Home
we had subs it was crazy

Primary links

  • About
    • $upport (lol)
    • Ethics
    • FAQ
    • Privacy Policy
  • Contact
  • MGoStore
  • MGoBoard
    • MGoBoard FAQ
    • Ticket spreadsheet
    • Michigan bar locator
    • Moderator Action Sticky
  • Useful Stuff
    • Depth Chart By Class
    • Unofficial Two Deep
    • 2013 Offer Board
    • Crude Bug Tracking System
    • Third Down Stats
    • Diaries, Windows Live Writer, And You
    • Michigan Future Schedules
    • User-Curated HOF
    • 2013 Recruiting Board
    • Where To Eat In Ann Arbor
Home

Navigation

  • Forums
  • Recent posts

User login

  • Create new account
  • Request new password

MGoElsewhere

  • @MGoBlog (Brian)
  • @aceanbender
  • @TomVH (Tom)
  • RSS Feed
  • iPhone App
  • Facebook profile
  • MGoKindle Store
  • mgo.licio.us
  • Brian @ TSB [Archive]
  • Brian @ AOL [Archive]
  • Sour Salty Bitter Sweet

Michigan Blogs

  • Big House Blog
  • Burgeoning Wolverine Star
  • Genuinely Sarcastic
  • Go Blue Michigan Wolverine
  • Holdin' The Rope
  • MGoFootball
  • MVictors
  • Maize 'n' Blue Nation
  • Maize 'n' Brew
  • Maize And Go Blue
  • Michigan Hockey Net
  • The Blog That Yost Built
  • The Hoover Street Rag
  • The M Block
  • The M Zone
  • The Wolverine Blog
  • Touch The Banner
  • UMGoBlog
  • UMHoops
  • UMTailgate
  • Wolverine Liberation Army

M On The Net

  • mgovideo
  • MGoBlue.com
  • Mike DeSimone
  • Recruiting Planet
  • The Wolverine
  • Go Blue Wolverine
  • Winged Helmet
  • UMGoBlue.com
  • MaizeRage.org
  • Puckhead
  • The M Den
  • True Blue Fan Forum

Big Ten Blogs

  • Illinois
    • A Lion Eye
    • Hail To The Orange
    • Illinois Baseball Report
    • Illinois Loyalty
  • Indiana
    • Inside The Hall
    • The Crimson Quarry
  • Iowa
    • Black Heart, Gold Pants
    • Fight For Iowa
  • Michigan State
    • The Only Colors
  • Minnesota
    • GopherHole.com
    • The Daily Gopher
    • I'm In Love With A Fringe Bowl Team
    • TNABACG
  • Nebraska
    • Big Red Network
    • Corn Nation
    • Husker Mike's Blasphemy
    • Husker Gameday
  • Northwestern
    • Sippin' On Purple
    • Lake The Posts
  • Notre Dame
    • The House Rock Built
    • One Foot Down
  • Ohio State
    • Eleven Warriors
    • Buckeye Commentary
    • Men of the Scarlet and Gray
    • Our Honor Defend
    • The Buckeye Nine
  • Penn State
    • Slow States
    • Black Shoe Diaries
    • Happy Valley Hardball
    • Penn State Clips
    • Linebacker U
    • Nittany White Out
  • Purdue
    • Boiled Sports
    • Hammer and Rails
  • Wisconsin
    • Bruce Ciskie

Links of Note

  • Baseball
    • Big Ten Hardball
    • College Baseball Today
    • The Baseball Zealot
    • The College Baseball Blog
  • Basketball
    • Ken Pomeroy
    • Basketball Prospectus
    • Midmajority
  • College Hockey
    • Chris Heisenberg
    • College Hockey Stats
    • Inside College Hockey
    • Michigan College Hockey
    • Hockey's Future
    • Sioux Sports
    • USCHO
    • Western College Hockey
    • CCHA
      • LSSU Hockey
      • Bronco Hockey Blog
  • Football
    • Smart Football
    • Every Day Should Be Saturday
    • Doctor Saturday
    • CFB Stats
    • Harold Stassen
    • NCAA D-I Stats Page
    • The Wizard Of Odds
  • General
    • Sports Central
  • Local Interest
    • The Ann Arbor Chronicle
    • Arborwiki
    • Arbor Update
    • Teeter Talk
    • Vacuum
  • Teams Of The D
    • Lions
      • Pride of Detroit
      • Fire Millen
    • Pistons
      • Detroit Bad Boys
      • Need4Sheed
    • Tigers
      • Roar Of The Tigers
      • The Detroit Tigers Weblog
      • The Daily Fungo
    • Red Wings
      • On The Wings
      • Behind The Jersey
      • Winging It In Motown
    • Michigan Sports Forum

Archive

  • May 2013 (50)
  • April 2013 (94)
  • March 2013 (104)
  • February 2013 (81)
  • January 2013 (93)
  • December 2012 (74)
  • November 2012 (142)
  • October 2012 (143)
  • September 2012 (107)
  • August 2012 (103)
  •  
  • 1 of 11
  • ››

Get Yer Tickets

Football Display Case

NFL Watches

Follow your favorite team with localtv-satellite.com: Click Here.

