Game Over, Insert Freshman To Continue Comment Count

Brian

10/14/2017 – Michigan 27, Indiana 20 (OT) – 5-1, 2-1 Big Ten

37000927384_4682b3b2b8_z

[Bryan Fuller]

I am at stage five. I have passed through denial, anger, bargaining, and depression. And here we are: acceptance. Michigan is not very good this year. I accept that they are rebuilding.

Well... wait. Let me rephrase that. 60% of Michigan is righteous. 20% is questionable but encouraging. 20% is a deep, black pit of infinite depth that you fall through for hours at a time. The walls murmur foul, unspeakable red-zone stats. You yell "I DON'T BELIEVE RED ZONE OFFENSE IS MEANINGFULLY DIFFERENT FROM OVERALL OFFENSE"; the walls ignore you. Occasionally a gust of wind buffets you from below, braking your descent. It doesn't really matter, though. Terminal velocity or soon-to-reach terminal velocity are functionally identical when you are dropping forever in an inky expanse of nothing, waiting for the sickening crunch that will never come except when it does about every 365 days.

Woe! Woe! Fire and flame, death and brimstone! Woe. Dolorous woe.

...is what you might have said like 15 years ago when this stuff still had the capacity to hurt you. Now? Nah. Some Indiana fan sent me a picture of scoreboard from The Horror on Saturday and I just snorted. This is no longer a fanbase that considers 7-5 the "Year of Infinite Pain," as this site did way back in the ancient past. Michigan's going to lose some more games this year and end up in Florida on New Year's Day.

That's more or less fine. They return something like 21 starters next year, give or take QB. This depends on whether or not Brandon Peters can humorously conk John O'Korn in the head and sneakily don his jersey at some point in the next few weeks.

-------------------------------

You've probably figured it out already but the righteous bits are the run defense,  the pass defense, and special teams. The questionable-but-encouraging bit is a ground game that appears to be waking up and putting things together. And the black, infinite, inky pit is the passing offense.

O'Korn's 10-for-20, 58 yard performance was actually worse than last year's Indiana game, when he managed 59 yards on 16 throws. Michigan completed three passes for four yards in the second half—two of them screens—and did not even think about involving O'Korn in their attempts to put away the game. It got so bad that on one of Michigan's few downfield attempts of the fourth quarter that Official Journalists were barely concealing their bewilderment:

Very same, Zach Gentry. A quick glance at the photo that leads this column will confirm how very, very covered Kekoa Crawford was. And yet.

Meanwhile Harbaugh almost lost his mind on the sideline when Michigan pulled out a shovel pass they hadn't put on film, saw it break for a first down and more, and then had it called back because O'Korn didn't get the snap off in time. Harbaugh's clearly toning down his sideline behavior this year after the PF in Columbus and the supposed extra focus on coach behavior; that was a moment where he just about relapsed. But did not!

Also this:

37678519292_db58ba9b61_z (1)
somehow not an INT [Fuller]

So here we are. That's three of four O'Korn games with extended playing time where he's been horrible. I have no idea what happened against Purdue, but if you're asking me to project future performance it's more in line with the last two weeks than the outlier. Teams are now preparing for a guy who's only good when he breaks the pocket, and there goes the efficiency of that gambit.

It's bad, man. It's so bad that Michigan spent half of its dropbacks presenting O'Korn with just two guys—or even one—in a downfield pattern. The interception he threw at a dominated Eddie McDoom was third and seven; Michigan had outside receivers run fades. Nobody else was in a pattern. O'Korn somehow still threw the wrong fade, choosing the 5'11" guy being checked by Indiana's best cornerback. Michigan dumbed down their passing offense to an extraordinary extent in this game, and their quarterback still couldn't keep up.

Game over, man. Game over.

It turns out there is a difficulty level too hard on the Jim Harbaugh Quarterback Constructor video game, and it's "Houston transfer who lost his job as a sophomore." Noted, and forgiven. Michigan's desperate scramble for quarterbacks upon Harbaugh's arrival turned up a strike in Jake Rudock, and a... not strike in O'Korn.

Michigan still has their goals in front of them, and maybe O'Korn has another Purdue game in him somewhere. I doubt it, personally, but we'd all written off the Brown Jug in 2008 just in time for Nick Sheridan to put up 200 passing yards in a 29-6 win. You can just barely cobble together a justification for continuing with O'Korn for another week, because a road night game at Penn State is next and we don't want to send our baby lamb to slaughter.

But win or lose against PSU, it's hard to imagine Michigan not taking Brandon Peters out for a test drive against Rutgers. Because Michigan's future is extraordinarily bright if they can find a QB. Even if O'Korn turns it around he's not going to be part of that future. Meanwhile it's hard to imagine production worse than what they've currently got. Here is where people say "it can always be worse": I submit that it cannot. Two point nine yard an attempt and two shoulda-been interceptions, people.

