Fee Fi Foe Film: Indiana Defense Comment Count

Ace

Previously: Indiana Offense


oh c'mon it's already hard enough to take this seriously

So.

Indiana is last in the B1G in scoring defense, 13th in yards per play allowed, 13th in yards per pass allowed, 13th in yards per carry allowed, 13th in defensive S&P+, last in opponent first downs per game, last in opponent 3rd down conversion rate, and last in opponent scrimmage plays of >20 yards, >30 yards, >40 yards, >50 yards, >60 yards, >70 yards, and >80 yards.

Let's get this over with.

Personnel: Seth's diagram [click to embiggen]:

The Hoosiers rotate quite a bit up front; you'll see plenty of Ralph Green and Robert McCray on the interior. Tyler Green, a true freshman corner listed third on the depth chart, also got a lot of run against Iowa.

Base Set? Multiple. They're something of a 3-4 team, but in the way Michigan is—there are usually four nominal down linemen, and IU actually played a lot of over fronts in this game.

[Hit THE JUMP for the rest of the breakdown.]

Man or zone coverage? Mostly zone. Much like Rutgers, Indiana plays a lot of two- and three-deep coverage and allows a ton of easy throws in front of both their underneath guys and their deep safeties. And sometimes over the top, too. Indiana: not good at defense.

Pressure: GERG or Greg? Indiana didn't dial up much in the way of blitzes. They'll show a double A-gap blitz look frequently on passing downs but backed at least one linebacker out of it all but once in this game. Their D-line can't generate any pressure on its own, so I'm surprised they don't bring more heat—the secondary can't stop teams with seven in coverage anyway, especially when opponents have all day to throw, so it's worth a shot.

Dangerman: MIKE TJ Simmons got booted late in the first half for a (shockingly correct) targeting call, but before that he showed why he's Indiana's best defender. Playing behind a D-line that often gets knocked clear out of running lanes, he repeatedly diagnosed plays and knifed in for tackles before a blocker could reach him:

When he existed there was a noticable dropoff to sophomore Tegray Scales, who filled at at WILL while starter Marcus Oliver slid to the middle. Indiana's defense wasn't playing well to begin with but they had no hope of stopping the run without Simmons in the middle. The announcers noted he's been dealing with an ankle injury but he's played through it fine for a couple weeks.

Five-tech Darius Latham, a former top-250 recruit, is the one defensive lineman who consistently beats blocks, but his impact is limited by the lack of help around him; CJ Beathard repeatedly broke the pocket when one rusher got through and there was rarely a second rusher arriving to stop him.

OVERVIEW

Let's start with the second play from scrimmage:

There's zero recognition of the draw, the D-line allows a huge gap, Oliver (#44) starts into his pass drop and can't recover, and safety Chase Dutra (#30) is way too aggressive, ending up on the wrong side of the last blocker and ten yards too far upfield. Other than that, though, the play went great.

The defensive line is the source of a lot of Indiana's defensive woes. To make up for being a little undersized and mostly unable to beat blocks straight up, they slant often, and Iowa used this against them over and over:

That's the entire defensive line and both inside linebackers stuck on the wrong side of the field a mere moment after the handoff. Akrum Wadley—yet another opposing running back I now covet—had ten free yards, then got an extra bunch with a slick juke on a safety just outside the screen.

Nose tackle Adarius Rayner didn't have a good performance; he got buried multiple times trying to hold up against doubles and sometimes took himself out of the play by trying to shoot a gap—an issue pervasive along the entire line. That's still better than when they try to play straight-up; this is about how that usually went:

A hat on a hat everywhere and an easy chunk gain. As for their pass rush, ESPN took care of that for me:

This wasn't even as "good" of a rush as it seems, as #44 is just getting off the ground after being pancaked. Beathard had a clean pocket for most of the day.

Edge runs were quite successful as well; BANDIT Zack Shaw lost the edge a few times, as did SLB Clyde Newton. The defensive backs aren't good tacklers in space, either.

As noted above, the linebacker play outside of Simmons wasn't strong. Oliver racks up a lot of tackles but also misses his fair share and isn't great in coverage. Even though Indiana played a lot of soft zone, underneath throws in front of the linebackers were often good for first downs—Iowa picked up on third-and-nine on a pass caught underneath a very soft Cover 2 that may have made sense on a third-and-15.

There was also plenty of room between the linebackers and safeties, especially on deep in routes and throws up the seam to the tight end. Michigan's stable of blocky-catchy types should be excited for this one; IU also didn't do so well on throws to the flat:

Newton (#41) completely bit on the run fake and couldn't recover. Because the linebackers have to be so aggressive filling holes up front in the run game, they're prone to getting caught out of position against play-action.

