Home
i'm an actor, not a reactor

Primary links

  • About
    • $upport (lol)
    • Ethics
    • FAQ
    • Glossary
    • Privacy Policy
  • Contact
  • MGoStore
    • Hail to Old Blue
  • MGoBoard
    • MGoBoard FAQ
    • Michigan bar locator
    • Moderator Action Sticky
  • Useful Stuff
    • Depth Chart By Class
    • Hoops Depth Chart by Class
    • 2017 Recruiting Board
    • Unofficial Two Deep
    • MGoFlickr
    • Diaries, Windows Live Writer, And You
    • User-Curated HOF
    • Where To Eat In Ann Arbor
  • Schedule/Tix
    • Future Schedules (wiki)
    • Ticket spreadsheet
Home

Navigation

  • Forums
  • Recent posts

User login

  • Create new account
  • Request new password

MGoElsewhere

  • @MGoBlog (Brian)
  • @aceanbender
  • @Misopogon (Seth)
  • @Aeschnepp (Adam)
  • @BISB
  • @EUpchurchPhoto
  • @FullOfTwitt (Fuller)
  • Hail to the Victors 2016
  • MGoFacebook
  • MGoPodcast
  • WTKA
  • Instagram

Michigan Blogs

  • Big House Blog
  • Burgeoning Wolverine Star
  • Genuinely Sarcastic
  • Go Blue Michigan Wolverine
  • Holdin' The Rope
  • MVictors
  • Maize 'n' Blue Nation
  • Maize 'n' Brew
  • Maize And Go Blue
  • Michigan Hockey Net
  • MMMGoBlueBBQ
  • The Blog That Yost Built
  • The Hoover Street Rag
  • The M Zone
  • Touch The Banner
  • UMGoBlog
  • UMHoops
  • UMTailgate
  • Wolverine Liberation Army

M On The Net

  • mgovideo
  • MGoBlue.com
  • Mike DeSimone
  • Recruiting Planet
  • The Wolverine
  • Go Blue Wolverine
  • Winged Helmet
  • UMGoBlue.com
  • MaizeRage.org
  • Puckhead
  • The M Den
  • True Blue Fan Forum

Big Ten Blogs

  • Illinois
    • Illinois Loyalty
    • Illinois Baseball Report
  • Indiana
    • Inside The Hall
    • The Crimson Quarry
  • Iowa
    • Black Heart, Gold Pants
    • Fight For Iowa
  • Michigan State
    • The Only Colors
  • Minnesota
    • GopherHole.com
    • The Daily Gopher
  • Nebraska
    • Corn Nation
    • Husker Max
    • Husker Mike's Blasphemy
    • Husker Gameday
  • Northwestern
    • Sippin' On Purple
    • Lake The Posts
  • Notre Dame
    • The House Rock Built
    • One Foot Down
  • Ohio State
    • Eleven Warriors
    • Buckeye Commentary
    • Men of the Scarlet and Gray
    • Our Honor Defend
    • The Buckeye Nine
  • Penn State
    • Slow States
    • Black Shoe Diaries
    • Happy Valley Hardball
    • Penn State Clips
    • Linebacker U
    • Nittany White Out
  • Purdue
    • Boiled Sports
    • Hammer and Rails
  • Wisconsin
    • Bruce Ciskie

Links of Note

  • Baseball
    • College Baseball Today
    • The College Baseball Blog
  • Basketball
    • Ken Pomeroy
    • Hoop Math
    • John Gasaway
    • Luke Winn/Sports Illustrated
  • College Hockey
    • Chris Heisenberg (Class of 2016)
    • College Hockey Stats
    • Michigan College Hockey
    • Hockey's Future
    • Sioux Sports
    • USCHO
  • Football
    • Smart Football
    • Every Day Should Be Saturday
    • Matt Hinton/Grantland
    • Football Study Hall
    • Football Outsiders
    • Harold Stassen
    • NCAA D-I Stats Page
    • The Wizard Of Odds
    • CFB Stats
  • General
    • Sports Central
  • Local Interest
    • The Ann Arbor Chronicle
    • Arborwiki
    • Arbor Update
    • Ann Arbor Observer
    • Teeter Talk
    • Vacuum
  • Teams Of The D
    • Lions
      • Pride of Detroit
    • Pistons
      • Detroit Bad Boys
      • Need4Sheed
    • Tigers
      • Roar Of The Tigers
      • Bless You Boys
      • The Daily Fungo
      • The Detroit Tigers Weblog
    • Red Wings
      • Winging It In Motown
      • On The Wings
    • Michigan Sports Forum

Beveled Guilt

Site Search

Diaries

  • New
  • Popular
  • Hot
  • Thirteen unlucky minutes (TL;DNR-This is a bit of rant about the refs)
    docwhoblocked - 2 weeks ago
  • Fan Satisfaction Index End of Season Bball Survey
    OneFootIn - 2 weeks ago
  • How likely are we to revert to the mean?
    Bo Glue - 2 weeks ago
  • It's time to avenge Villanova's 1985 NCAA tourney upset over Michigan
    Communist Football - 2 weeks ago
  • 14 Months Ago: The Fire Beilein Threads.
    stephenrjking - 3 weeks ago
  •  
  • 1 of 2
  • ››
more
  • This Month in MGoBlog History - March 2008: Pryor isn't coming, Boren has left, and some academic fraud allegations sprinkled in
    Maize.Blue Wagner - 215 comments
  • The Ballad of Jordan Poole
    k.o.k.Law - 176 comments
  • 14 Months Ago: The Fire Beilein Threads.
    stephenrjking - 91 comments
  • PreSpring Football updates from Sam Webb
    AZBlue - 90 comments
  • Thirteen unlucky minutes (TL;DNR-This is a bit of rant about the refs)
    docwhoblocked - 61 comments
  •  
  • 1 of 2
  • ››
more

