Decision Time Comment Count

Brian

In such a cynical, sarcastic society, oftentimes looking for the negative on anybody or anything, if you're fortunate enough to spend five minutes or 20 minutes around Tim Tebow, your life is better for it.

-Thom Brennaman

"DECISION TIME! DO YOU GO FOR IT?"

"Go. Go. Go. Go. Go"

-Brennaman and Charles Rogers. On third and goal.

Ideally, football games are not opportunities to reflect on just why everyone under 35 has a protective shell of cynicism and sarcasm between the world and everyone's inner Beaver.* But this one was the BCS championship game on FOX, so it was either that or picture Thom Brennaman massaging lotion into Tebow's feet.

Anyway, the reason most of my generation raised outside the state of Utah and I are looking for the negative so often is people like Thom Brennaman, corporate robots who relentlessly praise anyone and anything they're directed to.

The annoying shilling doesn't stop at the commercial break's edge these days; in fact, that guy with the Boomhauer accent saying "that thur is purty dern cool" during one of the six hundred commercials for a pickup truck was probably the most genuine moment of the night. That guy actually believed tool boxes in the side of your pickup truck were purty dern cool, and he communicated that without sanctimony or idiocy. At no point did he turn to the camera and say that if you didn't think tool boxes on your pickup truck were purty dern cool then you are destined for the lake of fire.

If only we could say the same for FOX. I could write a bunch of stuff about what an embarrassment that whole thing was, but other people have taken care of this for me. Fanhouse:

Brennaman was so far over the top in his pro-Tebow hyperbole on Thursday that the game became darn-near unwatchable unless the volume was off.

Orson:

Assumptions one should not make about this game: … 3) Fox puts on an incompetent broadcast. No. Incompetent doesn't cover how inept their clodfooted work on the BCS has been.

Awful Announcing, which must live for moments like this:

This is so bad, I really don't even have words to describe it.

Deadspin:

According to Fox announcer Thom Brennaman—and if you don't agree with him, you must be some kind of deranged lunatic—Tim Tebow just may be the finest human being to ever live on this planet or any other.

Etc, etc, etc. The presentation was such a disaster that a lot of people have been complaining about how bad the game was when, really, it wasn't too bad. Julio Iglesias was nearly decapitated, and there was a critical fourth-down stand and a couple of miraculous interceptions and all in all it was a tense, well-played football game but for the context.

At some point, being directed to interpret everything as history in the making has a downside. Now we expect the Greatest Game Ever Played between the Greatest Players Ever Assembled every time out. And when that's not happening—which it wasn't—no one backs off. They just lie to your face.

So, yeah, I'm tired of all hype. I'm tired of having the "national championship" game between two teams virtually indistinguishable from a half dozen others on a random Thursday night in January on a network that never shows college football. I'm tired of how stupid it all is.

And I think I'm detecting a seismic shift in opinion out there. Bowl defenders outside of newspaper columnists who love them some junket are few and far between—and frankly, I'd rather have Stewart Mandel on the other side of any argument I'm having, thanks very much. Every year some coach and some president gets screwed and converts to the church of playoff. Last year, weirdly, it was Georgia. This year, obviously, it's USC and Utah and Texas. At some point things have to change, because last night felt more like a farce than a championship.

*(60s television version, not unwise quarterback version.)

Comments

dex

January 9th, 2009 at 4:57 PM ^

FOX, and all the networks, know that we are going to watch the BCS title game. It doesn't matter who plays or what channel it is on - we are pretty diehard football fans and will be tuning in. Same with a lot of us and the Super Bowl. So they do nothing to cater to our tastes, because hey, what are we gonna do, watch Office reruns? So the whole broadcast is designed to appeal to the people who only watch the "big game". That's why they slurp Tebow - it's an easy storyline for your grandma or cousin that doesn't like sports or uncle who pretends to like football to digest and understand. And that's why the Super Bowl commercials are popular - so 38 year old middle manager at your office who doesn't watch football can talk about "the big game" with you without having to watch the actual football, and instead focus on Terry Tate, Office Linebacker. We're all delusional if we think ESPN is going to handle it much better. Sure, Brent and Herbie probably won't get 3rd and 4th down confused and we might have an actual playclock instead of a retarded clock ticking up to the next OU snap, but the hype and the catering to the casual fan will still be there. A playoff won't change that either.

