Home
i'm an actor, not a reactor

Primary links

  • About
    • $upport (lol)
    • Ethics
    • FAQ
    • Glossary
    • Privacy Policy
  • Contact
  • MGoStore
    • Hail to Old Blue
  • MGoBoard
    • MGoBoard FAQ
    • Michigan bar locator
    • Moderator Action Sticky
  • Useful Stuff
    • Depth Chart By Class
    • Hoops Depth Chart by Class
    • 2017 Recruiting Board
    • Unofficial Two Deep
    • MGoFlickr
    • Diaries, Windows Live Writer, And You
    • User-Curated HOF
    • Where To Eat In Ann Arbor
  • Schedule/Tix
    • Future Schedules (wiki)
    • Ticket spreadsheet
Home

Navigation

  • Forums
  • Recent posts

User login

  • Create new account
  • Request new password

MGoElsewhere

  • @MGoBlog (Brian)
  • @aceanbender
  • @Misopogon (Seth)
  • @Aeschnepp (Adam)
  • @BISB
  • @EUpchurchPhoto
  • @FullOfTwitt (Fuller)
  • Hail to the Victors 2016
  • MGoFacebook
  • MGoPodcast
  • WTKA
  • Instagram

Michigan Blogs

  • Big House Blog
  • Burgeoning Wolverine Star
  • Genuinely Sarcastic
  • Go Blue Michigan Wolverine
  • Holdin' The Rope
  • MVictors
  • Maize 'n' Blue Nation
  • Maize 'n' Brew
  • Maize And Go Blue
  • Michigan Hockey Net
  • MMMGoBlueBBQ
  • The Blog That Yost Built
  • The Hoover Street Rag
  • The M Zone
  • Touch The Banner
  • UMGoBlog
  • UMHoops
  • UMTailgate
  • Wolverine Liberation Army

M On The Net

  • mgovideo
  • MGoBlue.com
  • Mike DeSimone
  • Recruiting Planet
  • The Wolverine
  • Go Blue Wolverine
  • Winged Helmet
  • UMGoBlue.com
  • MaizeRage.org
  • Puckhead
  • The M Den
  • True Blue Fan Forum

Big Ten Blogs

  • Illinois
    • Illinois Loyalty
    • Illinois Baseball Report
  • Indiana
    • Inside The Hall
    • The Crimson Quarry
  • Iowa
    • Black Heart, Gold Pants
    • Fight For Iowa
  • Michigan State
    • The Only Colors
  • Minnesota
    • GopherHole.com
    • The Daily Gopher
  • Nebraska
    • Corn Nation
    • Husker Max
    • Husker Mike's Blasphemy
    • Husker Gameday
  • Northwestern
    • Sippin' On Purple
    • Lake The Posts
  • Notre Dame
    • The House Rock Built
    • One Foot Down
  • Ohio State
    • Eleven Warriors
    • Buckeye Commentary
    • Men of the Scarlet and Gray
    • Our Honor Defend
    • The Buckeye Nine
  • Penn State
    • Slow States
    • Black Shoe Diaries
    • Happy Valley Hardball
    • Penn State Clips
    • Linebacker U
    • Nittany White Out
  • Purdue
    • Boiled Sports
    • Hammer and Rails
  • Wisconsin
    • Bruce Ciskie

Links of Note

  • Baseball
    • College Baseball Today
    • The College Baseball Blog
  • Basketball
    • Ken Pomeroy
    • Hoop Math
    • John Gasaway
    • Luke Winn/Sports Illustrated
  • College Hockey
    • Chris Heisenberg (Class of 2016)
    • College Hockey Stats
    • Michigan College Hockey
    • Hockey's Future
    • Sioux Sports
    • USCHO
  • Football
    • Smart Football
    • Every Day Should Be Saturday
    • Matt Hinton/Grantland
    • Football Study Hall
    • Football Outsiders
    • Harold Stassen
    • NCAA D-I Stats Page
    • The Wizard Of Odds
    • CFB Stats
  • General
    • Sports Central
  • Local Interest
    • The Ann Arbor Chronicle
    • Arborwiki
    • Arbor Update
    • Ann Arbor Observer
    • Teeter Talk
    • Vacuum
  • Teams Of The D
    • Lions
      • Pride of Detroit
    • Pistons
      • Detroit Bad Boys
      • Need4Sheed
    • Tigers
      • Roar Of The Tigers
      • Bless You Boys
      • The Daily Fungo
      • The Detroit Tigers Weblog
    • Red Wings
      • Winging It In Motown
      • On The Wings
    • Michigan Sports Forum

