Hide Ya Kids, Hide Ya Wife Comment Count

Brian

11/6/2010 – Michigan 67, Illinois 65 (3OT) – 6-3, 2-3 Big Ten

image

Ariel Bond/Daily

At the risk of convincing everyone that the first impossibly apropos moppet was fiction, let me tell you about this impossibly apropos moppet a few rows in front of me.

He was about ten. He was wearing a number seven jersey and when he took his hat off for the national anthem his hair was staticky. Before the game he was hopping up in down in an attempt to burn off nervous energy, and when Michigan ran out to touch the banner his mind was blown. He exclaimed "this is so AWESOME" as only a ten-year-old boy can. The words forced themselves out in self defense—if they hadn't the pressure would have given him an aneurysm. I know what that excitement is like. I remember getting a Nintendo.

I can't imagine what his mind is like four fighter jets, three overtimes, 132 points, and one last-play win later. He's probably sitting at his desk right now, mouth slightly ajar and drooling, involuntarily twitching out the words "so" and "awesome" as the rest of the class learns to count to 15 in Spanish. Plans to put him on ritalin have been temporarily shelved. His father has been asked "what did you do to the boy?"

The father can only shrug and say "talk to Ron Zook, Rich Rodriguez, and Greg Robinson."

---------------------------------

What can you say about a game like that? You can say it was entirely appropriate for Special K to play the Bed Intruder song. Yes. Michigan and Illinois just went Rasputin on that barn. They burned it, then they napalmed it, then they nuked it, then they shot up the radioactive wasteland for the hell of it, then they poisoned a flat expanse of glass with holes in it, then they dug it up and threw it into the river for it to drown. And then it was halftime.

While the kid was getting the football equivalent of heroin in his eyeballs it seemed like the rest of the stadium was strangely muted once it became clear that touchdowns were more like baskets than goals. Any individual event was far less important in a game that would last until mid-day Sunday.

I was with them. I still remember thinking "that's 30% of the points we need to win" after Michigan's first touchdown in the 2006 Ohio State game. I was raised on three yards and a cloud of dust, and while I could not be more grateful that Michigan's offense now has run plays beyond "zone left" and "zone right," this style of football is all frisson. It piles up and up and up. It's amazing, but when you're not ten your mind only has so much to give before it gets complacent. Things don't build up, they just happen. So when Roy Roundtree scores on the first play of the game you're happy but you're also wondering how they're going to blow it.

The answer was "in all ways possible with a special emphasis on running back wheel routes." But they kept setting things right until Jonas Mouton leapt over a cut block and Craig Roh stunted inside and Nathan Scheelhaase finally had nowhere to go but down. My reaction to this was very strange. After feeling dampened most of the day I cracked and hugged my fiancée—making her annual pilgrimage—long and hard and relieved. So relieved.

This team isn't good at all but I love it. If Craig Roh gets to class early he runs up and down steps in his spare time. Roy Roundtree does a Donald Duck impression and wakes up hungry. Tate Forcier's gone from sulking on the bench and "out" to leaping around like a madman after leading a comeback win over Illinois and coming somewhat close to the same against Iowa. And then there's Denard, and the most put-upon man on the planet, and I just want them to succeed because it will make them happy.

A lot of sports fandom does degenerate into rooting for you in that sad Nick Hornby way. While I'm not anywhere near sports Buddhism, more and more prominent among the millions of reasons I want Michigan to win is because of how it will validate all this crap they have to put up with.

image

Even if that goes with the territory at Michigan, what's gone on the last three years long ago crossed the line from disappointed and upset to nastily personal, on everyone's part.

Almost everyone, anyway. After the game we're walking up the bleachers and the kid's right in front of us, trying to show his father his hand. His father seems to acknowledge the hand, but not enough for the kid's taste. "I'm never washing this hand again," he says. "Denard gave me a high five." He wears an Adidas wristband like the players. He doesn't care about anything other than Michigan won and I touched Denard and this is awesome. I think about White Noise, a Don DeLillo book I don't actually like that much* about the paralyzing fear of death driving middle aged academics literally insane, and how the only moments of respite in the book are thanks to the presence of an infant named Wayne or Warren or something.

So Saturday was awesome, and this is my favorite bad team ever, and goddammit I'm going to their nondescript bowl.

junior-hemingway-illinoistate-forcier-illinoisroy-roundtree-illinois

via Tim

*(The moment in American literature when ironically capitalizing marketing messages to assert that the background radiation of advertising has become our national discourse has mercifully passed—David Foster Wallace got away with it a few times but only just, and not always.)