MGoBoard

  • New
  • Recent
  • Hot
  • Schembechler Hall practice field ripped out (photos)
    8 replies
  • The Evolution of Commerce - What Industries are Dying, What's Thriving?
    54 replies
  • Softball Wins Series Opener Over Maryland, 6-0
    7 replies
  • OT: How do some student-athletes finish a bachelors so quickly (to transfer)?
    54 replies
  • OT: Avicii dead at 28
    63 replies
  • Chase Young becomes highest drafted Michigan lacrosse player
    20 replies
  • Podcast discussion on the conference
    31 replies
  • Matthews Declares WITHOUT agent
    45 replies
  • OT - Jalen Hurts possibly looking to transfer
    117 replies
  • Game Day Condos - who's gonna buy one?
    70 replies
  • OT: Arsene Wenger set to retire from Arsenal FC
    51 replies
  • OT: The Cube Inaccessible Until Fall 2019
    22 replies
  • It’s Friday - Time to POSBANG!!
    81 replies
  • RIP Earle Bruce
    47 replies
  • Final 2018 Basketball COMPOSITE Rankings
    34 replies
  •  
  • 1 of 6
  • ››
  • Apparently, the NCAA has already received a response from MSU about Nassar
    62 replies
  • Belleville coach Jermain Crowell mad at UM again
    244 replies
  • RIP Earle Bruce
    47 replies
  • OT: The Cube Inaccessible Until Fall 2019
    22 replies
  • Final 2018 Basketball COMPOSITE Rankings
    34 replies
  • Any news on Grant Newsome?
    81 replies
  • Auston Robertson arrested again
    59 replies
  • "Being Not-Rich at UM" Guide
    168 replies
  • HELP WANTED! I'm moving to Chicago for school and I need good haunts to watch football/basketball games. Recommendations?
    61 replies
  • 2018-19 Michigan Basketball B1G slate announced
    43 replies
  • Michigan announces single-game ticket prices for 2018 football season
    36 replies
  • CBS Sports: Shea Patterson details scope of Ole Miss deception in lengthy letter to Michigan
    41 replies
  • NCAA changes rules to restrict James Doug Foug's super power
    107 replies
  • Angelique on Patterson Transfer
    58 replies
  • Q&A with FB Ben VanSumeren--Video
    10 replies
  • ‹‹
  • 2 of 6
  • ››
  • Why should we be optimistic about 2018 M football?
    273 replies
  • Belleville coach Jermain Crowell mad at UM again
    244 replies
  • Police investigating Elysee Mbem-Bosse for death threat against Harbaugh
    224 replies
  • "Being Not-Rich at UM" Guide
    168 replies
  • Buckle Up
    159 replies
  • Scouting the Enemy: Ohio State QBs are Good
    158 replies
  • Semi-OT: What sports would you fix?
    158 replies
  • Elysee Mbem-Bosse disturbing tweets
    157 replies
  • Whats the Best Way to Make Flight Arrangements?
    149 replies
  • Wagner to NBA
    141 replies
  • Urban Meyer throws more shade at Michigan
    141 replies
  • FB new Nutrition plan under Herbert is well received by players
    132 replies
  • What past season would you have liked to see an Amazon-style documentary on?
    121 replies
  • OT: best-selling musical artists by state of birth
    120 replies
  • OT - Jalen Hurts possibly looking to transfer
    117 replies
  •  
  • 1 of 6
  • ››

Support MGoBlog: buy stuff at Amazon

First Look: 2013 Offense

  • View
  • Revisions
By Brian — January 3rd, 2013 at 4:14 PM — 80 comments
Filed under:
  • devin funchess
  • devin gardner
  • first look
  • jeremy gallon
  • michael schofield

DEPARTURES IN ORDER OF SIGNIFICANCE.

denard-robinson-full-flight-osubilde[1]Roy Roundtree Illinois v Michigan UgChzRnSSall[1]

goodnight sweet prince

  1. QB Denard Robinson. Michigan's career leader for yards per carry (6.3, tied with Jon Vaughn, would best it if sacks were accounted for properly). All-time national record-holder for most rushing yards by a quarterback. Three-year starter. Only player who could run for more than two inches per carry behind last year's offensive line. Kind of a big deal. Did not start last five games at QB, which mitigates blow significantly since Gardner was a revelation.
  2. LT Taylor Lewan [assumed]. Future first-round pick was near flawless in pass pro his last two years. Penalties returned after refinement as a sophomore; got beat painfully against OSU, but nearly shut out Clowney in the bowl game.
  3. WR Roy Roundtree. Never really recovered his prominence after rampant 2010. Did bounce up to 31 catches as a senior at a nice YPC clip. Had clearly become the #2 option by the end of the year.
  4. OG Patrick Omameh. Four year starter was probably Michigan's best interior OL. Lacked desired power for manball run game. Pass protection was solid. Probably replaceable. Probably not getting drafted.
  5. TE Mike Kwiatkowski. Don't-call-him-a-walk-on tight end was Michigan's most effective blocker at the spot; not targeted much in the pass game.
  6. OC Elliott Mealer. Last minute switch to center didn't smooth over issues; seemed to mess up a bunch of line calls starting in the Nebraska game; graded out as an extensive downgrade from Molk.
  7. OG Ricky Barnum. Not very good. Got run over a lot.
  8. RB Vincent Smith. Throwback screen merchant and pass-protector extraordinaire was never a great runner but leaves a hole at third down back. Admirably managed to not dissolve into component atoms after Clowney hit.
    [end contributors]
  9. FB Stephen Hopkins. Seemed to lose his job to Joe Kerridge and left the team after the OSU game.
  10. TE Brandon Moore. Barely played.

