Home
i'm an actor, not a reactor

Primary links

  • About
    • $upport (lol)
    • Ethics
    • FAQ
    • Glossary
    • Privacy Policy
  • Contact
  • MGoStore
    • Hail to Old Blue
  • MGoBoard
    • MGoBoard FAQ
    • Michigan bar locator
    • Moderator Action Sticky
  • Useful Stuff
    • Depth Chart By Class
    • Hoops Depth Chart by Class
    • 2017 Recruiting Board
    • Unofficial Two Deep
    • MGoFlickr
    • Diaries, Windows Live Writer, And You
    • User-Curated HOF
    • Where To Eat In Ann Arbor
  • Schedule/Tix
    • Future Schedules (wiki)
    • Ticket spreadsheet
Home

Navigation

  • Forums
  • Recent posts

User login

  • Create new account
  • Request new password

MGoElsewhere

  • @MGoBlog (Brian)
  • @aceanbender
  • @Misopogon (Seth)
  • @Aeschnepp (Adam)
  • @BISB
  • @EUpchurchPhoto
  • @FullOfTwitt (Fuller)
  • Hail to the Victors 2016
  • MGoFacebook
  • MGoPodcast
  • WTKA
  • Instagram

Michigan Blogs

  • Big House Blog
  • Burgeoning Wolverine Star
  • Genuinely Sarcastic
  • Go Blue Michigan Wolverine
  • Holdin' The Rope
  • MVictors
  • Maize 'n' Blue Nation
  • Maize 'n' Brew
  • Maize And Go Blue
  • Michigan Hockey Net
  • MMMGoBlueBBQ
  • The Blog That Yost Built
  • The Hoover Street Rag
  • The M Zone
  • Touch The Banner
  • UMGoBlog
  • UMHoops
  • UMTailgate
  • Wolverine Liberation Army

M On The Net

  • mgovideo
  • MGoBlue.com
  • Mike DeSimone
  • Recruiting Planet
  • The Wolverine
  • Go Blue Wolverine
  • Winged Helmet
  • UMGoBlue.com
  • MaizeRage.org
  • Puckhead
  • The M Den
  • True Blue Fan Forum

Big Ten Blogs

  • Illinois
    • Illinois Loyalty
    • Illinois Baseball Report
  • Indiana
    • Inside The Hall
    • The Crimson Quarry
  • Iowa
    • Black Heart, Gold Pants
    • Fight For Iowa
  • Michigan State
    • The Only Colors
  • Minnesota
    • GopherHole.com
    • The Daily Gopher
  • Nebraska
    • Corn Nation
    • Husker Max
    • Husker Mike's Blasphemy
    • Husker Gameday
  • Northwestern
    • Sippin' On Purple
    • Lake The Posts
  • Notre Dame
    • The House Rock Built
    • One Foot Down
  • Ohio State
    • Eleven Warriors
    • Buckeye Commentary
    • Men of the Scarlet and Gray
    • Our Honor Defend
    • The Buckeye Nine
  • Penn State
    • Slow States
    • Black Shoe Diaries
    • Happy Valley Hardball
    • Penn State Clips
    • Linebacker U
    • Nittany White Out
  • Purdue
    • Boiled Sports
    • Hammer and Rails
  • Wisconsin
    • Bruce Ciskie

Links of Note

  • Baseball
    • College Baseball Today
    • The College Baseball Blog
  • Basketball
    • Ken Pomeroy
    • Hoop Math
    • John Gasaway
    • Luke Winn/Sports Illustrated
  • College Hockey
    • Chris Heisenberg (Class of 2016)
    • College Hockey Stats
    • Michigan College Hockey
    • Hockey's Future
    • Sioux Sports
    • USCHO
  • Football
    • Smart Football
    • Every Day Should Be Saturday
    • Matt Hinton/Grantland
    • Football Study Hall
    • Football Outsiders
    • Harold Stassen
    • NCAA D-I Stats Page
    • The Wizard Of Odds
    • CFB Stats
  • General
    • Sports Central
  • Local Interest
    • The Ann Arbor Chronicle
    • Arborwiki
    • Arbor Update
    • Ann Arbor Observer
    • Teeter Talk
    • Vacuum
  • Teams Of The D
    • Lions
      • Pride of Detroit
    • Pistons
      • Detroit Bad Boys
      • Need4Sheed
    • Tigers
      • Roar Of The Tigers
      • Bless You Boys
      • The Daily Fungo
      • The Detroit Tigers Weblog
    • Red Wings
      • Winging It In Motown
      • On The Wings
    • Michigan Sports Forum

