Hello: Michael Barrett Comment Count

Ace


Despite gaudy passing stats, this is a running back. [Valdosta Daily]

At somewhere in the neighborhood of 6-foot-even, 215-pounds, Valdosta (GA) Lowndes athlete Michael Barrett faced a choice: remain at quarterback in an option system, likely at in-state Georgia Tech, or give that up in favor of being more of an Ohio State-style H-back (think thicc Curtis Samuel):

Looking at the two pictures above, you'd probably want to see Barrett in more of a running back role for his future NFL prospects. Barrett apparently agreed, choosing the Wolverines over the Yellow Jackets this evening with a post on Twitter. He's the 21st commit in the 2018 class, the second to pledge in three days, and the third who should spend a large portion of his time at running back, joining Hassan Haskins and Christian Turner.

In semi-related news, Michael Barrett the football player rather difficult to google these days.

GURU RATINGS

Rivals ESPN 247 247 Comp
3*, 5.6, NR ATH,
#72 GA
3*, 78, #50 ATH,
#63 GA
3*, 86, #70 ATH,
#84 GA, #811 Ovr
3*, #64 ATH,
#72 GA, #733 Ovr

I'm honestly not sure how to reconcile Barrett's very middling rankings with his decent offer sheet, solid tape, and remarkable high school production. I know Georgia is loaded with talent, but he looks like he deserves a higher placement than, at best, 63rd in the state.

All three sites list Barrett at 6'0" (except 247, which docks him a half-inch) and somewhere between 200 and 215 pounds. That is very much a running back build.

[Hit THE JUMP for scouting, video, some very impressive stats, and more.]

SCOUTING

There is surprisingly little out there on Barrett given he starred for multiple seasons against high-level Georgia competition. Even though Barrett was the region player of the year in Georgia's largest classification as a junior and articles indicate he attended at least a couple camps with media coverage last spring, a scouring of the recruiting sites reveal only one full scouting report. It's an underclassman eval from fire-and-forget ESPN:

Strengths: Versatile. May not be a QB for everyone, but is a dynamic runner. Plays faster than his listed times. Looks and moves like a tailback. Has good size and should continue to fill out. May be a SS at the next level. Good overall quickness and agility. Good ball handler. Areas of Improvement: May not be a burner. Has a live arm, but erratic and would need polish and development. Bottomline: Good player, very good athlete that plays at a good school against quality people. Competes. Viable option on both sides of the ball.

The only other available pieces of information are Barrett's stats, which are rather bonkers and will make you wonder why Joe Milton is the quarterback of this class (via MaxPreps)...

Year Comp-Att (%) Yards YPA TD INT Rush Yards YPC Rush TD
Senior 111-174 (63.8%) 1705 9.8 16 2 129 1195 9.3 13
Junior 132-213 (62.0%) 2753 12.9 27 6 168 1283 7.6 21

...and his film, which should answer that question when you see his throwing motion:

He makes enough impressive, unorthodox throws to make you think he could hack it at quarterback; then he takes off running and you want to see much more of that. Since there was a dearth of updated scouting reports out there, we had the new Mr. Future Blue, Adam Schnepp, break down Barrett's senior tape with a focus on his probable future at running back (I've added emphasis):

I can see why Michigan's been after Mike Barrett for so long. He's obviously fast, but I came away from viewing his nine-game tape more impressed with how he utilizes his quickness than with his straight-line speed. He repeatedly sped up and slowed down as defenders drew closer so as to force them into either taking a bad angle or missing the tackle entirely. He also showed that he can stick a foot in the ground and change directions without losing speed. Barrett was rarely brought down by the first free defender he encountered. He also runs low to the ground and with good balance.

That all means very little, though, if a guy doesn't know where he's going. Barrett's decision-making was excellent, and he made good decisions quickly. I thought the most impressive part of his quarterbacking was his ability to throw accurately on the run despite funky mechanics; he was able to get out of the pocket and find the open man repeatedly, and he did so while fitting the ball into some fairly tight windows. As a runner, he always ran to the right side of his block in the open field. This is a guy who isn't going to run into a clogged frontside B gap when the backside A gap is there for the taking because he has good vision and processes what he sees quickly and accurately.

I think Barrett has greater utility as a running back because of his quick-decision-making-plus-elusiveness combo and Michigan's roster composition, but he's not a bad quarterback. His throwing motion is very reminiscent of a shot putter, and though not aesthetically pleasing, the resulting throws were shockingly accurate. While Barrett's arm strength is satisfactory it's not a plus. 

There you have it. Barrett should develop into a stocky, 220- or 230- pound back who's at his best operating between the tackles.