Non-Bullets, Amazingly Long

Head injuries. Michigan's bombing Illinois with Denard and pulls him because of a headache and some concussion-like symptoms in a game that is almost make or break for Rich Rodriguez's career. And he could even see:

"Certainly for his safety, you're not going to put him back out there," Rodriguez said. "I'm not a doctor, so I can't tell you where he is, but he had a smile on his face and he was talking, but obviously, you're going to be precautionary.

"Anytime you get hit there and you've got some headaches, you're going to watch that."

Is there anyone who's been unfairly demonized more than him? "Win at all costs." Right.

  

(HT: the Wolverine Blog.)

Skill position contributions. My takeaway from the offense other than "duuurrrr" was that's what it looks like when the skill position players are adding yards of their own. Vincent Smith made a lot of great glide cuts on the zone stretch, spun through a couple tackles, and had his best day as a runner at Michigan. Junior Hemingway's sideline rain dance created another touchdown from 15-20 yards, and Roy Roundtree was finding epic YAC. That's something we've been missing most of the year save for Stonum's screen touchdown against UMass, which is UMass and was not the #15 defense in the country entering the game.

Stretching it. Speaking of the stretch: it came back. Michigan had gone almost exclusively to an inside run game earlier in the year, and that worked well enough, but I think part of the issue with getting Denard some zone keepers has been that move away. The stretch makes it tough on the backside defensive end because if he's going to tackle the tailback on a cutback he has to flow down the line hard. On all the inside zone stuff Michigan's been running he can hang out and do whatever and still have a decent chance of making a play. That's why Michigan has been blocking the backside guy all year and probably why I'm always a little frustrated by Denard never keeping the ball.

They brought it back for Illinois and I'm pretty sure what I'll see in the UFR is an ass-kicking day from David Molk. On Michigan's last touchdown they went to the stretch on second and goal from the five. Corey Liuget, who is an all-conference type of player, shot into the backfield; Molk walled him off and eventually sent him to the ground. There wasn't a hint of a hold on the play, but a frustrated Liuget did the flag motion thing to the referee and just stood there exasperated as Michigan celebrated a touchdown that came on a gaping hole from the five because Liuget had just gotten owned.

The stretch also seemed to revitalize Vincent Smith, who had the opportunity to make darting cuts past traffic and find the creases as they developed. I'll be interested to see how it holds up on film.

End of half game theory stuff. Reverse on the kickoff was a beautiful playcall because in that situation if you get hammered for a loss you can probably just run the clock out. A perfect time for that call and one that got Michigan in scoring position with a minute on the clock. That's a win.

In retrospect, the decision to kick was not so much. I didn't think about this at the time so I'm not blaming anyone else for not thinking about it either, but with Michigan's defense and 42 seconds (IIRC) on the clock the argument for going for it is a lot stronger than it would be with 12, because if you get it you're robbing Illinois of the opportunity to get that last possession in. Even if you don't get it, most coaches will just head to the locker room if they get the ball on their own 15.

Defensive moves. While the defense remained horrendous, it wasn't nearly as horrendous as it was against Penn State (and Matt McGloin did just bomb Northwestern for 35 points despite Robert Bolden playing the first two series, so that performance was only 90% completely awful). PSU had 41 points on nine real drives; Illinois had 45 in regulation on 16, many of which started in advantageous field position after Michigan turnovers and one Hagerup punt from his endzone.

Moving Craig Roh back to defensive end seemed to pay immediate dues, but Michigan kept flipping between three and four man lines with the fourth guy on the line either Obi Ezeh or JB Fitzgerald. Illinois ran right at that and had good success—that was the setup on the first and twenty option that went the distance, though I'm pretty sure the culpable party there was Mouton. Anyway, Cam Gordon looked a lot better in his second game at spur and you can tell the difference in tackling technique between him and Ray Vinopal—Vinopal uses his arms. Sweet.

Gordon looks like a much better fit as his current position. He was surprisingly adept at blitzing—he'd get the edge on the Illinios tackle and come around to flush Scheelhaase a few times.

image

Melanie Maxwell/AnnArbor.com

Demens,  yo. Another thing that will have to wait for the tape but: I'm pretty sure Kenny Demens had a great game unless he blew a lot of coverage (which is possible). The number of runs that were heading outside the tackles for what looked like big gains until they were suddenly cut down by Demens after he cut through a block seemed like it was around a half dozen.

Not a controversy but not a clear cut thing either. I was thinking this myself but Adam Jacobi already wrote it and blockquoting is easy:

Forcier is clearly not Denard, but the fact remains that Forcier is good enough that he should be spelling Robinson periodically throughout Michigan's game regardless of Robinson's health. Michigan has two starting-quality quarterbacks, and as Robinson's accumulation of minor injuries demonstrates, they clearly need to use them! It's just up to Rich Rodriguez to use both on his own terms, rather than waiting for Robinson to get knocked out of the game first.

