Fee Fi Foe Film: Notre Dame Defense Comment Count

Ace

Previously: Notre Dame Offense


The defense as a whole isn't terrifying, but SWEET JEBUS SHELDON DAY COVERING A WHEEL ROUTE OUT OF THE BACKFIELD CERTAINLY IS.

Ah, so, Brian has already posted the game preview because our schedule got weird this week. It's Notre Dame week, so I guess weird is the norm. Usually these will go up on Thursdays because that makes far more sense.

Anyway, Notre Dame pummelled Rice on the scoreboard, 48-17, and mostly limited the Owl offense outside of a couple big plays, including one that came in garbage time. There do appear to be significant holes in the Irish defense, however, and Michigan is better equipped to take advantage than Rice. On to the breakdown...

Personnel: Seth has made some tweaks to the diagram. He did his best to make it readable on this page, but there's enough packed in there that I suggest you click on the image to embiggen:

Dangermen and top-100 recruits have been properly identified; right now, Notre Dame has more of the latter than the former.

Base Set? 4-3 under. As Brian noted, the Irish stuck with their base personnel for the most part against Rice's spread, with OLB James Onwualu—a converted WR who played safety in the spring—often lined up over the slot. Sometimes they'd have one of their DEs play from a two-point stance. Here are both of those things in one screenshot:

Onwualu is over the slot to the near side.

ND did play some three-man fronts, usually on third-and-long, and also shifted to what Brian dubbed a "30 slide" in the UFR when Rice overloaded one side.

[Hit THE JUMP for the rest of the breakdown, including... breakdowns.]

Man or zone coverage? A healthy mix of both principles. The Irish run a fair amount of quarters and Tampa 2, but they'll also play a lot of man free when they blitz. New DC Brian VanGorder will throw in zone blitzes, as well. The one with Day dropping onto a running back in the GIF worked out okay. This one... did not.

This would be a theme whether or not Notre Dame blitzed—crossing routes against their zones were there all day, as were most other underneath routes.

Pressure: GERG or Greg? VanGorder didn't bring the house very often, but he switched up the blitz schemes enough that it was tough to identify where pressure was coming from; it wasn't unusual to see a lineman drop into coverage while a defensive back flew in off the edge, and he also utilized an Okie front similar to Mattison's favorite third-down blitz package.

Notre Dame got a little pressure—but not much—off their blitzes, and practically nothing outside of Sheldon Day being spectacular when they left the D-line to their own devices. Speaking of which...

Dangerman: DT Sheldon Day, with a bullet. He's going to give Michigan's interior line problems, because he's going to give every line he faces problems. Day is extremely quick, splits doubles with regularity, should not be blocked one-on-one, and finishes plays when he gets penetration. He's easily ND's best pass-rusher despite coming from the interior most of the time, and he's also their best run defender. (Yes, better than Jaylon Smith, who's good but not yet great.)

OVERVIEW

Starting up front, Notre Dame's line looks like a weak point outside of Day, who's good enough on his own to haul them up to at least an average unit. Jarron Jones is a 6'5" DT who plays like he's 6'5", alternating solid plays with ones in which he gets stood up and blown off the ball; Michigan should be able to single-block him and double Day. The defensive ends didn't do much, and were complete non-factors in the pass rush. The backups, as Brian noted, are mostly freshmen—true freshmen at that—and they were responsible for a couple of Rice's best runs on the day.

Jaylon Smith is an athletic marvel who's still working his way to being a great linebacker; he'd probably look closer to that end if he had more talent around him, but right now he's flying around the field trying to cover for having an unathletic former walk-on and a converted receiver flanking him at linebacker, and trying to do that much comes with mixed results. He only finished with three tackles, all solos, in this game; much of that was because Rice largely abandoned the run and picked on the other linebackers in coverage. Make no mistake: Smith is a good player.