Cornerback Rashad Fant appears to be decent, because I believe Iowa targeted him once, an incomplete deep ball he had blanketed. That may also be because the other starting corner, true freshman Andre Brown, had a disastrous game. He had a hard time holding his zones and an equally hard time tackling after the catch; Green had similar issues when he entered the game. Here's what happened when Brown tried to play press man:

Only a Beathard overthrow prevented a very long touchdown.

The safeties, as you'd expect from Indiana's number of big plays allowed, were awful. Dutra is aggressive and takes terrible angles to the ball, which is not a good combination. Crawford is slightly more reliable from what I can tell but that may just be because Dutra plays more in the box.

This is a defense Michigan should dominate. Indiana will have a hard time holding up physically against the run game, and with Harbaugh dialing up misdirection and screens and the like, the offense might not have much of a need for a traditional downfield passing attack—though that should work, too, as long as Iowa Rudock is present.

Comments

I Love Lamp

November 12th, 2015 at 6:50 PM ^

Why we shouldn't wear this team down and pull away comfortably. But then again, the road still scares me. Damn the recent staffs and their piss poor record away from home. Still gets me worked up.

Nothsa

November 12th, 2015 at 7:46 PM ^

However, I will also say that Iowa's offensive line was hands-down the best I've seen all year in the conference. They suppressed IU in ways that MSU's and OSU's OL simply could not. Even in spite of that, Iowa suffered multiple negative plays in the running game. Indiana was often incapable of stopping the third and longs that they faced due to those negative plays, but getting the Hawkeyes behind the chains was a huge factor. Frankly, if Ferentz had not turned a gimpy Beathard loose in the second half (he passed a lot), Indiana might have taken that game.

Unless the Hoosiers have packed it in this year (certainly a possibility, as they are winless in conference play), I expect that Michigan will be punting on Saturday. There will be some big, busted plays - it's the IU defense after all - but there will be more effective run defense than what Ace saw in the Iowa game. Frankly, if the IU offense shows up and Rudock is not effective downfield, I think Indiana has a real chance.

SalvatoreQuattro

November 12th, 2015 at 8:10 PM ^

Their defense is atrocious.All teams suffer negative plays. That IU caused some is no surprise. They gave up more big plays than negative ones which probably occurred because IU takes risk on defense to compensate for a dearth of talent. Blitzing and risk taking defenses will occasionally get negative plays. Unfortunately, IU consistently gives up big plays which negates that.

MSU can''t run on anyone these days and OSU shredded IU on the ground. Elliott had 274 guards rushing and three touchdowns vs IU.This with Jones taking all of the snaps. I suspect OSU would have scored 50-60 if Barrett had started and played the entire game.

IU's offense has mediocre receivers and QB who isn't mobile. Their backs are good, but this isn't Wilson's best offensive unit at IU. It lacks the explosiveness of the Roberson-Latimer-Wynn unit. 

 

Frankly, the only hance IU has is if UM's secondary has the yips like they did in Minnesota and Michigan turns the ball over. Both are certainly possible, but that's the only shot IU has.  Michigan's defense matches up well vs IU in that their front seven is excellent vs the run* and they possess a secondary good enough to blanket IU's receivers. IU will score, but it will be a serious challenge for their offense.

 

*Absence of Glasgow obviously makes things a bit easier for the Hoosiers. How his replacement performs will be key to the game.

UMForLife

November 12th, 2015 at 8:15 PM ^

I watched the IOWA-IU game yesterday. The 60 minute version. In the second half, there was literally no penetration from DL. IOWA QB missed quite a few downfield throws. When I watched him overthrow the WRs, I thought "what do you know? May be it is IOWA that screws up the QBs". Anyway, my point is, IOWA should have been better in the second half. Not sure if that is IU Defense or IOWA offense.

Roc Blue in the Lou

November 12th, 2015 at 11:46 PM ^

Just wondering--isn't it nearing the time to consider 86 a bit of a dangerman???  From jet sweeps to ninja blocking and now several touchdown receptions...i feel Chesson deserves a bit of love.  Then again, he is a St. Louisan, so i may be homered up. 

dragonchild

November 13th, 2015 at 7:05 AM ^

Chesson, instead of being a "just a guy" receiver, is that oddball who's downright elite at some things and not so good at others, unfortunately those others being pretty darn important to the position.

I'm a Chesson fan but the blocking and sweeps are all Harbaugh incorporating Chesson's unusual strengths into the offense.  Chesson's also sure-handed with the short and intermediate stuff but his tracking is still very subpar for a wideout and with Rudock already struggling with accuracy problems, they just haven't been able to connect on a deep pass all year.  That means his speed can't take the top off a defense, which leaves him well short of what you can call a playmaker.

I'm hoping he puts it all together because then he'd be an incredible weapon.  But until then, if the safeties are ignoring you because they know you can't burn them, you're not a dangerman.

Avon Barksdale

November 13th, 2015 at 10:09 AM ^

IU is still dangerous in my opinion to keep it close, but I would really really like to see a 45-7 type mauling at their place. It would make me feel great about the Penn State game next week.