Fee Fi Foe Film: Penn State Defense Comment Count

Ace


well, yeah, he would be nice to have right now [Fuller]

The Big Ten boasts some elite defensive lines, and this week's opponent, Penn State, has a group that's up there with any of them. The fearsome line combined with defensive coordinator Bob Shoop's aggressive blitz schemes has produced the best pass rush in the country, and that was on full display two weeks ago against Northwestern, when they came away with six sacks (PSU was on a bye last week).

Despite being down their starting quarterback for most of the game, however, Northwestern managed to expose some flaws in the PSU defense, and they're flaws Michigan has the potential to exploit.

Personnel: Seth's diagram [click to embiggen]:

Penn State lost safety Jordan Lucas to an undiscosed injury early in the Northwestern game; all-conference-quality LB Nyeem Wartman-White has been out all season, which has really hurt PSU's LB play.

Base Set? 4-3 multiple. PSU should be in an under front for much of the game against Michigan's heavier sets; they'll also spend plenty of snaps in an over front and will often shade SLB Brandon Bell over the slot receiver in three-wide sets.

[Hit THE JUMP for the rest of the breakdown.]

Man or zone coverage? PSU runs a lot of Cover 2. They weren't great at it in this game. When the pass rush wasn't hitting home—which, admittedly, was a rare occasion—there were serious holes in coverage. The most common soft spot was up the seam, which Northwestern from a few different spots. Here's TE Garrett Dickerson getting a big chunk after splitting into the slot

The very next play, Dickerson lined up as an in-line TE, ran right up the seam again, and dropped a pass that was quite open:

Later, Northwestern put the game's first points on the board when WR Christian Jones did the same thing from the slot:

Jake Butt and AJ Williams could both make a significant impact, especially since PSU also struggled to defend the other Cover 2 soft spot—the sideline between the safety in a deep half and the corner playing the flat. Unfortunately for Northwestern, starting QB Clayton Thorson got hurt late in the first quarter, and backup Zack Oliver was erratic. He missed this throw by a good five yards:

There were a couple others like that. Pressure played a factor, but the Wildcats left yards on the field, and even Sad Ghost Rudock is generally more accurate than Oliver.

Pressure: GERG or Greg? Shoop is as blitz-happy as any defensive coordinator Michigan has faced this year. He prefers zone blitzes, usually involving Bell:

Shoop varies the coverage and pressure enough that PSU can generate a lot of heat without devoting too many rushers. Here's a third-and-five with three down linemen; Shoop has Carl Nassib, PSU's best pass-rusher, drop into coverage, as does the other DE, and Northwestern still can't pick up the four defenders coming after Oliver:

That doesn't mean Shoop won't bring a heavy rush; on a late third-and-long with PSU clinging to a one-point lead, a zero blitz (seven rushers, man coverage behind it) forced a quick incompletion and a punt. Michigan's linemen and any RBs/FBs/TEs providing blocking help are going to need to be on top of their game when it comes to identifing and picking up the rush.

Dangerman: There are degrees of dangermen; in Penn State's case, NT Austin Johnson and DT Anthony Zettel are top-tier dangermen. Each is great on their own; in concert they're terrifying. The line of scrimmage isn't really where the ball is placed, it's where they decide to set it.

Northwestern's early attempts at inside zone failed miserably because blocking those guys one-on-one, even after a chip, is begging for a TFL.

Zettel's tree-tacklin' strength is quite applicable to the football field. Scroll back up the page and watch what he does to his blocker on the sack by Bell. Yeah. A (legal) combo hit by him and Carl Nassib knocked Thornson out of the game, as well.

Johnson had even more of an impact. He had eight solo tackles in this game, stuffing the rare inside runs—Northwestern quickly learned not to try those—and going sideline-to-sideline to make plays. This is a 330-pound nose tackle:

He's Supersized Ryan Glasgow. That wasn't the only tackle Johnson made well outside the hashes. Both tackles also contribute heavily to the pass rush. It's difficult to overstate their importance to this defense; their ability to blow up and finish plays on their own covers up some serious deficiencies, especially in the linebacker play.