OFFERS

Barrett holds offers from Georgia Tech, LSU, Maryland, Michigan State, NC State, Nebraska, South Carolina, Tennessee, UCF, USF, Virginia, and West Virginia, among others. Other than Georgia Tech, I believe all the power conference schools were recruiting him as a running back or athlete, not a quarterback.

HIGH SCHOOL

First of all, Barrett spearheaded a record-setting season for Lowndes in 2017:

The Vikings finished 11-1 after a perfect 10-0 regular season led them to a Region 1-7A championship (their first region title since 2010). They set a new school record for points scored in a season with 627, shattering the previous record of 594 from last year. The offensive outpour allowed Lowndes to become the 60th team in Georgia high school history to pass 600 points in a season, according to the Georgia High School Football Historians Association. Lowndes scored 50 points or more in nine games.

The school has produced several Power 5 signees in the Rivals era (2002-present), including former FSU signees Greg Reid, Telvin Smith, and Gerald Demps.

STATS

In addition to the offensive stats posted above, Barrett accrued some solid numbers as a defensive back in his sophomore year, recording 44 tackles (27 solo) with three TFLs, two interceptions, two pass breakups, and two fumble recoveries. He scored six total touchdowns that year: four rushing (on only 30 carries; he also had six two-point coversions) and one each on fumble and kickoff returns.

FAKE 40 TIME

Barrett's ESPN page lists SPARQ-verified combine numbers: a 4.67 40 (zero FAKEs), 4.40 shuttle, 34.4-inch vertical, and 37.5-foot powerball throw for a solid all-around score of 95.7. While he doesn't have the most wiggle, he's got solid explosiveness and decent straight-line speed.

VIDEO

Nearly 19 minutes of junior highlights:

Single-game reels can be found on his Hudl page.

PREDICTION BASED ON FLIMSY EVIDENCE

Barrett should indeed wind up at running back unless things really go pear-shaped at quarterback or he makes the six-foot-nothing, power-running version of Vince Young thing work for him enough to win over the coaches; for many reasons, especially the passing talent of the other quarterbacks on the roster, that'd be a surprise.

Instead, he should battle with classmates Haskins and Turner, as well as Kurt Taylor, for scattered snaps behind the returning RB corps of Karan Higdon, Chris Evans, Kareem Walker, and O'Maury Samuels. Barrett has the added dimension of his passing ability as a means to work his way onto the field; on the other hand, he also has the least experience as an actual running back. He's got the physical ability to develop into a tough, one-cut back; it might take him a few years to get there, especially since Jim Harbaugh isn't going to stop recruiting talent in the backfield.

UPSHOT FOR THE REST OF THE CLASS

It's now got 21 members in a class that should add a few more. With wide receivers JaMarr Chase and Chris Olave, who were relatively luxaries, looking like longshots, the focus is primarily on offensive tackle (Jarrett Patterson, Nick Petit-Frere), defensive tackle (mostly a question mark), and retaining Otis Reese (looking better recently).

Comments

WindyCityWolverine

January 23rd, 2018 at 10:05 PM ^

https://n.rivals.com/news/michael-barrett-says-goblue

"I have known inside for a while it was Michigan, but I wanted to be sure," Barrett said. "I had to make sure I was making the right choice. I talked it out with my family, I prayed about it and I made the final decision today."

"I just got a good feel for the place when I took my visit, and I can see myself being there the next three to four years," he said. "Michigan has a great program, the coaches are great and I feel for me, this is the best opportunity."

"They want to use me like Jabril Peppers on offense," Barrett said. "They want me as a running back, they want me to play some Wildcat and they want to use me on special teams.

"It will be a great opportunity for me. Different schools wanted to use me in different ways, and I think I could be successful in different roles. I am excited about the opportunity Michigan is giving me at this position."

Bones032

January 23rd, 2018 at 10:21 PM ^

I like him as a prospect, I am just so confused by this recruiting class. We lose 0 DBs and bring in 5 commits and 1 grad transfer. We lose 1 RB and bring in 3 commits. We lose 1 TEs(counting Asiasi here) and bring in 2 commits. We lose 0 DEs and bring in 3 commits. But no DTs, only 2 OL(1 who might be a TE) Would just love to be in the coaches room when they discussed this roster and the decisions to bring in these numbers at these positions.

Whole Milk

January 24th, 2018 at 8:52 AM ^

It does seem a bit odd in places, but others, not so much. Look at the DB's for instance, we will lose Kinnell, Watson, and Hughes after this year, and that is not even considering that there is a legitimate possibility that we will also lose one of or both Hill and Long. If that happened, our corners would be down to Ambry and St. Juste of guys who are currently on the roster. That leads me to believe that the coaching staff recognizes how good the two corners on this team are, and are preparing appropriately for the chance that both are drafted in 2019 by bringing in 4 corners.