WHAT'S LEFT

8193374455_9d02066e09_z1_thumb1[1]rn_u_jeremygallon_ms_600[1]512x[1]

we gon' throw

  1. QB Devin Gardner. Blew in from wide receiver after Nebraska debacle to start final five games of the season, completing nearly 60% of his passes for 9.7 yards a pop with 11 TDs and 5 INTs. Added a couple hundred yards on the ground, sacks excluded. Those were mostly on scrambles. Fluctuating accuracy a concern.
  2. WR Jeremy Gallon. Gardner's favorite target was on pace for 80 catches and 1300 yards once Denard hurt his elbow. Diminutive but capable of leaping past defensive backs; quick enough to get open against almost anyone.
  3. RB Fitzgerald Toussaint. Gruesome break of both bones in his leg should actually be healed by fall. If available, Michigan needs the 2011 version of him badly.
  4. LT (presumably) Michael Schofield. Early struggles as he transitioned back to tackle did not last; established himself a good pass protector and adequate run blocker. With freshmen populating the depth chart everywhere on the OL, will likely move over to Gardner's blindside, allowing a burlier kid to play RT.
  5. TE Devin Funchess. After breakout Air Force game use steadily declined; he finished with only 15 catches for 234 yards. Did lead the team in receiving TDs with five. Passing game priority one needs to be getting the Devins on the same page.
  6. WR Drew Dileo. Sticky-fingered Louisiana gnome should have been targeted more. Catches quickly, gets upfield, small target but extremely reliable.
  7. TE AJ Williams. High school tackle was supposed to be Michigan's blocking TE but displayed horrendous technique and probably would have redshirted if Michigan had any options. Needs a big step forward with Kwiatkowski out the door.
  8. FB Joe Kerridge. Thumping fullback of the walk-on variety will be frequently used as Michigan transitions back to pro-style.
  9. RB Thomas Rawls. Flashed some tackle-breaking power in garbage time against Purdue and Illinois; proceeded to average under two yards a carry once forced into the lineup late in the year. Passed by Justice Hayes in bowl game and will likely fall behind freshmen when they arrive on campus.
  10. WR Jeremy Jackson. Lumbering possession receiver can't get separation from DBs.

WHAT'S NEW, OR CLOSE ENOUGH, ANYWAY

Kyle_Kalis_Action-thumb-590x499-83764[1]chris-bryant-hat[1]Derrick%20Green%20Photo%202[1]
Kalis, Bryant, COME ON DOWN DERRICK GREEN

The offensive line. With Lewan taking his twosie to the next level, Michigan is left with Michael Schofield and a bunch of guys who haven't seen the field. Two fellows seem like locks to start:

  • Redshirt sophomore Jack Miller at center. It's possible Blake Bars moves over to challenge, and vaguely possible that Patrick Kugler—son of former Steelers OL coach and new UTEP head coach Sean—enters ready to play on day one. Miller has to be considered the heavy favorite. The coaches love his nasty, Molk-like disposition; they may not love his Molk-like size. He does have the asset of being a center from the get go, unlike the candidates in 2012.
  • Redshirt freshman Kyle Kalis at guard. I bet if Michigan had to do it over they would have put Kalis in the mix to start from day one. Instead they preserved a year of eligibility for him, which will benefit them down the road. If Kalis, a proverbially nasty road grader, doesn't win a job with ease, it's time to start worrying about living up to the hype.

A third is not quite a lock but has a healthy lead in my head:

  • Redshirt freshman Ben Braden at right tackle. Braden is a mountain of a man better suited to crubberate people off the ball than classmate Erik Magnuson, who's more of a left tackle type. Scuttlebutt reaching my ears is that the coaches are extremely high on him. Magnuson does have a shot.

The fourth is up in the air between these folk:

  • Redshirt sophomore Chris Bryant, who remains a 320, 330-pound mauler. He missed the season with a leg fracture. Availability in spring will be key.
  • Redshirt freshman Blake Bars, who's a lot smaller than Bryant and will probably have to wait a bit longer for a shot at the starting job. He was a 3/4 star borderline kid.
  • True freshman Kyle Bosch, this year's edition of Kalis. While he's not quite as hyped, he's enrolling early and should find himself on the two-deep immediately. He could push through.
  • Redshirt junior Joey Burzynski. I'd be surprised if a 6'1" kid can move past the aforementioned trio and into the starting lineup. That said, he's got the most on-field experience in this grouping.

Breaking in four new OL, three of them likely to be freshmen, is scary. On the other hand, it's not like they can be worse at run blocking.

A dang running back who can run the dang ball. Maybe this is Toussaint. It seems more likely it's either DeVeon Smith or Derrick Green, particularly the latter guy if he does indeed end up in Ann Arbor like it seems the world expects him to. Running backs don't need a lot of seasoning, and Green is college-sized and then some.

Also here's my candle for Dennis Norfleet, third down back kthx. Get some Muck in you, kid, and there's a job waiting.

African refugee wide receivers. Amarah Darboh pointlessly burned a redshirt; Jehu Chesson kept his. With no immediate help from this WR class likely, last year's folk will have to break in. I was pretty high on both those dudes, with Chesson a co-MGoBlog Sleeper of the Year with Braden. They both provide relatively big targets, and Chesson might have deep speed.

WHAT'S ROD STEWART 1972

Gardner to Gallon. As mentioned above, that connection was red-hot over the last five games of the season, and not just against tomato cans. Gallon's best game of the year was the nine-catch, 145-yard, two-TD outing against a top-shelf SEC defense in the bowl game. Those guys are in tune.

Just running one offense, thanks. No longer will Michigan be at war with itself about what it wants to do. A section a bit later in this post hopes they'll run the QB some; this should not detract from the fact that Michigan moves from a system Borges never quite got the hang of to his bread and butter. Gallon's performance once Michigan had a quarterback who could stand in the pocket and deliver entices.

Presumably large improvement from the tight ends. Devin Funchess and AJ Williams got thrown into the fire a year too early; now they can add 20 pounds each and learn how to block and add a couple new guys in the hopes of Stanfordizing this offense.

Funchess seemed like a matchup issue last year, but if you were a defensive coordinator considering him a wide receiver, how wrong would you have been? Not very. Getting him to a point where he is a credible blocker is what'll get him open on seams and whatnot.

WHAT'S ROD STEWART 2013

Offensive line depth x2. This isn't quite as bad as it was last year, when there were essentially no backups—the sixth OL was a walk-on. It is still not good. If you make the reasonable assumptions that the freshman class redshirts and Bryant wins the other guard job, Michigan has Burzynski, Bars, and Magnuson available. Freshmen and that walk-on. Suboptimal.