Game over. Insert freshman to continue.

AWARDS

37039611113_32d29841f9_z

go go go go [Marc-Gregor Campredon]

Known Friends And Trusted Agents Of The Week

-2535ac8789d1b499[1]you're the man now, dog

#1 Karan Higdon. Yeah, maybe several defensive players had better individual games in chart-world. All of those guys reinforce each other, though. Higdon's efforts were emphatically not reinforced by Michigan's passing game and he still put up Michigan's first 200 yard RB game since Mike freakin' Hart. He earned all 25 of Michigan's overtime yards, showed legit deep speed on his long touchdown, and ground out countless YAC without much, if anything, in the way of a missed read.

#2(t) Rashan Gary and Mo Hurst. Gary's 2.5 TFLs coulda shoulda been 4.5; he was robbed of a couple more sack by bloody circumstance but for the first time felt like an omnipresent terror. Meanwhile Hurst continued being Hurst, repeatedly whipping guys and getting pressure directly up the middle. The downgrade when both gents were out on the first IU touchdown drive was obvious. Both guys get two points, because I want them to have these points.

#3 Lavert Hill, Brandon Watson, and David Long. Michgian's CB crew all but erased Simmie Cobbs, and Hill turned in a Jourdan Lewis-esque INT. Most completions were to guys they were not in coverage on. Also: I mean, 40 yards for Cobbs. Get it.

Honorable mention: Chase Winovich wasn't far off his DL mates. Devin Bush turned in another very good outing, albeit one without fireworks. Ty Isaac chipped in eight productive carries. The OL was excellent on the ground and gave up zero sacks... narrowly.

KFaTAotW Standings.

8: Devin Bush (#1 Florida, T2 Cincinnati, T2 Air Force, #1 Purdue)
5: Chase Winovich(#1 Air Force, #2a Purdue), Mo Hurst (#1 MSU, #2(T), Indiana) 
3: Mason Cole (#1, Cincinnati), Ty Isaac (#2, Florida, #3 Cincinnati), Lavert Hill(#2 MSU, T3 Indiana), Karan Higdon (#1 Indiana)
2: Quinn Nordin (#3 Florida, #3 Air Force), John O'Korn (#2 Purdue), Rashan Gary(T2 Indiana).   
1: Khaleke Hudson (T2 Cincinnati), Tyree Kinnel (T2 Cincinnati), Mike McCray(T2 Air Force), Sean McKeon(T3 Purdue), Zach Gentry (T3 Purdue), Brad Robbins(#3 MSU), Brandon Watson (T3 Indiana), David Long (T3 Indiana).

Who's Got It Better Than Us Of The Week

Michigan busts out a new counter look on a fourth-quarter drive, running it three times on a five-play drive that ended with a 59-yard Higdon touchdown. Don't stop:

Honorable mention: Michigan wins the game with a goal-line stand from the two. Higdon bounces outside for an OT touchdown. Higdon bounces outside for a first-half touchdown.

imageMARCUS HALL EPIC DOUBLE BIRD OF THE WEEK.

John O'Korn throws to a double-covered Kekoa Crawford instead of finding the other guy on a two man route. That guy, Zach Gentry, was open for a 40-yard catch and run touchdown. Also he was the only other guy in a route.

Honorable mention: Indiana breaks off a punt return that gets them to overtime; various absurd calls after the mean man yelled at the refs but especially the Cam Cheesman "hold" that was critical for IU's tying FG drive; Michigan picks up a bunch of legitimate penalties, including PFs against Kekoa Crawford and Josh Metellus (unless Drake Harris is on the punt return team).

[After THE JUMP: How can Peters be behind this guy?]

OFFENSE

34057879395_5db0f04ee5_z

backup backup QB is always everyone's favorite player [Patrick Barron]

How can Peters be behind this guy? I don't know. I do think even excellent coaches make mistakes and have to change their minds from time to time. Inserting Nolan Ulizio over Juwann Bushell-Beatty is an example. JBB was clearly a long way from good last year, and might still be a long way from good. Ulizio was worse, but Michigan still talked themselves into playing him. Something similar could be going on with Peters.

More likely: Michigan has a case of Joe Bolden Syndrome. Bolden generated three years of insane practice hype that never translated to the field. Not even the previous two years of experience could entirely douse it when Bolden was a rising senior; we were still treated to varying levels of "this guy is Devin Bush, but tall!" despite the fact Bolden had barely been replacement-level in two years as a starter. This wasn't even a guy shrouded in the mists of recruiting accolades and the bench. This was a guy who everyone had seen start for two solid years, and yet.

Bolden was once again barely replacement-level as a senior, and it was very frustrating when Ben Gedeon had a one-year run as a starting LB vastly better than the guy he replaced. Gedeon is starting on the Vikings defense as a rookie; Bolden is a grad assistant at WSU. Michigan would have been better off benching Bolden for Gedeon as soon as Gedeon was a sophomore.