Beveled Guilt

Site Search

Diaries

  • New
  • Popular
  • Hot
  • Loyola-Chicago: A First Glance
    Bambi - 3 weeks ago
  • PreSpring Football updates from Sam Webb
    AZBlue - 3 weeks ago
  • ‹‹
  • 2 of 2
  •  
more
  • This Month in MGoBlog History - March 2008: Pryor isn't coming, Boren has left, and some academic fraud allegations sprinkled in
    Maize.Blue Wagner - 215 comments
  • The Ballad of Jordan Poole
    k.o.k.Law - 176 comments
  • 14 Months Ago: The Fire Beilein Threads.
    stephenrjking - 91 comments
  • PreSpring Football updates from Sam Webb
    AZBlue - 90 comments
  • Thirteen unlucky minutes (TL;DNR-This is a bit of rant about the refs)
    docwhoblocked - 61 comments

MGoBoard

  • New
  • Recent
  • Hot
  • Final 2018 Basketball COMPOSITE Rankings
    11 replies
  • OT: Map of college stadiums that sell alcohol
    47 replies
  • Auston Robertson arrested again
    54 replies
  • Michigan announces single-game ticket prices for 2018 football season
    35 replies
  • 2018-19 Michigan Basketball B1G slate announced
    42 replies
  • Final 247 Basketball rankings published
    43 replies
  • Any news on Grant Newsome?
    77 replies
  • Karsen Barnhart - did we cool on him?
    89 replies
  • HELP WANTED! I'm moving to Chicago for school and I need good haunts to watch football/basketball games. Recommendations?
    57 replies
  • Angelique on Patterson Transfer
    57 replies
  • CBS Sports: Shea Patterson details scope of Ole Miss deception in lengthy letter to Michigan
    40 replies
  • OT: NFL Schedule Release
    12 replies
  • OT: Gregg Popovich's wife Erin dead at 67
    23 replies
  • Belleville coach Jermain Crowell mad at UM again
    236 replies
  • Q&A with FB Ben VanSumeren--Video
    10 replies
  •  
  • 1 of 6
  • ››
  • OT: Map of college stadiums that sell alcohol
    47 replies
  • Final 2018 Basketball COMPOSITE Rankings
    11 replies
  • Michigan announces single-game ticket prices for 2018 football season
    35 replies
  • CBS Sports: Shea Patterson details scope of Ole Miss deception in lengthy letter to Michigan
    40 replies
  • Any news on Grant Newsome?
    77 replies
  • HELP WANTED! I'm moving to Chicago for school and I need good haunts to watch football/basketball games. Recommendations?
    57 replies
  • Angelique on Patterson Transfer
    57 replies
  • Auston Robertson arrested again
    54 replies
  • Karsen Barnhart - did we cool on him?
    89 replies
  • Q&A with FB Ben VanSumeren--Video
    10 replies
  • Final 247 Basketball rankings published
    43 replies
  • 2018-19 Michigan Basketball B1G slate announced
    42 replies
  • OT: Gregg Popovich's wife Erin dead at 67
    23 replies
  • Belleville coach Jermain Crowell mad at UM again
    236 replies
  • "Being Not-Rich at UM" Guide
    167 replies
  •  
  • 1 of 6
  • ››
  • OT: best-selling musical artists by state of birth
    120 replies
  • The Ice Storm Cometh - And Your Favorite Winter Storm
    119 replies
  • No additional protest of Shea Patterson appeal by Ole Miss
    113 replies
  • OT: MSU digs hole deeper, Engler adviser: Nassar survivor's claims of payout 'fake news'
    106 replies
  • NCAA changes rules to restrict James Doug Foug's super power
    106 replies
  • 1, 2, you know what to do: POSBANG
    104 replies
  • Was the spring game cancellation unnecessary?
    98 replies
  • Hello Te'Cory Couch
    92 replies
  • Malik McDowell Likely to be Cut
    91 replies
  • Karsen Barnhart - did we cool on him?
    89 replies
  • OT: RIP R. Lee Ermey
    87 replies
  • TMI Spring Takeaways
    86 replies
  • Way OT: NYC poop sitting on a train in Alabama
    78 replies
  • Any news on Grant Newsome?
    77 replies
  • New kickoff rule
    75 replies
  • ‹‹
  • 2 of 6
  • ››

Support MGoBlog: buy stuff at Amazon

Dennis Norfleet To Safety Bothers Me

  • View
  • Revisions
By Brian — December 11th, 2012 at 2:12 PM — 215 comments
Filed under:
  • dennis norfleet
  • position switches

Yesterday Jordan Kovacs casually tossed off something about helping out Dennis Norfleet—or dennisnorfleet, whichever—and other young safeties with minutiae, and then there's a clip of a 5'6" guy wearing 26 tackling someone else:

I hate this for lots of reasons.

REASON #1

The chance Dennis Norfleet becomes a good safety seems minimal. There's being small, and there's being Norfleet small. Bob Sanders is the go-to-comparison here and yes okay there has been one Norfleet-sized safety in the last ten years of college football who has been really good. I can think of plenty of mini-me running backs who have been somewhere between okay and great. Garrett Wolfe, Brian Calhoun, and Jacquizz Rodgers pop immediately to mind, a guy like Vincent Smith has provided Michigan value.