But hey at least next year this problem goes away: Schofield's gone; everyone else returns.

Offensive line starters, probably. Four new ones; asking a lot for all of them to be good from day one.

WR depth? I'm not entirely sure this is a huge problem with Gallon stepping up and Dileo presumably establishing himself an excellent slot option. But they need some other guys; the incoming class provides little immediate help, so then it's down to Darboh and Chesson. Either or both could break out—Michigan needs one to.

QB depth. Bellomy or a true freshman.

WHAT'S HEISENBERG ROD STEWART UNCERTAINTY

The offensive line can't be worse, right? The running backs didn't help sure but when you return a thousand-yard rusher and his YPC average dips almost two yards a carry, the finger points squarely at the blocking. Lewan will be missed. The other guys are replaceable.

But replacing them is not a great thing. Michigan needs an upgrade.

How accurate is Devin really, and how much progress can he make in one offseason as the man? The overall numbers are good; his last two games left a bit to be desired. Hopefully he can refine down those misses by 20-30%, at which point Michigan is in the proverbial business.

How hard are we jamming the pro-style pedal down? Petrified at the prospect of having Gardner go down when it seemed like the alternative was Jack Kennedy, Michigan all but dumped quarterback runs from its playbook once Gardner entered the game. Was that circumstance or preference? And if it was the former, how comfortable will Michigan be incorporating Gardner's legs as an intentional part of the gameplan if the alternative is Shane Morris?

We won't know that until fall. I'm hoping Michigan keeps the inverted veer around, because that's a pretty good play.

FOR THE LOVE OF GOD CAN ANYONE OTHER THAN DENARD ROBINSON PICK UP THREE FEET ON THE GROUND? Freshmen will get opportunities, yes. Toussaint may be back. The youngsters will be a bit older, and at least Hayes and Norfleet came with some scatback hype—though I wouldn't be entirely surprised to see Hayes move to slot receiver since there's no one on the roster who won't be a senior next year. Only the seeming likelihood that Michigan acquires Derrick Green prevents this from going in the Rod Stewart 2013 category.

MANDATORY WILD ASS GUESS

Improvement as long as Gardner stays on the field. This edition of Michigan limped to middling numbers everywhere. Next year's offense figures to have a better fit with the offensive coordinator, a better offensive line if only because of reversion to the mean and having non-walk-on options outside of the starters, and at least equivalent playmakers at the skill positions with an outside shot at much better if the running back situation gets an injection of talent.

So then, how are you feeling about Denard Robinson's legs versus Devin Gardner's arm+legs? I'm thinking that's a push once turnovers are accounted for and we bake in an offseason of Gardner improvement. Guy was the #1 dual threat QB of his class, after all, and displayed some excellent potential on the ground in his tenure as a starter. And in a Borges offense, there's no comparison in the passing game*.

A lot rides on Jack Miller and the tackles; I figure the guards will be an upgrade. I'd guess we see an improvement—not that it'll take much to get that with Alabama sliding off the schedule and hopefully not having a half against Nebraska where the offense goes to die. Gardner bails Michigan out from some tough times.

*[Let's say we had that argument about the spread 'n' shred and not have it, okay?]

  • Login or register to post comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
January 3rd, 2013 at 4:20 PM
#2
Erik_in_Dayton
Erik_in_Dayton's picture
Joined: 12/03/2008
MGoPoints: 34174
Rod Stewart

It's very rare that I have any real qualm with the blog, but the Rod Stewart thing is something that I find almost morally offensive.  Can't we use the Rolling Stones?  

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
January 3rd, 2013 at 4:37 PM
(Reply to #2) #3
Needs
Joined: 08/05/2008
MGoPoints: 7194
d'oh

Go redshirts! And Bryant. Don't be Rod Stewart!

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
January 3rd, 2013 at 4:35 PM
(Reply to #2) #4
Needs
Joined: 08/05/2008
MGoPoints: 7194
I agree on the Rod Stewart

I agree on the Rod Stewart thing but on different grounds. The 'What's Rod Stewart 2013' section seemed to at least imply hopes toward quality, while actual Rod Stewart 2013 contains no such hope. (Rod Stewart 1972 is, however, totally awesome).

The Rolling Stones might be a better comparison, in that I might listen to a new stones song with faint hope, even though I know it will probably suck.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
January 3rd, 2013 at 4:49 PM
(Reply to #2) #5
Sinsemillaplease
Joined: 01/01/2011
MGoPoints: 964
Who is Rod Stewart?

(Leaves to consult Google.)

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
January 3rd, 2013 at 5:26 PM
(Reply to #2) #6
OysterMonkey
OysterMonkey's picture
Joined: 08/22/2009
MGoPoints: 5480
Jefferson Airplane

Starship

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
January 4th, 2013 at 6:01 PM
(Reply to #2) #7
ChopBlock
ChopBlock's picture
Joined: 12/11/2011
MGoPoints: 2434
I suggest Ride the Lightning

I suggest Ride the Lightning and St. Anger

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
January 3rd, 2013 at 4:42 PM
#8
eschaton811ydau
eschaton811ydau's picture
Joined: 11/03/2011
MGoPoints: 419
Rod Stewart

i'm just happy that there is Never A Dull Moment on this blog

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
January 3rd, 2013 at 4:43 PM
#9
BornInAA
BornInAA's picture
Joined: 11/21/2009
MGoPoints: 12362
I like next year - no double

I like next year - no double offense package - we should be more productive on offense.

Easier schedule. No Alabama. Weaker ND at home (new coach?) Neb and Ohio at home.

MSU obviously weaker after today.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
January 3rd, 2013 at 4:47 PM
(Reply to #6) #10
Blueph
Blueph's picture
Joined: 07/08/2008
MGoPoints: 12756
(new coach?)