The frequency of Denard Robinson dings has seen Forcier enter most games this year, with extended relief appearances in the fourth quarter of the Iowa and Illinois games. When Forcier comes in Michigan generally punts quickly (or Forcier yakety saxes an unforced fumble). Forcier gets his feet under him a bit later and things are fine. It may be time to put Forcier in on the regular, say two or three drives a game. This would reduce wear on Robinson, have Forcier ready to play each week, throw defenses a curveball, and lessen the chances a desperately-needed Forcier lights out for somewhere else after the season. The offense doesn't seem quite as good when Tate's in there but the difference isn't vast and the benefits are tangible.

Special K, I hate you. The level of odiousness from Special K was exceeded by a factor of 100 on Saturday when he played "Let the Bodies Hit the Floor" and "Down with the Sickness." We've gone from minor league hockey to WWE. Thanks, Special K. This is the no-BS one thing that makes me think the Brandon era will be something other than a success: he hasn't taken this guy and put him in stocks on the diag.

Elsewhere

The game broke SBNation's animated drive chart widget. MVictors covers the Mud Bowl and has a photo gallery from the game. Cake:

mmb-cake

Some photos from an Illinois guy. AnnArbor.com has an extensive collection as well.. Purdue blogger guarantees victory over Michigan. The Hoover Street Rag riffs on A Better Son/Daughter. Doc Sat's take:

If for some reason you were kidnapped by maniac who forced you at gunpoint to make sense of Michigan's roller-coaster season in 12 words or less, you'd probably settle for something like this: The offense is unstoppable. The defense is horrible. Denard Robinson got hurt.

If you hadn't seen a single one of the Wolverines' first eight games, that would pretty much bring you up to speed coming into today, except for one minor detail: Against a string of respectable competition over the last month, you could also add "Wolverines lose."

And a random video of the Michigan drumline:

There's another one on the tubes as well.

An finally, Maize n Brew headline:

Hallelujah!!!! Holy S@#%

Comments

grand river fi…

November 8th, 2010 at 12:00 PM ^

*(The moment in American literature when ironically capitalizing marketing messages to assert that the background radiation of advertising has become our national discourse has mercifully passed—David Foster Wallace got away with it a few times but only just, and not always.)

Agreed, I even think it falls flat in Ulysses  

El Jeffe

November 8th, 2010 at 12:00 PM ^

Maybe it's just the trials, tribulations, and all-around Sisyphusian nature of the past three years, but I find this team to have a rootability factor the likes of which I have never experienced. And I've experienced from 1974-2010.

So Donald Duck wakes up hongry and shreds the opposition for 246 yards. What's better than that? I submit nothing. Nothing is better.

saveferris

November 8th, 2010 at 12:26 PM ^

Is there anyone who's been unfairly demonized more than him? "Win at all costs."  Right.

Seconded.  To all those out there who suggested that Rich Rodriguez cares not a wit for the welfare of this players (ahem, Mike Valenti....ahem, Free Press hack squad), I'd like to take a moment to say, "Fuck you".

Apologies for the profanity MGoGentlemen...but I feel better now.

[Footnote to all parents of potential recruits....please read above.  Take away:  Rich Rodriguez cares about the welfare of your son more than winning.]

Tater

November 8th, 2010 at 12:05 PM ^

I have been wanting to see Forcier get two or three drives a game since his first relief performance.  I like giving other teams more to prepare for, too.  Their tempos are different, and it should drive opposing DC's even more nuts than the team already does.

profitgoblue

November 8th, 2010 at 12:06 PM ^

This was my first game back to the Big House in 4 years and that headline from Maize n Brew (quote from Clark Griswold) sums up my feelings at the end of the third overtime precisely.  Hallelujah!  Holy Sh-t! 

jamiemac

November 8th, 2010 at 12:12 PM ^

Brian, welcome back to the Vinny Smith Fan Club. I knew you would be back, so I kept your seat warm and stocked up on your favorite whiskey.

Also, we're allowed to count Tate's numbers this week? I was told by some that his Iowa nmbers didnt prove the offense was effective or even better that a year ago. But, we're good here, right?

LOL

Go Blue, Beat Purdue

matty blue

November 8th, 2010 at 12:17 PM ^

his scrambling flights of fancy drive me nuts, but they almost certainly drive opposing defensive coordinators nuts.  a completely different second set of opposing keys for defenses might rev up the offense even further.  if that's even possible.

also - cake?  i thought they only did that for the final home game...and i have wisconsin tickets.  ah, well.