Site Search

Diaries

  • New
  • Popular
  • Hot
  • Raiding the B1G-er Big Ten: Recruiting Prospects in Maryland and Rutgers Territory
    The Mathlete - 7 hours ago
  • A Cynical Take on Why Expansion May be Dead for the Forseeable Future
    maizeonblueaction - 1 day ago
  • LIGHT IT UP, AGAIN. WALLPAPER
    jonvalk - 1 day ago
  • Using Rivals' Star Ratings To Look At Big Ten Football Recruiting: 2002-2013
    LSAClassOf2000 - 2 days ago
  • UMich NFL draft history, Part III
    blueheron - 2 days ago
  •  
  • 1 of 4
  • ››
more
  • Future Non-Conference Opponent Recruiting Watch
    EGD - 802 views
  • Using Rivals' Star Ratings To Look At Big Ten Football Recruiting: 2002-2013
    LSAClassOf2000 - 739 views
  • More Milford Men Than Michigan Men: Comparing the 11-12 and 12-13 Hockey Teams
    MGoBlueline - 735 views
  • UMich NFL draft history, Part III
    blueheron - 701 views
  • LIGHT IT UP, AGAIN. WALLPAPER
    jonvalk - 533 views
  •  
  • 1 of 2
  • ››
more
  • Big Ten Recruiting Rankings 4-30-13
    Ace - 81 comments
  • Using Rivals' Star Ratings To Look At Big Ten Football Recruiting: 2002-2013
    LSAClassOf2000 - 19 comments
  • A Cynical Take on Why Expansion May be Dead for the Forseeable Future
    maizeonblueaction - 17 comments
  • LIGHT IT UP, AGAIN. WALLPAPER
    jonvalk - 15 comments
  • More Milford Men Than Michigan Men: Comparing the 11-12 and 12-13 Hockey Teams
    MGoBlueline - 9 comments
  •  
  • 1 of 2
  • ››
more

MGoBoard

  • New
  • Recent
  • Hot
  • OT: Mott Takeover
    9 replies
  • Jersey Name Patches
    14 replies
  • ESPN's Luginbill Predicts Top 5 Impact Freshmen, includes Derrick Green
    55 replies
  • Initial 2015 Top247 Released
    45 replies
  • Lewan Makes Feldman's "Freak List"
    29 replies
  • NFL: Pro-Bowl Considers A Bounty System
    43 replies
  • Putting out the MGoBatsignal for.......the Michigan Stormtrooper!
    31 replies
  • OT - Brian Urlacher retires
    42 replies
  • OT - Official MGoBaby Thread (you got 'em, we want to see 'em)
    132 replies
  • Plaxico Burress is designing a men’s "luxury hosiery line"
    62 replies
  • BTN Tourney Baseball
    14 replies
  • OT: I love High School football
    39 replies
  • OT? Graduatin' Season. Who had the Worst Commencement Speaker?
    134 replies
  • 2015 QB Josh Rosen offered
    51 replies
  • Charles Woodson signs with Raiders
    48 replies
  •  
  • 1 of 7
  • ››
  • NFL: Pro-Bowl Considers A Bounty System
    43 replies
  • Plaxico Burress is designing a men’s "luxury hosiery line"
    62 replies
  • OT - Brian Urlacher retires
    42 replies
  • Initial 2015 Top247 Released
    45 replies
  • Putting out the MGoBatsignal for.......the Michigan Stormtrooper!
    31 replies
  • OT? Graduatin' Season. Who had the Worst Commencement Speaker?
    134 replies
  • OT: Mott Takeover
    9 replies
  • Lewan Makes Feldman's "Freak List"
    29 replies
  • OT: I love High School football
    39 replies
  • Jersey Name Patches
    14 replies
  • BTN Tourney Baseball
    14 replies
  • Complete 2013-14 M Hockey scheduled revealed
    29 replies
  • ESPN's Luginbill Predicts Top 5 Impact Freshmen, includes Derrick Green
    55 replies
  • Gardner updates the recovery of Fitz & Countess
    42 replies
  • OT - Official MGoBaby Thread (you got 'em, we want to see 'em)
    132 replies
  •  
  • 1 of 7
  • ››
  • OT: Red Wings vs Hawks Game 3 Open Thread
    203 replies
  • How much do you really hate ohio?
    143 replies
  • OT? Graduatin' Season. Who had the Worst Commencement Speaker?
    134 replies
  • OT - Official MGoBaby Thread (you got 'em, we want to see 'em)
    132 replies
  • UM 2014 Conf schedule football
    123 replies
  • Brandon on Uniformzzz
    119 replies
  • Speight and TomVH on Peppers
    116 replies
  • OT: Red Wings @ Hawks Game 2 Open Thread
    114 replies
  • Prayers for Moore, Oklahoma
    112 replies
  • Alex Bars to Notre Dame
    96 replies
  • 5 star 2013 DT may not be enrolling at Notre Dame
    83 replies
  • OT: NBA Draft Lottery
    78 replies
  • ESPN 30 for 30 on the Bad Boys
    77 replies
  • Michigan Softball vs. Cal Open Thread
    75 replies
  • Michigan has #1 recruiting class on ESPN now.
    73 replies
  •  
  • 1 of 7
  • ››

mgo.licio.us

  • Charles Barkley discusses Michael Jordan, Dream Team and more - NBA - Jack McCallum - SI.com

    "When I call somebody a midget, clearly I'm not trying to insult f---ing midgets. I'm just using basketball terminology."

    0 comments
  • Why does the NFL make for such bad media?

    robots

    0 comments
  • Pictured: Detroit's Robocop Statue nears completion date

    elsewhere in awesome things kickstarter made happen

    0 comments
  • Spectacular images of the madness that was the first FA Cup final

    And you think you're crowded at Michigan Stadium

    0 comments
  • Bear Vs. Monkey Bicycle Race Ends With Bear Eating Monkey

    IMPORTANT: Ondre Pipkins not involved.