Beveled Guilt

Site Search

Diaries

  • New
  • Popular
  • Hot
  • Loyola-Chicago: A First Glance
    Bambi - 3 weeks ago
  • PreSpring Football updates from Sam Webb
    AZBlue - 3 weeks ago
  • This Month in MGoBlog History - March 2008: Pryor isn't coming, Boren has left, and some academic fraud allegations sprinkled in
    Maize.Blue Wagner - 4 weeks ago
  • ‹‹
  • 2 of 2
  •  
more
  • This Month in MGoBlog History - March 2008: Pryor isn't coming, Boren has left, and some academic fraud allegations sprinkled in
    Maize.Blue Wagner - 215 comments
  • The Ballad of Jordan Poole
    k.o.k.Law - 176 comments
  • 14 Months Ago: The Fire Beilein Threads.
    stephenrjking - 91 comments
  • PreSpring Football updates from Sam Webb
    AZBlue - 90 comments
  • Thirteen unlucky minutes (TL;DNR-This is a bit of rant about the refs)
    docwhoblocked - 60 comments
  •  
  • 1 of 2
  • ››
more

MGoBoard

  • New
  • Recent
  • Hot
  • Michigan announces single-game ticket prices for 2018 football season
    13 replies
  • 2018-19 Michigan Basketball B1G slate announced
    31 replies
  • Final 247 Basketball rankings published
    30 replies
  • Any news on Grant Newsome?
    60 replies
  • Karsen Barnhart - did we cool on him?
    82 replies
  • HELP WANTED! I'm moving to Chicago for school and I need good haunts to watch football/basketball games. Recommendations?
    42 replies
  • Angelique on Patterson Transfer
    51 replies
  • CBS Sports: Shea Patterson details scope of Ole Miss deception in lengthy letter to Michigan
    37 replies
  • OT: NFL Schedule Release
    12 replies
  • OT: Gregg Popovich's wife Erin dead at 67
    21 replies
  • Belleville coach Jermain Crowell mad at UM again
    225 replies
  • Q&A with FB Ben VanSumeren--Video
    8 replies
  • "Being Not-Rich at UM" Guide
    163 replies
  • Apparently, the NCAA has already received a response from MSU about Nassar
    58 replies
  • No additional protest of Shea Patterson appeal by Ole Miss
    113 replies
  •  
  • 1 of 7
  • ››
  • CBS Sports: Shea Patterson details scope of Ole Miss deception in lengthy letter to Michigan
    37 replies
  • 2018-19 Michigan Basketball B1G slate announced
    31 replies
  • Final 247 Basketball rankings published
    30 replies
  • Karsen Barnhart - did we cool on him?
    82 replies
  • Michigan announces single-game ticket prices for 2018 football season
    13 replies
  • Belleville coach Jermain Crowell mad at UM again
    225 replies
  • HELP WANTED! I'm moving to Chicago for school and I need good haunts to watch football/basketball games. Recommendations?
    42 replies
  • Any news on Grant Newsome?
    60 replies
  • Angelique on Patterson Transfer
    51 replies
  • "Being Not-Rich at UM" Guide
    163 replies
  • OT: NFL Schedule Release
    12 replies
  • No additional protest of Shea Patterson appeal by Ole Miss
    113 replies
  • OT: Gregg Popovich's wife Erin dead at 67
    21 replies
  • OT: MSU digs hole deeper, Engler adviser: Nassar survivor's claims of payout 'fake news'
    106 replies
  • OT: RIP Bruno Sammartino
    16 replies
  •  
  • 1 of 7
  • ››
  • Why should we be optimistic about 2018 M football?
    273 replies
  • Belleville coach Jermain Crowell mad at UM again
    225 replies
  • Police investigating Elysee Mbem-Bosse for death threat against Harbaugh
    224 replies
  • Speight to UCLA
    172 replies
  • How Many Football Games Will Michigan Win This Year? (Poll)
    167 replies
  • "Being Not-Rich at UM" Guide
    163 replies
  • Buckle Up
    159 replies
  • Scouting the Enemy: Ohio State QBs are Good
    158 replies
  • Semi-OT: What sports would you fix?
    158 replies
  • Elysee Mbem-Bosse disturbing tweets
    157 replies
  • Whats the Best Way to Make Flight Arrangements?
    149 replies
  • Wagner to NBA
    141 replies
  • Urban Meyer throws more shade at Michigan
    141 replies
  • FB new Nutrition plan under Herbert is well received by players
    132 replies
  • Today’s MSU outrage Apparently Engler has attempted to bypass the victims attorneys
    130 replies
  •  
  • 1 of 7
  • ››

