullbacks from the walk-on program, while his backs, e.g. Toussaint, were recruited to operate in space. I wish he'd redshirted Vincent Smith, or gotten a medical for him.

But I do think he could have seen the need for tight ends even before the abilities of Koger and Webb opened his eyes to that. Rodriguez ignored the position for two years, and when he started looking again it was for the 2011 class that was devastated by Rosenberg and The Process: Hoke and Borges went on the hunt for last-minute TEs in 2011 and came back with Chris Barnett, a vagabond of the type that Michigan typically stays away from. Barnett transferred almost right away; I put that on having just a few weeks.

Tight end is another position that typically requires a lot of development, but Michigan knew by mid-2011 that its 2013 starters would be, at most, true sophomores, and knew a year later that neither of their 2012 recruits were much for blocking. At this point any sane human would not have made the ability of their tight ends to block a key component of their offense.

Offensive Line, Longly

jackmiller
Rodriguez put all of his eggs in the 2011 OL recruiting basket, and Michigan ended up with all their eggs in a project recruit's basket.

As for the OL, the failure to recruit just one offensive lineman in 2010 is the centerpiece of modern bitching. Is that fair? Here's a line from Brian in Mike Schofield's recruiting post, dated June 2009:

"Michigan didn't need a huge offensive line class one year after taking six big uglies and graduating zero, but you never want fewer than three and you always want quality."

So yes it is established MGoPrecedent that fewer than three OL in a class no matter how much meat you have stacked for the meat god is not cutting it.

Offensive line recruiting happens a bit earlier than most other positions. Since they're unlikely to be starting for several years (even redshirt freshmen are pretty rare) OL recruits rightly look for coaching stability more than early opportunity. The 2009 class was narrowing down their lists before the 2008 season, and so on. With that said here's a timeline of Michigan offensive line recruiting:

2009 (recruited in early 2008): Tackles Taylor Lewan and Michael Schofield, and guard Quinton Washington. This despite a huge/mixed haul from 2008, when RR added Barnum and Omameh to Carr's class of O'Neill, Mealer, Wermers and Khoury. For the record O'Neill left the team in June 2009, and Wermers was gone in July (though his World of Warcraft account was presumably active), so the coaches wouldn't have adjusted to either of those departures at that time. Meat for 2013 Meat God: three redshirt seniors, one a potential Jake Long 2.0, can't do more because there's still six guys from the previous class.

[Fail leaps atop fail, after the jump]

2010 (recruited in 2008-'09): Center Christian Pace and air. Of all Michigan's injuries over the last four years the one to Pace is probably the least talked about yet the most damaging—yes even more than Molk's knee and Denard's elbow, and there's a case to be made for Woolfolk's ankle. The coaches wound up with a proto-Molk who went from zero to ludicrous off the ball. And…nobody. NOBODY! The feeling at the time, just so we're not deluding ourselves into thinking we were content then to rest on the 2008 class and get the 2013 kids in 2011:

Needs: Moderate. Michigan will have nine freshmen on campus this fall, but Moosman, Ortmann, and McAvoy graduate and Michigan should endeavor to keep the numbers on the line at about the current level. Two or three are likely; only one tackle is needed so there might be a slight emphasis on the interior.

Translation: need three, got one. That the one lost his career to injury is the No. 1 reason that center has been Mealer/Miller-or-Bust the last two years. Note that QWash didn't make the move to DL until 2010 but Meat for 2013 Meat God: just four dudes—Lewan, Schofield, Washington and Pace. Even if they all work out you're expecting the 2011 haul to net you the starting guard and all of your depth.

Michael Rosenberg and The Process Murdered the 2011 Class

Having pulled in just four players in the last two classes, Michigan was expected to get a good five quality options, the carrot being a clear path to a starting job by 2012 or '13, when the RR machine should be humming. Here's where that gamble met the instability of the program to produce a black hole.

Michael-Rosenberg-MI-Co-SW1
Ultimately the biggest effect of Rosenberg's vendetta was a year of negative publicity for Michigan, and a recruiting down year that stemmed from it.

Few schools can point to an alum in the media who did so much damage to their program with so little. Practicegate calculatedly began with the 2009 season, and the threat of "major violations" atop the mounting losses as the year progressed helped to kill off the Rodriguez program's momentum.