I'm less sold than Brian on walk-on ILB Joe Schmidt's run-stopping ability; we both agree that he's a minus in pass coverage, as he was repeatedly the culprit on those open crossing routes. Schmidt led the team with eight tackles and usually found himself in the right place against the run. He didn't always finish plays when he got into good position, though. Here he falls over—I think he clipped a lineman's foot—on a free run into the hole:

That might just be bad luck, but these missed tackles on back-to-back plays were not:

On the next play, he made a stop by catching the running back flat-footed and allowed about three yards after contact as a result; he did have a couple nice sticks on running backs, so perhaps I'm a little harsh here, but I thought he gave up a fair number of leaky yards against dudes less big and powerful than Derrick Green and De'Veon Smith.

Onwualu's placement on the edge and Rice's play distribution kept him from being much of a factor in the run game; I thought he did fine in coverage. Same goes for both of Notre Dame's corners, who were mostly untested as Rice chose to attack the middle of the field. I do think Michigan has a chance to get the screen game going; on a slip screen to the RB, corner Cole Luke got blocked by a Rice receiver ten yards downfield and never disengaged, allowing a first down when Jaylon Smith couldn't be Superman.

The safeties, well...

“With Elijah and Max back there, we needed somebody to pick it up and neither one of those guys picked up the slack,” [Brian] Kelly said during his weekly Sunday teleconference. “Whatever we have to do, we’ll get better back there between those two guys and making sure they communicate better.”

...that's not good, and it brings us to the play breakdown.

PLAY BREAKDOWN

I was going to picture-page Elijah Shumate's major bust on Rice's first touchdown...

...but One Foot Down already has it covered, in gory detail:

It looks to me like [Shumate] thinks he has the inside receiver in man coverage. Post snap, Shumate follows this receiver towards the middle of the field and then realizes too late the rest of his teammates are playing zone.

I'm not sure why Shumate switched from playing zone to man just before the snap. It may have been an automatic check that he failed to communicate. Or it might have just been a straight up mental error. Regardless, it didn't work out very well for the Irish.

Communication was clearly a problem, but the safety issues went deeper than that. Either Shumate (#22) is giving up too much room to the inside here or Max Redfield (#10) needs to get way deeper in his drop, though that would've opened up a wide open crossing route, so this is just asking a lot out of a safety manned up against a receiver:

If that's a Michigan receiver, it's at least a catch and likely a touchdown—that dude wasn't exactly a burner, and then he dropped a pass that hit him square in the hands.

Shumate also bit on some play fakes, and you can bet Doug Nussmeier took notice of this exquisite play design on a fake screen Rice used to take advantage:

A better throw gets Rice a touchdown or something close to it on that play, and Michigan will give Notre Dame a tough choice: play off to cover for the safeties and allow a lot of easy yards on screens and underneath stuff, or challenge Michigan's receivers to beat them at the line—not an ideal option when Devin Funchess is out there commanding safety help.

Rice added a late touchdown on a 53-yard bomb right over the top of backup safety Nicky Baratti, so I don't think they have a choice but to roll with the guys they've got. I'm pretty confident Michigan will be able to throw on these guys, and the underneath passing game should cover for a lack of a consistent running game if the O-line has trouble keeping Day out of the backfield. I'm with Brian on his prediction: while the Irish offense with Golson is dangerous, I think Michigan's defense is much more up to the task of stopping their opposition than Notre Dame's.

Comments

animalfarm84

September 5th, 2014 at 4:51 PM ^

Thirded, though I wonder whether there's a way to easily show someone who both was a Top 100 recruit and is a star player (e.g., Gardner).  Not terribly important (as I think the key here is to show who either is or might be someone to focus on, and the current system accomplishes that well), but it might be interesting anyway.

RobM_24

September 5th, 2014 at 3:58 PM ^

Ace, do you think Hayes has a larger role in this game? It seems like we might have an advantage to exploit with their LB's in pass coverage, but obviously Smith/Green haven't showed much in the hands department.

