Fee Fi Foe Film: Ohio State Offense Comment Count

Seth

[Recurring guest author note: Ace is on Hawaii time]

image

RESISTENCE IS (/checks weather) FUTILE.

Lower your shields and surrender your ships. We are Borg. We have existed for hundreds of years, marching inexorably forward at a rate sufficient for first downs, passing only in conditions of peak efficiency as calculated by a quotient of run-pass-optimization. We have scored 200 touchdowns, accumulated 10,000 yards, won 35 of 41 games started.

Our ultimate goal is achieving perfection; to that end we have by maximum face-saving means finally removed creatively challenged Ed Warinner from our Collective, and assimilated the diabolical and technological distinctiveness of former Indiana  head coach Kevin Wilson to our own. His tempo, motion, and deep passing concepts have been adapted to serve us as we plod forward at optimal zombie efficiency.

I observed this collection of cybernetic organisms versus Iowa and Michigan State, two good defenses that lean on their cornerbacks. They’re a threat.

------------------------------

Personnel:

image

You know these guys. QB JT Barrett is trying to become the first quarterback in this rivalry to win four straight since Rick Leach ever. He remains what he is, an excellent runner with total command of an offense designed around his ability to get every inch (and sometimes more) available to him, and a meh passer. RB JK Dobbins is a low bugger who Wally Pipp’d returning starter RB Mike Weber. Dobbins has more speed and moves his feet so quickly he tends to squirt through no holes all the time. Weber is squatter, slower, and the better blocker.

Pay no attention to which receivers are “starting” because they rotate all of them often, though H-receiver (their term for slot) Parris Campbell is usually in. There’s a lot of athleticism, but all the outside guys still run routes like Michigan’s freshmen, i.e. badly. TE Marcus Baugh is rounding into a good blocker; as a receiver he’s more of a catch-and-run dude than a matchup problem.

The genetically perfect offensive line has improved despite losing a decent new starter at one of the guard spots. C Billy Price has been a starter since their national championship season. Now at center, most of the offense goes through him. LT Jamarco Jones didn’t impress me as much as I thought he would—he’s more of a finesse guy than a mauler, but he’s not long enough to translate that to elite pass protection; he’s on the border. RG Michael Jordan took over Price’s old job and is better at being a large object in the way than the more complicated stuff he was doing last year. RT Isaiah Prince had a great Penn State game and has improved as a pass protector, however he’s still quite the sieve. LG Demetrius Knox was the projected starter last offseason so replacing injured Branden Bowen with him hasn’t hurt them. I’m anxious to see what they’re like next year without Price and Jones.

[Hit THE JUMP for the rest of the breakdown]

------------------------------

Spread, Pro-Syle, or Hybrid: Archetypical spread. In two games I charted 3.29 WRs per play and every snap from either a Pistol or Shotgun (and all but two times the Pistol motioned into a Shotgun). I’ve removed the 4th quarters (when OSU was salting away a blowout vs MSU and trying to pass their way out of one at Iowa) from the following:

Formations Run Pass PA RPO
Gun 51 32 8 14
I-Form - - - -
Ace - - - -
Pistol 1 - - 1
Heavy - - - -

A handful of those runs might be RPOs since Ohio State will use J.T. Barrett as the run option and that’s functionally impossible to tell from a QB draw. They only use a few formations so it’s worth going over them. This is the main one, called “Y-offset” in Urban playbooks because that infuriates football purists. The tight end often lines up inside the tackles where he act as a quasi-fullback. He’ll motion often.

image

The next most common formation is they’ll put the tight end on the line in the slot for a four-wide look. This formation then puts the “H” in motion, making him a threat to run. They also do a lot of unbalanced stuff—against Michigan State they were in an unbalanced formation over a third of the time! I’ll cover it in the overview.

Basketball on Grass or MANBALL? They are far more zone. The base run play is back to regular zone read, with that Penn State zone read counter motion option worked in. Out of 52 plays I charted as called runs, 24 were zone reads, five were the counter pitch, five were called QB runs, and only six pulled a lineman. The Power Read that was their base in the past only comes out once or twice a game.