Its most tangible effect was on recruiting the 2010 and 2011 classes, since it made sure the phrase "major violations" could be tacked on to any mention of Michigan to a recruit for that whole year. Recruiting is a world where kids are shown 10-30 different heavens and end up choosing one on factors as marginal as the color of the angels' (or helmets') wings, so a little thing like "their coach is under investigation" can matter a great deal, no matter how tiny the a molehill it started with.

Before that, Rich Rod was in on several 5-star types who'd wind up in the SEC, as well as Aundrey Walker (four-star from Glenville), James Elliott (went to Kentucky), and Andre Yruretagoyena, a spread-tastic OL from Roh/Lewan's school. They were also recruiting Zettel as a guard, and looked in good position for Tony Posada, provided Miami (YTM) didn't get too involved. Jordan Walsh was that year's annual Chicago-Guy-Who-Likes-Michigan-Then-Commits-Elsewhere except he chose Iowa instead of Michigan or OSU or ND. At least in-state spread-tackle Jake Fisher was in the fold, and they reeled in Ohio developmental project Jake Miller, who was rated by everybody as a DE at the time.

Other than Fisher, Practicegate killed off any chance of any Plan A targets coming this way. By this point they were also looking at Tyler Moore (went to Nebraska), Ryan Nowicki (went to Penn State), and various other names that would pop up in TomVH posts then disappear as quickly. Chris Bryant first showed up on radar as a guy fishing for an offer.

By the time the investigation concluded in fall 2010 there were only a few months left to 2011 signing day, and the appearance of program instability was replaced with the real program instability of the 2010 win-or-die-and-oh-yeah-do-it-without-a-defensive-backfield season. During the season Pace's career was lost to injury and Washington was swapped with Will Campbell—no they couldn't tack a redshirt on him then so hypothetical Will Campbell: 2013 guard was never going to happen.

The Process finished the job, since nobody was going to commit to Rodriguez if he could be fired, and Michigan spent the last few crucial months of the 2011 recruiting cycle leaving that completely in the air. The final firing chased Fisher off to Oregon. Bryant got his offer from the new staff and committed, and Posada committed but lasted all of a few months. The new staff focused their few weeks of recruiting on a few defensive prospects—the more immediate fire—and didn't add any last-minute Omameh-types. Meat for the 2013 Meat God: Schofield and Lewan, and two fliers in Miller and Bryant.

The Lizard Brain Strikes

You have to give tremendous credit to Hoke and Borges and Funk for the offensive line recruiting they pulled off in 2012 and 2013. They inherited a major problem and addressed it on the recruiting trail exactly as well as you could hope for. Imagine if Rich Rod had brought in ten four-star-or-better defensive backs in the 2009 and 2010 classes, and held on to all of them. Most programs would have supplemented that with some JUCOs but Michigan's transfer requirements make that not an option in Ann Arbor. Anyway as long as they can get these guys to stick around (hardly guaranteed) Michigan ought to have five good linemen going into 2015 and '16.

With those guys so young it's hard to evaluate their development. They've had Kyle Kalis and Ben Braden and Erik Magnusson and Blake Bars for a year and change, and you'd expect only Kalis, probably, to be better at this point than we've seen. Jack Miller's lack of development under this staff is more worrisome, but it's hardly unheard of for a project recruit to not pan out. I give Bryant a total pass since he was a project and he's been too injured to practice. And while we're we're hardly the only school to be starting a true freshman mid-way through the season (Notre Dame is already playing onetime Michigan target Steve Elmer) I treat any contribution from 2013 guys as a bonus.

Where I find Hoke and Borges and Funk culpable is:

1. Changing up/not knowing their personnel. Schools do this, but it comes with a cost. When you see players missing assignments and doing a terrible job on combo blocks this year, a big part of that I bet is they're not used to playing with each other. Brian wishes they'd just kept rolling with Miller, whatever his problems with blocking, because Glasgow's snapping deficiency is costing them a drive per game, and you're not getting much better blocking out of the guard replacements, and meanwhile you've thrown out any experience they gained by playing together since spring. I tend to agree, with the caveat that I completely understand at least one shuffle after Akron and UConn.

9741748845_22778f9fc4_h
We did see plenty of problems with Miller and Kalis early on, and there's little guarantee that they would have fared any better than their replacements. But OL do tend to improve the more time they spend next to one another.

