2 full 2013 posts without even one mention of Treadwell? I feel like everyone is 100% confident that ship has sailed.
Mike Spath points out that doing an interview for the official site is a pretty good indicator he'll be back.
goodnight sweet prince
we gon' throw
The offensive line. With Lewan taking his twosie to the next level, Michigan is left with Michael Schofield and a bunch of guys who haven't seen the field. Two fellows seem like locks to start:
A third is not quite a lock but has a healthy lead in my head:
The fourth is up in the air between these folk:
Breaking in four new OL, three of them likely to be freshmen, is scary. On the other hand, it's not like they can be worse at run blocking.
A dang running back who can run the dang ball. Maybe this is Toussaint. It seems more likely it's either DeVeon Smith or Derrick Green, particularly the latter guy if he does indeed end up in Ann Arbor like it seems the world expects him to. Running backs don't need a lot of seasoning, and Green is college-sized and then some.
Also here's my candle for Dennis Norfleet, third down back kthx. Get some Muck in you, kid, and there's a job waiting.
African refugee wide receivers. Amarah Darboh pointlessly burned a redshirt; Jehu Chesson kept his. With no immediate help from this WR class likely, last year's folk will have to break in. I was pretty high on both those dudes, with Chesson a co-MGoBlog Sleeper of the Year with Braden. They both provide relatively big targets, and Chesson might have deep speed.
Gardner to Gallon. As mentioned above, that connection was red-hot over the last five games of the season, and not just against tomato cans. Gallon's best game of the year was the nine-catch, 145-yard, two-TD outing against a top-shelf SEC defense in the bowl game. Those guys are in tune.
Just running one offense, thanks. No longer will Michigan be at war with itself about what it wants to do. A section a bit later in this post hopes they'll run the QB some; this should not detract from the fact that Michigan moves from a system Borges never quite got the hang of to his bread and butter. Gallon's performance once Michigan had a quarterback who could stand in the pocket and deliver entices.
Presumably large improvement from the tight ends. Devin Funchess and AJ Williams got thrown into the fire a year too early; now they can add 20 pounds each and learn how to block and add a couple new guys in the hopes of Stanfordizing this offense.
Funchess seemed like a matchup issue last year, but if you were a defensive coordinator considering him a wide receiver, how wrong would you have been? Not very. Getting him to a point where he is a credible blocker is what'll get him open on seams and whatnot.
Offensive line depth x2. This isn't quite as bad as it was last year, when there were essentially no backups—the sixth OL was a walk-on. It is still not good. If you make the reasonable assumptions that the freshman class redshirts and Bryant wins the other guard job, Michigan has Burzynski, Bars, and Magnuson available. Freshmen and that walk-on. Suboptimal.
But hey at least next year this problem goes away: Schofield's gone; everyone else returns.
Offensive line starters, probably. Four new ones; asking a lot for all of them to be good from day one.
WR depth? I'm not entirely sure this is a huge problem with Gallon stepping up and Dileo presumably establishing himself an excellent slot option. But they need some other guys; the incoming class provides little immediate help, so then it's down to Darboh and Chesson. Either or both could break out—Michigan needs one to.
QB depth. Bellomy or a true freshman.
The offensive line can't be worse, right? The running backs didn't help sure but when you return a thousand-yard rusher and his YPC average dips almost two yards a carry, the finger points squarely at the blocking. Lewan will be missed. The other guys are replaceable.
But replacing them is not a great thing. Michigan needs an upgrade.
How accurate is Devin really, and how much progress can he make in one offseason as the man? The overall numbers are good; his last two games left a bit to be desired. Hopefully he can refine down those misses by 20-30%, at which point Michigan is in the proverbial business.
How hard are we jamming the pro-style pedal down? Petrified at the prospect of having Gardner go down when it seemed like the alternative was Jack Kennedy, Michigan all but dumped quarterback runs from its playbook once Gardner entered the game. Was that circumstance or preference? And if it was the former, how comfortable will Michigan be incorporating Gardner's legs as an intentional part of the gameplan if the alternative is Shane Morris?
