Fee Fi Foe Film: Michigan State Defense Comment Count

Ace

Previously: Michigan State Offense



Cackle with knowing glee if...

Let's cut to the chase: after watching MSU's defense allow six yards per play against Rutgers, my optimism hasn't abated.

Personnel: Seth's diagram [click to embiggen]:

MSU's defense is as injury-riddled as their offense. Standout SAM Ed Davis is out for the year with a knee injury; safety RJ Williamson is out for the majority of the season; both starting corners are injured—if Darian Hicks can't go, which seems likely, Jermaine Edmonson will replace him and the backups will be true freshmen.

Base Set? 4-3 over. MSU will stay in their base for most of the game; it's rare for them to even bring on a nickel, which is fortunate for them given their personnel issues.

[Hit THE JUMP for the rest of the breakdown.]

Man or zone coverage? State is still a heavy Cover 4 team, which essentially functions as man press while keeping the safeties in position to help with the run. Unlike previous interations of the Spartan defense, this group really struggles with the press coverage aspect. Their corners repeatedly missed jams against Rutgers' receivers and Leonte Carroo made them pay dearly.

Arjen Colquhoun, pressed into starting duty because of Vayante Copeland's injury, had an awful game; here he never gets his hands on Carroo, stumbles while flipping his hips, and tops the play off with an ill-advised lunge when Carroo had to hold up on an underthrow:

I don't recall seeing Carroo get successfully jammed all night. While Michigan doesn't have a receiver with his big-play ability, there should be opportunities to hit MSU over the top regardless, especially since State also busts their fair share of coverages.

Pressure: GERG or Greg? This is MSU—they're aggressive with their blitzes, and they'll still bring plenty of double A-gap pressure. This year those inside linebacker blitzes function in part to offset that their DTs are very aggressive getting upfield, which often leaves creases on the interior; bringing the linebackers helps fill those gaps while allowing the tackles to pin their ears back.

Dangerman: Shilique Calhoun is the obvious choice. He's explosive off the edge and will give Michigan's tackles all they can handle when he ends up one-on-one with them. When he's not hitting the quarterback himself, he's often able to disrupt the pocket in a way that benefits the other D-linemen (it helps when, in this case, Lawrence Thomas obliterates a tackle with a spin move):

Calhoun is a serious danger as a pass-rusher. I'm not as impressed with him against the run. He doesn't hold up great at the point of attack, especially when there's help from a tight end or back. Rutgers had a lot of success running off-tackle and Calhoun partly responsible. Here he's chipped by the H-back, who's able to pick off a linebacker after Calhoun is easily controlled by the right tackle:

Add in some shaky pursuit/tackling in the secondary and this success was repeatable. Rutgers ended up averaging 5.8 yards per non-sack carry.

The other guy to watch, and this won't be fun for Michigan fans, is sophomore DT Malik McDowell. He's quick off the line and extremely disruptive against both the run and the pass. His surprising agility for a 300-pounder allows him to jump a gap or two away from his responsibility and still come back to make the play:

There's a flip side to this: McDowell sometimes runs himself right out of the play. I'm expecting Michigan to take advantage of his aggressiveness with trap and wham concepts that'll use his upfield burst against him. MSU's entire D-line plays with this kind of style, but McDowell is the main culprit. A lot of run plays looked like this:

MSU held this down to a five-ish yard gain because they were playing their safeties so close to the line, but I doubt Montae Nicholson stops De'Veon Smith as easily as he brought down this Rutgers scatback.

OVERVIEW

The defensive line is disruptive. Calhoun and McDowell consistently get into the backfield and make plays. As mentioned above, though, they're both liable to have their aggressiveness used against them, and the rest of the line didn't impress me. DT Joel Heath (#92) was a liability on the interior; he can get pushed around, opening up creases that MSU's iffy secondary (in this case, Colquhoun, who's doing lord-knows-what) can't be relied upon to close:

Rutgers had most of their success running power and the occasional counter. Michigan can replicate this and then some.

The linebackers are solid but unspectacular. MIKE Riley Bullough is a good blitzer who reliably finds his way to the ball. The outside linebackers are both good stringing plays out to the edge; neither are major TFL threats. They miss Davis' ability to make things happen on his own. It doesn't help that the aggressive line and unreliable secondary put them in no-win positions on a regular basis.

About that secondary: they're not good. MSU is still running the defense that made stars out of the likes of Darqueze Dennard, Trae Waynes, and Kurtis Drummond, but they don't have the depth/talent right now to make that work. Aggressive Cover 4 defense requires cornerbacks who can get a good jam at the line; State really struggled in this regard. Rutgers had a ton of free releases.

Michigan could be in for some big plays in the screen and short passing games. Tackling in space was a major issues. Here's the replacement for Darian Hicks trying to defend a quick slant:

That is not good. No jam, lost leverage, didn't even make contact on the tackle attempt.