This goes doubly for the non-OL positions. It took them half the season to stop pretending Funchess is a TE on most plays, and they still go back to that at times. They also keep going back to A.J. Williams as a key blocker. And Toussaint or Green. It's unfortunate that the backs can't block, but neither should their coaches be making their blocks the only thing between Denicos Allen and Devin Gardner's midsection. Sacks caused by non-OL still make the OL look bad.

2. Changing up/not knowing their offense. We still don't know who they are or what they're trying to accomplish. They burned a bye week on the tackle-over gimmick that's so dead now the fans boo it when they see it, and so scouted that opponents immediately jam nine in the box when they do. They went to an almost Tiller-level passing spread for Notre Dame, and they broke out the run-from-the-gun/PA max protect passing offense against Indiana which worked against Indiana, but once that was scouted and opponents realized how much this puts on the backs and young OL to pick up complex blocking assignments we went two games in a row with negative rushing yards. No matter what they're good at, they won't commit to anything long enough to get good at it.

3. Giving up the offense's advantages. You've heard the complaints about how the play-calling isn't cohesive, and the last two games have demonstrated just how much of an easy scout this makes them. The one thing offense has on defense is they get to dictate the play. Defenses will do unsound things to mitigate that—for example Michigan State's deep coverage was weak by alignment—but when Michigan's only got one or two plays they run from a given look, they just hand this right over.

The result is the offense practices a lot of plays but gets good at none of them, and few things are ever simple, even for the guys you need to make things simple for.

4. WTF. Schofield is a 5th year senior and three-year starter who missed a slide protection. On an offense that's doing well that could be chalked up as a fluke, but people are talking about it because it's not the only time this year that one of the offense's working parts inexplicably broke down. Here's Space Coyote in that thread:

Those two plays were the most angry I've been at the OL this year, FWIW. So that explains how bad both missed assignments were. Michigan's staff is simplifying the pass protectin scheme to a high school level and the players still aren't executing. That screams coaching issue at the position level to me, because you can't dumb down the pass pro anymore.

WTF.

  • Login or register to post comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
November 12th, 2013 at 11:59 AM
#2
boliver46
boliver46's picture
Joined: 09/14/2012
MGoPoints: 13109
Meme

Michael-Rosenberg-MI-Co-SW1 

There should be a meme for this photo.  Insert caption here!

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
November 12th, 2013 at 12:05 PM
(Reply to #2) #3
His Dudeness
Joined: 11/24/2008
MGoPoints: -104
Never been Laid.

Never been Laid.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
November 12th, 2013 at 12:18 PM
(Reply to #5) #4
boliver46
boliver46's picture
Joined: 09/14/2012
MGoPoints: 13109
NBL

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
November 12th, 2013 at 12:18 PM
(Reply to #5) #5
allintime23
allintime23's picture
Joined: 09/21/2009
MGoPoints: 15060
Well done.

Well done.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
November 12th, 2013 at 12:23 PM
(Reply to #2) #6
MGoManBall
MGoManBall's picture
Joined: 10/27/2012
MGoPoints: 12251
(No subject)

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
November 12th, 2013 at 12:28 PM
(Reply to #15) #7
Benoit Balls
Benoit Balls's picture
Joined: 11/27/2010
MGoPoints: 4009
Im sure his eye is lazy

his reporting sure the hell is, so why not everything else?

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
November 12th, 2013 at 8:52 PM
(Reply to #15) #8
The Iron Jock
The Iron Jock's picture
Joined: 09/03/2012
MGoPoints: 205
(No subject)

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
November 12th, 2013 at 12:55 PM
(Reply to #2) #9
dothepose
dothepose's picture
Joined: 12/30/2008
MGoPoints: 7480
Great, just a punched a hole

Great, just a punched a hole in my work computer screen.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
November 12th, 2013 at 12:58 PM
(Reply to #2) #10
reshp1
reshp1's picture
Joined: 10/31/2011
MGoPoints: 25122
By the way, if you're looking

By the way, if you're looking for you daily dose of karmic retribution, go read the reviews of Rosenberg's book on Amazon.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
November 12th, 2013 at 1:56 PM
(Reply to #36) #11
Romeo50
Joined: 03/09/2013
MGoPoints: 124
My review is there and I enjoyed every minute of writing it!

