ESPN Report: Regents To Discuss Brandon Tomorrow, AD Candidates Contacted Comment Count

Ace


Jeff Long and Warde Manuel: already contacted?

ESPN is reporting that the regents will discuss Dave Brandon at their previously scheduled meeting tomorrow, as revealed to them by regent Denise Ilitch herself. This may very well be the beginning of the end (or the beginning of the end of the end) for Brandon, as Ilitch had this to say about the Shane Morris situation:

"The systems failed and there are a lot of issues we have to review," Ilitch told WWJ CBS TV in Detroit.

The money quote, however, came at the end:

Sources told ESPN's Brett McMurphy that someone on Michigan's behalf has contacted three possible candidates to replace Brandon to gauge their interest in the job.

Arkansas AD Jeff Long, UConn AD Warde Manuel, and Boston College AD Brad Bates are the obvious candidates to be those three people, with Texas Tech deputy AD Joe Parker as a possible dark horse.

Comments

KSmooth

October 15th, 2014 at 12:37 PM ^

Far from a done deal, but yes, if they're contacting potential replacements, it has to mean that there's a serious chance he gets replaced.  Brandon's seat is now officially hotter than Hoke's

Blue Durham

October 15th, 2014 at 1:18 PM ^

The regents would not "discuss" Dave Brandon if they didn't know how each of them stand. This would be done privately, between individuals so not to be accused of having a meeting behind closed doors. All of the regents know who and how many are for and against firing Brandon. So either they are strongly in favor of Brandon and would want to give him the ole vote of confidence, or they are preparing to fire him (if it was close either way they would not publicly discuss Brandon at the meeting). If other potential candidates have been contacted, the vote is solidly if not unanimous in favor of his firing.

KSmooth

October 15th, 2014 at 2:07 PM ^

The regents don't have authority to fire Brandon, that's Schlissel's call.  But you have to expect he would confer with them before taking this step.

And I wouldn't say we know how a vote (even if it's strictly advisory) will go just from the fact there's a meeting.

HOWEVA -- there's no denying something is up.  Combine that with the feelers going out to different ADs and it sure doesn't look like Brandon's getting a raise.

Blue Durham

October 15th, 2014 at 2:19 PM ^

The regents would not be "discussing" this in a public meeting if they didn't already knew where Schlissel stood and that he stood with them. Otherwise, this discussion could be a pointless public embarrassment. This is orchestrated, everyone is on board, it just needs to be played out. The regents "discussion" and subsequent vote (one of no confidence or some sort) gives the president cover to fire Brandon and shows unity within the upper echelon of the university.

gustave ferbert

October 15th, 2014 at 2:25 PM ^

people called into Jamie Morris' radio show ( Ihtink his name was Bart?)  He was remarkably candid, and Jamie treated him with a great deal of credibility.  He very much gave the impression that if everyone was patient, the president was going to act in a manner that the everyone would find agreeable.  And now we are seeing these stories break.  

 

Plus I don't think ESPN would publish this unless there was something behind it. 

MI Expat NY

October 15th, 2014 at 12:45 PM ^

He also fired Petrino when it would have been easier from a public support standpoint not to have done so (they were coming off a top-5 finish) and hired the coach of the three-time defending Big Ten champs to replace him.  I think the positives outweigh the negatives.  

Reader71

October 15th, 2014 at 1:28 PM ^

He gets points for that. But he loses point for hiring Bobby Petrino. He is a mercenary, and a poor recruiter whose programs tank after he leaves, and always leaves on a bad note. I don't want Long. If you guys do, that's fine. But I don't.

Mpfnfu Ford

October 16th, 2014 at 3:30 AM ^

I'd rather have an AD who has managed to hire a sitting NFL coach away from a NFL team before than ADs who have never done that. It's uncharted territory to hire someone like Jim or John Harbaugh away from the NFL given their success there, so Long's hiring of Petrino is as close to relevant job experience as it gets.

Mr Miggle

October 15th, 2014 at 2:09 PM ^

that few would think he had a chance of landing. I like that he is willing to aim high rather than settle for someone certain to take the job. Petrino might be a mercenary who would leave when a better job beckoned, but he's a proven winner. Not many places can do better than that. I have to wonder when was the last time we did.