    11 comments
  • ‹‹
  • 2 of 2
  •  
more

First Look: 2013 Offense

  • View
  • Revisions
By Brian — January 3rd, 2013 at 4:14 PM — 80 comments
Filed under:
  • devin funchess
  • devin gardner
  • first look
  • jeremy gallon
  • michael schofield

DEPARTURES IN ORDER OF SIGNIFICANCE.

denard-robinson-full-flight-osubilde[1]Roy Roundtree Illinois v Michigan UgChzRnSSall[1]

goodnight sweet prince

  1. QB Denard Robinson. Michigan's career leader for yards per carry (6.3, tied with Jon Vaughn, would best it if sacks were accounted for properly). All-time national record-holder for most rushing yards by a quarterback. Three-year starter. Only player who could run for more than two inches per carry behind last year's offensive line. Kind of a big deal. Did not start last five games at QB, which mitigates blow significantly since Gardner was a revelation.
  2. LT Taylor Lewan [assumed]. Future first-round pick was near flawless in pass pro his last two years. Penalties returned after refinement as a sophomore; got beat painfully against OSU, but nearly shut out Clowney in the bowl game.
  3. WR Roy Roundtree. Never really recovered his prominence after rampant 2010. Did bounce up to 31 catches as a senior at a nice YPC clip. Had clearly become the #2 option by the end of the year.
  4. OG Patrick Omameh. Four year starter was probably Michigan's best interior OL. Lacked desired power for manball run game. Pass protection was solid. Probably replaceable. Probably not getting drafted.
  5. TE Mike Kwiatkowski. Don't-call-him-a-walk-on tight end was Michigan's most effective blocker at the spot; not targeted much in the pass game.
  6. OC Elliott Mealer. Last minute switch to center didn't smooth over issues; seemed to mess up a bunch of line calls starting in the Nebraska game; graded out as an extensive downgrade from Molk.
  7. OG Ricky Barnum. Not very good. Got run over a lot.
  8. RB Vincent Smith. Throwback screen merchant and pass-protector extraordinaire was never a great runner but leaves a hole at third down back. Admirably managed to not dissolve into component atoms after Clowney hit.
    [end contributors]
  9. FB Stephen Hopkins. Seemed to lose his job to Joe Kerridge and left the team after the OSU game.
  10. TE Brandon Moore. Barely played.

WHAT'S LEFT

8193374455_9d02066e09_z1_thumb1[1]rn_u_jeremygallon_ms_600[1]512x[1]

we gon' throw

  1. QB Devin Gardner. Blew in from wide receiver after Nebraska debacle to start final five games of the season, completing nearly 60% of his passes for 9.7 yards a pop with 11 TDs and 5 INTs. Added a couple hundred yards on the ground, sacks excluded. Those were mostly on scrambles. Fluctuating accuracy a concern.
  2. WR Jeremy Gallon. Gardner's favorite target was on pace for 80 catches and 1300 yards once Denard hurt his elbow. Diminutive but capable of leaping past defensive backs; quick enough to get open against almost anyone.
  3. RB Fitzgerald Toussaint. Gruesome break of both bones in his leg should actually be healed by fall. If available, Michigan needs the 2011 version of him badly.
  4. LT (presumably) Michael Schofield. Early struggles as he transitioned back to tackle did not last; established himself a good pass protector and adequate run blocker. With freshmen populating the depth chart everywhere on the OL, will likely move over to Gardner's blindside, allowing a burlier kid to play RT.
  5. TE Devin Funchess. After breakout Air Force game use steadily declined; he finished with only 15 catches for 234 yards. Did lead the team in receiving TDs with five. Passing game priority one needs to be getting the Devins on the same page.
  6. WR Drew Dileo. Sticky-fingered Louisiana gnome should have been targeted more. Catches quickly, gets upfield, small target but extremely reliable.
  7. TE AJ Williams. High school tackle was supposed to be Michigan's blocking TE but displayed horrendous technique and probably would have redshirted if Michigan had any options. Needs a big step forward with Kwiatkowski out the door.
  8. FB Joe Kerridge. Thumping fullback of the walk-on variety will be frequently used as Michigan transitions back to pro-style.
  9. RB Thomas Rawls. Flashed some tackle-breaking power in garbage time against Purdue and Illinois; proceeded to average under two yards a carry once forced into the lineup late in the year. Passed by Justice Hayes in bowl game and will likely fall behind freshmen when they arrive on campus.
  10. WR Jeremy Jackson. Lumbering possession receiver can't get separation from DBs.

WHAT'S NEW, OR CLOSE ENOUGH, ANYWAY

Kyle_Kalis_Action-thumb-590x499-83764[1]chris-bryant-hat[1]Derrick%20Green%20Photo%202[1]
Kalis, Bryant, COME ON DOWN DERRICK GREEN

The offensive line. With Lewan taking his twosie to the next level, Michigan is left with Michael Schofield and a bunch of guys who haven't seen the field. Two fellows seem like locks to start:

  • Redshirt sophomore Jack Miller at center. It's possible Blake Bars moves over to challenge, and vaguely possible that Patrick Kugler—son of former Steelers OL coach and new UTEP head coach Sean—enters ready to play on day one. Miller has to be considered the heavy favorite. The coaches love his nasty, Molk-like disposition; they may not love his Molk-like size. He does have the asset of being a center from the get go, unlike the candidates in 2012.
  • Redshirt freshman Kyle Kalis at guard. I bet if Michigan had to do it over they would have put Kalis in the mix to start from day one. Instead they preserved a year of eligibility for him, which will benefit them down the road. If Kalis, a proverbially nasty road grader, doesn't win a job with ease, it's time to start worrying about living up to the hype.