Support MGoBlog: buy stuff at Amazon

Fact Check: Brady Hoke's Red Aversion

By Brian — April 20th, 2011 at 12:21 PM — 132 comments
Filed under:
  • brady hoke
  • brady hoke gets it

So Brady Hoke vowed to Adam Rittenberg he'd never worn red as as a head coach despite the fact both of his jobs were at schools that kinda sorta prioritized said color. This is hard to believe, so I paged through Google Images until porn started coming up on a search for "Brady Hoke ball state"—the definitive signal your search has ended—and A-HA:

BradyHoke_1180395236

Yeah… that's the best I could do. Red tie at an introductory press conference. There is also this:

brady-hoke-ball-state

In all other pictures Rittenberg's Johnny Cash reference is dead on. Getty has nothing. Hoke really did go through his Ball State career never putting on the school's primary color as anything more than an embarrassing accent. I should probably find that juvenile or something but it pokes my fan button. This is a man who gets it. What is it? If you don't know, you don't get it. Sucks to be you, buddy.*

*[Strong possibility "it" is "black is slimming." Also, the last four sentences are the plot of Atlas Shrugged.]

  • Login or register to post comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
April 20th, 2011 at 12:26 PM
#2
Michigan Arrogance
Michigan Arrogance's picture
Joined: 06/30/2008
MGoPoints: 15310
This is a man who gets it.

*rolls eyes*

 

Does "it" have anything to do with winning games?

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
April 20th, 2011 at 12:42 PM
(Reply to #2) #3
Callahan
Callahan's picture
Joined: 06/30/2008
MGoPoints: 3390
The author of the above

The author of the above comment is clearly a textualist.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
April 20th, 2011 at 12:27 PM
#4
zeda_p
Joined: 12/21/2010
MGoPoints: 355
A is A

Dolla Dolla Bills, yo.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
April 20th, 2011 at 12:28 PM
(Reply to #3) #5
justingoblue
justingoblue's picture
Joined: 11/16/2010
MGoPoints: 29685
Haha...

Those last four sentences are probably the shortest summary of the book I've ever heard. Either way it gets to the core of the book, and quickly.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
April 20th, 2011 at 12:35 PM
(Reply to #5) #6
willywill9
willywill9's picture
Joined: 09/22/2008
MGoPoints: 12910
Hey so, this is the 2nd time

Hey so, this is the 2nd time this book has come to my attention this week.  Admittedly, I'd never heard of it before... I know it's a long read, but can anyone vouch and say it's worth it?  I have ADD when it comes to reading long books, but just wondering what folks thought.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
April 20th, 2011 at 12:38 PM
(Reply to #9) #7
OysterMonkey
OysterMonkey's picture
Joined: 08/22/2009
MGoPoints: 5480
I can only vouch for the first 20 pages

because I quit at that point, but that book sucks.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
April 20th, 2011 at 1:54 PM
(Reply to #12) #8
kalamazoo
Joined: 08/20/2010
MGoPoints: 724
Better after page 40 and Jack Handey

Having no idea what the book was about, I read up to page 30 on 3 different occasions and also thought the book sucked.  Who is John Galt?  Who the hell cares.