Scathing is tame.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
November 12th, 2013 at 2:24 PM
(Reply to #36) #12
Wolverine862
Joined: 10/07/2011
MGoPoints: 84
MOST INTERSTING FAN IN THE WORLD

slandered

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
November 12th, 2013 at 11:59 AM
#13
ChuckieWoodson
ChuckieWoodson's picture
Joined: 01/13/2012
MGoPoints: 12562
Well

that pic of Rosenberg sure is annoying

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
November 12th, 2013 at 12:07 PM
(Reply to #4) #14
LJ
LJ's picture
Joined: 07/05/2008
MGoPoints: 17318
As the post clearly mentions,

As the post clearly mentions, it's UM's transfer requirements that limit our ability to get JUCOs, not Hoke's policy.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
November 12th, 2013 at 12:55 PM
(Reply to #6) #15
Toasted Yosties
Toasted Yosties's picture
Joined: 06/05/2013
MGoPoints: 5445
Are there more requirements than these?

http://www.admissions.umich.edu/drupal/transfer-u-m

- Is in good academic and social standing at his/her prior institution.

- Has a distinguished record of college work, earning a cumulative GPA of at least a B (3.0 on a 4.0 scale) or better.

- Has earned sophomore or junior standing (preferably) with transferable credit earned at a community college or another two or four -year college or university

If not, coming out of a junior college, they don't seem exactly insurmountable.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
November 12th, 2013 at 1:21 PM
(Reply to #33) #16
Shop Smart Shop...
Joined: 07/10/2008
MGoPoints: 4848
My understanding is that the

My understanding is that the "transferabe credit" line is generally the sticking point.  The university simply doesn't let a lot of credits transfer in.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
November 12th, 2013 at 1:31 PM
(Reply to #46) #17
gbdub
gbdub's picture
Joined: 02/16/2010
MGoPoints: 12685
At least not from the sort of

At least not from the sort of JUCOs that field good football teams.



In the SEC, the JUCO transfers are mostly guys who couldn't make the academic eligibility requirements for D1. They go to "school" for a couple years to meet the transfer requirements and get good enough a football to make it worth the risk to take them.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
November 12th, 2013 at 1:32 PM
(Reply to #46) #18
Toasted Yosties
Toasted Yosties's picture
Joined: 06/05/2013
MGoPoints: 5445
It sounds like they do for many common undergraduate majors,

which I imagine is the situation for many transfer candidates.  A 101 course at JuCo college is going to count for a 101 class at Michigan, or that's how I read the "Equivalent Credit" statement below.  Perhaps they are more strict than the way they make it seem on the website.

Equivalent Credit

Courses you’ve completed at other colleges and universities that closely match courses taught at U-M will usually transfer as “equivalent credit.” These courses will appear on your University of Michigan transcript with a U-M course number assigned.

Departmental Credit

Courses you’ve taken at other colleges and universities that do not match courses in the same departments on our campus may transfer as “departmental credit.” (Please note that departmental credit, while transferable and usually applicable as elective credit, may only be used toward meeting distribution or concentration requirements with the permission of an academic or concentration advisor.)

Interdepartmental Credit

Courses that cover a broad range of topics within a general area of study are considered “interdepartmental credit.” These are courses that, because of the scope of their subject material, cannot be assigned to any individual academic department. Like departmental credit, interdepartmental credit is usually applicable as elective credit. (It also must be approved by an academic or major advisor if it is to be used toward distribution* or major requirements.)

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
November 12th, 2013 at 1:55 PM
(Reply to #33) #19
Seth
Seth's picture
Joined: 10/14/2008
MGoPoints: 94411
I've been through the process

I've been through the process (as of 2001, so...) and been told it was different elsewhere (as of Michigan State 2002, so...), and I've used that as my basis--plus that Michigan doesn't get transfers and JUCOs--to justify the theory that Michigan's transfer system sucks for athletes.

What happened to me is I dropped out of my pre-approved study abroad program (which placed me in a grammar class with a bunch of Chinese kids) and got accepted for a semester into the actual school, which was awesome but created all sorts of hassles for me once I came back with a transcript in French, grades on a 20-point scale that never awards higher than 16, and classes that translated as "Looked at Buildings."

First you submit your transcripts from your other school, as well as the course descriptions (this was a pain in the ass before they put that sort of thing online and publicly available.)

Then they take FOREVER to review them. Like months. They come back with a decision on each class, where they've matched it up to the closest course description they can find among Michigan courses.