We won't know that until fall. I'm hoping Michigan keeps the inverted veer around, because that's a pretty good play.
FOR THE LOVE OF GOD CAN ANYONE OTHER THAN DENARD ROBINSON PICK UP THREE FEET ON THE GROUND? Freshmen will get opportunities, yes. Toussaint may be back. The youngsters will be a bit older, and at least Hayes and Norfleet came with some scatback hype—though I wouldn't be entirely surprised to see Hayes move to slot receiver since there's no one on the roster who won't be a senior next year. Only the seeming likelihood that Michigan acquires Derrick Green prevents this from going in the Rod Stewart 2013 category.
Improvement as long as Gardner stays on the field. This edition of Michigan limped to middling numbers everywhere. Next year's offense figures to have a better fit with the offensive coordinator, a better offensive line if only because of reversion to the mean and having non-walk-on options outside of the starters, and at least equivalent playmakers at the skill positions with an outside shot at much better if the running back situation gets an injection of talent.
So then, how are you feeling about Denard Robinson's legs versus Devin Gardner's arm+legs? I'm thinking that's a push once turnovers are accounted for and we bake in an offseason of Gardner improvement. Guy was the #1 dual threat QB of his class, after all, and displayed some excellent potential on the ground in his tenure as a starter. And in a Borges offense, there's no comparison in the passing game*.
A lot rides on Jack Miller and the tackles; I figure the guards will be an upgrade. I'd guess we see an improvement—not that it'll take much to get that with Alabama sliding off the schedule and hopefully not having a half against Nebraska where the offense goes to die. Gardner bails Michigan out from some tough times.
*[Let's say we had that argument about the spread 'n' shred and not have it, okay?]
2 full 2013 posts without even one mention of Treadwell? I feel like everyone is 100% confident that ship has sailed.
The Outback implosion and the Denard departure were depressing, but this summary really highlights the lack of departures.
Yes, Denard was the whole rushing O because he could find holes and Taylor was a physical force. But there must be more talent and productivity in the 2012 and 2013 classes to replace the departures.
A quality WR and RB could make a huge difference but a year of maturity for the rest of the group leaves us better in 2013 than 2012.
Jake Butt seems like a legit pass catcher. Wonder if we don't see him on the field as a true WR if Chesson or Darboh don't step up. I bet Funchess would have lined up as a true receiver if we'd had any TE depth this year. Borge loves him some 6-5 ish targets.
Next year is a bizarre schedule and if affords M's young offensive line time to gel and mature.
Only one BIG road game before November (Penn State). Also M has two byes next season and plays only 3 games in October before running the gauntlet in November with 5 tough games. Don't ever remember M playing 5 November games.
|Aug. 31||CENTRAL MICHIGAN|
|Sept. 7||NOTRE DAME|
|Sept. 21||at Connecticut|
|Sept. 28||Bye Week|
|Oct. 5||MINNESOTA* (HC)|
|Oct. 12||at Penn State*|
|Oct. 26||Bye Week|
|Nov. 2||at Michigan State*|
|Nov. 16||at Northwestern*|
|Nov. 23||at Iowa*|
|Nov. 30||OHIO STATE*|
|Dec. 7||Big Ten Championship Game|
I would not say the O-line cannot be worse. It can ALWAYS be worse. I see 8 wins as the ceiling next year with a real possibility of 6-6.