A third is not quite a lock but has a healthy lead in my head:

  • Redshirt freshman Ben Braden at right tackle. Braden is a mountain of a man better suited to crubberate people off the ball than classmate Erik Magnuson, who's more of a left tackle type. Scuttlebutt reaching my ears is that the coaches are extremely high on him. Magnuson does have a shot.

The fourth is up in the air between these folk:

  • Redshirt sophomore Chris Bryant, who remains a 320, 330-pound mauler. He missed the season with a leg fracture. Availability in spring will be key.
  • Redshirt freshman Blake Bars, who's a lot smaller than Bryant and will probably have to wait a bit longer for a shot at the starting job. He was a 3/4 star borderline kid.
  • True freshman Kyle Bosch, this year's edition of Kalis. While he's not quite as hyped, he's enrolling early and should find himself on the two-deep immediately. He could push through.
  • Redshirt junior Joey Burzynski. I'd be surprised if a 6'1" kid can move past the aforementioned trio and into the starting lineup. That said, he's got the most on-field experience in this grouping.

Breaking in four new OL, three of them likely to be freshmen, is scary. On the other hand, it's not like they can be worse at run blocking.

A dang running back who can run the dang ball. Maybe this is Toussaint. It seems more likely it's either DeVeon Smith or Derrick Green, particularly the latter guy if he does indeed end up in Ann Arbor like it seems the world expects him to. Running backs don't need a lot of seasoning, and Green is college-sized and then some.

Also here's my candle for Dennis Norfleet, third down back kthx. Get some Muck in you, kid, and there's a job waiting.

African refugee wide receivers. Amarah Darboh pointlessly burned a redshirt; Jehu Chesson kept his. With no immediate help from this WR class likely, last year's folk will have to break in. I was pretty high on both those dudes, with Chesson a co-MGoBlog Sleeper of the Year with Braden. They both provide relatively big targets, and Chesson might have deep speed.

WHAT'S ROD STEWART 1972

Gardner to Gallon. As mentioned above, that connection was red-hot over the last five games of the season, and not just against tomato cans. Gallon's best game of the year was the nine-catch, 145-yard, two-TD outing against a top-shelf SEC defense in the bowl game. Those guys are in tune.

Just running one offense, thanks. No longer will Michigan be at war with itself about what it wants to do. A section a bit later in this post hopes they'll run the QB some; this should not detract from the fact that Michigan moves from a system Borges never quite got the hang of to his bread and butter. Gallon's performance once Michigan had a quarterback who could stand in the pocket and deliver entices.

Presumably large improvement from the tight ends. Devin Funchess and AJ Williams got thrown into the fire a year too early; now they can add 20 pounds each and learn how to block and add a couple new guys in the hopes of Stanfordizing this offense.

Funchess seemed like a matchup issue last year, but if you were a defensive coordinator considering him a wide receiver, how wrong would you have been? Not very. Getting him to a point where he is a credible blocker is what'll get him open on seams and whatnot.

WHAT'S ROD STEWART 2013

Offensive line depth x2. This isn't quite as bad as it was last year, when there were essentially no backups—the sixth OL was a walk-on. It is still not good. If you make the reasonable assumptions that the freshman class redshirts and Bryant wins the other guard job, Michigan has Burzynski, Bars, and Magnuson available. Freshmen and that walk-on. Suboptimal.

But hey at least next year this problem goes away: Schofield's gone; everyone else returns.

Offensive line starters, probably. Four new ones; asking a lot for all of them to be good from day one.

WR depth? I'm not entirely sure this is a huge problem with Gallon stepping up and Dileo presumably establishing himself an excellent slot option. But they need some other guys; the incoming class provides little immediate help, so then it's down to Darboh and Chesson. Either or both could break out—Michigan needs one to.

QB depth. Bellomy or a true freshman.

WHAT'S HEISENBERG ROD STEWART UNCERTAINTY

The offensive line can't be worse, right? The running backs didn't help sure but when you return a thousand-yard rusher and his YPC average dips almost two yards a carry, the finger points squarely at the blocking. Lewan will be missed. The other guys are replaceable.

But replacing them is not a great thing. Michigan needs an upgrade.

How accurate is Devin really, and how much progress can he make in one offseason as the man? The overall numbers are good; his last two games left a bit to be desired. Hopefully he can refine down those misses by 20-30%, at which point Michigan is in the proverbial business.

How hard are we jamming the pro-style pedal down? Petrified at the prospect of having Gardner go down when it seemed like the alternative was Jack Kennedy, Michigan all but dumped quarterback runs from its playbook once Gardner entered the game. Was that circumstance or preference? And if it was the former, how comfortable will Michigan be incorporating Gardner's legs as an intentional part of the gameplan if the alternative is Shane Morris?

We won't know that until fall. I'm hoping Michigan keeps the inverted veer around, because that's a pretty good play.

FOR THE LOVE OF GOD CAN ANYONE OTHER THAN DENARD ROBINSON PICK UP THREE FEET ON THE GROUND? Freshmen will get opportunities, yes. Toussaint may be back. The youngsters will be a bit older, and at least Hayes and Norfleet came with some scatback hype—though I wouldn't be entirely surprised to see Hayes move to slot receiver since there's no one on the roster who won't be a senior next year. Only the seeming likelihood that Michigan acquires Derrick Green prevents this from going in the Rod Stewart 2013 category.