REASON #2

There would seem to be no need to make this move unless safety depth next year is just terrifying. With Gordon/Wilson the presumed starters, the very idea they'd need to move a kid like Norfleet to D says bad things about replacing Kovacs, or that neither Furman or Robinson is viable even as a backup.

Nickel corner? There's even less of a need there. Avery returns, Delonte Holowell is locked into nickel-or-nothing, and Terry Richardson is also a nickel sort. That they'd even try this seems to indicate a need in the secondary that can only be explained by attrition or inability to play.

REASON #3

We're really going to make this move before even trying the guy as a change of pace/third down back? He's clearly not needed to play S for the bowl game, but he may be needed to run the ball since Rawls isn't really getting it done and Norfleet—a guy who Hoke was pushing to get on the field on offense early this year—is just going to go by the wayside to not play safety? WTF?

I mean, if we're trying to win a bowl game here Norfleet has a much better chance of helping that cause on offense than the sideline watching Kovacs and Gordon play safety.

REASON #4

Hoke mentioned something about burning Drake Johnson's redshirt, which he probably won't actually do, but he has put it on the table:

He offered the proposal when asked about his running backs, who will take the field Jan. 1 against South Carolina in the Outback Bowl without starter Fitz Toussaint. Sophomore Thomas Rawls, redshirt freshman Justice Hayes and senior Vincent Smith are expected to be in the rotation.

That indicates Hoke would like to see true freshman Drake Johnson get some time against the Gamecocks. Johnson, who starred at nearby Ann Arbor Pioneer High School, is redshirting this year.

"Maybe," Hoke said. "We like what Drake's done to this point."

So instead of trying out the guy that Michigan thought was good enough to play on kickoffs they're thinking about burning a redshirt for a guy who only got an EMU offer before Fred Jackson swooped in.

REASON #5

This could mean Norfleet isn't good at running the ball to the point where it's not even worth trying him over Rawls. I find that hard to believe after watching his high school tape, but it is a hit on any expectations you may have for the kid as a runner. The nonsensical-seeming position switch is the first step on the road to obscurity.

REASON #6

But more likely it means he's not good at running through unblocked guys and that he might never get a shot running behind an offensive line that could get him some cracks.

CONCLUSION

images[1]

Hopefully this is dismissed as a crazy bet Fred Jackson lost by Saturday.

  • Login or register to post comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
December 11th, 2012 at 2:34 PM
#102
BlueMan80
BlueMan80's picture
Joined: 01/21/2011
MGoPoints: 7559
Norfleet is like Bob Sanders..

but faster.  Fred Jackson knows just how to pitch this to Mattison.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
December 11th, 2012 at 2:36 PM
#103
cjpops
cjpops's picture
Joined: 09/01/2009
MGoPoints: 1945
Shocker!

I, for one, can't believe that the offensive genius Al Borges can't find a place for Norfleet. 

/s

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
December 11th, 2012 at 2:38 PM
#104
Kilgore Trout
Kilgore Trout's picture
Joined: 02/20/2009
MGoPoints: 3351
Norfleet

While I agree that this seems to be an odd decision given the situation, my excitement for Norfleet was tempered as the season went on. We heard about him making people look silly in seven on seven, but as the season progrossed I was hoping for more from his kick off returns. More often than not, he seemed to just run straight into the pile without really doing anything.

One additional observation about kickoff returns / coverage is that it seems like UM uses a rotating cast of guys on these teams, even within a single game. I would think that wouldn't be productive to consistent output.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
December 11th, 2012 at 2:40 PM
(Reply to #25) #105
Monocle Smile
Monocle Smile's picture
Joined: 09/17/2009
MGoPoints: 12232
Illusion

Norfleet got much more on most of those returns than a lot of other dudes would. Our blocking on special teams, much like our punt coverage, blows donkey balls.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
December 11th, 2012 at 2:41 PM
(Reply to #27) #106
Kilgore Trout
Kilgore Trout's picture
Joined: 02/20/2009
MGoPoints: 3351
Agree

I think that's probably true. I think my expectations were too high. And yes, the blocking seems to be awful.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
December 11th, 2012 at 2:58 PM
(Reply to #33) #107
Lionsfan
Lionsfan's picture
Joined: 06/03/2011
MGoPoints: 1962
I think expectations for

I think expectations for Norfleet were set way too high. Everyone kept talking about how "This year you just know he's gonna run one back". It seemed like he was supposed to run for a TD every kick.