My best guess as to how this happened: Bolden was a memorizer. He had the Michigan offense's playbook and was totally awesome when he saw something he recognized. He did this all the time in practice, thus the hype. When he was faced with things not quite entirely unlike Michigan's offense in live-fire play he froze, because he was a memorizer. Gedeon extrapolated: he could understand football principles and adapt on the fly based on his knowledge of the game. He had instincts. Bolden did not.

O'Korn might be good when he's seen the same defense for dozens or even hundreds of reps. He clearly has no ability to go from read one to read two, let alone three, unless he's in a situation he's seen a bunch. Or Purdue is playing, I guess? I don't know. Football is weird and complicated.

Anyway: what I'd heard this fall was that Peters only had command of a small section of the playbook and had a tendency to make explosively bad mistakes. Michigan's already whittled the passing game down to bare bones and is suffering explosively bad mistakes from their quarterback. I can't imagine Peters doesn't emerge here.

The not-inconsiderable bright side. Michigan tore it up on the ground in this game with a mixture of inside zone and power stuff. Indiana's run defense entering this game was not amazing, but in two of three games against Power 5 schools they'd stuffed opponents. Virginia had just 2.8 YPC and an opportunity rate of 17%; Penn State had just 2.3(!!!) yards a carry despite having Saquon Freakin' Barkley. Ohio State gashed them in the opener; this still looks like a run defense somewhere between decent and legitimately good.

So: Michigan's performance was better than OSUs in sack-adjusted YPC. OSU hit 6.0; Michigan was at 6.2. The huge Higdon touchdown was only a bonus; even without it Michigan averaged nearly five yards a carry.

The looming caveat. Michigan's zone ID was vastly improved in this game. I wonder how much of that is traceable back to Greg Frey. Last year Frey was at Indiana, going up against Tom Allen's defense every day in practice. Next week will be an acid test for the new-and-improved ground game.

36999991534_85751f99aa_z

[Campredon]

Better than Mike Weber. Karan Higdon vs Indiana: 25 carries, 200 yards. Mike Weber, season: 48 carries, 227 yards. I'm not sayin', I'm just sayin'.

Seriously, though: Higdon had a break-out game that should see him solidify the top of the depth chart at running back. He might even have a get-out-of-fumble-free card at this point. Higdon's correct decisions to bounce got Michigan two touchdowns. One of those was well blocked and fairly easy. The second was some Houdini business on the first and only offensive play in overtime. In addition he showed impressive long speed on his touchdown, and displayed his typical ability to grind out YAC by running behind his pads.

Ty Isaac was also effective in this game, but Higdon got 25 carries to his 8 and I'd expect something along those lines going forward.

Chris Evans keeps getting buried, usually because nobody's blocking for him. He managed to turn a TFL into four yards by reversing field, and that was about it as far as opportunities go. He's more of a spread back who thrives in space than a between-the-tackles guy who can run through an arm tackle like Isaac and Higdon, and if Michigan is going to go with a bunch of fullbacks and tight ends because those guys are better players than the wide receivers, Evans's role gets reduced.

I do think Evans should be more of a target on short passes. He dusted an MSU LB last week for a chunk gain, and with a passing game that's struggling badly there are way worse ideas than trying to get Evans a bunch of catch and run opportunities.

Hello Kareem Walker and his glorious dreads. One carry in this game, but it was an impressive one:

That's a first down conjured out of a TFL. Michigan had an effective day from Higdon and Isaac so the need to poke around Walker seems less dire; he should still get a few more at-bats next week.

How the grinding got ground. Michigan was effective at both inside zone and power stuff in this game. JBB and Onwenu proved to be people-movers on power stuff and Michigan was much better at identifying which guy was theirs in the zone game; IU didn't force Michigan into those downfield releases where the OL has no angle to block a linebacker.

Michigan also may have dipped into the "break glass in case of emergency" section of the playbook, first with the shovel pass that ate a penalty and then with the counter play Michigan had not shown on film until they ran it three times on their second-half TD drive.

Must be said. Kekoa Crawford added a bad 15-yard penalty and a heartstopping near-onside-kick to his season resume. Not great, Bob.

DEFENSE

37678523052_1b511c46c8_z

GET IN MAH BELLIES [Fuller]

The usual. Drive overview:

  • 7 three-and outs and one INT after two plays.
  • one first-down and out
  • three longish FG drives of 54, 61, and 42 yards
  • one 6 play TD drive of 64 yards
  • one 20 yard TD drive after the punt return
  • Two first downs and then a goal line stand in OT.

That's 15 drives and 20 points, not much worse than the 14-for-14 performance against MSU, and much of that was Indiana's usual tempo stuff catching Michigan in bad spots.

