Shouldn't that last section be 2014 news? Just a little confusing.
Edit: Now it's fixed
Today's recruiting roundup is relatively light after a calm week following the BBQ, but there's still much to talk about, including Derrick Green, the E.J. Levenberry non-story, and some 2014 updates.
SBNation's Bud Elliott takes on the trend of early commitments and even earlier offers in college football recruiting, an issue I briefly addressed in yesterday's mailbag. He focuses on the practice of schools giving out hundreds of verbal offers—with various levels of commitability, if I'm allowed to completely make up words—since the NCAA pushed back the date when players can receive written offers (for the class of 2013, written offers couldn't go out until this Wednesday).
Elliott doesn't come up with much of a solution for the spate of early verbal offers—he suggests moving up the date when written offers are allowed to go out, even though he acknowledges that in the current structure written offers bear the same level of binding agreement as verbal offers: none. Personally, I think the NCAA is going to have to institute an early signing period like they have for basketball. The process is only speeding up, and an early signing period allows for a little more stability for both coaches and players, with the added benefit of saving committed players the hassle of dealing with other coaches trying to flip their commitment all the way through signing day.
Anyway, Elliott brought up the topic to several coaches at ACC Media Day, and leave it to the conference's running joke of a coach, Maryland's Randy Edsall, to... say something really insightful?
Edsall was also the only coach to discuss the new NCAA qualifying rules that will impact the class of 2015.
"It just doesn't make sense to me [to offer players early] because you have new rules that are going to go into effect where you've got to have a 2.3 [GPA] and a 1020 [SAT] in order to be eligible. We don't know until the end of that kid's junior year if he's even going to be on track to do that."
"The NCAA talks about education and APR? And all this stuff? And then they're allowing us to go and recruit kids and then thinking about making this the wild west where you can text a kid as much as you want? I mean, what are we doing? There's no wonder kids who are 12, 13, who think they're entitled. We're creating part of the problem. I just don't get it. Where is the leadership coming from in terms of allowing open season on all these kids who aren't mature enough to be able to handle all this recruiting?"
In a few years we're going to see schools scrambling to replace the academic casualty who's been committed to them for years, and while Randy Edsall probably won't be at Maryland at that point he'll still be very, very right.
VA RB Derrick Green named his top six yesterday, with Michigan, Auburn, Oregon, Tennessee, Ole Miss, and Virginia Tech comprising the list. Of those schools, Michigan and Auburn are the two regarded as favorites, and the recent decommitent of four-star RB Greg Bryant from Oklahoma could swing that race decidedly in Michigan's favor, according to 247's J.C. Shurburtt:
That leaves us with the question- where will Bryant land? Best guess at this point is Auburn. Reports indicated the Tigers and South Carolina were his top two choices with Georgia also in the mix. Auburn makes the most sense based on everything that is known at this time.
Bryant to AU leaves us with another question. How does that impact four-star running back Derrick Green (Richmond, Va./Hermitage) and where he will land? The Tigers will take one more back. They like both Bryant and Green, but it’s highly doubtful they take both and unless a new school makes a charge, they are getting Bryant.
Shurburtt speculates that would be enough for the Wolverines to land Green. For what it's worth, Green told Mike Farrell that he has no current timeline, but would like to take some officials ($):
So now that Green is down to six, what's next?
"I am focusing on the season, we are in two-a-days now," he said. "I'd like to get this down to three schools sometime soon if I can, but I'm not sure of any timeframe right now. I'll obviously take some official visits as well but I'm not sure where and when yet."
Though Green's recruitment could very well stretch into the season, Michigan is in a very strong position to land him.
Remember E.J. Levenberry, the linebacker recruit who chose Florida State over Michigan all the way back in April? Since Michigan has claimed to be full at linebacker since even before Ben Gedeon committed, Wolverine fans haven't given him a second thought. That is, until Wednesday, when Mike Farrell posted a letter from Levenberry's father on The Wolverine's message board that strongly hinted at a decommitment and ended thusly ($);
Right now I have to say my son made the right decision in choosing Jimbo and FSU but that Michigan degree and Greg Mattison's relationship with my son are hard to resist.
Farrell "confirmed" with Levenberry's father that E.J. would take an official visit to Ann Arbor for the Michigan State game. Recruitment back on, start your engines, buckle up, and all that noise, right? Not so fast, my friend; Sam Webb caught wind of the news and swiftly shot down any misconceptions about Levenberry's recruitment:
Lots of chatter suddenly about EJ Levenberry. Great player/prospect, but no room at the inn at
#Michigan and no official visit to Ann Arbor
— Sam Webb (@SamWebb77) August 1, 2012
In other words, the circumstances at Michigan didn't change one bit, and Levenberry's dad almost certainly didn't check with the coaches before floating the official visit idea out there. 20 minutes after Webb's tweet, Farrell backpedals:
And just like that
#Michigan pulls out of the Levenberry race unless they lose a commit per levenberry's father
— Mike Farrell (@rivalsmike) August 1, 2012
"Just like that," eh? This is the problem with premium recruiting websites; if Farrell wanted to get the right story out there, he would've checked into Michigan's scholarship situation before posting that to a Michigan recruiting message board. HOWEVA, he knew that post would cause a stir and get a lot of clicks whether Michigan could take him or not. The result, of course, is that he posts, people freak out, and then Webb has to come along and insert some reality into the situation, but Rivals gets a nice spike in pageviews.