MANDATORY WILD ASS GUESS

Improvement as long as Gardner stays on the field. This edition of Michigan limped to middling numbers everywhere. Next year's offense figures to have a better fit with the offensive coordinator, a better offensive line if only because of reversion to the mean and having non-walk-on options outside of the starters, and at least equivalent playmakers at the skill positions with an outside shot at much better if the running back situation gets an injection of talent.

So then, how are you feeling about Denard Robinson's legs versus Devin Gardner's arm+legs? I'm thinking that's a push once turnovers are accounted for and we bake in an offseason of Gardner improvement. Guy was the #1 dual threat QB of his class, after all, and displayed some excellent potential on the ground in his tenure as a starter. And in a Borges offense, there's no comparison in the passing game*.

A lot rides on Jack Miller and the tackles; I figure the guards will be an upgrade. I'd guess we see an improvement—not that it'll take much to get that with Alabama sliding off the schedule and hopefully not having a half against Nebraska where the offense goes to die. Gardner bails Michigan out from some tough times.

*[Let's say we had that argument about the spread 'n' shred and not have it, okay?]

  • Login or register to post comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
January 4th, 2013 at 10:04 PM | A.K.A. "Swiss Army Knife" (Score:3 Normal)
Gulo Gulo Luscus
Gulo Gulo Luscus's picture
Joined: 12/18/2009
MGoPoints: 404

I think "Stanfordizing" in this context means having players at a position who compliment one another to exploit mismatches on the defense.  At TE the example is Funchess as pass catcher (but needs to learn to block) and AJ Williams as mauler (who hopefully can catch from the H-back spot).  Tough to defend a pair of 6-6 TEs when one is 240 and the other is 290, especially if they can competently fill the opposite role.

Another example cited by Brian in a recruiting profile was Dennis Norfleet:

Dennis Norfleet is another guy who Michigan can plug into their offense to jar opponents out of comfort zones and exploit weaknesses. Whipsaw, Swiss army knife, etc., the null offense, whatever you want to call it, Norfleet is a guy who fulfills a role. He is a specialist.

From that class, one complimentary counterpoint to Norfleet's electricity will be Sione Houma's power. Again, to cite the recruiting profile:

...I can understand this one as part of Michigan assembling a Swiss Army Knife roster for Borges to do diabolical things with.

Bottom line is that the personnel needs to bring a variety of skill sets to allow the offense to bring diverse formations and packages.

"Hey Now!"

  • Login or register to post comments
January 3rd, 2013 at 6:00 PM | Redshirt (Score:1 Normal)
goblue1213
Joined: 01/09/2011
MGoPoints: 221

How much of a difference is there between a redshirt freshman starting and a true freshman? My assumption is that is a fairly major difference. Does someone have any ideas/know? A redshirt freshman will have been through 2 fall practices and a spring. If they were an early enrollee they would have 2 springs in the system. So they may not have game experience, but they do have experience in the system. And the true freshman will only have a fall's worth of practice in te system. Personally I feel that the O-line will be better than last year. There will be growing pains early, but I feel that at the start of the conference games it will be clicking. Hoke and his staff seem to "get" line recruiting and appear to evaluate prospects very well, in my opinion from the praise we read online about some of our players as recruits. Obviously this fall will be the first time they will see game time, and we'll find out how good the coaches actually did.

Flying the Maize and Blue in the heart of Dixie

  • Login or register to post comments
January 3rd, 2013 at 6:04 PM | Weight training and (Score:4 Normal)
stephenrjking
stephenrjking's picture
Joined: 03/15/2012
MGoPoints: 1297

Weight training and technique. Skill guys can enter college with speed and moves, but OL players need strength that, as a teenager, they still haven't fully developed yet. And they need technique to cope with their first real challenge: competition against players whom they no longer exceed in size in strength.

Servant. Pastor. Husband. Michigan fan in Duluth. 

  • Login or register to post comments
January 3rd, 2013 at 6:02 PM | Sunshine, Lollipops, and (Score:1 Overrated)
stephenrjking
stephenrjking's picture
Joined: 03/15/2012
MGoPoints: 1297

Sunshine, Lollipops, and Rainbows:

Devin Gardner is now the man, and will have a full offseason and spring to develop his technique and improve as a passer. While Denard's numbers didn't show it, I felt like he actually made strides in the passing game this year (Brian, at times, did as well) and I think Devin has more potential to do so. Having an offense engineered for Devin's strengths will be a plus, too.

Young OLs can work. Insert obligatory 1997 comparison here, but youth doesn't mean that there isn't potential for the unit to gel.

Jeremy Gallon's ability to get open and Devin's ability to get him the ball make me feel a bit better about our receivers for next year. Roy was a good player but without RR running things his production just isn't a significant blow.

Funchess, with a year of practice, could really emerge as an every-down passing threat, and he plays a position Borges likes to use properly.

Talk me down from the Ledge:

Devin Gardner has had three years of instruction, two of it under Al Borges, and still makes headscratchingly bad throws. And while he's a good scrambler, I am pessimistic that Al will incorporate the burgeoning number of packages used in college in the NFL that take advantage of a quarterback's speed. There will be two teams in Maryland playing an NFL playoff game with read option plays in their playbook--seems silly for Michigan to shelve a play that creates such great space for its offense.