But it was a birthday present so I finally committed to reading more...and now it is currently my favorite book...not as a literary work, but as a cool explanation of philosophy with some decent plot.  It was idealistic in a way, but Rand made some good points and, having read several other of her books (not Fountainhead yet), I really respect her intelligence and female audacity.  She really stuck her neck out in a time where it didn't seem like many women did that.  I hope her book helps provide a few good ideas to mankind.

But what really is mankind?  To finish with a Jack Handey...

Maybe in order to understand mankind we have to look at that word itself. MANKIND. Basically, it's made up of two separate words "mank" and "ind." What do these words mean? It's a mystery and that's why so is mankind.

-Jack Handey

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
April 20th, 2011 at 2:02 PM
(Reply to #76) #9
GoBlueInNYC
GoBlueInNYC's picture
Joined: 03/23/2010
MGoPoints: 9532
I'm not shy about my hate for

I'm not shy about my hate for Ayn Rand, but I do appreciate her audacity in saying what she said and doing what she did as a woman in her time. Fountainhead rape scene controversy aside, she was an admirably ballsy lady.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
April 20th, 2011 at 4:49 PM
(Reply to #76) #10
Captain
Captain's picture
Joined: 06/12/2009
MGoPoints: 12438
Speaking of novels and Jack Handy...

I think a good novel would be where a bunch of men on a ship are looking for a whale.  They look and look, but you know what?  They never find him.  And you know why they never find him?  It doesn't say.  The book leaves it up to you, the reader, to decide.  Then, at the very end, there's a page that you can lick and it tastes like Kool-Aid.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
April 20th, 2011 at 12:44 PM
(Reply to #9) #11
MGoShtoink
MGoShtoink's picture
Joined: 11/05/2010
MGoPoints: 8523
Great book

It is a very good book, but it is also a very conservative book in that it talks a lot about big government encroaching on corporations to the point of nationalization.  Ayn Rand is firmly against big government.

Whether or not you agree with smaller government, it lays out Rand's arguement for small government in story form.

It does get very wordy at times, especially the "John Galt Speech".

Bottom line, I highly recommend it.

 

If you don't want to read 1,000 pages, you can read Fountainhead, which is, basically, a shortened version.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
April 20th, 2011 at 12:47 PM
(Reply to #17) #12
justingoblue
justingoblue's picture
Joined: 11/16/2010
MGoPoints: 29685
Nitpick, it's a very

Nitpick, it's a very libertarian book. Conservative would imply something different. Basically the book is very socially liberal and very economically conservative.

Fountainhead is the better plot, but it's not the same as Atlas. Fountainhead deals with individualism and egoistic ethics, and Atlas deals with literally everything, but centers on economic philosophy. I would reccommend Fountainhead to see if you would even come close to liking Atlas.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
April 20th, 2011 at 12:54 PM
(Reply to #23) #13
MGoShtoink
MGoShtoink's picture
Joined: 11/05/2010
MGoPoints: 8523
Good call

Yes... your nitpicking is correct... libertarian is a much better way to describe it.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
April 20th, 2011 at 12:57 PM
(Reply to #23) #14
OysterMonkey
OysterMonkey's picture
Joined: 08/22/2009
MGoPoints: 5480
Another nitpick, it's a very

Another nitpick, it's a very Objectivist book. Rand's philosophy has some similarities to libertarainism, but there are plenty of forms of libertarianism that don't carry Rand's metaphysical baggage with them.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
April 20th, 2011 at 1:00 PM
(Reply to #30) #15
justingoblue
justingoblue's picture
Joined: 11/16/2010
MGoPoints: 29685
It is, and Rand (or some on

It is, and Rand (or some on the libertarian side) would be pissed at me for saying that. But to someone who doesn't follow libertarianism with a microscope, libertarian is sufficient as a label, IMO. Atlas itself isn't that Objectivist, compared to libertarian.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
April 20th, 2011 at 1:16 PM
(Reply to #33) #16
OysterMonkey
OysterMonkey's picture
Joined: 08/22/2009
MGoPoints: 5480
Like I said above,

I never finished it, so you might be right. I think anyone interested in libertarianism ought to read Robert Nozick's Anarchy, State, and Utopia. It's the best defense of a philosophically coherent version of libertarianism I've come across, and doesn't have all the unpalatable Randian extras.