When they do pull, it’s often a fold. This play came out three times before Michigan State learned to react to it. It’s a draw that becomes a fold. Watch the left guard:

Price, the center, blows a DT out and the left guard just folds around that to pancake a linebacker. The regular power stuff has all but disappeared as they try to keep things simple for the guards and feature Price.

Hurry it up or grind it out? The Wilson Effect is felt strongest in the tempo. Ohio State was previously a standard “hurry up and wait” offense, keeping their base 11 personnel on the field then checking the sideline for their play. Now they’ll actually snap it quickly about a quarter of the time.

Quarterback Dilithium Level (Scale: 1 [Navarre] to 10 [Denard]): I’m going to copy-paste what I wrote last year:

8, effectively 9. We’ve always struggled to nail Barrett to a number on this scale because he’s a good runner but not Gardner-level. What he lacks for in whoop he makes up with vision, patience, and leaving all of his bad decisions for off the field. Against Michigan State I charted JT a perfect 19/19 on zone reads. That didn’t include the RPOs, which he also, on review, chose correctly every time. There’s a serious there there, which is a big deal for an offense that has to stay ahead of the sticks.

He got two zone reads wrong in this year’s two games. A reminder of his annoying ability to maximize yards against your filling safety:

Danger Man and the Dangermen:

I think this is the first time I’ve put a shield on a lineman; the Weber touchdown I clipped above is one example. There are about 60 more. Watch the center handle this slanting DT like he always wanted that guy to do this:

Here’s another slant on which Price hands a block on his DT to the right guard on a silver platter then seals a linebacker.

Price is ridiculously strong, gets Ohio State in the right protections every time, and is by some margin their best pass protector. They pull him sometimes on play-action jut to get him at left tackle (Barrett bugs out unnecessarily here):

Though Mike Weber lost his job to Dobbins, he is still a dangerous dude earning nearly as many carries. The touchdown above is his as much as Price’s: Weber sets up Price’s second block by pressing outside before a sharp cut. Then he splits MSU’s safeties. I’m tempted to give Higdon a star now.

And here’s the guy Weber lost his job to:

J.K. Dobbins has ridiculous feet, sprinter speed, and excellent vision in traffic. He’s also compact and difficult to bring down. He’s averaging 7.3 YPC on 149 attempts this year. He’s not allowed to go to the NFL until 2020.

The current iteration of the H or “Percy Harvin” slotback position is Parris Campbell, who’s kind of a weird dude. Campbell was a running back in high school but is shaped like a receiver—Ohio State will used him as a slot merchant and jet sweep threat but not as much of a full-blown running back as Curtis Samuel was for them last year. Despite missing a game this year, Campbell is their top receiver in yards (his backup, K.J. Hill, has 20 more targets). Campbell is very crafty blocker and uses his elite acceleration to good effect:

He’s also their returner. Despite Campbell reclaiming his job, K.J. Hill gets on the field plenty—if they pull the tight end to go four-wide Hill’s the first guy in, though he’s not used as much outside as he once was. Hill didn’t feature as much in these games but I’ve seen enough of him to tell you what he is: a slippery receiver with a good inside-out move and plenty of speed to keep your safeties in danger.

I was back and forth about LT Jamarco Jones as I explained in the personnel section but here’s one of the reasons I thought about starring him:

I don’t have to go over J.T. Barrett again do I? Oh, right, there’s a section for that.

HenneChart:

Opponent DO CA MA IN BR TA BA PR SCR DSR
Iowa 1 16(3) 3 2xx 5xx 4 3 3 - 60%
Michigan State 1 6(8) 2(1) 5xx(1) - - - - 2 63%

J.T.’s passing game relies heavily on his feet and defenses overreacting to the running game in general. His long passing is accurate enough to be plenty dangerous to a defense going Cover Zero or overreactive zone safeties. The old joke is his weakness is rain, because defenses can get away with run-focused safeties without worrying about receivers with five-star speed getting behind them. In fair weather Barrett doesn’t have to be that accurate to put a ball up and win a talent competition:

Kevin Wilson has added a lot more deep switches and a more coherent pass game to maintain that threat. He still can’t fix Barrett’s accuracy (not the INs above), especially when he’s under pressure. And sometimes when he’s not:

The Iowa game was a new experience: as Barrett’s protection broke down he would come down backside reads and not see that a zone defender was right there to pick it off.