Then they send you a letter saying you got X amount of credit from them, without a breakdown. Most of your credit is elective X credit, and it is about half of the amount of credit hours that you actually took.

Then you call them and ask for a breakdown of their decisions and they schedule you with an academic advisor.

Then the academic advisor goes through the transcripts you brought with you and the letter you brought with you and asks where you see the discrepency? I DIDN'T GET TO SEE ONE BECAUSE I HAVE NO IDEA WHERE THE HELL YOU CAME UP WITH THAT NUMBER!!!

Then you circle various classes like a 400-level history course taught at the University of Paris IV, i.e. the Sorbonne, i.e. the Francophone Oxford, which classwas taught in French to French students from France, and you say that should count as a high-level French course toward a French minor. And that one on French grammar should...

And then you don't hear from them in awhile until you go in to meet with your academic advisor because you want to graduate soon and these credits are still up in the air.

And then they tell you that the comparable courses you suggested in your review with an advisor were not comparable so they denied your appeal and you get what they gave you.

Then they suggest if you want to finish your degree you should come back for an summer courses and an extra semester, and they offer to make an appointment with financial aid, because what's another 20% of debt on top of your four years of University of Michigan debt?

I don't know how it is for football players--it would seem to behoove them to have a different advisor than they gave me for my study abroad credit kerfluffle. But given all the options and how easy most schools make it, if a transfer ever came across one of the idiots I did--and I'm sure a few are still around--that would be the end of transferring to Michigan.

Anyway, seriously, it's about the level of school--Michigan thinks their credits are worth more than almost anywhere, so I would guess most of the players who go the junior college route because their grades aren't Division I-worthy are not going to be getting the kind of credit that transfers well to Michigan. Grant Mason transferred successfully...from Stanford. Spencer Brinton went to San Diego State and had a two-year Mormon mission. Steve Threet went to Georgia Tech for a year. Their last JUCO was Austin Panter, who came from Butler and was studying to be a chiropractor. Jonathan Goodwin went to OHIO! for a season before transferring--since he was a 5th year guy it's plausible he started from near scratch.

To find JUCOs before Panter you have to go back to Tyrone Butterfield and Russell Shaw.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
November 12th, 2013 at 2:15 PM
(Reply to #61) #20
Shop Smart Shop...
Joined: 07/10/2008
MGoPoints: 4848
What might be more

What might be more infuriating is transferring within the IU system.  I was enrolled at the Bloomington campus nearly a decade ago.  I left school due to a lack of funds.  A few years ago I decided to go back to school to become a social studies teacher.  While at Bloomington, I was working towards a History degree.  I assumed that many of those credits would simply transfer directly, thus removing the need for the majority of my content classes.  I currently have five different 400 level courses from the History department at Bloomington that only count as general electives at the regional campus.  I've been told that if I switch to a History degree at the regional campus that they will count as a direct replacement for upper-level courses in that degree program.

Now I have to decide which is better for my ultimate goal of coaching tennis at a small to moderate sized college/university.  Sadly, no one on my campus has ANY idea what I should do to achieve that goal.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
November 13th, 2013 at 3:17 AM
(Reply to #61) #21
fatbastard
fatbastard's picture
Joined: 01/03/2009
MGoPoints: 792
First, Michigan does permit

First, Michigan does permit transfers from Jucos, without any problem at all.  If, you take the right classes. 

Second, Michigan football has long frowned on jucos because we can recruit so well, it makes senst to have a player for four (or five) years than only two, and the payoff of a juco immediately doesn't pay off.

Third, my experience with juco players, is the reason they are in juco in the first place is because they were not academically eligble to go to a major school.  Yes there is some talent.  However, far and away, it is dumb talent (okay, there are certainly exceptions).

Fourth, transfers from non juco must sit out a year before playing. 

It's understandable, then, why the staff didn't look around for transfers too hard in bulk.  They did look for a graduated qb, rightfully so, though.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
November 12th, 2013 at 3:58 PM
(Reply to #6) #22
pescadero
pescadero's picture
Joined: 03/28/2013
MGoPoints: 5991
The ability to get transfer

The ability to get transfer players (not necessarily from a JUCO) is somewhat limited - but it isn't impossible.