Obviously it's not fiction, but as far as I could get into Rand's fiction, the story is just a prop for her philosophy anyway.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
April 20th, 2011 at 1:23 PM
(Reply to #47) #17
justingoblue
justingoblue's picture
Joined: 11/16/2010
MGoPoints: 29685
Nozick is great, as is Murray

Nozick is great, as is Murray Rothbard. There are better examples in economists as well.

Agreed that the Rand as a person stuff got wayyyyyyy too much in the way of the ideas for my liking. Talking from an academic standpoint, not trying to ignite a conversation about specifics here.

BTW the Objectivist as apart from "mainstream" libertarianism didn't come around until after Atlas, when she got into writing specifically philosophy books. It's minarchy/anarchy and a few ethical differences where the two split. Honestly, they're not that different from an outside perspective. If a libertarian was given the choice of living in an Objectivist society in place of modern day, or vice versa, I think most would see improvement more than their differences.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
April 20th, 2011 at 1:46 PM
(Reply to #54) #18
OysterMonkey
OysterMonkey's picture
Joined: 08/22/2009
MGoPoints: 5480
Ultimately I think Nozick

Ultimately I think Nozick fails (well, at least fails to convince me) because so much of his argument is dependent on the Lockean labor theory of property, which I don't think really provides a defensible foundation for a system of allowable inequities. I think the requirement that a system can allow natural resources to be unequally allocated as long as no one is made less well off by the inequity is too weak to result in a just society.

I would prefer something like Rawls' (No, not that Rawls) proposal that inequities are allowable only insofar as they improve the predicament the least well off.

I wonder if that's sufficiently abstract to dodge the no politics rule.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
April 20th, 2011 at 1:49 PM
(Reply to #66) #19
justingoblue
justingoblue's picture
Joined: 11/16/2010
MGoPoints: 29685
A: Yes, I don't think you got

A: Yes, I don't think you got into actual politics enough.

B: I think you're wrong about the Homestead Principle (and about Rawls), but I'll leave it at that because, while I don't think you went political, any debate will surely get there very quickly.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
April 20th, 2011 at 2:34 PM
(Reply to #73) #20
OysterMonkey
OysterMonkey's picture
Joined: 08/22/2009
MGoPoints: 5480
Rawls' theory has some

Rawls' theory has some foundational problems as well (mainly that the level of risk averseness (is that a word?) he ascribes to people behind the Veil of Ignorance doesn't match empirical work on people's actual willingness to accept risk and uncertainty) so I wouldn't endorse the whole theory. But on this narrow issue I definitely prefer it to Nozick.

Ok. I'm done.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
April 20th, 2011 at 2:25 PM
(Reply to #30) #21
Marshmallow
Marshmallow's picture
Joined: 11/08/2009
MGoPoints: -109
Another nitpick- it's

Another nitpick- it's pseudophilosophy.  And shitty pseudophilosophy at that.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
April 20th, 2011 at 3:05 PM
(Reply to #90) #22
Michigan Shirt
Michigan Shirt's picture
Joined: 02/05/2010
MGoPoints: 1682
And this is the reason that

And this is the reason that we have a ban on politics and religion on this board, it is not ok to just blatantly mock/trash somebody else's beliefs and that's is all I will say on the matter.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
April 20th, 2011 at 8:32 PM
(Reply to #100) #23
Marshmallow
Marshmallow's picture
Joined: 11/08/2009
MGoPoints: -109
I assume you are a reasonable

I assume you are a reasonable guy, but its the board, so who knows.  To avoid a potential meltdown that could devolve into prohibited political discussion, I will just say that I did not intend this as a comment on anyone's political or religious beliefs.  I view this literature and its message as separate and apart from those.  Nevertheless, to those who don't, I apologize and retract my comment.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
April 20th, 2011 at 1:00 PM
(Reply to #23) #24
michgoblue
michgoblue's picture
Joined: 11/16/2009
MGoPoints: 20962
vouching

It is a very long read, and admittedly, some of the text can be a bit long winded, but it is a great book. 

I am someone that tries not to get too into politics - there are things that I like and dislike about both parties - but I found the book to be not only entertaining, but also thought provoking. 