How do you figure there's a chance ND will have a new coach in 2013?  Even ND alums aren't so delusional as to fire Kelly for getting blown out by Alabama.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
January 3rd, 2013 at 4:51 PM
(Reply to #7) #11
OysterMonkey
OysterMonkey's picture
Joined: 08/22/2009
MGoPoints: 5480
NFL

NFL

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
January 3rd, 2013 at 4:52 PM
(Reply to #7) #12
SalvatoreQuattro
SalvatoreQuattro's picture
Joined: 11/30/2010
MGoPoints: 39903
I believe that he believes that Kelly will be in the NFL.*

vvv

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
January 3rd, 2013 at 4:52 PM
(Reply to #7) #13
trueblue262
trueblue262's picture
Joined: 07/01/2008
MGoPoints: 8071
Kelly does not consider ND his dream job

He's using them as a "step ladder", and the ladder might be shorter because of the fact that 7 NFL coaches got canned. The hottest name is Saban, so if Kelly comes close at all to hanging with Bama, I think Kelly gets some serious coaching offers from the league

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
January 3rd, 2013 at 5:03 PM
(Reply to #13) #14
BornInAA
BornInAA's picture
Joined: 11/21/2009
MGoPoints: 12362
Both Chip and Brian are in

Both Chip and Brian are in the talks.

http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/01/02/brian-kelly-attracting-n...

Saban saying "no" now, but we know abouts his past "no"s.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
January 3rd, 2013 at 4:49 PM
#15
beenplumb
beenplumb's picture
Joined: 10/15/2010
MGoPoints: 1450
Funchess

May not have the size yet, but his can-can form is impeccable.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
January 3rd, 2013 at 4:51 PM
#16
SalvatoreQuattro
SalvatoreQuattro's picture
Joined: 11/30/2010
MGoPoints: 39903
I am confident that the run game will be greatly improved.

It is often expressed by those in the know that young linemen pick up run blocking much quicker than pass blocking. Add to this the fact that these linemen were specifically recruited for The Gorgeous Borges System of Touchdowns and Other Wonderful Things, my expectations for this offense are higher than most fans.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
January 3rd, 2013 at 5:02 PM
#17
DGDestroys
DGDestroys's picture
Joined: 01/05/2010
MGoPoints: 19352
Wait

We want AJ WIlliams to gain 20 pounds?

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
January 3rd, 2013 at 10:27 PM
(Reply to #17) #18
Mich1993
Joined: 12/08/2010
MGoPoints: 760
With you.

I see Burzynski as the safe option. I think he'd be at least as good as the guys who played this year (less power but fewer times blocking the wrong guy or air). I'm glad that if he doesn't start that whoever beats him out showed something rather than being the only option.
I think the line will struggle early but improve ton throughout the year and be pretty good later in the year.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
January 3rd, 2013 at 5:08 PM
#19
SF Wolverine
SF Wolverine's picture
Joined: 10/04/2010
MGoPoints: 9101
Focus On One Style Should Make a Lot of Difference

For the first time in the careers of every single guy on this offense, they will be able to focus on a system that they know, and only on that system.  That means lots more reps doing what you are going to do on Saturdays.  I'm hoping that moves the needle a fair piece.  We also have a meaningful number of redshirts and early enrollees for the first time in a while.  Here's hoping that moves the needle as well.

All in all, I expect the offense to start the year somewhat better than what we saw this year, and to progressively get better. 

The defense has already had the advantage of consistency in approach/system, and we saw real results from that fact this year.  Year 2 of Hoke's vastly improved recruiting classes also makes me hopeful that one or two of his kids will come in and impress, a la Funchess.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
January 3rd, 2013 at 5:12 PM
#20
profitgoblue
profitgoblue's picture
Joined: 09/01/2009
MGoPoints: 19557
Denard will be sorely

Denard will be sorely missed.  Who will pick up and take over producing all the "ooohhh" and "aaahhh" moments on offense?  I don't see any of that on next year's roster except maybe if Gardner has a long leash with respect to scrambling/running.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
January 3rd, 2013 at 7:12 PM
(Reply to #20) #21
Blue since birth
Blue since birth's picture
Joined: 12/24/2009
MGoPoints: 205
I'll gladly take fewer

I'll gladly take fewer "ooohhhs" and "aaahhhs" if it goes along with fewer "for the love of god! WHY?!"-s. May next season not take such a toll on my sanity.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
January 3rd, 2013 at 7:52 PM
(Reply to #21) #22
Magnus
Magnus's picture
Joined: 07/17/2008
MGoPoints: 122923
The problem is that the '13

The problem is that the '13 wide receivers aren't very good.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
January 3rd, 2013 at 8:17 PM
(Reply to #57) #23
Magnus
Magnus's picture
Joined: 07/17/2008
MGoPoints: 122923
I think another pass catching

I think another pass catching threat might appear, too, but I don't think it will be any of the true freshmen in 2013.  It will likely be Darboh or Chesson.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
January 4th, 2013 at 7:40 AM
(Reply to #60) #24
Magnus
Magnus's picture
Joined: 07/17/2008
MGoPoints: 122923
Chesson was very thin to

Chesson was very thin to start the year.  Jackson is not a starter-quality player.  They targeted Reynolds just once or twice this year.

I agree that an underclassman is likely going to step up.  And I'm not saying the freshmen won't be given a chance.  But if Darboh and Chesson couldn't see the field this year on offense, then I don't know why you'd expect someone like Dukes or York to do it, either.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
January 5th, 2013 at 9:57 AM
(Reply to #79) #25
Magnus
Magnus's picture
Joined: 07/17/2008
MGoPoints: 122923
I'm not saying that the ONLY

I'm not saying that the ONLY reason Chesson didn't play was being thin.  All I'm saying is that his chances would have been better if he were 205 or 210.  Expecting a tiny AND inexperienced receiver to play is a little odd.  It's also odd that you have more confidence in a few low-rated true freshmen playing than a couple second-year players who have had a year of weightlifting, route running practice, etc.

You're right that Roundtree was thin.  He turned out to be pretty good.  Did he play as a true freshman?  No.  Did Gallon?  No.  In most cases, you have to be an outstanding athlete or physically developed to play as a true freshman.  