But not the usual. Michigan's pass rush felt less rampant in this game. I mean, probably? PFF had Winovich with a whopping 9 QB pressures and Hurst with 8.  That's almost half of Indiana's passes (43) from just two guys. I assume you can have multiple pressures on the same play. My frustration at Michigan's inability to get to the quarterback may be a derangement based on previous outings.

Even so, Indiana pass protected well enough to get in field goal range in a one-minute drill despite entering the game with indifferent pass protection stats. IU got their starting RT back and that was a big upgrade for them; Michigan also got their fair share of battery in. I think this is just derangement; I now expect almost literally every dropback to get pressured, because that's what this defense has taught me is normal football.

37648408746_609796db94_z

2.0. PFF's Josh Liskewitz on how Lavert Hill is faring this year:

This is barely off Jourdan Lewis's pace from last year, something JD himself noted on twitter. Also impressed: Richard Sherman. So that's a good start to your sophomore year.

Also the other CBs. David Long and Brandon Watson both got extended at-bats against Simmie Cobbs and won those battles. Long was particularly impressive on back-to-back plays where he dominated an attempted fade so badly that Cobbs was ten yards away from the throw and then covered a slant so well that Ramsey didn't even attempt at throw. He did draw two flags, a legit holding call and an absurdly bad PI call. Meanwhile Cobbs did almost zero against him.

Meanwhile Watson's time checking Cobbs saw him awarded a 62-yard catch-and-run that got overturned because Watson had forced him out of bounds so far that he was not able to re-establish himself in-bounds before the catch. That should not have had to go to replay, and even after it was overturned I was a bit ticked off because Watson didn't actually shove him out of bounds, he just stuck out an arm to keep in contact when Cobbs tried to avoid him. That should have seen a hat throw and illegal touching, IMO, but it was at least somewhat close.

Anyway: Cobbs had four catches for 39 yards and most of that was Long and Watson doing work. The cornerback spot is wildly exceeding expectations. Mike Zordich is good at coaching and bad at giving press conferences. I'll take it.

23844164328_bb5e1e1ba5_z

kind of think Kinnel should have cut this off [Fuller]

Still a little squirrelly. Michigan's safeties are a little wobbly. I don't want to overstate things here. They don't bust and they are part of a very good unit; they make the calls and those are usually very good.

But... I mean... insofar as I have worries about the defense, they're mostly about the safeties. Metellus had a bizarre incident on the sideline where an improv throw found him checking the slot guy a few yards short of the sticks; slot guy just ran by on the outside for a baffling conversion and a chunk more.

Kinnel turned a third-and-22 tunnel screen into an adventure with another hyper-aggressive missed tackle, and I'm fairly sure that the late IU TD was something he coulda-shoulda dealt with: Michigan was in man coverage against a rub route, but Kinnel was tasked in a short robber zone; it almost seemed like Michigan's defense was designed to bait Indiana into that drag throw, but Kinnel didn't read it fast enough and come up to tackle.

Both guys made their fair share of positive plays. Metellus tackled on a TE drag to prevent third and ten from being a conversion; Kinnel broke up a couple slants. They only bother me because there's nothing else to get bothered about on the starting D.

The special one. Mike DeBord's tactical innovations in this game: running a QB throwback and tunnel screens to the slot receivers. IE, things Purdue had already done. Michigan, unsurprisingly, was ready for those wrinkles.

It'll be interesting to see where Indiana goes from here. There's usually a hangover year when a very successful coach leaves where the unit they were in charge of looks basically identical under the new regime. Indiana is having one of these. They're still super-fast and all spread and the only hints that Kevin Wilson is gone come at the margins. Year two is when the new philosophy starts being introduced in earnest.

I predict this won't go well for the Hoosiers.

SPECIAL TEAMS

37661587746_c29cd35735_z

[Campredon]

I am a mite concerned with the above form. DPJ caught a couple of punts like this. Nothing bad happened; something bad might happen in the future if this continues. Silver lining: this plus his downfield catch give us a little more insight into his ability to make awkward catches, which appears to be good. Now if anyone could just put it on him.

You will get got more often as a pro style punt unit. Michigan has mostly avoided the consequences of reverting to pro-style punting in the wake of the disaster in 2015, but they suffered them against Indiana when a Brad Robbins kick was too long and not high enough and J-Shun Harris just about added two his two return TDs this year. When you are pro-style punting it comes down to the punter to keep your coverage units in the game, and that's a tall order to do every time for a freshman.

It's kind of weird this hasn't happened before. Mo Hurst blocked a 51-yard field goal in this one and my immediate thought was "why did that take so long to happen?" I am a very reasonable person who is not excessively demanding of people I have never met.

God bless a boring kicker. 38 and 40 yarders from Nordin went right down the middle of the goalposts, into the weird Fallout endzone Indiana currently sports. Not only does he make the field goals, there's never any doubt. He's at 88% on the season with two misses, one of them from 52.