M-Wolverine

November 8th, 2010 at 12:17 PM ^

Needs to come to more games.
<br>
<br>Days like today are why it's great to read MGoBlog.
<br>
<br>But then, days like Saturday are why it's great to be a Michigan Wolverine.

jamiemac

November 8th, 2010 at 12:37 PM ^

I can hear the band waaaaaaay up in my cheap seats in Section 14 for the first time in close to a decade. We can actually do Temptation--well, when we actually force punts--up there now since we can finally freaking hear it. So, I am sold. It was all about wanting to hear the band anyway, at least for me.

iawolve

November 8th, 2010 at 12:27 PM ^

and the accompanying 1000 years of darkness that would occur as a result of some inter-dimensional hole opening up due to the incredible irony of Zook=Coach of the Year. At 9-3 he would have a damn good shot. We dodged a bullet once, twice we might not be so lucky.

Kilgore Trout

November 8th, 2010 at 12:34 PM ^

" stadium was strangely muted once it became clear that touchdowns were more like baskets than goals"

Agreed.  It's a strange game when a team gets a touchdown, and you kind of just say, "ok, let's see where it goes from here" rather than being upset or thrilled. 

Ziff72

November 8th, 2010 at 12:34 PM ^

I was pretty adamant that Tate needed to be the starter to maintain offensive balance and mix in Denard.  I admit defeat due to Denard's awesomeness and hard work that  have made him a good passer.

I have been saying for a couple weeks now that I don't want Tate to come in for a series or 2, but I want him ready with helmet on ready to come in for a play or 2 during the series.

My thinking is this,  Denard is unreal and to take him off the field removes an element of danger from our offense, but how much does Denard lose his effectiveness over the course of the drive?

After 2 or 3 consecutive Denard runs the guy is tired, just like a RB would be.   When people say his accuarcy is off, how many times does he make a bad throw after a long run because his legs are tired and his mechanics break down?   How many times does he not break a run because he lost that little burst because his lungs are burning?

I think the best course of action is to pull Denard after he has a couple of taxing plays and put Tate in for a play or two to allow Denard to catch his breath and get back in there.   If Denard has an easy series where he hands off a lot or they are easy throws then he takes it the whole way, but I think spelling him a play or 2 will keep him fresher on the drive and near the end of the game and it keeps Tate engaged and ready if Denard goes down and it will keep him mentally sharp in practice knowing he will be most certainly be playing the whole game.

Yostal

November 8th, 2010 at 12:40 PM ^

If I have a quick text on my phone that says "Damn you Journey!" knowing it will be used in the second quarter of every game, we have several problems.  (And yes, one of them is mine, but that is neither here nor there.)

Amping the band has been great, we should continue to proceed in that direction.

If there must be canned in game music, I say we take the current playlist, eject any cliches, any thing mortifying, and then filter the remaining six songs into a Pandora station called "Special K Replacement" and start finding stuff that will become Michigan's own rather than just recycling "Seven Nation Army" from PSU/OSU.

Heck, Bobby Kennedy was right: "We've got a bunch of smart guys. We lock 'em in a room and kick 'em in the ass until they come up with some solutions..."

*--Yes, I know Jack White is from Michigan, this is not the point here.

msoccer10

November 8th, 2010 at 12:54 PM ^

I would prefer the band to rawk, but if you are going to use piped in music, at least make it our own. I would add that the timing of said music sucks and it should be used to quiet opposing fans in certain situations and have a few situation appropriate songs that are used rather than the seemingly haphazard way it has been used at the games I have gone to.

MightAndMainWeCheer

November 8th, 2010 at 12:52 PM ^

I think that was another example of where it should be RPS-1 and Kovacs (-2) and not Mouton's fault initially.  Kovacs shoots upfield again and the Illinois blocker only needed to make a marginal block to get Kovacs to fly out of the play.  Kovacs wasn't really in a position to make a play on any of the three options (initial dive/inside zone, QB, pitchman), and again Illinois ran the play as if he wasn't even there.

He put Vinopal in a tough spot (having both the QB and the pitchman); had Kovacs not shot upfield, he would have had a chance at the QB which would have allowed Vinopal to focus on the pitchman.

Obviously Mouton makes a very awkward-looking and ineffective tackle attempt 20 yards downfield , which maybe actually deserves a minus b/c it was so horrible, but the play blowing up wasn't his fault.  Against an option, you need to play your assignments and Mouton is supposed to play the inside dive/zone.