Recruiting doesn't tend to be about next years team needs, it is about the years after that. I am concerned about DT simply from a numbers stand point, but I have faith that the coaches know what they are doing.

outsidethebox

January 23rd, 2018 at 10:22 PM ^

I know he was trending to Michigan but I was still shocked by this decision. 

Love this kids tape...bs on the three stars...this kid is football player. It will be interesting to see where they play him...curious that Partridge was a force in pushing for his (continued) recruitment. I watched a lot of his tape...he was the fastest kid on the field...every game...in big-time Georgia hs football. Michigan has not had a 6'0' 225 RB who does not go down when someone sneezes on them for a long time. But he could play everywhere from RB, QB, WILDCAT, ILB, OLB, SS to FS...and he is an excellent kick returner as well.

Don

January 23rd, 2018 at 10:42 PM ^

was offering him as a QB. From what I saw on his senior film, he's far more dangerous as a throwing QB with the ability to pull the ball down and get positive yards; just running with the ball he's got good body control in tight spaces and good juking ability, but doesn't have the speed to hit the home run very often. Doesn't strike me as a difference-maker purely as an RB.

Seems like he would work great in a RR-style spread, but maybe there aren't enough blue-chip programs running that who offered him. 

Regardless, sounds like a high-quality young man who's very coachable and team-oriented, and knows what it takes to lead a team to a championship.

outsidethebox

January 24th, 2018 at 6:49 AM ^

On film he is always the fastest kid on the field...in the highest class of Georgia HS football. This kid is "football" fast. Obviuosly he is also very powerful...looks like he could be one of those Alabama backs who run over, through and away from linebackers. Michigan could surely find a way to use a Scarbrough or Harris-don't ya think???

Don

January 24th, 2018 at 11:00 AM ^

Barnett is nowhere as big as Scarborough and Harris

Coming out of HS, 247 listed Scarborough as 6-2/226, and Harris as 6-3/236.

Barnett is maybe 6-0 and 215. Doesn't mean he can't be a decent back, but he's not going to be running over people like those other two.

Losher

January 24th, 2018 at 11:07 AM ^

If youre talking about damien harris, the running back who was once committed to michigan youre just slightly off on how big he was listed at coming at of high school. he was listed at 5'11 and 205 pounds, just about the same size as barrett. 

najee harris is a different breed of guy though, damien harris is quuick with some power as opposed to the physically dominating presence that najee harris is

EconClassof14

January 23rd, 2018 at 11:37 PM ^

If his athleticism/quickness aren't there as a RB, I could see him bulking up to ~230 and being a slightly smaller 2016 Khalid Hill. Lining up as a H back, short handoffs, crack blocks on the edge/ pass pro and the occassional short outlet pass

dragonchild

January 24th, 2018 at 11:01 AM ^

Obviously I'm speculating, but I think beyond the very obvious needs of the first couple years, Harbaugh is inherently against the idea of going out and recruiting "just a guy".  Hence the lack of depth at tackle.  Hence all the ridiculously talented young receivers.  He'd rather whiff on 5-stars and bring in a bunch of ballers and figure out where to put them than grab a generic 3-star to be a warm body.  I mean, he'll do the latter, but only when absolutely necessary and arguably not enough.

This class they whiffed on the best prospects, so beyond very minimal depth needs they're going after fliers left and right -- recruits who are as likely to become stars as get buried in the depth chart and transfer out.  So the position groups are all out of whack, but I don't think they're that concerned.  It is fair to criticize that, assuming I'm right.

iMBlue2

January 24th, 2018 at 8:35 AM ^

I see a lot of similarities. Same homestate, star ranking, bunch of production in tough high school division, stature, position and position switch. Some quick stop and start to get defenders out of position and rur with power through arm tackles created by out of position defenders. Young McKinnon turned out very well and I bet if he had opted to play RB before his recruiting the offers would have been there. I’ll take it.

Blue in PA

January 24th, 2018 at 8:50 AM ^

I'm betting we do see more of an option look to the offense, trending toward the style that we've struggled with in late november for too many years.

Whatever it takes.... GO BLUE

Sopwith

January 24th, 2018 at 1:12 PM ^

that look like they're playing against middle school teams.

This is not one of those. The opponents he's playing against look like big, fast, athletic high school kids, and in a couple of cases, could have fooled me into thinking I was looking at a small college team. 

Good competition seems...good.

GoBlueSouth

January 24th, 2018 at 10:49 PM ^

Has played his entire career against some of the top high school football teams in the nation.Lowndes County in South Georgia is a powerhouse and they play against some great teams like their rival Valdosta. Very good get for Michigan and this kid will wind up playing on D or playing RB. He is a 3 star because Georgia is LOADED with great talent just like Florida.