8 wins is the floor. bama is off the schedule and most tough games are at home. Hoke is undefeated at home if I am not mistaken
Its amazing to me that no one mentions Drake Johnson as a possible RB contributor next year, when Hoke & Co have been floating his name out there as having had great after season practices, and florida bowl practices, etc. Kid is big AND fast AND physical. He ran for almost 3000 yards his senior year in HS, much more then either DeVeon Smith or Derrick Green. He was the ESPN Midwest All American RB and has has a full year in the system. Another note is that Hoke said he prepared them for the MSU game and Leveon Bell. Bell got 68 yards that game. Guess he did pretty good on the scout team. Scout team starters on offense go against Michigans STARTING defense, so he got great practice this year to prepare him for next year. The starting offense goes against SCOUT team defense. Personnally, I thnk Drake got a great shot at significant PT. He is no slouch. I think DeVeon Smith is a nice prospect, but will probably RS next year. And quite frankly, Derrick Green looks more like fullback than a tailback to me. He doesnt seem to have any wiggle. He doesnt pick up his knees when he runs, so he gets triped up all the time. He doesnt have any runs over 40 yards, and is caught from behind frequently...this spells fullback to me. Drake was a track champion so he has breakaway speed, and from all accounts this year, he is becoming more and more physical tailback. I think the diamond in the rough is already on campus....
You seem to be really passionate about Drake Johnson but you rarely post, so that makes me think you have some kind of personal interest in his success.
Looking at things objectively, though, Michigan really struggled with running back production this year. They tried Toussaint, Rawls, Hayes, Smith, and Norfleet, yet none of them produced very much at all. All of those guys return next year except Smith (and perhaps Norfleet, who might be a cornerback). If Drake Johnson couldn't beat them out this year, then why would he suddenly be considered a front-runner for the position next year? I could understand if, say, the #1 and #2 running backs were both graduating and someone was going to need to come out of nowhere, but there's an established pecking order, and Johnson isn't part of it.
I'll also say that the coaches really talked up Russell Bellomy and Nathan Brink. Neither one did/has done a darn thing. These coaches seem to praise kids to build confidence and/or maintain "The Fort." Hoke dropping Drake Johnson's name a couple times really doesn't mean anything at all.
I think all the talk about Thomas Rawls has everyone leery of great "practice" running backs. Heck, in the bowl practices we kept hearing things about the freshmen receivers, but I don't recall them doing anything in the bowl game. (Even the one whose redshirt is burned).
Doesn't mean any of them can't still become good players. Just means that we're not going to buy the hype till they perform on the field.
Drake, you do know that MGoBloggers don't decide whether you get playing time, right?
I disagree with your assessment, but you are entitled to your opinion. I guess we will have to wait and see what happens on the field and how it all shakes out. I watched Drake play at Pioneer for a couple of years, and I think he is legit. Time will tell. I do agree with coaches talking doesnt mean a lot, and sometimes its just a smoke screen. But the great thing about football, is you cant hide on the field play - this is my opinion as an OLD football coach. I like the physical way Johnson runs the ball, and think that is what M has to get back to. I believe with 8 scholarship RB's on the roster at the beginning of the year, the decision was probably made pretty early to RS him. After plays at all in BIg Ten game, his RS is lost, so im not so sure later in the year he didnt develop as much or more than the backs we saw. Even so, the production out of what we had was not exceptional. Sometimes the RS is because the coaches want a 5 year player and not because they arent good enough to crack the lineup, particularly later in the season. Im sure Kyle K was "good enough", but they choose to save him and half the very talented freshman class this year, which was smart. But i dont think it reflects the kids ability, talent and what type of football player they will become for the U of M.
And yes, I do not post often, but I read very often.
Delonte Hollowell burned his redshirt last year in about the last third of the season. I don't think the coaches would have been opposed to playing him late in the year if they thought he could contribute to victories over Nebraska or Ohio State. Kalis likely didn't play because, as a true freshman, he wouldn't have been an upgrade over Barnum/Omameh; next year those guys will be gone, so the spots are open. Johnson didn't play this year when they NEEDED production at the spot, and the guys ahead of him will still be on campus (except Vincent Smith).
Johnson might turn out to be the starter in 2013. Who knows? But as I guessed, the fact that you watched him at Pioneer for a couple years makes me think that you might be overvaluing him.