Getting Ready for the B1G Stretch Run Comment Count

Alex Cook

b1g em scatter

b1g standings

With just four games remaining for most Big Ten teams, it’s pretty safe to say at this point: the Big Ten just isn’t that good this season. Of the seven teams with positive efficiency margins in conference play, only three – Purdue, Wisconsin, and Maryland – are locks to make it into the NCAA Tournament; the other four (Northwestern, Minnesota, Michigan State, Michigan) will probably total three or four bids, but none are safe with three weeks remaining in the season.

While the top three aren’t likely to receive impressive seeds in the NCAA Tournament (mostly due to a lack of significant non-conference wins and the general mediocrity of their conference opponents), there could be some surprises in March. As of right now, the Bracket Matrix has Purdue as a 4, Wisconsin as a 5, and Maryland as a 6.

  • PURDUE: Feature National Player of the Year candidate and likely 1st-team All-American PF/C Caleb Swanigan (as well as 7’2 gargantuan Isaac Haas), one of the best three-point shooting teams in the country, in the top 20 nationally on offense and defense.
  • WISCONSIN: Veteran team with five multi-year starters, have one of the most unique big men in college hoops in Ethan Happ (a defensive menace) as well as two key seniors in guard Bronson Koenig and wing Nigel Hayes, have a top 10 defense nationally.
  • MARYLAND: Rank much lower than the other two in computer metrics, but have won a lot of close games throughout the season, start three impressive freshmen in Anthony Cowan, Kevin Huerter, and Justin Jackson, offense and defense are outside top 40 nationally.

Maryland is a year ahead of schedule and quite unlikely to make it to the Sweet 16, in my opinion, although Melo Trimble’s record in tight games over his three seasons in College Park have indicated that the Terps possess perhaps more late-game chops than the conventional statistical wisdom of “results of coin flips are random” would suggest. The Cowan / Huerter / Jackson trio is the best young nucleus in the conference, but tournament success will be difficult for such a young team. I’ve been mostly wrong about UMD since they’ve joined the Big Ten though, so who knows.

Wisconsin and Purdue are better equipped to do some damage as part of March Madness: the Badgers made a surprise run to the Sweet 16 last season and the Boilermakers were felled in a 4/13 first round upset. Recent offensive struggles and a hobbled  Koenig make me a little more leery of Wisconsin’s prospects, but their experience and the presence of Happ make them a relatively safe bet.

Purdue is probably the best team in the Big Ten; a frontcourt of Swanigan and Haas is a formidable matchup for any team, and Matt Painter has surrounded them with a cast of sharpshooters who enable them to operate effectively inside. Teams with strong offense and defense (as opposed to one or the other) as well as one of the best players in the country are always threats to make a deep run and the Boilermakers could be a Final Four team if things break right – though their guard play is still suspect.

[More on the Big Ten – including the bubble – after the JUMP]

The last major conference to add a tournament at the end of the regular season was the Big Ten, so the more coveted conference title is contested over an 18-game schedule against league opponents. Wisconsin was my pick to win and they’re currently tied with Purdue at 11-3 – Maryland is a game back at 10-4 after losing a game in Madison against the Badgers this past weekend.

Based on the Kenpom win probabilities for each team’s remaining schedule, it should be a close race to the finish:

end of b1g

All three teams are favored in each of their remaining games; the toughest matchups for each team are Purdue @ Michigan, Wisconsin @ Michigan State, and Minnesota @ Maryland. A split title in some form seems to be the likeliest scenario, though there’s a chance that either Purdue or Wisconsin could win out from here.

* * *


Minnesota is a near-lock to make the field. [Patrick Barron]

The other four Big Ten teams currently projected to be in the field are Minnesota (7), Northwestern (8), Michigan (10) and Michigan State (10). As of right now, the Gophers and Wildcats(!) are fairly safe; both teams have been pleasant surprises this season and will likely finish in the top half of the conference standings. Theoretically an implosion down the stretch from either could bump them out of the tournament, but each already has 20 wins and Northwestern has locked up at least a .500 record in Big Ten play.

The Wolverines and Spartans are both present in nearly every mock bracket, though a rough close to the season could drop either to the “First Four” in Dayton or even out of March Madness entirely. Michigan State just lost 5th-year senior guard Eron Harris to an injury – their third season-ending loss of a veteran rotation piece this season (though the first in the backcourt). With remaining games against Wisconsin at home and on the road against Maryland, the Spartans have some opportunities for big wins – but their current record (16-11) is unimpressive and a couple more losses could be devastating. They had a typically difficult Izzo strength of schedule, but their best wins are against Wichita State at a neutral site and against Minnesota on the road.

Michigan is in better position: with their recent win over Wisconsin, holding serve in road games that they’re supposed to win – @ Rutgers and @ Nebraska – should be good enough to solidify a spot for the Wolverines, assuming that there aren’t any nasty surprises in the Big Ten Tournament. Improved defense since the beginning of conference play has been the difference (although the recent loss to Minnesota represented a step back in that regard) – Michigan’s offense is the best in the league and they have a lot of potential if they play even adequate defense.

Seven tournament bids will probably be the max for the Big Ten with Indiana’s slide to the NIT.