And then you look up the stats, and one of the greatest returners in UM history (Steve Breaston) only had 1 KR TD. Desmond had 2. Even Devin Hester, statistically the best return-man ever, only had 2 KR TD's in college

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
December 11th, 2012 at 5:00 PM
(Reply to #60) #108
jmblue
Joined: 11/07/2008
MGoPoints: 56282
Right now we can't mention

Right now we can't mention Norfleet in the same breath as those guys.  I think you could count on one hand the number of returns he broke past our own 35.  Did he ever return a kickoff past midfield?

Norfleet has excellent acceleration, but hasn't yet shown a lot of vision or ability to break tackles.  The few times he's improvised have been his best returns.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
December 11th, 2012 at 7:25 PM
(Reply to #149) #109
Lionsfan
Lionsfan's picture
Joined: 06/03/2011
MGoPoints: 1962
Yeah that's what I was

Yeah that's what I was getting at. Norfleet could be very good, but there were people talking about how he was gonna be better than Breaston, and how he was gonna run a KR back this year, and comparing him to those guys, even though he's just a freshman

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
December 11th, 2012 at 7:29 PM
(Reply to #183) #110
Magnus
Magnus's picture
Joined: 07/17/2008
MGoPoints: 122918
Breaston as a RS freshman: 9

Breaston as a RS freshman: 9 KR, 191 yards, 21.2 yards/return
Norfleet as a true freshman: 34 KR, 795 yards, 23.4 yards/return

And you'll note that Norfleet plays at a time when the kickoff team is 5 yards closer to the returner to start.  Maybe those people who said "Norfleet is better than Breaston" could be onto something.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
December 11th, 2012 at 2:40 PM
#111
switch26
Joined: 02/04/2010
MGoPoints: 4933
So where the hell is Norfleet

So where the hell is Norfleet in that video tackling someone?  And to think he is going to ever start at Safety over anyone we currently have or going to have is completely absurd

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
December 11th, 2012 at 2:40 PM
#112
akim
Joined: 12/30/2010
MGoPoints: 530
Could it be that working with

Could it be that working with the safeties will improve his tackling/reads for the purpose of special teams as a gunner?  Just a random thought...

I'm not going to get involved in this questioning the coaches stuff more than this but I think there is some aspect of the coaches seeing something within Fort Schembechler that we haven't seen which is driving this decision.  

I agree that there's something fishy about this, but Hoke and Mattison seem to be doing pretty well at identifying talent on the recruiting trail, so that aspect of it makes me feel like there MUST be something that we're missing.

Also... damn you GoWings2008 that gif was in the corner of my eye while I was writing this :(

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
December 11th, 2012 at 3:05 PM
(Reply to #30) #113
BryanAAMI
Joined: 12/11/2012
MGoPoints: 163
4th down safety

I fully support PR getting reps at safety... Just in case

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
December 11th, 2012 at 2:55 PM
(Reply to #31) #114
ChopBlock
ChopBlock's picture
Joined: 12/11/2011
MGoPoints: 2434
Something about converted

Something about converted safeties: Troy Woolfork, Dennis Northfleet...

 

THIS JUST IN: Mattison is giving Devin Slevin Mevin Smith some looks at safety as well

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
December 11th, 2012 at 2:42 PM
#115
Hardware Sushi
Hardware Sushi's picture
Joined: 03/08/2010
MGoPoints: 6379
I don't like Norfleet at S

I don't like Norfleet at S either but I think this is a little (a lot) a bit of an overreaction.

Is it that strange that they're trying a guy out at a different position during bowl practice than practicing him at a position he wasn't already getting PT?

Maybe, but it's not THE WORST THING IN THE WORLD as it's made out to be here. Norfleet didn't get much time when Toussaint was out during the Ohio game, didn't get much PT all year outside of returns, what makes you think we're 'taking away' from the offensive side of the ball in the bowl game?

It's like freaking out in spring practice because Gardner couldn't hit a WR to save his life and Bolden was going to be our starting MLB because Demens sucked. You are better than this type of reaction.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
December 11th, 2012 at 2:49 PM
(Reply to #36) #116
FreddieMercuryHayes
Joined: 12/29/2010
MGoPoints: 35030
Shouldn't your Gardner

Shouldn't your Gardner example make you feel worse about this?  This is the offense staff that looked at Bellomy and said "yep, you're ready" and moved Gardner to WR.  Now I suppose they could have thought that the season was fucked if Denard went down and decided we needed more help at WR.  But given that Gardner was not the game changer at WR, Bellomy was terrible (in a hostile enviornment) at QB, and Gardner was pretty damn good at QB, crazy position switches with potential playmakers from the offensive staff now gets a sideways "are you sure?" look from me.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
December 11th, 2012 at 8:50 PM
(Reply to #46) #117
Hardware Sushi
Hardware Sushi's picture
Joined: 03/08/2010
MGoPoints: 6379
This staff also

This staff also made a nice move to start Kwiatkowski as our blocking TE and put Quentin Washington in the right place to succeed in our 1-tech spot when nobody on here projected him at NT before.* Anecdotal evidence isn't really the greatest thing to use because we can both pull some good moves and bad moves by the coaching staff.