OVERVIEW:

Again this is with no 4th quarters:

Down Run Pass PA RPO
1st 26 13 6 7
2nd 17 10 2 6
3rd 8 9 - 2

So Ohio State isn’t as run focused as they were previously, though you have to remember most of those passes are screens. This offense is still based on running the ball against six in the box, and all the frippery is there to make you play that straight up. There isn’t an idea Urban won’t use to screw with defenses. Take two steps toward a veer and they’ll pull a tackle around:

The run-pass-options are a big part of that. One of the most successful was a package that uses the tight end as a very wide option pitch:

Another RPO they turned to a bunch is one you saw earlier when I pointed out how good of an inside runner Barrett is. Here’s the other option on that play if the safeties are staying inside:

------------------------------

PLAY BREAKDOWN: THE UNBALANCED GAME

Ohio State went unbalanced a ton in these two games, and did more of it against Illinois. Each of these games saw the package further developed: against Michigan State they were running several RPOs out of it. The base of that is the standard Rich Rodriguez zone read with a pre-snap bubble read:

Going unbalanced means the second receiver from the top is officially an offensive linemen for this play—if he goes downfield like on the above play Ohio State can’t throw downfield. They can still pass behind the line of scrimmage, hence the screens.

You do lose an eligible receiver but what do you care if your passing game doesn’t actually look for a fourth guy to get open.

The tradeoff is fewer defenders on the backside unless the defense wants to pull someone out of the middle. That accomplished, Ohio State is back to running a simple zone read versus six in the box.

If you have a Rivals account—and Ross Fulton is the best reason to do that—Fulton this week tied OSU’s development of their unbalanced game directly to the Michigan gameplan ($), as the constant RPOs will stress Michigan’s safeties and lead to Ohio State dictating matchups. It’s not hard to picture WLB #33 here as McCray on Dobbins in an edge race:

The Buckeyes likewise targeted linebackers in coverage, below throwing a counter flood route to Dobbins.

Pvuopq02orw52eunysjy

I wish I could quote the whole article. Fulton discusses how the motion puts a defense like Michigan’s in a bind. If you have every defender follow his man, he gets caught behind on jet motions. If you choose to swap the OLBs’ jobs Ohio State gets to pick their matchups. Your last option is to bring down a safety and play with no help against their 5-star receivers.

Comments

Don

November 22nd, 2017 at 1:41 PM ^

Forget Iowa-OSU. The score you should be keeping in mind is Michigan-OSU in 1961.

• Former UM football hero is in his third season as UM coach.

• Michigan starts off season with strong victory over ranked opponent.

• Michigan follows with strong victory over service academy opponent.

• Michigan loses to MSU in Ann Arbor, loses another BIG game on the road

• Highly-ranked OSU comes into town coached by guy who's won multiple NCs

• Final score: OSU 50  UM 20 

UM Indy

November 22nd, 2017 at 1:43 PM ^

Was a lifetime ago. Besides, which part are you hoping to replicate? The 55? Martians will arrive before this offense puts up 55 on anybody, let alone a solid Ohio St defense. Holding them to 24? Possible but doubtful. Throw in Ohio St’s year long undying obsession with and hatred of Michigan and there’s simply no way they will look unprepared and uninterested like they did in Iowa City. Zero chance.

GordonG

November 22nd, 2017 at 1:33 PM ^

once again Barrett is key...

will need him to fumble and throw an INT or two

for us to have any chance.  

If he is efficient and goes 35 out of 40 attempts this game will be out of control.

Go Blue !!