THE FOUG DENDRITES. James "Ol' Doug" Foug honed his kickoff skills to a fine point; now he's dropping them at the two so fools have to bring them out. They inevitably get buried at the 15. That's good kickoffin'. Please ignore the one he put out of bounds. Returners are so terrified of Foug that they lose all perspective when the ball twists, horribly, into their path.

MISCELLANEOUS

I don't want to have to say this again but here we are. If you're playing a 1950s football game rife with offensive incompetence your decision-making should reflect that, and Michigan's approach just before halftime reflected that. There were a number of mutters about Harbaugh's excessive conservatism at halftime. I find these baffling, because... uh... what does a two-minute offense with Michigan's pass protection, wide receivers, and quarterback look like? Guernica? No. Not bizarre enough. Here we go:

ae558ecabe33abd745fc377c6004138e--cat-art-print-cat-prints

"ALF devouring his cat"

That's what it looks like, and your dang hopes are the cat.

Similarly, Michigan's approach in the second half was more or less fine if you assume that your quarterback is a broken thing. When Michigan deviated from extreme conservativism they were rewarded with throws at the wrong guy, near interceptions, and one time they got six yards on third and twelve.

Now, if you want to complain about not inserting Peters I'm listening. Michigan was up and trying to hang on. They were trying to play as low-variance as possible on offense and let their defense take it home, and without a big punt return that would have worked. That makes the decision to leave a guy with 3 YPA who barely avoided two INTs vaguely, barely justifiable.

The power of the hatewatch. Also a timeslot in which not much else was going on:

My dream where all Michigan games are noon on ABC (or FOX, I guess) is one step closer.

Nice enforcement. I remember when yelling at people from the sideline and/or running onto the field was going to be a penalty. Nope, just on Harbaugh. Tom Allen took timeout specifically to scream at the referees for minutes at a time and instead of getting hit with a call he slid the refereeing in Indiana's favor for the duration. Several calls down the stretch were absurd, including a personal foul on Mo Hurst for tackling the quarterback, the holding call on Cam Cheeseman for something that was neither a hold nor at all relevant, and a pass interference on David Long for getting in the way of Cobbs on an uncatchable back shoulder throw Cobbs was not even looking for. IU also escaped an obvious grounding call when Ramsey threw the ball at absolutely nobody on their final drive while being sacked.

This was an awful, awful game for the refs.

Pine pine pine pine. It's a very good thing Michigan's running game took off in this game, because it might have been too painful for words if they'd lost to Indiana at the same time AJ Dillon was doing this:

Dillon, of course, decommitted from Michigan in favor of BC late in the last recruiting cycle because he wanted to be the man immediately. He evidently is.

HERE

Best and Worst:

Best: The Good Kid

You always hear that teachers spend a disproportionate amount of time dealing with the "troublemakers", the disruptive kids in a classroom. The quieter kids, the ones who just do their work without a fuss, are given a pat on the back and a silent "thank you" as the teacher navigates the room. You want to praise them and you do, but the reality is that the squeaky wheel gets the most attention, and if this analogy hasn't been made clear yet, the offense is the biggest fucking squeaky wheel on this team. By comparison, the defense is a wheel covered in the contents of a 55-gallon tub of lube rolling on a floor covered with Teflon. Also, it's the quiet kid who does her job really well without much fanfare, while the offense is destroying the school bus. Yes, this whole paragraph exists for the sole purpose of linking to an article about a tub of sexual lubricant. Deal with it.

On the day, Indiana was held to 278 yards of total offense, 3.9 ypp and 13 first downs, all season lows for the Hoosiers. This isn't CHAOS team like in years past, but when you face 72 plays over 15 drives and hold the opposition to well under 300 yards while picking them off twice, you're doing something well. Michigan forced 7 3-and-outs as well as a 2-and-turnover, and racked up 2 sacks and 7 TFLs to boot. Even when they buckled a bit at the end, it wasn't particularly egregious; the late TD was due mostly to IU getting a great return on a punt (again, ignoring multiple blocks in the back), and leaving a college kicker with a 46-yard FG to tie the game is a reasonable strategy. On the last play in OT, which brought back memories of way more gamesthan I'd like, Michigan's defense was able to overwhelm IU's line and chase Ramsey into throwing the pick to Kinnel, and at the end you saw Winovich just passed out on the field next to Ramsey, exhausted but elated. I sadly know the feeling.

State of Our Open Threads:

Here's what all that looked like across the game:

InstancesByPageIndiana

R-squared for "fuck" was 0.83 in this game, so we are coming back to that word as a driving factor for expressing ourselves in these games. Keep in mind too that each page represents 300 comments and about 6 minutes of regulation play (OT factors into 9 and 10 here). You can see "fuck" spike right where you would think - end of the 4th quarter and in OT. The pace of talk on the offense, which is in gray, was fairly steady throughout the second half

ELSEWHERE

Mo Hurst was again the best defender in the country per PFF:

Another week, another stud performance from Michigan Wolverines defensive tackle Maurice Hurst. After capturing the top overall grade from PFF College last Saturday in a loss to Michigan State, Hurst graded out with a 97.4 score in the Indiana game (on a 0-100 scale). That’s good for No. 2 nationally behind Colorado State’s Michael Gallup and first among defensive players.