 

Russell Shaw

Spencer Brinton

Grant Mason

Austin Panter

Steven Threet

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
November 12th, 2013 at 7:02 PM
(Reply to #75) #23
BluCheese
Joined: 04/14/2011
MGoPoints: 881
Brinton

Brinton wasn't a JUCO.  He transferred from San Diego State after a 2 year Mormon mission. Threet transferred from Georgia Tech to Michigan to Arizona State.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
November 12th, 2013 at 8:53 PM
(Reply to #88) #24
pescadero
pescadero's picture
Joined: 03/28/2013
MGoPoints: 5991
The ability to get transfer

The ability to get transfer players (not necessarily from a JUCO) is somewhat limited - but it isn't impossible.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
November 12th, 2013 at 12:11 PM
(Reply to #4) #25
His Dudeness
Joined: 11/24/2008
MGoPoints: -104
UM just doesn't do JUCO in

UM just doesn't do JUCO in football. You can say it's academics, but we get a few in basketball. I am not sure the reasons why, but UM has just never really taken many JUCO transfers in football.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
November 12th, 2013 at 12:56 PM
(Reply to #4) #26
Rusty Shackleford
Joined: 04/03/2010
MGoPoints: 5981
That's not his call

Hoke doesn't get to decide whether the program can accept JUCO players, that comes from higher up.

Notre Dame has a similar policy, which Charlie Weis said in an interview that he was told he wasn't allowed to recruit JUCO players when he took the job.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
November 12th, 2013 at 12:11 PM
#27
Don
Don's picture
Joined: 06/30/2008
MGoPoints: 70311
That smug, pompous weasel

I wouldn't piss on him if he was on fire.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
November 12th, 2013 at 1:08 PM
(Reply to #9) #28
lilpenny1316
lilpenny1316's picture
Joined: 11/19/2009
MGoPoints: 28721
I would s%[email protected] on him though

I would s%[email protected] on him though

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
November 12th, 2013 at 2:19 PM
(Reply to #40) #29
Red is Blue
Red is Blue's picture
Joined: 05/13/2010
MGoPoints: 9841
  Five letter words starting

 

Five letter words starting with S and ending in T

 

sabot, saint, sault, sayst, scant, scart, scatt, scent,
scoot, scout, shaft, shalt, sheet, shent, shirt, shist,
shoat, shoot, short, shott, shout, shunt, sight, skeet,
skint, skirt, skort, slant, sleet, slept, slipt, smalt,
smart, smelt, smolt, snoot, snort, snout, spait, spelt,
spent, spilt, spirt, splat, split, sport, spout, sprat,
sprit, spurt, squat, start, stent, stilt, stint, stoat,
stopt, stott, stout, strut, stunt, sturt, suint, swart,
sweat, sweet, swept, swift,

 

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
November 12th, 2013 at 2:25 PM
(Reply to #64) #30
MGoManBall
MGoManBall's picture
Joined: 10/27/2012
MGoPoints: 12251
Definitely skeet.  

Definitely skeet.

 

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
November 12th, 2013 at 3:01 PM
(Reply to #66) #31
Red is Blue
Red is Blue's picture
Joined: 05/13/2010
MGoPoints: 9841
So glad to hear it is not

So glad to hear it is not "spurt". 

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
November 12th, 2013 at 12:13 PM
#32
WCHBlog
Joined: 12/03/2008
MGoPoints: 1794
I see that Spain got off

I see that Spain got off light this week.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
November 12th, 2013 at 12:17 PM
#33
allintime23
allintime23's picture
Joined: 09/21/2009
MGoPoints: 15060
Lizard brain. I almost forgot

Lizard brain. I almost forgot about you. Welcome to the new pain version 2.5.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
November 12th, 2013 at 12:21 PM
#34
ReadYourGuard
ReadYourGuard's picture
Joined: 08/21/2008
MGoPoints: 33681
I don't know man. We have two 5th year tackles, a

I don't know man. We have two 5th year tackles, a 2nd year starting 265lb blocking TE, a 5th year tailback, a record setting wide receiver, a freak in Funchess, and the top rated dual threat QB from the 2010 class. If the staff can't take those components and make the offense successful, it's on them. OL recruiting is obviously an issue, but it's not the reason we've rushed for -69 yards the past two games.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
November 12th, 2013 at 12:28 PM
(Reply to #14) #35
Monocle Smile
Monocle Smile's picture
Joined: 09/17/2009
MGoPoints: 12232
Good big picture evaluation

Most of the rationalizations about why our offense/OL suck so hard seem to include legitimate reasons for mediocrity or a step below.