SF Wolverine

September 5th, 2014 at 4:23 PM ^

than they do.  That said, the matchup of their NT against our interior is a bit disconcerting.  Biggest issue, for me, if how ND plays our receivers.  My guess is that they play off us and keep the ball infront of them, try to lull DG into a false sense of security, then pick their moment try to jump a route.  Need DG to have patience and poise.  Hard for me to believe that ND can do too much fancy in terms of what they show given relatively lack of experience, injuries, etc., on defense.

 

Asgardian

September 5th, 2014 at 4:37 PM ^

Circa March 2012 (his JR yr of high school immediately pre-ND commitment; recall Onwualu went to same HS as Michael Floyd):

 

ACE: What position did Michigan offer you for? I know you're listed as an athlete. Do you know what position you'd play if you decided on Michigan?

JAMES: Well, as of right now, they just have me offered as an athlete. We haven't really talked position-wise. Since I've been talking to Mattison a lot of people assume I'm going to be playing safety or corner, but as of right now I don't really know.

ACE: Do you have a preference in terms of where you fit best on the field? Do you prefer offense or defense?

JAMES: I don't know, it could change. Next year I'm going to be all over. We've got a really good running back, [2014 RB] Blake Banham, who's going to be playing next year, so I'm not going to playing as much running back. We've also got a safety, [2014 S] Tim Gordon, so we're going to have to see, I might be playing corner and receiver.

Irish9

September 5th, 2014 at 4:46 PM ^

My only nit is I think you undersell Jaylon Smith.  I suppose it's understandable based solely on Rice.  He had no highlight reel plays in this game, but didn't have much opportunity, either.  He was near dominant the last half of last year (ASU, USC), and did make a couple tackles in the Rice game that had me rubbing my eyes in disbelief.  One was in the 1st Q, 3rd and 10, and Rice ran a perfect inside draw against an outside blitz.  Should've gone for 40-50 yards.  Smith ran him down after 6, from absolutely out of nowhere, and forced a punt.  That's alot of words to tell you that ND hasn't had an athlete like him on defense in YEARS.  He's still a below average blitzer, but I don't think he'll be asked to do that much tomorrow.

Ace

September 5th, 2014 at 4:56 PM ^

No. Te'o was about 20 pounds heavier than Smith, at least in the latter part of his career, which helped him take on blocks and hold up against the run. Smith's athleticism is just outrageous for a linebacker, so while he's not necessarily going to knock a guard back, he does well enough just by being really hard to corral.

Ace

September 5th, 2014 at 4:54 PM ^

I'm pretty much in agreement; he's clearly a phenomenal athlete and is well on his way to reaching his prodigious potential. My writeup may not have been entirely fair to him; I think a lot of his lack of impact was due to the lack of opportunities to make one, like you said—he had to cover a ton of ground and did well with it.

socalwolverine1

September 5th, 2014 at 5:13 PM ^

matches up favorably, whenever Day lines up on the right half of their DL.  Magnuson appears to be our quickest, most decisive and technically sound OL; and teamed up with Cole, we are very solid on that side.  On the other side, I'm not worried about Glasgow, but Kalis needs to play smart and be more consistent, no whiffs.

CRISPed in the DIAG

September 5th, 2014 at 5:47 PM ^

I loved the fake screen.  This is exactly the counter I've been looking for off the WR screen (insert Funchess hurdle) we've been running since late last year.  I hope DG has the touch. If yes, we could take in the direction of the proverbial house.

LordGrantham

September 5th, 2014 at 6:08 PM ^

Lol at Sheldon Day "covering the wheel route."  He gets about a 2 second head start and a great angle on the guy, and he still ends up two yards behind him.  Without safety help, that's an easy touchdown.  He may be a great DT, but he can't cover wheel routes.

aplatypus

September 5th, 2014 at 9:29 PM ^

who stopped a rush and turned, then ran with a sprinting RB for 10 yards down the field before giving ground. He may not be covering the wheel like a great corner, but he does more than well enough to make sure it's shut off for 10-15 yards while the rest of his team does his duty. Most D-linemen would not have gotten close to the RB, let alone stick with him going down field.