All these young offensive linemen we are counting on were on the bench this year when Michigan could barely gain a yard with a running back. I know, blahblahblah Kalis Redshirt and all, but you'd think some of these guys could get on the field at least. The interior line this season was a disaster, and as Mat darkly noted, it's quite possible that they could be worse next year.

Recruiting has done a good job of stockpiling OL prospects and defensive players; offensive skill position players have yet to make an appearance. This is a recipe for disaster in today's college game, where even neanderthal offenses like LSU and Alabama have NFL talent available to make their plays work. OSU will continue to be our measuring stick for success, and Michigan is going to need to score points to beat them, and without skill players at RB or WR it's going to be tough sledding.

I'm not convinced Al Borges can cut it. I hope I'm wrong, and he's not useless, but I'm not convinced. 

Conclusion:

It all hangs on Devin. If he is as good as he has shown he has the potential to be, he can make throws that are caught by our undertalented receivers, make first downs by scrambling, and score enough points for our defense to win the game. And Michigan could have two shots at Pasadena. 

If he can't, it's going to be a long year.

Servant. Pastor. Husband. Michigan fan in Duluth. 

  • Login or register to post comments
January 3rd, 2013 at 6:30 PM | Devin Gardner has had three (Score:5 Normal)
snarling wolverine
Joined: 12/14/2011
MGoPoints: 4701

Devin Gardner has had three years of instruction, two of it under Al Borges, and still makes headscratchingly bad throws. And while he's a good scrambler, I am pessimistic that Al will incorporate the burgeoning number of packages used in college in the NFL that take advantage of a quarterback's speed.

Yeah, but there is no substitute for game experience, especially experience against a future top 10 NFL DE (Clowney). I think he got a little jumpy at times and rushed some of his passes, but this was true of many QBs that faced SCar this year. Even so, he made many clutch plays (including that beautiful throw in a tight window on 3rd and 13 to give us the lead). He has it in him. He'll settle down with experience.

As for Borges taking advantage of his speed, that remains to be seen, but we will hopefully have actual QB depth next year, in the form of a more experienced Bellomy and Morris. This year, after Denard went down, we had no alternatives to Gardner, so we really didn't want him taking many hits.

  • Login or register to post comments
January 3rd, 2013 at 6:41 PM | Fair enough. The problem I (Score:3 Normal)
stephenrjking
stephenrjking's picture
Joined: 03/15/2012
MGoPoints: 1297

Fair enough. The problem I saw was that Gardner had a handful of open outs that would have sustained drives that he just whiffed on. I don't know if SC's pressure added to that or not, but they seem like pretty basic throws. He's made some good ones, too, but the inaccuracy hurt us at key times.

I think we all agree that it's just as well that Gardner wasn't exposed as a runner this year; Jack Kennedy was taking backup snaps in warmups for several games. As you say, next year is a questionmark.

Servant. Pastor. Husband. Michigan fan in Duluth. 

  • Login or register to post comments
January 3rd, 2013 at 7:50 PM | They say you can win with a bad OL or a bad QB but not both (Score:1)
Mat
Mat's picture
Joined: 07/02/2008
MGoPoints: 1506

The question to me is if you can win with a bad OL and not much talent at RB.  I say yes, but the QB has to be great.  Gardner could be, and I agree he is the key to the offense being successful.

It's hard to envision a strong run game, whether you want to look at the OL or the RBs, it doesn't look very promising.

I think it's probably unfair to label our receivers as "undertalented".  Borges doesn't use that many WRs and between Gallon and Funchess you have 2 players with a good chance of playing in the NFL, with Dileo being a fine complementary college player, and a boatload of recruits coming in.  Plus, expect to see more passes to H-backs and fullbacks next year as Borges spends less of his time worrying about how to incorporate spread stuff (even though it's probably the best fit for Devin to keep many of those elements in place.)

Frankly, it may not matter all that much how good the O is.  They need just to avoid incompetence, if the defense is as good as some of us think it will be.

  • Login or register to post comments
January 3rd, 2013 at 8:49 PM | I'd like to hope you're (Score:1)
stephenrjking
stephenrjking's picture
Joined: 03/15/2012
MGoPoints: 1297

I'd like to hope you're right. The problem with great defense/meh offense teams is that they play a lot of close games that can easily go against them. The ceiling is OSU 2002 or ND this year; but the floor is MSU.

Servant. Pastor. Husband. Michigan fan in Duluth. 

  • Login or register to post comments
January 3rd, 2013 at 9:08 PM | The ceiling is 97 Michigan (Score:1)
Mat
Mat's picture
Joined: 07/02/2008
MGoPoints: 1506

Especially if you're willing to think the OL recruiting rankings are meaningful and translatable to immediate ability.

MSU is a scary example, especially considering they had Bell, but I think they're an extreme outlier in terms of close games lost.  This might be irrational but here goes; Gardner is a winner - there's no way he let's us down that consistently.

I see losses to ND and OSU as likely, despite being at home, and probably another close loss or two somewhere along the line when our offense fails to convert.  One thing working in our favor is that Gibbons and Wile appear to make up a strong kicking duo.

  • Login or register to post comments
January 3rd, 2013 at 6:27 PM | Craig Roh? (Score:2)
duelThreat
duelThreat's picture
Joined: 07/06/2009
MGoPoints: 166

Is less significant than Brandon Moore?

  • Login or register to post comments
January 3rd, 2013 at 6:30 PM | Roh didn't play on offense (Score:4 Normal)
snarling wolverine
Joined: 12/14/2011
MGoPoints: 4701

Roh didn't play on offense (check the title of the post again).