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
January 3rd, 2013 at 5:19 PM
#26
M-Wolverine
M-Wolverine's picture
Joined: 10/04/2009
MGoPoints: 42199
That a former walk on will probably be in the top 5 of losses

on both sides of the ball says something.

Frankly, the guys leaving would seem a lot more managable if they weren't almost all from one position group. 

And we shouldn't be dodging people, but it's amazing the difference between toughest OOC schedule in the world vs. cupcake city. Take off the Bama loss that made no sense to schedule and things look brighter, even with the bowl result. Play a bunch of easy wins like a lot of programs do (or when Notre Dame ditches us) and we're probably losing in a BCS bowl game rather than in Tampa. Or maybe we're drawing a team from the state of Florida that looked completely disinterested in being there; say what you will, but South Carolina didn't act like they were too good for the Outback Bowl.  And they probably had a better claim to that than someone complaining they were in the Sugar Bowl.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
January 3rd, 2013 at 11:30 PM
(Reply to #22) #27
Blarvey
Blarvey's picture
Joined: 11/21/2011
MGoPoints: 2384
I am with you to a certain

I am with you to a certain point. If everything had aligned and there was more depth in a few different places this year and some games were called differently then UM could have beaten ND, OSU, Nebraska and possibly won the Rose Bowl and we would be talking about how great the team was because it beat so many good teams. 9-4 or 10-3 look prettier than 8-5 but I have to believe the team and coaches got better playing Alabama and ND (except losing Countess) instead of EMU and Rice.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
January 3rd, 2013 at 5:24 PM
#28
AC1997
AC1997's picture
Joined: 09/19/2008
MGoPoints: 3304
OL Comparison

Here are my thoughts on the 2012 vs. 2013 OL:

  • LT - Schofield can't match Lewan, but he'll be solid. 
  • LG - Barnum was awful, Kalis should be better
  • C - When they had Molk I feel like Borges called plays to use his talents.  This year I felt like he called plays to avoid Mealer's weaknesses.  If Miller falls between those two he's a slight upgrade at least.
  • RG - Omameh was miscast in this offense, but he was still a long-tenured starter that was excellent in pass protection.  I'm not convinced Bryant, Bars, Burzinski or a freshman will have the combo of technique and size to be better than Omameh.  The good news is that they can rotate bodies and find the best one. 
  • RT - Having Braden and Magnussen fight it out to see who wins the spot is a nice perk, with the loser being the obvious swing tackle in case of emergency.  But after a rough start Schofield was pretty solid. 

In my opinion the biggest POTENTIAL advantage for next year besides the system fitting the personnel is depth.  Maybe all of our depth is young, but at least there are options.  In 2012 we didn't make any changes on the line because there weren't options (though this could be a possible indictment to Miller). 

In 2013 we have four solid players/recruits that could play tackle (Schofield, Braden, Magnussen, Fox).  We have two viable centers (Miller, Kugler).  And we have three viable players at guard (Kalis, Bryant, Bars).  That also doesn't even take into account that we could move someone from tackle to guard or vice versa if we needed to get the five best guys on the field. 

Maybe they start out shaky, but by the end of the year I expect them to be good.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
January 3rd, 2013 at 5:26 PM
#29
Section 1
Section 1's picture
Joined: 06/29/2009
MGoPoints: 16556
Toussaint "should be ready."

I hope that's true, but a more realistic notion would be Toussaint "might be ready."

I am honestly not counting on him in 2013.  He will not play spring football.  Mabye that's a good thing for pro-set downhill runner.  But I question how much summer and fall football he will be able to play.

I'd love to see Fitz Toussaint get healthy, and win an NFL contract to support himself and his family.  I just wonder what year that might be.

We need a couple of great freshman runners.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
January 3rd, 2013 at 5:43 PM
(Reply to #24) #30
Needs
Joined: 08/05/2008
MGoPoints: 7194
Yep. Derrick Sherrod, the

Yep. Derrick Sherrod, the Packers swing tackle had a similar injury (if reports about Fitz's injury are accurate) last season at a similar time in the season and he's missed this entire season. Now a tackle has to bear more weight than a RB but it's far from given that Fitz is back next year.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
January 3rd, 2013 at 7:36 PM
(Reply to #24) #31
MosherJordan
Joined: 01/10/2011
MGoPoints: 529
If he steps foot on a

If he steps foot on a football field again, this year or next, then he's a braver man than I. Having my foot almost ripped off probably would have been it for me.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
January 4th, 2013 at 2:07 PM
(Reply to #24) #32
Blakk
Joined: 06/09/2009
MGoPoints: 9
Drake Johnson RS freshman

Drake Johnson RS freshman next year is getting a lot of buzz, and he was a beast in HS. Now in the system for a year, seems ready to carry the rock. Im surprised he seems to be always overlooked on the blogs. Everyone can only speak on DG, who hasnt even committed, and will not be in Spring workouts.  He will have very short window to learn the offense even if he does committ. The kids on the roster have a much better chance of becoming the starter. I think the only reason Drake didnt play this year, is because they wanted to save his eligibility. Now has 4 years and is now up to 6'1 and 213 lbs.  Reports by Sam Webb from florida say the coaches really like his growth and his ability in the open field.  Apparently they havent discounted him, as the blogs have, preferring to go straight to the 5 star "maybe" recruit.  Will Campbell was a 5 star recruit. Thomas Rawls and Justice Hayes were 4 stars. Stars dont mean anything when you get on the field. Kyle Kalis is a 5 star, and he also RS this year.  This kid is hungry, and has moved up the depth chart the hard way, by working on scout team and impressing the  coaches going up against Michigans starting Defense.  I would not count him out of the mix...

Just my opinion. 

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
January 3rd, 2013 at 5:28 PM
#33
AC1997
AC1997's picture
Joined: 09/19/2008
MGoPoints: 3304
Question for the educated - opposing defenses

I'm not smart enough to know how much this played into our struggles with the running game, so I'll throw it out to more educated readers.