MSU also just plain busts coverages. This is a screencap of a late fourth-and-six throw to the flat. The receiver here already has the first down:

When State tried playing softer zones, stuff like the screencaps at the top of this post happened; that was a simple corner route by Carroo that found him open by ten yards when Demetrious Cox pulled a JT Floyd and completely turned the wrong way.

Meanwhile, this is why Nicholson was benched twice earlier this season before injuries dictated he had to be on the field no matter what:

I think he bit on a flat route that was already covered by two defenders? In doing so he allowed Rutgers' only major offensive threat to run right by him to the end zone. He's made those kind of mental errors all season.

Unless Connor Cook vastly outplays Jake Rudock, which isn't outside the realm of possibility, it's hard to see MSU scoring enough on Michigan's defense to offset the seemingly inevitable breakdowns that'll occur when their defense is on the field. Jim Harbaugh has made a very nice living screwing with opposing safeties until they bust plays; this looks like an ideal matchup for that. Add in the possibility that Smith gets multiple opportunities to rampage through the secondary and it's hard not to like Michigan's chances.

Comments

VauntedD

October 15th, 2015 at 3:06 PM ^

This is the most confident I have felt in several years against MSU. The offense in spread of the wealth have given many individuals the experience they need for these big rivalry games.



Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad

bringthewood

October 15th, 2015 at 3:34 PM ^

I can't get there. I am still so shell shocked by the last couple of beatdowns it is difficult for me to be confident. You know they will pull out all of the stops, trick plays, fakes on special teams, and a quarterback who can throw deep.

I hope if all works out but I am nervous as hell. Hopefully a win will lead me to be more of a believer.

Pepto Bismol

October 15th, 2015 at 3:43 PM ^

If I just flew in from spending a decade on Neptune and watched the first 6 games of these teams on DVR, I would just look at you all like you're crazy and state "Clearly, Michigan will win this game". 

But I also watched the last 7 years, so I'm terrified.

**

Here's a skewed stat in a thinly veiled attempt to lower my own blood pressure:

(First, agree that Rich Rod was the worst coach in the history of Michigan football - at .404 win percentage he statistically was)

The last time MSU beat a Non-Rich Rod Michigan team in Ann Arbor, it was George Perles over Gary Moeller. 

Home field matters.  Michigan has it for the first time in 3 years.  Everything else was Rich Rod's fault.

superstringer

October 15th, 2015 at 4:02 PM ^

Let's analyze your most thought-provoking post.

How does one "fly in from Neptune"?  First, there is no air in space, so for most of the journey, you aren't "flying."  You are in free fall.  Neptune is farther from the sun, hence, you are spending 99.999% of the journey falling into the Sun's gravity well, once you escape Neptune's.  Even if part of the journey is powered, I don't know if "flying" is the right term for that.  "Piloting."  "Maneuvering."  Did we "fly" to the Moon?  No, no we most certainly did not.

Now... why are you even ON Neptune?  Er, AT Neptune?  (We don't think Neptune has an actual surface to stand "on."  Perhaps a liquified, molten interior at some point, but not a rocky surface.)  (ALthough, maybe you are "on" Neptune in the British sense, like Manchester City is "on" 18 points on the table.)  (And Chelsea is only on 8!  But I digress.  Let's get back to the important stuff.)  There are far more interesting places to go in the o'l Solar System than Neptune, where the high-altitude temp is 200 below and the winds are 600 mph.  Mars.  Venus.  Europa (Not That Europa) (meaning, not Europe, duh) (although... Czech girls!!!).  Columbus, even?

And, even if you were on/at Neptune, why don't you know the UM scores for 7 years?  They get radio signals on/at Neptune.  Tiny little robot spacecraft we built 40 years ago are still transmitting at the edge of the solar system; surely, Earth can beam Michigan scores out to Neptune.  It's like the Gerald Ford character in Revenge of the Pink Panther:  "Get me a score, damned it!"  (Or was it Return of the Pink Panther, I don't know.)  (Pink Panther Revisited?)  (Return of the Pink Panther III?) (Son of the Return of Pink Panther?)  Grrr... Get me the right name of the movie, damned it!

OK, so... but I agree, based on just the first 6 games this season, the final score should be 52-0.

SAM love SWORD

October 15th, 2015 at 3:17 PM ^

I'm trying not to be overconfident but the numbers and Xs and Os seem to be so overwhelmingly in our favor its hard not to feel good about Saturday.  All I'm getting from Sparty writers is the same old 'disrespect' trope and feelingsball.

MI Expat NY

October 15th, 2015 at 3:24 PM ^

Have I missed something?  Why does it seem likely that Hicks isn't playing?  Does he have a concussion history or something?  Just assuming that protocal these days holds a guy out for the next week's game?

Wolverine 73

October 15th, 2015 at 3:32 PM ^

to me this year is that I am confident we will be prepared to play the game, that we will have a sound game plan, the players will know what they are supposed to do (especially when it comes to blitzes!), and that our coaches will make adjustments to anything new MSU tries.  I have not felt confident about such matters in a very long time.  Add in the huge individual imrpovements in many of our guys and the injuries to the MSU OL and secondary, and this looks like a win by two scores.  I hope.

bringthewood

October 15th, 2015 at 3:40 PM ^

I hope so. I started watching in the late 60's when our beatdowns of MSU were common, so it took me awhile to recognize they were good the last few years, I'm hoping my nervousness is simply a lag in the other direction.