Anyway, I wasn't talking about the coaching staff's ability to evaluate, I was assessing Brian's (and to a greater extent, the community's) reaction to a freshman position move during bowl practice. My point in bringing up Gardner is that we all saw how terrible he was in the spring game. The spring game. The practice scrimmage with 75% of the scholarship roster and our team playing both sides in not an official game capacity. And the general overreaction on April 15: Gardner has no future as our QB.

Norfleet is practicing safety in bowl practice. The same bowl practice Hoke spends lining up the freshman across from each other doing technique drills for the first week straight.

TL; DR: I'm just saying the reaction is over-the-top for switching a non-starter that can still play his current position while practicing the new one. Didn't mean to throw off the scent by an anecdote or two.

*I don't really put any weight into the internet argument of "should the coaches have prepped Gardner for Nebraska" because none of the MGo users (I am aware of) attend practice and can really evaluate that. What we see which is like 5% of the actual on-field time the coaches see, not counting video, injury, etc., and of that time, Bellomy played in 60% of our offensive snaps in 1/12th of our season. We don't know shit and people claiming to are probably worse.

Bellomy might have been great in practice and the coaches did the best with the info they knew or he might have sucked and the coaches blew that decision (I also want to know what is wrong with Bellomy and why the coaches are being so crazy about discussing his status/injury before I pass judgement on his abilities at length, which some people have done with things like arm strength "which should be obvious in practice', to quote a former thread). Just like college basketball so far, small sample size definitely applies to Bellomy. Gardner didn't look like Michigan's starting QB in his spot duty last year, either. 

I also do not blame just Borges or just the offensive staff for Gardner - Hoke gets full credit or blame. QB is the most important position and HC makes that final call. If we're going to blame the staff for bad calls, gotta give them the good ones like QW.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
December 11th, 2012 at 2:54 PM
(Reply to #36) #118
GoWings2008
GoWings2008's picture
Joined: 01/26/2011
MGoPoints: 48586
Okay, maybe not the WORST

But definitely not good by any means.  A little research shows Norfleet with a little over a 23 yd average on returns, which appears to be slightly over the average across the NCAA.  IF, by some stretch of the imagniation, the blocking was solid...not good, but consistent...then his average I would guess be in the upper 25% of the NCAA.  If that happens, we're not even having this discussion. 

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
December 11th, 2012 at 9:00 PM
(Reply to #52) #119
Hardware Sushi
Hardware Sushi's picture
Joined: 03/08/2010
MGoPoints: 6379
What are you saying?

What are you saying? The discussion that you can't play safety and return kickoffs?

Regardless, I'm saying Norfleet wasn't getting running back carries before OR after Toussaint's injury, we have/are recruiting a fuckton of power backs, especially if we land Green, and it's a bowl practice. Try him out at safety, guy is a sick point guard and is obviously an athlete, let him go at it. Let's not spend all day fretting about the guy that wasn't getting PT switching to a new position during bowl practice.

Don't get me wrong - I don't mind the analysis by Brian or discussion among the group. Just seemed a little more emotional than a typical position analysis.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
December 11th, 2012 at 2:43 PM
#120
State Street
State Street's picture
Joined: 07/09/2011
MGoPoints: 15302
This has to be an epic troll

This has to be an epic troll by Hoke and co.  a 5'6'' razor thin safety in the B1G is laughable.  This would be a GERG-like move.  There's no way that this is even in the realm of possibility.

Hoke probably went over to Kovacs before the interview, gave him a "RILE EM UP KID" and patted him on the tush.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
December 11th, 2012 at 2:54 PM
(Reply to #37) #121
Brown Bear
Brown Bear's picture
Joined: 01/10/2011
MGoPoints: 35139
I wouldn't call him razor

I wouldn't call him razor thin. The kid is quite built.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
December 11th, 2012 at 2:43 PM
#122
tylawyer
Joined: 02/10/2010
MGoPoints: 250
*For some reason CAN'T get

*For some reason CAN'T get image of Justin Fargas's 1,000 yard NFL rushing season out of head*

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
December 11th, 2012 at 3:38 PM
(Reply to #39) #123
imafreak1
imafreak1's picture
Joined: 07/02/2008
MGoPoints: 1743
I'm guessing you are thinking

I'm guessing you are thinking about Fargas because he was a RB recruit who unsuccessfully moved to safety. But before we rewrite history and have Henson putting Brady on the bench and what not let's review what happened with Fargas.

In 1998, he had a very successful freshman year at RB (for the time) and was named one of SI's 10 best freshmen. In 1999 he broke his leg horribly. When he returned in 2000 he had fallen on the depth chart behind--at the very least--Anthony Thomas. He may have stayed and battled with Chris Perry and BJ Askew--both of whom had very successful Michigan careers. Maybe his leg wasn't fully healed. Maybe he wanted to be the starter sooner. Who knows.