I have yet to hear a legitimate reason for total deathpocalypse. Someone is failing HARD at their job.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
November 12th, 2013 at 12:41 PM
(Reply to #17) #36
VintageBlue
Joined: 08/04/2011
MGoPoints: 2010
So much this

UMs fail in the run game and pass protect has been historically bad in 3 of the last 4 games. Upgrade those areas to poor or below average and we're ridiculously sitting at 8-1 right now.  Go big or go home I guess.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
November 12th, 2013 at 12:59 PM
(Reply to #17) #37
ijohnb
Joined: 09/21/2009
MGoPoints: 51838
I can give you a few

but I am not sure you will like them.  QB competency and wide receiver depth, and they both involve the same person.  We are a little over a year removed from Devin Gardner being moved from quarterback to wide receiver, and not a soft move, but a move in which Bellomy was named the backup and Gardner ceased taking snaps.  This tells me two things, one, there was a point in time in which Gardner's quarterbacking days at Michigan were considered over, and two, the coaching staff was very concerned about vertical passing options.  Little did they know, 1) Denard Robinson would sustain a season ending arm injury, 2) Bellomy would, well, ya know, and 3) Morris gets fricking mono and barely plays a down for his entire senior season.  So, Garnder back to QB, there goes one vertical threat at wide receiver, Bellomy ACL (or whatever), Morris not the least bif of an option.  So it is Garnder with no other options, and then as if the above were not enough, down goes Darboh, taking away the next planned deep threat after Garnder.  So in short, our quarterback was considered done quarterbacking a little over a year ago, we don't have a backup that can play, and we lost both our expected vertical passing threats from one year ago.

The add in a dash of youth on the offensive line, and a half cup of coaching inadequacies, and let it sit for two hours.  Hmmm, that is some tasty Deathpocalyse.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
November 12th, 2013 at 1:06 PM
(Reply to #38) #38
Monocle Smile
Monocle Smile's picture
Joined: 09/17/2009
MGoPoints: 12232
That's an awful lot of fuckups

Most of those issues involve the staff putting themselves in situations that are absolutely BEGGING Murphy's Law to pull out the rug. Furthermore, even the best (realistic) scenarios are rather leery.

If your intent is to blame Devin Gardner, then you're almost entirely wrong. I think the coaches shat the bed when they stopped giving Gardner snaps in practice. And Bellomy is yet another data point in the tenuous track record of Al Borges as a QB coach.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
November 12th, 2013 at 1:16 PM
(Reply to #39) #39
ijohnb
Joined: 09/21/2009
MGoPoints: 51838
I am not

blaming Devin Gardner personally any more than I blame "the Flu" for getting me sick or the power from going out during a wind storm.  I do think there was a reason that he was moved to wide receiver when all logic would have indicated that was a shoe-in back up and eventual two year starter after Robinson's departure.  An inventory was taken of Gardner's potential at QB at one point in time and that inventory resulted in a hard move to wide receiver.  That tells me something.  A little pub from a QB camp in the off-season and the #98 does not change that.   

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
November 12th, 2013 at 1:27 PM
(Reply to #43) #40
Monocle Smile
Monocle Smile's picture
Joined: 09/17/2009
MGoPoints: 12232
Sounds like "trust the coaches" crap

What it tells ME is that the coaches blew it hardcore and this is a major black mark on their records. Look no further than Gardner's numbers. Coaches are not immune from doing stupid things that bite them in the ass later.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
November 13th, 2013 at 3:09 AM
(Reply to #50) #41
fatbastard
fatbastard's picture
Joined: 01/03/2009
MGoPoints: 792
How was Devin at WR before he

How was Devin at WR before he switched last year?  Do you think he had any role in the switch, as in wanting to get on the field?  What position do you think he will play in the NFL?  Were there any other deep threats on the field last year?  Other than Funchess was there a single WR that could catch a ball above the 6'2" mark last year (other than Devin)?  What position was Funchess recruited at, and what did he play last year? 

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
November 13th, 2013 at 10:32 AM
(Reply to #100) #42
MKEblue
Joined: 01/16/2011
MGoPoints: 169
yes!