Good clarification, Justingoblue.  While the book is embraces by many republicans and conservatives because of its anti-big-government message, it is not a conservative / republican book.  It is libertarian.  The book basically sets out to illustrate what the author believes to be the dangers of a society in which the government over-regulates and over-intrudes into life. 

For those who have not yet read it, I highly recommend it.  And, at 1000 pages, it should just get you through this interminable off-season.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
April 20th, 2011 at 1:40 PM
(Reply to #17) #25
Sopwith
Sopwith's picture
Joined: 06/29/2010
MGoPoints: 21267
Conservatives part ways with Rand

mostly on going to the logical conclusions of objectivism-- they're on board to a point.  Legalization of drugs and prostitution are advocated by objectivists, because after all, those are business transactions entered into by willing parties.  But pure capitalism isn't really a conservative thing. 

Has a one day holiday from the ban on political discussions on MGoBlog been declared?  That's cool.. I feel free, like I was just let out of my Supermax cell to step outside for 30 minutes in those gated pens they let the really bad dudes have a wander in.

Or maybe they don't have those at Supermax facilities.  I don't really know, I never watch CNBC on Friday nights.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
April 20th, 2011 at 1:52 PM
(Reply to #64) #26
justingoblue
justingoblue's picture
Joined: 11/16/2010
MGoPoints: 29685
I don't think political

I don't think political theory discussion has ever been that taboo as long as there aren't value judgements being made. Saying, Objectivists think A isn't about to start a flame war, where saying "I hate/love what that terrible/awesome senator did" will.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
April 20th, 2011 at 12:44 PM
(Reply to #9) #27
Six Zero
Six Zero's picture
Joined: 09/05/2008
MGoPoints: 10549
We have

discussed it before.  Scroll down to my second post on this page.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
April 20th, 2011 at 12:46 PM
(Reply to #9) #28
Newk
Newk's picture
Joined: 09/10/2008
MGoPoints: 611
It's a shitty novel, in my

It's a shitty novel, in my opinion. Even if you like her philosophy/politics, the story is melodramatic and way, way too long.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
April 20th, 2011 at 12:49 PM
(Reply to #21) #29
justingoblue
justingoblue's picture
Joined: 11/16/2010
MGoPoints: 29685
I wouldn't go so far as to

I wouldn't go so far as to say "shitty" but I wouldn't ever read it for the story. The plot isn't even close to the attraction because like you said, it frankly isn't that great. It's hampered with too much philosophy to make an easy read.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
April 20th, 2011 at 1:02 PM
(Reply to #25) #30
michgoblue
michgoblue's picture
Joined: 11/16/2009
MGoPoints: 20962
slight disagreement

I actually liked the plot - by the end, I found myself really hook and wanting to know what would happen to Dagny, Reardon and the rest. 

I do agree that all of the philosophy hampered what would otherwise be, in my opinion, a great plot.  I found myself skimming over the parts where the philosoph went for more than a paragraph or two.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
April 20th, 2011 at 1:05 PM
(Reply to #35) #31
justingoblue
justingoblue's picture
Joined: 11/16/2010
MGoPoints: 29685
Well the plot in a broad,

Well the plot in a broad, overarching way was great. After reading it, I did like the plot. Getting through it the first time, I can't say I loved the plot, and even if I did it was probably for...other reasons than the literary value of her readability in that case.

Either way, I think Fountainhead is the better story by far.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
April 20th, 2011 at 1:09 PM
(Reply to #37) #32
michgoblue
michgoblue's picture
Joined: 11/16/2009
MGoPoints: 20962
Fountainhead

Actually, the person that recommended Atlas to me also said that Fountainhead was better.  I have to get around to reading that.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
April 20th, 2011 at 1:14 PM
(Reply to #40) #33
justingoblue
justingoblue's picture
Joined: 11/16/2010
MGoPoints: 29685
It really is. Atlas Shrugged

It really is. Atlas Shrugged is 1,300 pages (in the original edition) and tries to go through all five branches of philosophy, and at times does a poor job integrating those ideas into a literary plot. Fountainhead is ~700 (in the original) and deals with one branch of philosophy.