umjgheitma

January 9th, 2009 at 5:01 PM ^

The announcers couldn't get enough of the comment made that Tebow would be the 4th best QB in the Big Twelve. I believe the exact response was, that is the most idiotic statement ever made (I may be off but it was definately along those lines). Really!?! That's the dumbest statement ever made?!? I will say I think Sam Bradford is totally overrated, and that Threet would be close to a Heisman candidate with that o-line. Sam didn't do anything once there was a hint of pressure, if he didn't get 6 seconds in the pocket then the play was done. Looks like we got another Jason White (who?) on our hands.

wolverine1987

January 9th, 2009 at 7:59 PM ^

was pretty good last night, I was impressed by his accuracy, and he would have had a couple of big pass plays were it not for penalties and a monster hit. Also, his two interceptions were much less horrid than the two Tebow threw. Having not seen a defense near as good and fast as Florida's before last night, he had the type of game most good QB' do, which is sketchy under pressure. We see that with the best, I recall Manning being average at best when faced with Florida's defense back in the day.

WolverBean

January 9th, 2009 at 5:26 PM ^

We seriously need to revisit the wisdom of putting announcers in the booth. Serious poll question: does anyone watch a sporting event to hear what the announcers have to say about it? Honestly, I want to know if there are people out there who care what the announcers have to say. Sure, occasionally the commentary guy will add some actual football analysis about why a team is lined up a certain way, or point out a key block that you might not have seen if you were only watching the ball carrier -- but these instances have become so few and so far between, and the rest of the drivel the commentators spew has become so vapid and often so obviously pre-scripted, that I'm amazed the networks don't get more backlash from it. And maybe this is just me, but don't incredible moments speak for themselves? When we see something amazing happen, do we need someone to tell us it was amazing? Jon Stewart made a comment last night about how it seems like the 24 hour news channels are afraid that if they shut up for even a minute, they'll explode. I'm wondering if sports announcers feel the same way. When the field reporter asked Percy Harvin how it felt to be a "Fed Ex national champion" I turned my TV off. You're not the only one who gagged upon hearing this question. But ignoring the "Fed Ex" part for a moment, I think I've finally come to terms with why reporters always feel the need to ask "how it feels." In fact, Brian's favorite David Foster Wallace explains it quite clearly in an essay titled "How Tracy Austin Broke My Heart." Highly recommended reading for anyone tired of being subjected to this inane question after every single game.

The FannMan

January 9th, 2009 at 8:13 PM ^

In the early 80's the NFL broadcast a game w/o announcers. There was just the stadium announcer and the crowd. (I seem to recall it was a Jets-Dolphins game, but it was 20 plus years ago so I could be wrong about the teams.) I remember that it really sucked. There were long periods of silence and it was just, well, weird. Of course, weird and totally sucking would have been better than the Fox coverage last night. I still can't believe that OU went for it on 3rd down! Those crazy Sooners . . .

wooderson

January 9th, 2009 at 5:49 PM ^

And of course Tim Tewbow got everything he has because hard work, the will to win and his superior moral character....whearas guys like Percy Harvin and Chris Rainey just have a lot of "natural talent" and "God-given ability." Of course.

chitownblue (not verified)

January 9th, 2009 at 6:19 PM ^

All this true, obviously. But this isn't at all relegated to FOX. Every time you tuned in NBC for a Notre Dame game, you were showered with how Zbikowski was boxer. Now, they're always all over Clausen and the brilliance of Weis. Depending on who was playing, you could always count on Musberger over-hyping anything that Mike Hart, Dan Connor (PSU LB), Javon Ringer, etc. did. It's blatantly clear that announcers routinely choose a single player on each team who they make a concious effort to hype every single game. In 2007, watching the UM/PSU game, my father-in-law and I were joking that at half-time they were going to claim that Mike Hart was working on a cure for cancer while showing footage of Dan Connor walking on water. So my point: yes, the Tebow love is undoubtedly out-sized, but it's not new - at all. And Michigan is frequently the recipient of it as well.