But this is nothing like Norfleet who is a complete unknown at both RB and safety because WE haven't seen him play much of either.

I say WE because while WE haven't seen him play either position much, THE COACHES have.

No one really doubted Fargas. He just got stuck behind some really good players.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
December 11th, 2012 at 2:49 PM
#124
jg2112
jg2112's picture
Joined: 11/25/2008
MGoPoints: 7764
Is it possible that Michigan

Is it possible that Michigan puts additional defensive backs in its secondary in order to make Gardner and Robinson make more difficult decisions in the coaching game?

Is it possible that Norfleet is asked to run through a couple of reps at safety in order to improve his understanding of the offense (surely unorthodox, but perhaps it would help his route recognition and understanding of the blocking scheme how it helped Gardner at WR) and to keep him active while other RBs get the lion's share of carries?

There - two non-nuclear reasons why Norfleet might have repped at safety during one moment of one practice.

You're welcome.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
December 11th, 2012 at 2:57 PM
(Reply to #44) #125
ChopBlock
ChopBlock's picture
Joined: 12/11/2011
MGoPoints: 2434
At the same time, why would

At the same time, why would Kovacs be coaching him up just like the other safeties if he were there not to play?

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
December 11th, 2012 at 2:59 PM
(Reply to #59) #126
jg2112
jg2112's picture
Joined: 11/25/2008
MGoPoints: 7764
Because Kovacs is a leader

Because Kovacs is a leader and wants Norfleet to do the job the right way if he's going to be back there?

Or, Kovacs is trolling everyone.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
December 11th, 2012 at 3:02 PM
(Reply to #58) #127
ReadYourGuard
ReadYourGuard's picture
Joined: 08/21/2008
MGoPoints: 33681
:shocked_look: Noooooo.

:shocked_look: Noooooo. Over reaction? On MGoBlog? GTFO.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
December 11th, 2012 at 3:01 PM
#128
Blue boy johnson
Joined: 03/15/2009
MGoPoints: 6357
You guys are dumb. Obviously

You guys are dumb. Obviously Borges traded Norfleet for Furman and and a running back to be hyperbolized later. Expect Furman to be starting tailback in Bowl game.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
December 11th, 2012 at 3:09 PM
(Reply to #63) #129
PurpleStuff
PurpleStuff's picture
Joined: 04/21/2009
MGoPoints: 15963
This would actually be exciting

Especially if he isn't expected to win a starting safety spot next year, I would love to see Furman get a crack at RB.  His size/speed and high school numbers lead me to believe he can't be any worse than the non-Fitz options available at the moment.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
December 11th, 2012 at 3:01 PM
#130
Felix.M.Blue
Joined: 10/22/2011
MGoPoints: 6126
Vinopal

Someone had to take the place of Ray.

How did you guys miss this?

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
December 11th, 2012 at 3:01 PM
#131
Mr Miggle
Mr Miggle's picture
Joined: 10/07/2010
MGoPoints: 31156
Was point #4 intended to be a joke?

There is no way in hell Hoke is burning Drake Johnson's redshirt for the bowl game. He only opined that it would be nice if players could play in bowl games without burning their redshirt and that Drake might play if that were the case.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
December 11th, 2012 at 3:10 PM
#132
Magnus
Magnus's picture
Joined: 07/17/2008
MGoPoints: 122918
Hm, let's see.  We've got a

Hm, let's see.  We've got a redshirt freshman in Justice Hayes, who is considered to be a third down-type back with speed to the outside and not much ability to break tackles.  And we've got true freshman Dennis Norfleet, who is considered to be a third down-type back with speed to the outside and not much ability to break tackles.

Two guys with the same general skill set in the same class.

I've got an idea: Let's keep them at the same position so one can always be blocking the other from playing time, and then they'll both graduate together and *POOF* be gone forever.

I'm not saying this is what the coaches are thinking, but there is a reason that some people were like "WTF?" when we signed Dennis Norfleet and Fred Jackson immediately said he didn't think Norfleet would ever be a feature back.

As long as the kid can still return kicks and punts while playing safety, I don't really care whether he plays offense or defense.  There are numerous guys who never made much of an impact on one side of the ball (Mel Gray, Dante Hall, Eddie Drummond, etc.) but were very valuable as returners.  It's quite possible that Norfleet could be one of those types of players.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
December 11th, 2012 at 4:23 PM
(Reply to #73) #133
mejunglechop
mejunglechop's picture
Joined: 07/09/2008
MGoPoints: 6619
There's a decent chance

There's a decent chance Norfleet becomes a substantially better 3rd down option than Hayes. The chances he becomes one of our two best safties is essentially zero. 