Carl Nassib, who's come out of nowhere for a possible All-American season, didn't have a great outing in this game, but still looked dangerous. He has a tendency to get too far upfield against the run, which Northwestern exploited by running power right at him. Nassib is really explosive, however, and if he can't get the QB himself he can usually force a step-up into pressure. When Northwestern tried a half-roll away from Nassib and blocked him with only a tight end, this happened:

Oliver fumbled, and while Northwestern recovered, that was a third-down play that killed an important drive.

Finally, Brandon Bell looked good as a blitzer; he does a nice job of shooting the available gap.

OVERVIEW

It's all about overcoming Penn State's defensive line. Northwestern struggled early as they tried to run their normal inside zone stuff against a line that's so difficult to move off the ball. They started breaking big plays in the run game—and eventually posted 6.3 YPC on 41 rushes with sacks removed—by running power to counter Shoop's blitzes. Here the Wildcats used a late shift to get H-Back Dan Vitale head-up on a blitzer to spring Justin Jackson for a big gain:

They set up a short touchdown later in the same drive with another power to the short side:

A common thread: Penn State's linebackers are far from the normal Nittany Lion standard. They're hesitant, eat a ton of blocks they can't disengage from, and take some poor angles to the ball. They also struggled getting depth in their zone drops and blew some coverages. Even on their best play—a pick by MIKE Jason Cabinda when Oliver forced a throw up the seam—there was a bust underneath that should've resulted in an easy first down and more:

The pass rush is so overwhelming, though, that beating this Penn State defense requires split-second decisions, often under heavy duress, and it can be tough to pick on—or even notice—the holes in the defense. Johnson and Zettel can both handle a huge snap load, and while their backups aren't nearly as disruptive they're both 300-pounders with plenty of experience. I didn't think Nassib's backup, Evan Schwan, had a great game; he lost contain a couple times and was handled in the run game.

In fact, after I initially though Michigan would have to lean heavily on the pass to win this game, Northwestern's growing success with power eventually had me believing the opposite. If they can simply seal off the playside DT—not always that simple, of course—there's usually room on the edge, and the linebackers aren't good at closing space and making tackles in those gaps.

If Rudock gets time, there should be openings downfield, especially in those soft spots in the Cover 2. Penn State will miss Lucas; safeties Malik Golden and Marcus Allen were a step slow closing on passes in their zones, and both took some questionable angles on long Northwestern runs. I noted Allen took one particularly bad angle on a quick receiver screen that netted a first down, which seems relevant to our interests. (Lucas actually got picked on in coverage before he exited; not sure if he was hurt already.)

The corners weren't tested a ton; they usually had the flats well-covered, though the openings behind them were sometimes the product of them failing to sink back when there wasn't anyone to defend in the flat. Trevor Williams looked superior to Grant Haley, who got picked on late. Neither looked like a star, but with only a handful of throws going at them it wasn't easy to evaluate.

This game will come down to Michigan's ability to deal with PSU's blitzes in both facets. Northwestern's success running power is a promising sign, especially since they were down their starting QB and two starting O-linemen for much of the game; they repeated caught PSU in blitzes and got solid gains out of it; that seems replicable by Michigan as long as Johnson and Zettel aren't overwhelming the interior blockers. Dealing with the pass rush will be more difficult; I'm expecting big plays from both sides, and it might come down to how much big plays from M's tight ends can offset the inevitable drive-killing sack or three.

Comments

PowerEye

November 19th, 2015 at 1:08 PM ^

It is also a wham game. We put the traps in our back pockets the past few weeks, but I hope we bring them back against PSU (because they are so fun).

Does anyone know what kind of blitzes PSU likes to use? Are they an A-gap blitzing team, or do they blitz mostly off the edge?

Maybe we'll see some FBs and H backs lined up behind the guards, to support the interior OL and pressure with counter runs.