I felt like opposing defenses designed their scheme to stop Denard.  In a true spread this would have burned them with WR running open down the hash or bubble screens churning out 7 yards repeatedly.  But with Borges' design and Denard's accuracy we were never able to victimize defenses for over-playing the run. 

Could this defensive game plan be partially responsible for our inability to run the ball?  Did we see against USC what is possible when a defense has to play you straight up and keep safeties deep since Denard got his yards playing 10-man football? 

I guess what I'm hoping is that Fitz+freshmen will have more opportunity to get to the second level when the defense has to respect Gardner's arm rather than Denard's legs. 

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
January 4th, 2013 at 10:44 AM
(Reply to #26) #34
Callahan
Callahan's picture
Joined: 06/30/2008
MGoPoints: 3390
"Borges's design" didn't seem

"Borges's design" didn't seem to hurt the offense in 2011. 

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
January 3rd, 2013 at 6:02 PM
(Reply to #27) #35
Needs
Joined: 08/05/2008
MGoPoints: 7194
This is where I think next

This is where I think next year's schedule proves a benefit. I expect things to be pretty rough early on. Nix from ND is likely going to tear things up pretty badly inside and I think that game's going to be very difficult given the oline. But I also expect pretty consistent improvement throughout the year, and we dont face another good D line until after the 2nd bye (maybe PSU but I think they lose their entire line apart from the freshman whose name escapes me). By the time we hit the meat of the conference schedule, the new line will have 7 games under their belt along with 2 bye weeks to work o. correcting issues that come up.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
January 3rd, 2013 at 6:35 PM
(Reply to #27) #36
Ron Utah
Ron Utah's picture
Joined: 02/28/2012
MGoPoints: 7428
?

Wait...what?

The interior O-line (Mealer and Barnum) could not block on running or passing plays, and I'm not sure how you can call our pass pro "very good."  Denard threw most of his picks under heavy pressure, DG dodged pressure for scrambles, and we ran sprint outs to avoid the inevitable up-the-gut pressure on about 50% of our pass plays once we went to pro style.  The blocking was very, very bad.

The trouble here is that this is not an opinion-based argument; the blocking was factually bad.  Ask coaches, scouts, grocery clerks or anyone who knows anything about football.  Our offensive line was offensive.

Denard's yards were mostly his, and even our own O-Line seemed to apologize after every game for their run-blocking.

This unit will be more talented next year, and will be better at run-blocking.  Pass pro will be an adventure for the young guys, but I seriously doubt that by mid-season it is any worse than this year's version.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
January 3rd, 2013 at 5:39 PM
#37
jabberwock
jabberwock's picture
Joined: 07/04/2008
MGoPoints: 44187
Wow

I'm not sure who broke Bryant's leg?

But I'd put one of his arms high on my suspects list.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
January 3rd, 2013 at 5:50 PM
#38
JTrain
Joined: 12/09/2012
MGoPoints: 7901
Bellomy

Lets hope this kid had mono.....or floaters in his eyes during the Nebraska game. He was a complete 'deer in the headlights'. I have a feeling we will need him at some point.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
January 3rd, 2013 at 10:47 PM
(Reply to #31) #39
Mich1993
Joined: 12/08/2010
MGoPoints: 760
Deer in the headlights.

I think he'll be a tolerable back-up by next year. He was clearly frazzled early and hurt by the blitzing, not open receivers and dropped passes. After the mess, he looked decent on his last drive. He'll have another year of practice to get better. I do see an issue in that I see him more as a game manager than a playmaker. Given our lack of difference makers, we need a playmaker at qb in 2013. By 2014, the Oline is probably good enough he could hand off and make enough plays in the passing game in a pinch.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
January 3rd, 2013 at 5:54 PM
#40
Thrillhouse
Thrillhouse's picture
Joined: 07/01/2008
MGoPoints: 1068
Stanfordizing

What makes you so sure this is in the cards? Aside from a power run game, what does the Gulf Coast Offense share with Harbaugh/Shaw/Hamilton's multi-tight end pro-style looks?

In case this sounds snarky, I'm asking because I honestly don't know.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
January 4th, 2013 at 10:04 PM
(Reply to #32) #41
Gulo Gulo Luscus
Gulo Gulo Luscus's picture
Joined: 12/18/2009
MGoPoints: 2994
A.K.A. "Swiss Army Knife"

I think "Stanfordizing" in this context means having players at a position who compliment one another to exploit mismatches on the defense.  At TE the example is Funchess as pass catcher (but needs to learn to block) and AJ Williams as mauler (who hopefully can catch from the H-back spot).  Tough to defend a pair of 6-6 TEs when one is 240 and the other is 290, especially if they can competently fill the opposite role.

Another example cited by Brian in a recruiting profile was Dennis Norfleet:

Dennis Norfleet is another guy who Michigan can plug into their offense to jar opponents out of comfort zones and exploit weaknesses. Whipsaw, Swiss army knife, etc., the null offense, whatever you want to call it, Norfleet is a guy who fulfills a role. He is a specialist.

From that class, one complimentary counterpoint to Norfleet's electricity will be Sione Houma's power. Again, to cite the recruiting profile:

...I can understand this one as part of Michigan assembling a Swiss Army Knife roster for Borges to do diabolical things with.