This, completely. The coaches assessed their personnel and made a calculated gamble. They ended up losing the bet, but that doesn't mean it was a wrong decision to take the gamble. They saw deficiencies and did what they could to get the best players on the field (with requisite risk).

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
November 13th, 2013 at 10:45 AM
(Reply to #102) #43
ijohnb
Joined: 09/21/2009
MGoPoints: 51838
You see

Gardner as an NFL QB right now?

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
November 12th, 2013 at 1:11 PM
(Reply to #38) #44
gbdub
gbdub's picture
Joined: 02/16/2010
MGoPoints: 12685
But even there, we see

But even there, we see possibilities missed - we continue to pretend Funchess is a TE and not Megatron-lite, Norfleet sits on the bench, and Dileo gets few targets. Yeah, the last two aren't downfield threats but they could at least occupy a linebacker /hybrid in coverage and serve as a dump off when Gallon an Funchess are bracketed.



Funchess should have gone full time WR as soon as Darboh got hurt, if not earlier.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
November 12th, 2013 at 1:19 PM
(Reply to #41) #45
ijohnb
Joined: 09/21/2009
MGoPoints: 51838
The lack

of Norfleet confuses the hell out of me.  I liked what we were doing with Denard last year against Iowa, Ohio, and South Carolina.  I understand that Norfleet is no Denard but we were running some really nice stuff out of what almost look liked a triple option for stretches last year.  I am stunned that Norfleet has not been used in the slot and out of the backfield this year.  I get the sense that he is very frustrated as well just based on body language, etc.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
November 12th, 2013 at 1:28 PM
(Reply to #44) #46
gbdub
gbdub's picture
Joined: 02/16/2010
MGoPoints: 12685
I want to clarify that I

I want to clarify that I don't think Norfleet would cure all our woes, and it's entirely possible he's a poor route runner and blocker and that's keeping him benched.



But we know he's got the quickness to be dangerous in space. Even Borges must think so, since he used him as the designated totally surprising jet sweep guy for awhile.



Is it really plausible that Norfleet is worse at being a 3rd/4th WR than AJ Williams is at being a blocking TE?



At this point having fewer than 3 receivers on the field is just asking to get blitzed to death. Max protect really just seems to be providing more opportunities to let a defender through while simultaneously providing fewer outlet targets for Devin.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
November 12th, 2013 at 1:34 PM
(Reply to #51) #47
ijohnb
Joined: 09/21/2009
MGoPoints: 51838
Yeah,

that jet sweep is tricky.  I am all, "Whoa, that just blew my mind."

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
November 12th, 2013 at 1:43 PM
(Reply to #57) #48
gbdub
gbdub's picture
Joined: 02/16/2010
MGoPoints: 12685
Of course, at least it

Of course, at least it averaged more than 1YPC.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
November 12th, 2013 at 2:26 PM
(Reply to #51) #49
Red is Blue
Red is Blue's picture
Joined: 05/13/2010
MGoPoints: 9841
it's entirely possible he's a

it's entirely possible he's a poor route runner and blocker and that's keeping him benched

 

Poor blocking is obviously not a criteria used to keep someone off the field.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
November 13th, 2013 at 3:03 AM
(Reply to #38) #50
fatbastard
fatbastard's picture
Joined: 01/03/2009
MGoPoints: 792
That is a very insightful

That is a very insightful comment.  The lack of WR depth has been palpable. and with Bellomy's injury, we've got nothing in reserve at qb.  Gardner is tentative.  He got that way, perhaps, from being pressured so often, but he also did a lot of it last year (though to be fair you can't blame him for that last after being thrown into the cauldron mid-season).   I like Chesson, a lot, but losing Darboh (a position that can be played as a freshman) and no other depth recruited by Rodriguez is a real problem. 

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
November 12th, 2013 at 12:29 PM
(Reply to #14) #51
TennBlue
TennBlue's picture
Joined: 10/12/2010
MGoPoints: 6445
Two obvious problems that go right to coaching:

1) The inability of the offensive line to implement even high school-level blocking schemes, and

 

2) The refusal (or inability) of Borges to call plays that minimize the stress on the line.

 

If I saw any effort to address either of those issues, I would feel a lot better about the situation. 

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
  • 1
  • 2
  • next ›
  • last »
Powered by Drupal, an open source content management system
Theme provided by Roopletheme; sidebars adapted from Chris Murphy.