Fleet is on the team to be a return specialist. He weighs 161 lbs. To have any chance of seeing the field on defense he'd have to add so much weight it would compromise his athleticism for returns. You can't play safety in the Big Ten at 5'7" 175.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
December 11th, 2012 at 4:56 PM
(Reply to #130) #134
Magnus
Magnus's picture
Joined: 07/17/2008
MGoPoints: 122918
Maybe he has mad ball skillz.

Maybe he has mad ball skillz.  Maybe Justice Hayes (who I don't remember playing defense in high school, but maybe he did) can't tackle worth a lick.

I'm not convined that Norfleet can't make an impact on defense.  Maybe he won't be the #2 safety at any point, but maybe he can be #3.  Maybe he's 5'8" or 5'9" now and packing on some weight.  There are several examples of short-ish safeties being successful (Bob Sanders, Tyrone Carter, Javier Arenas, etc.).

I don't know the answer.  All I'm saying is there are examples of success from the past, there are other options at RB in the same class, Norfleet has experience playing defense in high school, and he was mainly brought in to return kicks/punts.  Those aforementioned things make me shrug my shoulders about this, if it's indeed a thing.  It's not anything that we should be getting worked up about, in my opinion.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
December 11th, 2012 at 3:11 PM
#135
CRex
CRex's picture
Joined: 09/28/2009
MGoPoints: 9002
Norfleet
Just to point it out, while Norfleet has the KR job locked down fairly well, that doesn't mean he  automatically becomes the best RB ever.  It could be Hayes and Houma both have speed and are appearing as more attractive backfield options due to their ability to block, etc.  In additional we have a couple more backs coming into play via recruitment or off of redshirt.  
 
As for the safety thing, there are a lot of guys in the 5' 9" range that have had good careers as coverage safeties.  If Norfleet puts on an inch or two via growth spurt, he's right there and he already has the muscle mass.  
 
Assuming Fitx returns next year, we'll have at least 6 RBs on the rosters (perhaps 7 as we seem to want to add one more).  Plus three fullbacks.  Sooner or later guys who want PT are going to have to try out at other spots.  As Magnus mentions this could also be nothing more than a move to escape the fate of Darnell Hood.  
Top
  • Login or register to post comments
December 11th, 2012 at 3:12 PM
#136
QVIST
QVIST's picture
Joined: 08/22/2009
MGoPoints: 975
Could this just be for

Could this just be for certain packages? Doesn't SC have a bunch of fast midgets? Maybe Mattison isn't convinced our current guys are quick enough to hang with them in space.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
December 11th, 2012 at 6:15 PM
(Reply to #78) #137
jabberwock
jabberwock's picture
Joined: 07/04/2008
MGoPoints: 44181
^^^This

was my thinking after that SC previewas well.  Call it insurance.

 

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
December 11th, 2012 at 3:16 PM
#138
michgoblue
michgoblue's picture
Joined: 11/16/2009
MGoPoints: 20962
This doesn't bother me

This is not really a direct rebuttal of Brian's post, but here are my thoughts on why this doesn't bother me:

1.  Dennis Norfleet may not be very good at running back. 

I like fleet, and I think that he has potential, based upon his speed, but being fast does not necessarily equate to being a good college running back.  Oftentimes, neither does being a good HS running back.  I think that we can all agree that our stable of RBs this past year is very week.  What does it tell us if Fleet could barely earn any carries this year, when we were desparate for a productive RB?  Perhaps he fumbles because of smaller hands.  Perhaps he has poor vision (which may be the case, as he does not appear to always make the correct move on returns).  Perhaps he goes down easily on first contact. 

Whatever the reason, the coaches who watch him day in and day out may not believe that he is a capable college RB.  Note: this is not really a "trust the coaches on everything" argument.  Sure, coaches can and should be second guessed, and often make mistakes.  But when numerous coaches - Borges, Hoke, Jackson and Mattison, to name a few, all conclude that he doesn't offer an upgrade over V. Smith or Rawls eeking out 1.5 yards, perhaps there is a reason.

2.  Norfleet may be a good RB, but he does not fit the system that the coaches desire to run.

Borges and company have stated repeatedly that we are going to a pro-style, manball attack starting next season.  They also clearly have a desire for a big, thumping Chris Perry, A-Train type of back.  This is not Fleet.  Does that mean that he cannot be successful?  No, but if he is going to only see 1-3 plays per game as a change of pace back, perhaps his skill set is better used elsewhere where he may see the field.  He is already a special teams regular contributor.

Before someone says that the coaches should adopt the scheme to the talent, keep in mind that we are talking about a 4th string RB.  You adopt your scheme to Denard or Devin.  you don't adopt your scheme just for Norfleet.

3. 