  • Login or register to post comments
January 3rd, 2013 at 6:32 PM | Goodbye Sweet Death.. (Score:3 Funny)
duelThreat
duelThreat's picture
Joined: 07/06/2009
MGoPoints: 166

Edit: If only there was a center for kids who need to read good...

  • Login or register to post comments
January 3rd, 2013 at 7:01 PM | There is. (Score:3 Normal)
Lets_Go_Blue
Lets_Go_Blue's picture
Joined: 10/06/2010
MGoPoints: 1759

Football is both an identity and a terminal illness. A rhythm and a chaos and an opiate for the mind all at once.

     -Johnny Danbury (umichedme.blogspot.com)

  • Login or register to post comments
January 3rd, 2013 at 6:30 PM | Sailing away (Score:2)
mgoaggie
mgoaggie's picture
Joined: 06/12/2012
MGoPoints: 21

2 full 2013 posts without even one mention of Treadwell? I feel like everyone is 100% confident that ship has sailed.

  • Login or register to post comments
January 3rd, 2013 at 6:49 PM | I feel better (Score:1)
YoOoBoMoLloRoHo
YoOoBoMoLloRoHo's picture
Joined: 11/01/2012
MGoPoints: 1002

The Outback implosion and the Denard departure were depressing, but this summary really highlights the lack of departures.

Yes, Denard was the whole rushing O because he could find holes and Taylor was a physical force.  But there must be more talent and productivity in the 2012 and 2013 classes to replace the departures.

A quality WR and RB could make a huge difference but a year of maturity for the rest of the group leaves us better in 2013 than 2012.

"Everybody wants to be a hero, so to speak.  But it takes everybody."  - Charles Woodson

  • Login or register to post comments
January 3rd, 2013 at 7:33 PM | Jake Butt seems like a legit (Score:1)
MosherJordan
Joined: 01/10/2011
MGoPoints: 243

Jake Butt seems like a legit pass catcher. Wonder if we don't see him on the field as a true WR if Chesson or Darboh don't step up. I bet Funchess would have lined up as a true receiver if we'd had any TE depth this year. Borge loves him some 6-5 ish targets.

  • Login or register to post comments
January 3rd, 2013 at 7:54 PM | That wouldn't help (Score:1)
Mat
Mat's picture
Joined: 07/02/2008
MGoPoints: 1506

The problem with Funchess was that he couldn't get open against DBs.  That's why he's a TE.  He's going to destroy LBs, but is not a threat if you cover him with a safety.  The key to him becoming an impact player is if he can punish teams by blocking the DBs tasked with defending him into the ground.

Everyone likes a tall receiver who can win jump balls, but it's just not a big part of the offense on a down-to-down basis.  It's more important to get separation from coverage.

  • Login or register to post comments
January 3rd, 2013 at 7:41 PM | Next year is a bizarre (Score:2)
gordie bell
gordie bell's picture
Joined: 03/15/2009
MGoPoints: 7965

Next year is a bizarre schedule and if affords M's young offensive line time to gel and mature.

Only one BIG road game before November (Penn State). Also M has two byes next season and plays only 3 games in October before running the gauntlet in November with 5 tough games. Don't ever remember M playing 5 November games.

Date Opponent
Aug. 31 CENTRAL MICHIGAN
Sept. 7 NOTRE DAME
Sept. 14 AKRON
Sept. 21 at Connecticut
Sept. 28 Bye Week
Oct. 5 MINNESOTA* (HC)
Oct. 12 at Penn State*
Oct. 19 INDIANA*
Oct. 26 Bye Week
Nov. 2 at Michigan State*
Nov. 9 NEBRASKA*
Nov. 16 at Northwestern*
Nov. 23 at Iowa*
Nov. 30 OHIO STATE*
Dec. 7 Big Ten Championship Game

 

  • Login or register to post comments
January 3rd, 2013 at 7:56 PM | road games are all tough (Score:1)
Mat
Mat's picture
Joined: 07/02/2008
MGoPoints: 1506

None of them are a gimmie like Purdue and Minn were this year.  None are sure losses, and Michigan may not even be listed as an underdog in any one of them, but all (with the possible exception of Iowa) are bowl-caliber teams who could pose a stiff challenge on the road.

  • Login or register to post comments
January 4th, 2013 at 3:19 AM | iPhone (Score:1)
Ty Butterfield
Joined: 09/07/2009
MGoPoints: 892

I would not say the O-line cannot be worse. It can ALWAYS be worse. I see 8 wins as the ceiling next year with a real possibility of 6-6.

"But in the tire fire that was last year's secondary he showed a little spark." - Brian Cook

  • Login or register to post comments
January 4th, 2013 at 8:23 AM | ridiculous (Score:1)
d_ronii
d_ronii's picture
Joined: 09/09/2012
MGoPoints: 15

8 wins is the floor. bama is off the schedule and most tough games are at home. Hoke is undefeated at home if I am not mistaken

  • Login or register to post comments
January 4th, 2013 at 1:58 PM | Running backs 2013 (Score:1)
Blakk
Joined: 06/09/2009
MGoPoints: 3

