Since the RR hire there's been constant chatter about whether the spread offense is a good "fit" for Michigan. Maybe I'm missing something, but how does a scheme fit better or worse at a given university, aside from the current personnel? Does the Michigan Stadium turf prevent players from making defenders miss in the open field? Do the winged helmets make bubble screen reads more difficult to execute?
Mark May was recently on a radio show spouting garbage about how RR's scheme would fit better at Tennessee or Clemson. How does his scheme fit any better there than it does here? What is wrong with the people who are spitting this crap out?