 

via GIPHY

Space Coyote

November 19th, 2015 at 2:15 PM ^

First, it's hard to trap a NT. But these guys aren't your over-penetration type DTs. These are mountain men that control things up front. I wouldn't try trapping the DTs much because they are great fundamentally, that I think trapping them is not putting you in a position to have success.

There are a few things that can get you going.

  1. Quick hitting plays (FB dive) can get in a gap before the DT can. Aim for the empty A gap and try to spring a few.
  2. Power can be great because all you're really trying to do is get those guys sealed inside. Movement is a great plus, but you get a double at the point of attack which should at least prevent them getting movement into the backfield. With the DEs playing the way they are, Power has the added bonus of kicking them further outside.
  3. Counters and Lead sweeps would be great in this game... if Michigan could figure out how to block them effectively. Michigan has really struggled with both of these schemes all year, and I don't see them fixing it in this game, but they'll probably at least try it out a few times to keep PSU honest.

CRISPed in the DIAG

November 19th, 2015 at 1:17 PM ^

Can someone remind me what caused Zettel to sign at Penn St?  He was a Michigan lean or had strong interest for a while.

Edit: Nevermind. I forgot he would have been in the '11 class.  "You Lift Me Up" was all he needed to hear.

Firstbase

November 19th, 2015 at 12:50 PM ^

...from BlackShoeDiaries has Michigan winning 28-17.

Excerpt:

"While the intangibles are in Penn State's favor, it probably won't be enough to send off the seniors with a victory.

The deciding match-up for this game to me is Michigan's ferocious defensive line against Penn State's offensive line, which is still very much a work in progress. Even with the Wolverines banged up up front, Penn State will still likely struggle to open up running lanes for Barkley and give Hackenberg the time he needs to set his feet and be effective. This means Michigan likely controls the game from beginning to end, with Penn State putting together enough plays here and there to keep it interesting."

Link here.

FanNamedOzzy

November 19th, 2015 at 12:52 PM ^

Am I crazy to think we'll run at least 5 screens this game? The combination of blitzing often and the less-than-stellar PSU LBs sets up the screen well. Hopefully Rudock will learn to throw them in the turf if they do cover them like IU did.

M-Dog

November 19th, 2015 at 3:08 PM ^

Penn State will be well-coached to sniff out those screens.  But I can see Rudock ripping off several big runs against their agressive blitzes.  I would have a few designed Rudock runs early on to back the blitz off and keep them honest.

Rudock is very dangerous with the ball and a couple of open yards of field.

Farnn

November 19th, 2015 at 1:01 PM ^

Everytime I hear about how good Zettel is I get pissed because he could be part of Michigan's DL.  Hope we bring back the screen game that was so good vs Rutgers.

dragonchild

November 19th, 2015 at 2:01 PM ^

We’re not beat up.  Nobody’s beat up that I know of.  Do you know something I don’t know? We’ve got a bounce in our step.  We’re ready to go.  I think the student-athletes have a bounce in their step and they’re ready to attack the day with an enthusiasm unknown to mankind.

getsome

November 19th, 2015 at 1:26 PM ^

the only problem is m lacks quick, decisive backs to make proper cuts and hit lanes in order to take advantage of issues you outlined.  northwestern is not dominant up front and jackson is not super quick but hes quicker than any m backs have been - wish it were as easy as exploiting a crease and hitting the 2nd level but theyve been unable to do so for long stretches vs decent Ds.

hopefully some combo of smith and johnson gains enough yards to remain balanced as an O bc ending up in too many passing down and distances will not be a great recipe with some unfavorable matchups across the front and in pressure situations

wahooverine

November 19th, 2015 at 1:41 PM ^

I think we'll shut down their offense and Harbaugh/Fisch/Drevno will scheme up a nice offensive gameplan with new Peppers plays, an assortment of screens, some traps and power runs, quick throws to negate their DL and maybe some new designs for Butt, Willams and maybe Hill, which will be sufficient.  For some reason i don't think they are as scary as Indiana.