ThadMattasagoblin

October 15th, 2014 at 12:46 PM ^

Why do you hate the guy who hired Bobby Petrino? Yes, he had a scandal at the end but he was a homerun when he got him and he did well there. Long did not know about how it would end up when he hired him in 08. Manuel doesn't really have any good hires and the jury is out on Bates because his guys are so new. I like the Addazio hire for them.

clarkiefromcanada

October 15th, 2014 at 5:23 PM ^

On Addazio: I had the Addazio years at Temple in Philly and the guy is not a phenomenal coach by any means. Frustrating as hell his time at TU. I didn't think it was a great move by BC to pick him up and was frankly glad to see him go. The new guy, Matt Rhule, is younger, a better recruiter and from the Al Golden line of coaches (Al Golden may not be the be all end all at YTM Miami but he his time at Temple was glorious). Addazio went to a bowl game with Golden's players then did nothing...his offense was Hoke manball brutal x50. It is true that he beat USC at home this year and then promptly lost to Colorado State. 

Give me the guy who hired Bobby Petrino...hell, send me Bobby Petrino

MGolem

October 15th, 2014 at 1:11 PM ^

 but Jeff Long is the chairman of the new College Football Playoff. Presumably that says something about the amount of respect he has amongst his peers.

Either way, this news is like finding that birthday present you really wanted under your parents bed a week early. They told you it was too expensive, not to get your hopes up, but there it is in all its glory.

GoBLUinTX

October 15th, 2014 at 3:41 PM ^

Jurich is now one of the senior ADs in college athletics.  He also hired another Italian, some guy named Pitino.  And while his first football hire at Louisville was JL Smith, he did bring Charlie Strong into town when he needed another winner.  Michigan could do far worse than Tom Jurich....but then Jurich probably thinks he can do a lot better than Michigan.

The FannMan

October 15th, 2014 at 12:37 PM ^

My two tests are:

1) Not Dave Brandon.

2) The candidate have some experience with how to successfully run an D1 athletic department, being an assistant AD is fine here,  (Experience hiring a coach would be a plus.)

Once those two are met I really and truly don't care.

The Claw

October 15th, 2014 at 1:10 PM ^

They've had the chance to get hires right in the past, to include these meeting of the minds with the reagents and ex-football players in a coaches search.  Looked at how that's turned out. 

The Claw

October 15th, 2014 at 1:40 PM ^

since I guess my point did not get across. I'm afraid that no matter happens in the meeting, to include their recommendations, will have no bearing on the decision at hand.  Since the President is the only person that can fire Brandon, will their vote sway him?  I'm wary.  Will the reagents and ex-football players recommendations to fire or not fire Hoke be followed by Brandon or a new AD? I'm wary.  

Blue Durham

October 15th, 2014 at 2:13 PM ^

The regents wouldn't be "discussing" this in public if they didn't already know how they are going to vote, and that the vote would not be close. They also would not discuss this in public if the president was not in agreement with them. Otherwise, the "discussion" at the regents meeting would be pointless and a needless public embarrassment. This is a done deal and virtually everyone, if not everyone, is on board. Since feelers have been extended to gauge the interest in other ADs, this is not a discussion for a vote of confidence.

ThadMattasagoblin

October 15th, 2014 at 12:42 PM ^

I'd take the Arkansas guy if he'll fire Hoke and not let loyalties influence business decisions. He hired Bobby Petrino who was an awesome coach for them, and Bielema who's turning them around. He also hired Mike Anderson away from Missouri.

Arizona Blue

October 15th, 2014 at 12:42 PM ^

Wow! Definitley an intentional power move by the regents to leak this to ESPN. As much as I am intrigued by the AD and Turmoil, I cant help but think that Devil you know is sometimes better than the devil you dont. Maybee thats what the last 10 years have done to me.

mjv

October 15th, 2014 at 12:53 PM ^

It would be difficult for the devil we don't know to be any worse than DB.  Michigan Football season ticket holders are the golden goose of college athletics.  DB has greatly damaged the golden goose.  It really is the single most important thing he had to worry about and at every turn he told them to eff off.