Even worse is that Farrell acknowledges he was probably played by Levenberry's father, who's likely trying to give FSU's coaching staff a wake-up call by talking up Michigan and Oklahoma:
— Mike Farrell (@rivalsmike) August 1, 2012
Sam Webb's latest at the DetNews is a profile on IL CB Parrker Westphal, who's now visited Michigan twice after attending the BBQ. In case you haven't followed along, Westphal's position coach in high school is none other than former Michigan CB Todd Howard. Guess where he expects Westphal to end up?
"For me, I always said that I wanted to coach and get somebody to go to Michigan," Howard admitted to Scout.com. "I want our kids to go where they can go, the best choice for them, and where they'll be able to max-out their potential. Of course, I'm biased toward Michigan. I pulled Parrker aside before he even enrolled in high school and I said, 'You're going to go to Michigan.' I looked at his dad and said that and they said, 'You think so?' I guess one Wolverine can always pick out another."
Westphal himself also discussed his recent visit and may have unwittingly given us some insight into why Michigan doesn't yet have a 2014 commit:
When the time came to talk recruiting, the conversation was brief and to the point.
"Coach (Jeff Hecklinski) was telling me he doesn't want me to commit now because it's too early," Parrker said. "He just wants me to take my time."
Westphal doesn't claim any leaders at this time, though Michigan stands out among the schools he's visited. He looks like a candidate for an early commitment and the Wolverines would likely be the choice if that's what he does.
Webb also talked to OH LB Michael Ferns after the BBQ, and Ferns offered some insight into his potential timeline ($):
I still plan on waiting until mid-junior year, or the end of my junior year to commit because I feel like that would be a great time. By then, I’ll have a good understanding of what I want, and I’ll have seen enough to make a decision.
When pressed for a leader, Ferns admitted that Michigan is his favorite, with the caveat that they'd had the advantage of a return trip that his other top schools—Notre Dame and Penn State—have not had yet.
Tremendous caught up with MD CB Troy Vincent Jr.—son of the former NFL cornerback—after his BBQ visit, and for some reason this is one of my favorite quotes from a recruit [emphasis mine]:
Help Michigan?: "I wouldn't say it helped Michigan. I look at it more as them successfully reinforcing what I already believed about them. The visit confirmed a lot of thoughts for me with them and allowed my parents to draw their own conclusions as well".
Full steam ahead for the Brady Hoke Hype Train.
Quickly: Another 2014 quarterback to watch is VA QB Caleb Henderson, who "wants to pursue Michigan" after visiting for the BBQ ($). Matt Pargoff assembles lists of ten 2014 receivers and ten 2014 running backs to watch. Recruiting message boards are really special places, you guys.
Shouldn't that last section be 2014 news? Just a little confusing.
Edit: Now it's fixed
Yup, that was a typo—thanks for the heads up. Recruiting really is going fast, eh?
Randy Edsall a running joke?
No snark, genuinely curious.
I'm sure it wasn't entirely his fault, but in his first year at Maryland his team went from 9-4 to 2-10, and 24 players have transferred in his first 14 months on the job. He also informed his Connecticut players that he'd be taking the Maryland job by getting on their airplane telecom via phone on their way back from the Fiesta Bowl, which didn't exactly go over well.
He also repeatedly held post-game pressers this season in which he basically said they were losing because his players were awful at football, and thing would turn around when he got some real players.
Throwing your players under the bus doesn't earn you many point (ahem, Jerry Kill).
In the DC Metro area, Edsall is a favorite running joke. All the sports writers wrote that he should have been fired last year. All the radio guys spend entire shows hating on him whenver they are given the oppurtunity.
It is very entertaining and makes how RichRod was treated by the local Michigan media look like a ticker tape parade.
I also know that some will de-commit, and some will be busts (or busted). Non-events like the recent Levenberry story just reinforce for me the reasons that I don't listen to a lot of sources with early reports. When I really need to know it, it will be reported by someone I have some respect for.
The thing I like most about Ace is his sexy face. And what you said.
Gonna say this every time someone pushes for an early signing period: It doesn't work. It just pushes recruiting even further forward, because the "early signing period" just becomes "the signing period." And without further changes to the rules, an early signing period would protect only the coaches, while doing nothing for the players - in fact it would make things worse for them. See: Roundtree, Roy.
It's no coincidence that coaches all want one. It would just be another mechanism to pressure players into committing (and then signing) early.
He seemed to have a good visit with Ole Miss
He's not going to Ole Miss
i think more useful than an early signing period would be allowing kids to take official visits in their junior year. some kids/families cant afford to travel cross country on unofficials, and with things moving earlier and earlier it would seem fair to let them use some of their 5 visits in junior year, in case they really do have interest in a school a bit further away. my 2 cents...
I wouldn't say as early as junior year (at least not all of it) but I would extend the official visiting period to the summer or maybe as early as May. But probably June is what I'd say. My take is this: I think a lot of kids just write off their official visits because they figure they'll be committed by then. And then they commit in the spring. I think having official visits be allowed in the summer (you know, when kids are actually free) would encourage those that commit in the spring to wait until then. They'd have to have some rules like no official visits during camp weekend and such, but official visit season has been so marginalized now, it doesn't make sense to limit it to the fall.
Seeing as how his dad went there.
A lot of kids don't want to follow in their fathers footsteps. I think if someone looked it up very rarely do sons go to their dads alma mater. Someone look that up for me, thanks in advance.
Allen Gant and Troy Woolfolk disagree.
I'm just sayin'.