 

Jonesy

November 22nd, 2017 at 3:14 PM ^

We gon' die. I expect the our PSU game all over again while hoping we can be their Iowa (ouch) game instead. The only tension here is how long until I give up hope. It was 1 play in the PSU game! I think we can do better in this one.

jgoblue11

November 22nd, 2017 at 3:15 PM ^

to accept people who are going to get pissed off at Harbaugh for us losing this game. I don't know what is so hard to understand? Ohio state has had solid quarterback play since Troy Smith. We've had Chad Henne and Denard Robinson. That has been the difference in this rivalry. Harbaugh had us at #2 vs #3 last year and we were a 4th down stop away from the playoffs. Come Saturday, so many people will be giving Harbaugh and Pep Hamilton so much shit. I refuse to get mad at the coaching staff for having to use a third string quarterback. Ohio State is going to kill us. And it's because they have a great quarterback. Look at JT's stats. he's fucking amazing in these types of games.

micheal honcho

November 22nd, 2017 at 3:50 PM ^

Nothing to lose boys. Play like your hair is on fire.
First time we tackle JT, give him the Wisconsin treatment, drive skull into turf. Thank the B1G for the no call. When the 2nd stringer comes in, give him the Purdue treatment. Once again thank the B1G for the no call and let's play 3rd vs 3rd and see what happens.

M-Dog

November 22nd, 2017 at 4:42 PM ^

The Meyer / Wilson offense puts so much pressure on a defense at every single position.  It's very hard for anyone on D to help anyone else.  Everybody is on an island.

Meanwhile our offensive scheme, even with decent QBs, is relatively easy to defend.  There are a lot of opportunities for help defense.

Why do we run the scheme we do?

What makes our scheme worth all the fuss?  It takes a level of precision that is impossible to achieve with young / injured players, and it has no real compelling payoff versus other options.

What is the point to it?

 

Casanova

November 22nd, 2017 at 5:23 PM ^

Not to mention our scheme requires more things to go right for a play to work. 

Their offense is like the bugs on Klendathu, hard to kill effectively and are prone to adapt on the fly. You stop one aspect of a play, and they still pick up 5 yards.

OSU plays have multiple plays built into the same formation, even elite defenses have trouble with that kind of variation. 

 


 

 

 

 

dragonchild

November 22nd, 2017 at 7:55 PM ^

I'm not an OC but the way I see it. . .

Meyer's is a pressure offense.  It works by forcing your defense into athletic matchups (e.g. my slot receiver vs. your safety, or my RB vs. your MLB) one-on-one with no help as you say, and since Meyer's teams are always loaded, they tend to win those matchups.  Meyer is also very good at finding that matchup, picking on your guy who's on the field by default.  So they want you to think you have to play them one-on-one.  But when an offense can respond to that pressure, like Michigan did last year (before the refs took over anyway) or Clemson, or when Iowa's playing out of their minds, there's nowhere for the offense to go.  Easier said than done, but we've seen them get shut down.

Harbaugh's is a control offense.  It works like a Rube Goldberg machine to eventually get a positional mismatch, like a guard matched up on a safety -- something the defense can't possibly win.  But since it's complicated, defenses initially hit back with trickery like stunts or blitzes, throw a wrench into the works, so even before you can get to matchups the offense has a rough learning curve.  Matchups are irrelevant when a 5-star lineman can just as easily run right by his assignment.  But when it works. . . you're dead wrong about no real compelling playoff.  When it's on, even an elite defense can get eviscerated because you can't out-athlete the scheme.  You can RPS some plays but eventually you have to guess what the next move is, and there isn't a safety in all of college football that can do anything when Onwenu pulls through the gap he's responsible for.  Until that point it's frustrating to watch them put their pants on their heads, but the upside is a real shot at national championships.  Unless you think that's not compelling.

SpilledMilk

November 22nd, 2017 at 9:57 PM ^

But we've already seen that power spread offenses can (and will) will national titles. Harbaugh's offense is great for the NFL but it's a little clunky when running it with college players. May be best to maximize the talent that you have available as opposed to forcing something that takes years to master.