Its amazing to me that no one mentions Drake Johnson as a possible RB contributor next year, when Hoke & Co have been floating his name out there as having had great after season practices, and florida bowl practices, etc. Kid is big AND fast AND physical.  He ran for almost 3000 yards his senior year in HS, much more then either DeVeon Smith or Derrick Green. He was the ESPN Midwest All American RB and has has a full year in the system. Another note is that Hoke said he prepared them for the MSU game and Leveon Bell.  Bell got 68 yards that game. Guess he did pretty good on the scout team.  Scout team starters on offense go against Michigans STARTING defense, so he got great practice this year to prepare him for next year. The starting offense goes against SCOUT team defense.  Personnally, I thnk Drake got a great shot at significant PT. He is no slouch.   I think DeVeon Smith is a nice prospect, but will probably RS next year. And quite frankly, Derrick Green looks more like fullback than a tailback to me. He doesnt seem to have any wiggle. He doesnt pick up his knees when he runs, so he gets triped up all the time. He doesnt have any runs over 40 yards, and is caught from behind frequently...this spells fullback to me. Drake was a track champion so he has breakaway speed, and from all accounts this year, he is becoming more and more physical tailback.  I think the diamond in the rough is already on campus....

any thoughts??

Blakk

  • Login or register to post comments
January 4th, 2013 at 2:18 PM | You seem to be really (Score:3 Normal)
Magnus
Magnus's picture
Joined: 07/17/2008
MGoPoints: 27464

You seem to be really passionate about Drake Johnson but you rarely post, so that makes me think you have some kind of personal interest in his success.

Looking at things objectively, though, Michigan really struggled with running back production this year.  They tried Toussaint, Rawls, Hayes, Smith, and Norfleet, yet none of them produced very much at all.  All of those guys return next year except Smith (and perhaps Norfleet, who might be a cornerback).  If Drake Johnson couldn't beat them out this year, then why would he suddenly be considered a front-runner for the position next year?  I could understand if, say, the #1 and #2 running backs were both graduating and someone was going to need to come out of nowhere, but there's an established pecking order, and Johnson isn't part of it.

I'll also say that the coaches really talked up Russell Bellomy and Nathan Brink.  Neither one did/has done a darn thing.  These coaches seem to praise kids to build confidence and/or maintain "The Fort."  Hoke dropping Drake Johnson's name a couple times really doesn't mean anything at all.

Twitter - Recruiting Update: May 20

  • Login or register to post comments
January 4th, 2013 at 5:22 PM | We don't even have to go to another position. (Score:2 Normal)
M-Wolverine
M-Wolverine's picture
Joined: 10/04/2009
MGoPoints: 38826

I think all the talk about Thomas Rawls has everyone leery of great "practice" running backs. Heck, in the bowl practices we kept hearing things about the freshmen receivers, but I don't recall them doing anything in the bowl game. (Even the one whose redshirt is burned).

Doesn't mean any of them can't still become good players. Just means that we're not going to buy the hype till they perform on the field.

"I love him, he's a great coach, he's a great mentor, he's a great friend. He's every single thing you want a college coach to be, and he does it flawlessly." -David Molk

  • Login or register to post comments
January 4th, 2013 at 6:24 PM | Drake, you do know that (Score:3 Normal)
ChopBlock
ChopBlock's picture
Joined: 12/11/2011
MGoPoints: 1502

Drake, you do know that MGoBloggers don't decide whether you get playing time, right?

"The straightest line from A to B is straight: From A to B"

"When you have Denard Robinson, you can have everything"

~George Walden

  • Login or register to post comments
January 4th, 2013 at 2:50 PM | I disagree with your (Score:1)
Blakk
Joined: 06/09/2009
MGoPoints: 3

I disagree with your assessment, but you are entitled to your opinion. I guess we will have to wait and see what happens on the field and how it all shakes out. I watched Drake play at Pioneer for a couple of years, and I think he is legit.  Time will tell.  I do agree with coaches talking doesnt mean a lot, and sometimes its just a smoke screen. But the great thing about football, is you cant hide on the field play -  this is my opinion as an OLD football coach.  I like the physical way Johnson runs the ball, and think that is what M has to get back to.  I believe with 8 scholarship RB's on the roster at the beginning of the year, the decision was probably made pretty early to RS him. After plays at all in BIg Ten game, his RS is lost, so im not so sure later in the year he didnt develop as much or more than the backs we saw. Even so, the production out of what we had was not exceptional. Sometimes the RS is because the coaches want a 5 year player and not because they arent good enough to crack the lineup, particularly later in the season. Im sure Kyle K was "good enough", but they choose to save him and half the very talented freshman class this year, which was smart. But i dont think it reflects the kids ability, talent and what type of football player they will become for the U of M.

And yes, I do not post often, but I read very often.

Blakk

  • Login or register to post comments
January 4th, 2013 at 4:21 PM | Delonte Hollowell burned his (Score:3 Normal)
Magnus
Magnus's picture
Joined: 07/17/2008
MGoPoints: 27464

Delonte Hollowell burned his redshirt last year in about the last third of the season.  I don't think the coaches would have been opposed to playing him late in the year if they thought he could contribute to victories over Nebraska or Ohio State.  Kalis likely didn't play because, as a true freshman, he wouldn't have been an upgrade over Barnum/Omameh; next year those guys will be gone, so the spots are open.  Johnson didn't play this year when they NEEDED production at the spot, and the guys ahead of him will still be on campus (except Vincent Smith).

Johnson might turn out to be the starter in 2013.  Who knows?  But as I guessed, the fact that you watched him at Pioneer for a couple years makes me think that you might be overvaluing him.

Twitter - Recruiting Update: May 20

  • Login or register to post comments
  • « first
  • ‹ previous
  • 1
  • 2
Powered by Pressflow, an open source content management system
Theme provided by Roopletheme; sidebars adapted from Chris Murphy.