The highlights of Hurst’s performance were his pass-rush grade (96.7) and his run defense grade (91.7) on 62 total snaps.

Sap's Decals:

OFFENSIVE CHAMPION – Easy to single out Karan Higdon for this, but I’m going with the Big Uglies up front – specifically the Interior O-Line. It seemed like most of the successful (running) plays were straight up the middle. And while it’s difficult to single out just one guy, I’ll go with all three interior linemen. We saw some hints of this last week against another basketball school, so it was nice to see that it wasn’t a one-week-wonder.

HSR:

Overtime began and Higdon pulled a Barry Sanders-esque "nothing doing here in my original running lane, hit my blocker, bounce, bounce, burn, score" run to open overtime.  It put me in mind of Tom Brady's pass to Shawn Thompson in the 2000 Orange Bowl, getting the ball first and getting the touchdown and saying "OK, your turn."  Michigan's defense responded after an initial, Michigan school record-setting sixteenth penalty calling a pass interference that would move the ball to the 12, (which the ESPN play-by-play on the website does not acknowledge), standing firm getting into Peyton Ramsey's face and finally forcing an interception, Tyree Kinnel grabbing the ball and allowing every Michigan fan to finally exhale after something like four hours of hoping things would not go sideways.

The 16 penalties was a school record. Ten of those were legit. Maize and Blue Nation. MLive on O'Korn. We could be FSU though.

Comments

MGoStrength

October 17th, 2017 at 1:25 PM ^

There are some athletes that only want to compete when they know they will win or when they know they are the underdog.  This is because they have nothing to lose.  These are the ones that don't like competing when it's actually fairly even.  They tend to fold under the pressure.

 

I actually think JOK's got the sort of mental make up where he will play better in a challenging, difficult, hostile environment because there is less pressure on him.  I think he will get up for that sort of event.  I think he's more likely to struggle at home when everyone expects him to play well. 

 

This is a complete hot take, but seems to be his MO.  There is some sports psychology term for this phenomena, but it elludes me.

RedRum

October 16th, 2017 at 1:29 PM ^

Can't we do a wild cat with JOK at the helm and Peters involved? That is probably too gimicky. A big part of me believes that if Peters were to have been chosen to play, second quarter of the Indiana game would have been the insertion point.  I cannot get my self to logically consider that starting Peters is smart agianst #2 PSU at night. We live an die by our best QB -

I am still optimistic JOK will connect to a simple paybook agians PSU - Higdon has another great game- maybe have some McDoom packages with expanded options. 

I think UM can shut down PSU's only offensive weapon and form there it will be a punt punt, followd by some more puntin.

Go Blue

robpollard

October 16th, 2017 at 1:51 PM ^

I didn't have incredible expectations of him, but he was an excellent blocker last year, had a good recruiting profile, has nice size, got the #1 jersey (for whatever that is worth)....I thought he'd be at the very least a solid contributor on a very young WR/TE squad.

Instead, you could argue he's the 4th best receiver (behind Perry, Black and DPJ) and if we're including TEs, behind Gentry. In 6 games, he has a whopping 9 receptions with 102 yards and 1 TD -- I know our QBs have been less than optimal (and Crawford had a TD called back), but that should be a game, not half a season.

That production comes from iffy hands, a continual lack of separation (at least from what I cn tell on replays), poor job of highpointing throws and using your body to "force" a DB to interfere with you, goofed up the onside kick.

Again, I know our QB situation does not help, but with Perry, Black and DPJ, I've seen numerous nice things. Is Crawford at least blocking well (besides that penalty which took away an Isaacs TD a few games ago)?

funkywolve

October 16th, 2017 at 3:21 PM ^

was also working with two seniors who had a ton of experience.  This year just about every receiver other than Perry who is seeing the field is extremely inexerpienced and in a lot of cases new to college.  Who knows whether a dedicated wr coach would make a difference but most of these guys need a lot more than just a pat on the back and some fine tuning.  They need to learn the details of what it takes to become a good to great college receiver.

robpollard

October 16th, 2017 at 2:24 PM ^

I'm not saying it helps, but "not having a dedicated WR coach" should hurt Perry, Black and DPJ, as well. Plus, catching the ball when it hits you in the hands seems something a sophomore receiver should have down by now, WR coach or not.

Hail-Storm

October 16th, 2017 at 4:01 PM ^

He had a knack for bringing down those throws into coverage. He wasn't all that fast, but man he had a way to come down with the ball. 