Take out the philosophy/politics and Fountainhead is still a more interesting premise, IMO.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
April 20th, 2011 at 2:20 PM
(Reply to #43) #34
zeda_p
Joined: 12/21/2010
MGoPoints: 355
Didn't Rand Say

...the the Fountainhead was her prologue to AS?

If so.. Longest. Prologue. EVER.

(liked them both.)

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
April 20th, 2011 at 3:01 PM
(Reply to #40) #35
ND Sux
Joined: 10/01/2009
MGoPoints: 14974
Fountainhead is a great read,

but not a substitute for AS. 

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
April 20th, 2011 at 9:31 PM
(Reply to #99) #36
03 Blue 07
03 Blue 07's picture
Joined: 07/01/2008
MGoPoints: 3494
Cosign. I prefer Atlas

Cosign. I prefer Atlas Shrugged, having read both. Atlas Shrugged is a great book, even if you don't agree with the philosophy. And as others have said, Ayn Rand's philosophy is Objectivism. There are societies/organizations which carry on the tradition, and look to her and a handfull of her contemporaries as their forefathers. My understanding is that it is an offshoot of libertarianism. A man named Leonard Peikoff (sp?) who was Rand's lover, even though they were both married, carried it on following her passing; I believe the magazine Reason, which has an online outlet now, was started by Objectivists/Rand acolytes in the 1950's.

I don't necessarily agree with Rand's philosophies; I'd describe it as "life's a race, the individual is king, and if you don't win the race, don't fret that you lost, but be in awe of the winner, and find virtue in trying your hardest, because the highest human virtue is in working." Or something like that. FTR, Rand grew up in the USSR and emigrated to the U.S., and a lot of her hatred (too strong? hmm...maybe) of collectivism stemmed from her childhood experiences following the Bolshevik revolution.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
April 20th, 2011 at 10:28 PM
(Reply to #120) #37
justingoblue
justingoblue's picture
Joined: 11/16/2010
MGoPoints: 29685
I'd say Objectivism is under

I'd say Objectivism is under the libertarian umbrella, though an Objectivist would disagree. The basic tenants of egoism and individual freedom are there, and that's what would make me describe it that way. Think of Objectivism as a specific kind of Christianity, if that makes sense.

Yes, there are several places that continue Objectivist thought today. Your description is off of mine, because I would venture to say that I see the world more (not exactly, just more) like her than you do. I would describe it as: "we need to appreciate people who are gifted, because they are the ones we owe all of modern society to."

No; hatred is not too strong. I think she might think it's not a strong enough word.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
April 21st, 2011 at 11:14 AM
(Reply to #120) #38
archangel2k12
archangel2k12's picture
Joined: 01/19/2011
MGoPoints: 1064
Also

Cosign

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
April 20th, 2011 at 1:13 PM
(Reply to #37) #39
Newk
Newk's picture
Joined: 09/10/2008
MGoPoints: 611
Yeah, the story in its bare

Yeah, the story in its bare essentials could have made for a good read. But making your novel 5 times longer than it ought to have been counts as shitty writing in my view.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
April 20th, 2011 at 1:18 PM
(Reply to #41) #40
justingoblue
justingoblue's picture
Joined: 11/16/2010
MGoPoints: 29685
Well I think that depends on

Well I think that depends on what you write to accomplish. Did she make the most readable book ever? No. Did she spark more ineterst in her ideas (in big time depth)? Yes.

She is far from perfect, but I think she did what she wanted to do with her writing.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
April 20th, 2011 at 1:44 PM
(Reply to #51) #41
Newk
Newk's picture
Joined: 09/10/2008
MGoPoints: 611
I too have no doubt she was

I too have no doubt she was very satisfied with it.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
April 20th, 2011 at 1:46 PM
(Reply to #67) #42
justingoblue
justingoblue's picture
Joined: 11/16/2010
MGoPoints: 29685
HALOL

Yes, but that wasn't exactly what I was saying.

No doubt she loved every word she ever wrote, though. Great response, I really did laugh.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
April 20th, 2011 at 1:03 PM
(Reply to #25) #43
michgoblue
michgoblue's picture
Joined: 11/16/2009
MGoPoints: 20962
slight disagreement

I actually liked the plot - by the end, I found myself really hook and wanting to know what would happen to Dagny, Reardon and the rest. 