It took me awhile to be confident  that our basketball team could beat them.

beedub93

October 15th, 2015 at 3:39 PM ^

I'm officially nervous now - everything seems too good to be true.

I have a sinking feeling that Saturday may very well be a huge disappointment.

I sure as hell hope not - I just want to see Michigan destroy these fuckers. I can't shake the feeling that there are land mines and punji sticks strewn all about and only sparty knows where they are located.

I hate feeling like this - it's like the exact opposite of ND 2006.



Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad

Lanknows

October 15th, 2015 at 3:47 PM ^

I don't think you can count it against them since they aren't trying to execute the jam in the clipped plays. In each one, even the run plays, MSU doesn't attempt a single jam at the line that I saw. 

I guess maybe you can say the coaches are telling them not to because they know they can't do it.

alum96

October 15th, 2015 at 4:01 PM ^

0 INT by Jake and I think we win comfortably.

1 INT and a close win.

2+ and sadness.

I don't think Cook will play out of his mind as he did last week.  Mainly bc Lewis on Burbridge.  Contain Scott on the run and its Cook using secondary wrs and TEs which we can live with.  Avoid giving away short fields - please do that Jake.

M-Dog

October 15th, 2015 at 3:59 PM ^

Ace, what specifically is it that keeps our very aggressive DL from not being exploited, while teams (including us hopefully) can exploit MSUs very aggressive DL?

Wolverine In Exile

October 15th, 2015 at 4:08 PM ^

We've got two things going for us on the DL issue:

- Peppers really is erasing the screen and spread game that is notionally used to exploit aggressive DLs

- Morgan has done a good job of cleaning up when the DL gets pressure but overpursues

Plus, our use of stunts and not having to blitz lots of LBs gives us #s advantage at point of attack where running plays develop.

dragonchild

October 15th, 2015 at 5:22 PM ^

"Aggressive" in footballese implies a simplified responsibility where you attack one thing, at least preferentially.  That implies there's a tendency to exploit.  Mattison explained in his presser that it's easier to get sacks if you're "selfish" about it (overplaying the pass), but he drills his linemen to be disciplined and stay in their rush lanes.  As a result the pressure isn't reflected in our sacks, and the run game gets stuffed almost without any linebacker help.  They're ripping through, but they're not overplaying anything.  They're just very, very good.

Wolverine In Exile

October 15th, 2015 at 4:04 PM ^

I'm thinking we're going to see a lot of running away from Calhoun (or using run plays that force him to overrun the gap, i.e. counters and draws) and at McDowell, using Malik's tendency to go all out to completely mind fuck him with traps and whams, forcing Calhoun to use a lot of energy trying to track down running plays from the backside. Either that or we're going to screen the shit out of them and force their inferior DB's and replacement level LB's to make a lot of 1 on 1 open field tackles- force Calhoun to take a step back every snap instead of rushing to ensure a screen isn't coming his way. I think this game is entirely on Jake Rudock making the right reads at the LOS to take all the easy yards we can get.

Bodogblog

October 15th, 2015 at 5:05 PM ^

McDowell is a hell of a talent, no doubt.  But he still alternates between standing up and staying low.  Even on the highlight Ace posted above, he's standing straight up in order to get the speed and movement to come back around the blocker.  But on other plays he stays low, so the OL can't count on catching him and driving.  Unless... he tips one way or the other via his pre-snap stance.  Which I bet he does. 

And check out Bullough on the Heath highlight: Heath gets combo'd, and they do erase him so much that the guard is easily ready to peel off and bang Bullough, who should be in the hole.  I mean his the MLB and the run is clearly going to his gap.  He drifts to his left (the wrong way) and falls down on his own, with the guard looking around like what happened to the guy I was going to block. 

ND Sux

October 15th, 2015 at 4:14 PM ^

MSU has looked horrible this year.  If they played today, NW would beat them IMO.  We're at home for the first time in three years.  WE have all the motivation after the dismal recent past.  MSU is #83 (!) in total defense.  I'm VERY confident these coaches will have this team pumped up, and the proper outcome will be achieved...a Sparty ass-whoopin'. 

Steve-a-wolverine-o

October 15th, 2015 at 8:39 PM ^

Memories of Hoke; lingering burrito farts; those are all just in your heads. It's in many of our heads. It's in the media's heads. But from what I've seen from the players wearing wearing the winged helmets on Saturday and our coaches on the sideline, they couldn't care less about Hoke, or expectations, or what we think. They are playing for the final score at the end. And that is a fucking beautiful thing to watch.

NJblue2

October 15th, 2015 at 4:30 PM ^

This seems like an easy win for MIchigan. But damn am I shellshocked from the last few years. Jim you're the chosen one, bring balance back to the force.