Again, blitzing Kovacs against that particular play is probably something that GERG would want back, or he would have preferred to have somebody bigger blitzing so that they could take on the blocker rather than trying to avoid him (exacerbated by Kovacs going to the inside shoulder of the blocker).

riverrat

November 8th, 2010 at 12:54 PM ^

I'm curious about the entire O-Line's UFR, especially on pass blocking, and if there is a difference between pass blocking for Robinson vs. Forcier...in the numbers at least...

Seth

November 8th, 2010 at 1:07 PM ^

He's probably sitting at his desk right now, mouth slightly ajar and drooling, involuntarily twitching out the words "so" and "awesome" as the rest of the class learns to count to 15 in Spanish. Plans to put him on ritalin have been temporarily shelved. His father has been asked "what did you do to the boy?"

This was so me after my first Michigan weekend, after Desmond engineered a one-man destruction of Indiana. I didn't know things like "Indiana is Indiana" or "24-16 over those guys is actually not so good." I had a notebook and a pencil, and was having the hardest time figuring out how to doodle realistic-looking Michigan helmets so I could draw "21" on the guy's chest and have flames shooting out of his back and stuff.

At least for this kid, he won't be all that disappointed when he goes back and looks at the stats from that game to find it was actually a rather pedestrian day for his hero.

Yostal

November 8th, 2010 at 1:15 PM ^

This.

Plus, it didn't hurt that Hemingway, wearing 21, pulled off a little magic in "Desmond's corner" on that two point conversion in the third overtime.

I just hope he understands that they won't always score 67 points, the halftime show will not always feature a reenactment of Rufus on Brutus crime, and Michigan won't always win in three overtimes.  Life is just full of disappoinments that way.

The FannMan

November 8th, 2010 at 2:28 PM ^

This is possibly the greatest idea I have ever seen on this blog.  (Yes, really.)  Why is there no plaque or lettering or picture or something?  Damn, you are on to something here!  If you don't e-mail Brandon with your suggestion, I will.

The FannMan

November 8th, 2010 at 3:35 PM ^

Of course your're right.  Hell, the whole place was AC's first.  But, Desmond happened when I was in school and when we really, really, really needed to beat ND.  (Back when ND was ND.)  Given that is probably not a good enough reason, here a few others.   It was not just a big catch, it was an incredible catch.  He stretched out fully and brought it in.   Desmond also won the Heisman that year - at the time no Michigan player had won for decades.  The catch, which made the cover of SI, started his campaign.  He had a pretty good pro career, with a Super Bowl MVP award.  He has also stayed involved in college football through ESPN.  Throughout, he was a great citizen and always had a smile on his face.  (Denard reminds me of him in that way.)  I think it would be cool to have something special for the 20th anniversary of the catch next year.  Nothing big - just a marker making it Desmond's corner.  It would also connect the current program to players who were recuited by Bo and played for Mo.

As I type this, I know that it will never happen for exacly the reason you state.  But, it struck me as pretty cool.  Besides, it is the internet - home of good ideas that will never be.

InterM

November 8th, 2010 at 1:25 PM ^

is a lot more fun than post-PSU "FIRE CORCH" Brian.  Welcome back -- but please remind your passengers to keep their seat belts fastened, because the season isn't over and some continued turbulence is to be expected.

lexus larry

November 8th, 2010 at 1:25 PM ^

But 13 y/o's can also have the "incessant-Facebook-updating-floating-on-a-cloud-best-game-EVAR" slack-jawed and glassy-eyed bliss.

My son, Gameboy, was just that lad.  So awesome was the win, he collapsed into bed well before SNL, but was able to beat back the demons of DST falling back, and arose to find Detroit ABC affiliate sports anchor Don Shane taking a personal foul on the chin (in 1/15th slo-mo) on the DVR, courtesy of Tate Forcier and un-named PF Illini defender.

Excellent summary of the day, the game, the sensation.  Thanks, Brian!

ForestCityBlue

November 8th, 2010 at 1:26 PM ^

It was just a kind of sublime, Twilight Zone, experience. 

One thought kept running through the back of my mind the whole game:  Hell, forget a kill-all-we-see defence.  If we could get to the level where we can make two or three stops a game, this team will down right frightening.

For all the lack of defence, it was an edge of the seat experience unlike few games I have ever watch.  As my high school age boys are want to say, "It was EPIC."

 

Darth Vader

November 8th, 2010 at 6:11 PM ^

I think the bigger point was to look at our record-setting offense, and pair it with not even a good defense, but one that performs maybe just under average (with its two or three major stops per game) and we're team that's always going to come out with more points.  Make it a good defense and we're stompin' at the savoy.

Now conjure up a defense like 2006...