I'm surprised how many misses Michigan has had at reciever. I know they are young, but Crawford and McDoom seem to be following the same path as so many Reciver recruits over the last 6 years.  I don't know what happened to Schoenle (sp?). He seemed good in his one outing. 

mikegros

October 16th, 2017 at 1:35 PM ^

O'Korn is a high variance player. He doesn't make great reads consistently, he throws into very tight windows, he bugs out at pressure and runs around trying to find somewhere to make a tough throw downfield. He did this against Purdue as much as against Indiana or MSU.

Against Purdue it just worked because he hit on 17 and got a 4 instead of a J. He was in a tough place a number of times and managed to have things work out so that he could make the play. This throw in a tight window was completed whereas other week's it's broken up or picked off: https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=10&v=moYO8YubAYw Similarly, the play where he was almost sacked by Purdue, but spun away scrambled around the backfield for a second and then found Perry downfield was a good play, but also a lucky one. 

O'Korn lives on a very thin edge as a QB. Some games he'll come down on the good side but he's as likely to gamble away a big plays for the other team. 

evenyoubrutus

October 16th, 2017 at 1:37 PM ^

I expect a flurry of tweets from the OSU blogosphere, including the revered Ramzy, for that comparison of Higdon and Weber as well as the OSU ground game against IU. I am sure they will be uber pissed you guys. I honestly can't fathom how that fanbase has remained infinitely salty even in the midst of the most successful run in their program's history.

evenyoubrutus

October 16th, 2017 at 2:30 PM ^

Is that true? That's kinda weird if it is. I mean I didn't go to Michigan so I'm not criticizing or questioning his fandom but then again I'm not one of the loudest voices in Michigan blogosphere. Maybe I'm the most obnoxious, homer slappy, but not the loudest.

Fezzik

October 16th, 2017 at 8:06 PM ^

Kugler snapped it because he thought a defender was offside. This tells O'Korn its a free play and toss a jump ball down field. McDoom made close to zero effort on the ball. It's not like O'Korn can run the originally play when the ball is snapped before his cadence calls for the snap.

stephenrjking

October 16th, 2017 at 1:41 PM ^

If the QB still needs to make check calls at the LOS for running plays, it is not a given that a RS freshman who had been kind of discouraged and less engaged until a few weeks ago (or that's the rumor) will be just as good, even if passing skills are the same. Still, if he's buckling down as the same rumor suggests, might not hurt to give him a shot when things are disastrous. But explosively bad mistakes are a recipe for losing winnable games in the Tresselball paradigm we now exist within. Our inability to avoid turnovers is bad at any time, but now we basically can't win without being careful with the ball.

At least one thing worked consistently in this game. The idea that we might, maybe, be able to get some things done on the ground is very encouraging, the one thing the team can rely upon. Maybe. 

There are stil wrinkles available, btw. The PA passes that I paid attention to all appeared to lack any real frippery on the OL. There are still some surprises to be had by putting gap blocking keys into PA that could give us something with our TEs.

 

Shop Smart Sho…

October 16th, 2017 at 1:44 PM ^

Anyone else having issues with the first two videos not playing? 
I notice they're both twitter embeds, while the third is a youtube embed and works fine.

And as to that third video, my only thought is fuuuuuuuuuck. 

Shop Smart Sho…

October 16th, 2017 at 1:44 PM ^

Anyone else having issues with the first two videos not playing? 
I notice they're both twitter embeds, while the third is a youtube embed and works fine.

And as to that third video, my only thought is fuuuuuuuuuck. 

rc15

October 16th, 2017 at 2:35 PM ^

Agreed, they need to give all of the McDoom snaps/routes to Evans. Still the threat for the jet sweep, less likely to drop a catch, and gives the defense more trouble trying to identify what our personnel is while in the huddle.

stephenrjking

October 16th, 2017 at 4:49 PM ^

I what we're seeing from Evans is not regression. I think we held him to unfair expectations. He's shifty, but he was never Barry Sanders. And he has decent acceleration, but the combine demonstrated that he wasn't as fast as we'd think. Higdon is faster! So Evans is left trying to muddle through as a feature back without wide open spaces to work magic with. This team doesn't utilize what he brings to the table very much. When given space, he is still fine, but the RBs often have to work without that much space right now.

Reader71

October 16th, 2017 at 5:02 PM ^

I specifically used the phrasing I did because I don’t believe it’s possible for any player to regress with more practice and playing time. His performance has absolutely regressed, however, even though I’m sure he is more capable than he was last season. I never loved him as a player, though. He’s McGuffie. Fast with some shake, but not capable of breaking tackles at all and not a plus blocker.