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
December 11th, 2012 at 3:20 PM
#139
M-Wolverine
M-Wolverine's picture
Joined: 10/04/2009
MGoPoints: 42199
Holy Moses, 100 posts in an hour over

2 seconds of film and an offhand comment. Considering we had a different center playing most of spring and fall ball, this could mean next to nothing (you do try guys out at different positions to see how they'd do without intentions of moving them...that's what extra practice is for). But FREAK OUT is the default mode around here.  Sometimes I don't think football fans read this site; it's more like a gossip fueled circle like this:

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
December 11th, 2012 at 3:38 PM
(Reply to #86) #140
profitgoblue
profitgoblue's picture
Joined: 09/01/2009
MGoPoints: 19557
What else are we going to

What else are we going to do?  Work?  Study?  Forget it.  Lets freak out on the interwebs!

 

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
December 11th, 2012 at 4:10 PM
(Reply to #86) #141
mGrowOld
mGrowOld's picture
Joined: 10/04/2010
MGoPoints: 111579
I think the woman second from

I think the woman second from right was my pledge formal date.  

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
December 11th, 2012 at 4:30 PM
(Reply to #124) #142
M-Wolverine
M-Wolverine's picture
Joined: 10/04/2009
MGoPoints: 42199
Good to know

You upgraded.

Substantially.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
December 11th, 2012 at 3:21 PM
#143
MGoBkExam
Joined: 04/26/2011
MGoPoints: 273
Gardner's foot/ankle

Given that we knew Devin's foot and/or ankle got a little banged-up during the Ohio game, did anyone else think he looked fairly uncomfortable running at about 1:00 in the video? Here's hoping that he feels a lot better by Jan 1.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
December 11th, 2012 at 3:27 PM
#144
Wave83
Wave83's picture
Joined: 03/09/2011
MGoPoints: 1134
Punk'd?

Maybe Brian, South Carolina, etc. are just being punk'd by Hoke & Co.  Seriously, when does Hoke ever give honest information about who is hurt, who's going to start, who's going to play what position, etc. until about 3 seconds before the game starts?

I have no idea what is going on, if anything is going on.  I think that is true of everyone.  If moving Norfleet to safety doesn't make sense, maybe it won't happen.  Kovacs' comments are intriguing, but I think we are jumping the gun on this a bit.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
December 11th, 2012 at 3:38 PM
#145
Swayze Howell Sheen
Swayze Howell Sheen's picture
Joined: 10/05/2008
MGoPoints: 14684
is it

is it next football season yet?

 

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
December 11th, 2012 at 3:48 PM
(Reply to #100) #146
MichFan1997
MichFan1997's picture
Joined: 08/04/2008
MGoPoints: 10334
it is

Still this season. And we still have another game in it

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
December 11th, 2012 at 3:44 PM
#147
funkywolve
Joined: 10/08/2008
MGoPoints: 15750
3rd down back

 

"We're really going to make this move before even trying the guy as a change of pace/third down back?"

Does this mean that we're not going to get to see Dennis in the I-formation on 3rd and short and try to run between the tackles??

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
December 11th, 2012 at 3:45 PM
#148
JimBobTressel
JimBobTressel's picture
Joined: 11/28/2010
MGoPoints: 4235
Could we move either Hayres

Could we move either Hayres or Norfleet to slot receiver?

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
December 11th, 2012 at 3:58 PM
(Reply to #108) #149
ChopBlock
ChopBlock's picture
Joined: 12/11/2011
MGoPoints: 2434
Slot-mites aren't really a

Slot-mites aren't really a MANBALL type thing. So no, probably not going to happen.

But the question (for someone who knows more about football than me) is why? Why couldn't we integrate the dreaded bubble screen into a MANBALL offense? I could be very mistaken, but didn't we run quite a few bubbles in the later Carr era, even if half of them were DeBord putting Breaston 1-on1 with a corner and hoping he'd make a guy miss?

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
December 11th, 2012 at 4:23 PM
(Reply to #114) #150
FreddieMercuryHayes
Joined: 12/29/2010
MGoPoints: 35030
That's just the thing. 

That's just the thing.  There's always a place for playmakers on offense, no matter what their skill set is.  A good OC adjusts the plays and calls to maximize the potential of their weapons.  A lot of MANBALL teams do this as a change of pace to their base offenses.  I think we should to.  Creativity is needed to make an offense elite.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
December 11th, 2012 at 4:29 PM
(Reply to #129) #151
ChopBlock
ChopBlock's picture
Joined: 12/11/2011
MGoPoints: 2434
And that's the odd thing

And that's the odd thing about Borges, because he's known for tinkering with an offense and not being afraid to try new things. Given that, I don't understand his aversion to bubble screens to get his slot mites out on the edge quickly.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
  • « first
  • ‹ previous
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • next ›
  • last »
Powered by Drupal, an open source content management system
Theme provided by Roopletheme; sidebars adapted from Chris Murphy.