* * *

There’s been a fair amount of discussion about the mediocrity in the Big Ten this season, so I decided to take a look at how the quality of teams stacks up against the recent past. The data in these charts comes from the Kenpom ratings:

b1g em over time

Note: the big outlier in 2015 was the Kaminsky-Dekker Wisconsin team that came within a few possessions of winning the national title.

Typically there are stronger teams at the top than there are in 2017. Only Purdue and Wisconsin are in the top 25 nationally in the Kenpom rankings – and the only teams with an adjusted efficiency margin over 20. The middle of the conference is clustered pretty tightly which has made for parity in the league but the Big Ten is ultimately as weak as it’s been in recent years – 2015 was at least bolstered by a truly elite Wisconsin crowd.

This is how the Big Ten stacks up against the other top conferences in 2017:

conference ems

1) Big 12, 2) ACC, 3) Big East, 4) Big Ten, 5) SEC, 6) Pac-12

The Big 12 is probably the best conference in college hoops – the floor of the conference is higher than others; Kansas is on track to win its 13th consecutive conference title, which is a remarkably impressive accomplishment. The ACC has six teams with an adjusted efficiency margin of over 20, far more than the Big Ten. Villanova in the Big East and Kentucky and Florida in the SEC are more highly-rated than any team from the Big Ten. Even the Pac-12, which is quite bad at the bottom, has three standout squads in Oregon, Arizona, and UCLA.

While the Big Ten probably isn’t the worst league of those six, it’s undeniably been a down year in the conference – the slides by Indiana and Ohio State loom large as a part of that.

Comments

blue90

February 21st, 2017 at 3:27 PM ^

No reason MSU should be in the conversation, even for the past few weeks. They have one(Wichita state) if any impressive wins and have lost every top 25 game they've played. They also have BAD losses. It's incredibly annoying how just because they're MSU people assume they should just be in, especially even the committee who knows better. I hope they lose their next 4 games.

Yinka Double Dare

February 21st, 2017 at 3:30 PM ^

Definitely a bad year when the conference looks most similar to the perennial two-team SEC. The best of the B1G aren't as good as usual, and there aren't as many good teams as usual either. 

wolverinekeith

February 21st, 2017 at 3:38 PM ^

Need to split v. Purdue and @NW, and win @Rutgers and @Nebraska.  10-8 B1G, 20-11 overall.  Even with a loss in the first round of the BTT, that should be enough to get in and avoid the play-in games.  

zlionsfan

February 21st, 2017 at 3:45 PM ^

Purdue was actually a 5/12 upset victim last year, which makes a little more sense because The School Formerly Known As UALR was closer to the top of the remaining conference champions, but that still doesn't make up for the loss.

It's no coincidence that I really would prefer that Purdue stay up in the 4s. I think that the Boilers are much better prepared for that odd, unusual thing that some call Press* this season, but also agree that guard play is the weak spot. (Well, that and foul trouble. Put Teddy V on the floor and anything can happen.)

*I'm not sure which is more odd, that Painter could have learned more about breaking a press simply by staying in the same building and watching the women's team practice, or that Sharon Versyp can simultaneously be disappointing at her job and also know something better than Painter apparently does.

ryholly

February 21st, 2017 at 3:53 PM ^

You can't rip MSU and say Michigan is that much better.  We are 17-10, they are 16-11.  They have a better big ten record.  They played a much tougher Big Ten slate.  We are esentially neck and neck.

 

Why should they be out and we should be in?

TrueBlue2003

February 21st, 2017 at 4:31 PM ^

they beat WSU and beat us, beat Minn twice, beat NW.

We beat SMU, beat them, beat Wisc but then....not much else. Marquette I guess?

They are definitely not as good as us, when you account for margins and even "eye test", but their resume is very close in terms of quality of Ws and Ls.  Unfortunately, I don't think this committee can dig into the weeds and use eye test like the CFP committee does.  It's more about resume and unfortunately, RPI weighs into that.

blue90

February 22nd, 2017 at 9:32 AM ^

The selection committee is updating how they pick teams.  See these links because you clearly haven't been reading anything.

https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/the-ncaa-is-modernizing-the-way-it…

http://www.sbnation.com/college-basketball/2017/1/13/14264948/ncaa-tour…

RPI is an outdated measure and should not hold that much sway.  The only reason I can think of that MSU is in the field and not clearly out is their AD is head of the selection committee, like Ace said. They have just two quality wins, WSU and NU, (that's number 25 and not ranked); Minny could be slightly seen as quality but also not.  We have two wins over top 20 teams and no bad losses, unless you count Iowa which could or could not be seen as a bad loss.  You can also look at head to heads, which luckily we have two of and we clearly were the better team, given that they barely beat us at home and we smoked them by 30.  They should be barely out of the tourney field and we should be barely in the tourney field.  After these next few games, I think it will be clear that they are not going to make it and we will, I guess that's all that matters.

Frank Chuck

February 21st, 2017 at 10:17 PM ^

We have the best offense and the second worst defense in the Big Ten.

This post gives further credence to the notion that Michigan has one of the worst defenses of any power 5 team. Ouch.