MGoStrength

October 17th, 2017 at 2:08 PM ^

Just watching the games, not having broken down plays or anything, his performances strike me as unlucky.  I seem to recall the majority of times he's been handed the ball there is a defender in the backfield.  Are you seeing holes that he's missing or him going down on contact too quickly?  The only bad thing I can recall is his one fumble, which was poked out by a guy from behind, right?  That could have happened to anyone.  I just think he's the product of spreading the ball around to 3 guys, not getting consistent carries, and getting poor blocking in front of him, in addition to the QB not being able to complete passes to loosen up the defense.  

mastodon

October 16th, 2017 at 1:45 PM ^

Pre-game hypnosis for JOK.  I could not be more serious.

Pump him up with confidence, and overwrite all the negative hurdles that he's apparently building in his head when given a week's notice that he's starting.  Purdue-JOK played well because he was spontaneously inserted in the game - no negative clutter buildup.

Some hypnotic-suggestion suggestions:

  • You love playing night-game whiteouts.
  • The noise doesn't bother you.  In fact, the louder it is, the more accurate your passing.
  • Just generally instill:  You are the fucking man, and are going to tear it up!

This could be easily done, and what do they have to lose?  His playing well is the absolute key to any shot at winning this game.  Why the hell not?

 

 

Blue_In_Texas

October 16th, 2017 at 1:46 PM ^

Well said on all points. 

I think the reason the team's performance thus far has been so jarring and painful to us is that it has been in many ways unexpected. We all expected some struggles, and for us to lose some of the big 4 games. Instead, we came out and whooped Florida's ass, raising expectations. 

I also expected Speight to be the best player on our offense, and to have above-average QB  play this year... We obviously have had awful QB play, so to see that has been fucking awful. 

We all expected the OL to struggle, but somehow seeing it in real life has been worse than we could have imagined. 

I very much expected the young secondary to be our weakest link on the team other than OL, but they have far exceeded expectations, and Hill looks to be a star. Same thing with Dline, especially depth-wise. Thus far they have been excellent. 

We also expected MSU to be on par with that 3-9 team, and clearly that is not the case. 

In other words, much of why this has been so rough is that its been rough in ways we definitely did not expect. While we knew there would be growing pains, we were all at least excited for QB and knew we'd whoop MSU...until we didn't. 

814 East U

October 16th, 2017 at 1:46 PM ^

Maybe there is a chance JOK takes himself out like Ryan Gosling did in remember the titans where he couldn't cover the WR so the defensive coach put Petey in at DB? 

RIGHT? RIGHT? MAYBE......

huntmich

October 16th, 2017 at 1:48 PM ^

Best case Brandon peters scenario: we put him in against Rutgers and he turns in a lights out performance and we are forced to leave him in for the rest of the season? No way we could go back to okorn at that point. So then what happens when we play Wisconsin and Ohio State and our offensive line let's those d lines tee u against him? Keep okorn as long as he is healthy, accept 8-4, and then put peters in with next year's o line.

robpollard

October 16th, 2017 at 1:58 PM ^

It would make no sense to put a RS Freshman in, on the road, against a Top 5 opponent looking for revenge, at night in his first game. Hopefully, JOK can get it together, play mistake free and through a good running game, great defense, and some luck, we can pull out a win.

But unless JOK plays very well against Penn State, Peters should start against Rutgers. And, assuming he is not even worse than JOK has been these last two games, he should start all games after that (incl Wisconsin and OSU).

I trust the coaches/scuttlebutt that Peters has not been ready to this point; I'm not expecting miracles. But the QB position is at a low-point and Peters could show on the field more than he has in practice/off the field. He has the physical tools. There are numerous instances this year of freshmen (RS or otherwise) who have come in, unplanned, and performed well.  Pending the outcome of Penn State, it would be time to see what Peters could do.

robpollard

October 16th, 2017 at 3:20 PM ^

Should Penn State have just thrown in the towel after getting whooped by us last year? They beat a superior OSU game with some key special teams play and off they went to a B1G title.

UM has too good a defense to just accept 8-4. I agree, that's our most likely record, but who knows? Let's say Peters looks very good against Rutgers, Minnesota, etc -- why wouldn't you put him out there against Wisconsin and Ohio State if he's your best QB? Because he'll (likely) get sacked a few times and hit a few more? It's one football game -- if any QB gets mentally broken after one game, they're the wrong man for the job, anyway.

And if he looks poor against Rutgers etc, well, then back to JOK we go. But we need to know about Peters in the meantime.

BlueMetal

October 16th, 2017 at 4:12 PM ^

I mean, anything can happen but it's not like we are going to put Brandon Peters in and install a down field passing attack that has him dropping back 30 times for slow developing routes. He will likely drop back 10-15 times, maybe 20 at most and most throws will be short drops with quick "easy" passes.

MGoStrength

October 17th, 2017 at 2:11 PM ^

We act like throwing the ball away is such a hard thing to do.  Is it really that unrealistic to expect QBs to be able to move around a little bit within the pocket and if they cannot do so to simply throw it away?  We aren't asking him to be Cam Newton for God's sake.