I do agree that all of the philosophy hampered what would otherwise be, in my opinion, a great plot.  I found myself skimming over the parts where the philosoph went for more than a paragraph or two.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
April 20th, 2011 at 2:57 PM
(Reply to #36) #44
MGoShtoink
MGoShtoink's picture
Joined: 11/05/2010
MGoPoints: 8523
Admittedly

I skimmed over most of the John Galt speech.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
April 20th, 2011 at 11:53 PM
(Reply to #36) #45
03 Blue 07
03 Blue 07's picture
Joined: 07/01/2008
MGoPoints: 3494
So did you skim the 100 page

So did you skim the 100 page soliloquiy by you-know-who then? (Don't want to spoil it for those who haven't read it).

EDIT: So much for the non-spoiler. And, of course, I was late on the trigger.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
April 20th, 2011 at 12:51 PM
(Reply to #9) #46
NMB
Joined: 04/14/2011
MGoPoints: 3
I think the following quote

I think the following quote sums it up pretty well:

"There are two novels that can change a bookish fourteen-year old's life: The Lord of the Rings and Atlas Shrugged. One is a childish fantasy that often engenders a lifelong obsession with its unbelievable heroes, leading to an emotionally stunted, socially crippled adulthood, unable to deal with the real world. The other, of course, involves orcs."

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
April 20th, 2011 at 1:32 PM
(Reply to #26) #47
matty blue
matty blue's picture
Joined: 08/01/2008
MGoPoints: 4565
well,

not going to join the ayn rand yay-or-nay argument, but damn i love that quote.  funny as all hell.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
April 20th, 2011 at 5:14 PM
(Reply to #26) #48
BlueVoix
BlueVoix's picture
Joined: 06/25/2009
MGoPoints: 5574
That is so incredibly

That is so incredibly awesome.  Not enough upboats.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
April 20th, 2011 at 1:19 PM
(Reply to #9) #49
GoBlueInNYC
GoBlueInNYC's picture
Joined: 03/23/2010
MGoPoints: 9532
Don't waste your time on Atlas Shrugged

Regardless of philosophy, I think Atlas Shrugged is an awful read. Rand's writing is poor, the characters are paper-thin (they're not characters, but simply ciphers through which Rand inelegantly spouts her philosophy), and the story is ridiculous and boring. So as a novel, it's piss poor.

As far as Rand's objectivist philosophy, Scotthany sums it up pretty well in the thread Six Zero linked to when he said:

Atlas Shrugged is the book that helps you rationalize being a selfish asshole when you're 17.  Sure, it has some valid points, but it's pretty strawman heavy.  So read it, but read it with a discerning mind.

Obviously a lot of people disagree, but I think her philosophy is pretty awful and poorly thoughtout. Between her ridiculous, inarticulate ideas and her ridiculous, inarticulare writing, I'd say it's not worth reading.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
April 20th, 2011 at 1:45 PM
(Reply to #52) #50
justingoblue
justingoblue's picture
Joined: 11/16/2010
MGoPoints: 29685
GoBlueInTX, I like your

GoBlueInTX, I like your posting, and you can certainly think whatever you want about Rand and her philosophy, but I'd be careful making value judgements about her ideas here.

For me, I'm not the biggest fan of Rand and some of her specific ideas, but that philosophy touches a whole lot of other philosophical thought that I really do like. Doing something so simple as to just call names isn't very productive, IMO, and alienates some people who think the same way you do.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
April 20th, 2011 at 2:03 PM
(Reply to #68) #51
GoBlueInNYC
GoBlueInNYC's picture
Joined: 03/23/2010
MGoPoints: 9532
Just giving my opinion.

Just giving my opinion. Clearly a lot of people would disagree with my take on her philosophy, otherwise she wouldn't be as popular as she is. Willywill9 was asking whether or not it's worth reading, I just was saying that I think it's emphatically not worth the time. I didn't call anyone any names (aside from Rand, herself, I guess, but I'm OK with that).

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • next ›
  • last »
Powered by Drupal, an open source content management system
Theme provided by Roopletheme; sidebars adapted from Chris Murphy.