Bottom line is that the personnel needs to bring a variety of skill sets to allow the offense to bring diverse formations and packages.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
January 3rd, 2013 at 6:00 PM
#42
goblue1213
Joined: 01/09/2011
MGoPoints: 649
Redshirt

How much of a difference is there between a redshirt freshman starting and a true freshman? My assumption is that is a fairly major difference. Does someone have any ideas/know? A redshirt freshman will have been through 2 fall practices and a spring. If they were an early enrollee they would have 2 springs in the system. So they may not have game experience, but they do have experience in the system. And the true freshman will only have a fall's worth of practice in te system. Personally I feel that the O-line will be better than last year. There will be growing pains early, but I feel that at the start of the conference games it will be clicking. Hoke and his staff seem to "get" line recruiting and appear to evaluate prospects very well, in my opinion from the praise we read online about some of our players as recruits. Obviously this fall will be the first time they will see game time, and we'll find out how good the coaches actually did.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
January 3rd, 2013 at 6:04 PM
(Reply to #33) #43
stephenrjking
stephenrjking's picture
Joined: 03/15/2012
MGoPoints: 20051243
Weight training and

Weight training and technique. Skill guys can enter college with speed and moves, but OL players need strength that, as a teenager, they still haven't fully developed yet. And they need technique to cope with their first real challenge: competition against players whom they no longer exceed in size in strength.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
January 3rd, 2013 at 6:02 PM
#44
stephenrjking
stephenrjking's picture
Joined: 03/15/2012
MGoPoints: 20051243
Sunshine, Lollipops, and

Sunshine, Lollipops, and Rainbows:

Devin Gardner is now the man, and will have a full offseason and spring to develop his technique and improve as a passer. While Denard's numbers didn't show it, I felt like he actually made strides in the passing game this year (Brian, at times, did as well) and I think Devin has more potential to do so. Having an offense engineered for Devin's strengths will be a plus, too.

Young OLs can work. Insert obligatory 1997 comparison here, but youth doesn't mean that there isn't potential for the unit to gel.

Jeremy Gallon's ability to get open and Devin's ability to get him the ball make me feel a bit better about our receivers for next year. Roy was a good player but without RR running things his production just isn't a significant blow.

Funchess, with a year of practice, could really emerge as an every-down passing threat, and he plays a position Borges likes to use properly.

Talk me down from the Ledge:

Devin Gardner has had three years of instruction, two of it under Al Borges, and still makes headscratchingly bad throws. And while he's a good scrambler, I am pessimistic that Al will incorporate the burgeoning number of packages used in college in the NFL that take advantage of a quarterback's speed. There will be two teams in Maryland playing an NFL playoff game with read option plays in their playbook--seems silly for Michigan to shelve a play that creates such great space for its offense.

All these young offensive linemen we are counting on were on the bench this year when Michigan could barely gain a yard with a running back. I know, blahblahblah Kalis Redshirt and all, but you'd think some of these guys could get on the field at least. The interior line this season was a disaster, and as Mat darkly noted, it's quite possible that they could be worse next year.

Recruiting has done a good job of stockpiling OL prospects and defensive players; offensive skill position players have yet to make an appearance. This is a recipe for disaster in today's college game, where even neanderthal offenses like LSU and Alabama have NFL talent available to make their plays work. OSU will continue to be our measuring stick for success, and Michigan is going to need to score points to beat them, and without skill players at RB or WR it's going to be tough sledding.

I'm not convinced Al Borges can cut it. I hope I'm wrong, and he's not useless, but I'm not convinced. 

Conclusion:

It all hangs on Devin. If he is as good as he has shown he has the potential to be, he can make throws that are caught by our undertalented receivers, make first downs by scrambling, and score enough points for our defense to win the game. And Michigan could have two shots at Pasadena. 

If he can't, it's going to be a long year.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
January 3rd, 2013 at 6:30 PM
(Reply to #34) #45
snarling wolverine
snarling wolverine's picture
Joined: 12/14/2011
MGoPoints: 42990
Devin Gardner has had three

Devin Gardner has had three years of instruction, two of it under Al Borges, and still makes headscratchingly bad throws. And while he's a good scrambler, I am pessimistic that Al will incorporate the burgeoning number of packages used in college in the NFL that take advantage of a quarterback's speed.

Yeah, but there is no substitute for game experience, especially experience against a future top 10 NFL DE (Clowney). I think he got a little jumpy at times and rushed some of his passes, but this was true of many QBs that faced SCar this year. Even so, he made many clutch plays (including that beautiful throw in a tight window on 3rd and 13 to give us the lead). He has it in him. He'll settle down with experience.

As for Borges taking advantage of his speed, that remains to be seen, but we will hopefully have actual QB depth next year, in the form of a more experienced Bellomy and Morris. This year, after Denard went down, we had no alternatives to Gardner, so we really didn't want him taking many hits.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
January 3rd, 2013 at 6:41 PM
(Reply to #38) #46
stephenrjking
stephenrjking's picture
Joined: 03/15/2012
MGoPoints: 20051243
Fair enough. The problem I

Fair enough. The problem I saw was that Gardner had a handful of open outs that would have sustained drives that he just whiffed on. I don't know if SC's pressure added to that or not, but they seem like pretty basic throws. He's made some good ones, too, but the inaccuracy hurt us at key times.

I think we all agree that it's just as well that Gardner wasn't exposed as a runner this year; Jack Kennedy was taking backup snaps in warmups for several games. As you say, next year is a questionmark.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
January 3rd, 2013 at 8:49 PM
(Reply to #53) #47
stephenrjking
stephenrjking's picture
Joined: 03/15/2012
MGoPoints: 20051243
I'd like to hope you're

I'd like to hope you're right. The problem with great defense/meh offense teams is that they play a lot of close games that can easily go against them. The ceiling is OSU 2002 or ND this year; but the floor is MSU.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
January 3rd, 2013 at 6:27 PM
#48
duelThreat
duelThreat's picture
Joined: 07/06/2009
MGoPoints: 409
Craig Roh?

Is less significant than Brandon Moore?

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
January 3rd, 2013 at 6:30 PM
(Reply to #37) #49
snarling wolverine
snarling wolverine's picture
Joined: 12/14/2011
MGoPoints: 42990
Roh didn't play on offense

Roh didn't play on offense (check the title of the post again).

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
January 3rd, 2013 at 6:32 PM
(Reply to #37) #50
duelThreat
duelThreat's picture
Joined: 07/06/2009
MGoPoints: 409
Goodbye Sweet Death..

Edit: If only there was a center for kids who need to read good...

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
January 3rd, 2013 at 7:01 PM
(Reply to #41) #51
Noleverine
Joined: 10/06/2010
MGoPoints: 3735
There is.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
  • 1
  • 2
  • next ›
  • last »
Powered by Drupal, an open source content management system
Theme provided by Roopletheme; sidebars adapted from Chris Murphy.