Yostal

January 9th, 2009 at 7:10 PM ^

If you need further proof, the Griese father/son love during the title run, the belief that Woodson won the Heisman because ESPN and ABC put him in the spotlight to do so, the perpetual references to "The A-Train" Brent broke out during his years in Ann Arbor (that was a drinking game that would have killed you, it's like picking "the ship" in the Love Boat character drinking game), and the love for Chris Perry (if only they had called him "The Commodore" like I wanted him to.) Anyway, chitown's point is very valid, but I can also seeing it make a lot of sense. The announcers do pre-game prep, so they get hype from the SIDs, they talk to the guys who the Athletic department want them to interview (they know who their more loquacious players are, after all), and they know the story lines they believe will develop, because they do need to pull in eyeballs for ratings. It's no different than when you watch the World Series or the Stanley Cup finals and you have watched all year and now you feel that you're being talked down to, and then you realize, they're not talking to you (I'm looking at you Tim McCarver and "Scooter"), they're talking to people who show up for the big games. And while annoying, it's what they have to do as networks because they have paid the big money for these rights and they need to make it back in ad dollars and they need not just the people who will watch a mid-September non-conference game on a Friday night, they need the people who know that college football exists and might be intrigued by a major event. So yes, good call good sir.

Blake

January 9th, 2009 at 6:48 PM ^

The point about having no announcers is a good one. A few years back the NBA broadcast a "silent game" on their network that just mic-ed up the PA announcer and courtside mics. It would be great if a similar thing was done with the college game where you could just place mics with the in-stadium PA, sounds on the field and the crowd/band so it was as if you were at the game yourself instead of watching it on a tv. Any injuries you could just include as a scrolling update across the bottom of the screen. More info: http://www.engadgethd.com/2006/02/26/nba-tvs-silent-game/

The FannMan

January 9th, 2009 at 8:35 PM ^

I actually heard a raido ad in Detroit that said the game was "Possibly the game of a lifetime!" WTF!!! A game between two teams I couldn't care less about, who are no more deserving than 3 or 4 other teams with one loss, and a lot less deserving than undefeated Utah, will be the best game I have ever seen, or will ever see in my whole, life. The ad actually made me stop, think about it and realzed I didn't give a shit about the game or either team. I went to bed at half-time. I did get to see the only good part of the game - when the announcers messed up what down it was. Priceless.

Don

January 10th, 2009 at 2:53 AM ^

ESPN has its faults, but as far as covering college football goes, they're in a separate and far superior league. Regardless of whether it's Fox news or Fox sports, on radio or tv — it's going to be very loud and very stupid.

evenyoubrutus

January 10th, 2009 at 12:02 PM ^

when I watched that live, I noticed that he said "do you go for it?" on third down, but I didn't realize that it took them almost the full two minutes to realize they didn't know the down... in BOTH plays.

zohizzle

January 10th, 2009 at 8:23 PM ^

...how everyone think tebows a God or something just because he beat Oklahoma. He was far from perfect in the nc game, throwing 2 interceptions and having a not so good completion percentage....compared to sam bradfords 2 interceptions which were caused because his recievers completely missed catches...furthermore, florida won the game based on its defense which was amazing, and percy harvin, NOT TEBOW ...its funny how so many people jump on the tim tebow bandwagon just because espns all over his balls

a2bluefan

January 11th, 2009 at 3:13 PM ^

I purposely did not watch even one second of pre- or post-game coverage, because I thought if I heard one more word about the Great and Good Saint Timothy of Tebow, I would surely puke. If I'm gonna puke, it had better be because I drank too much. That was the worst broadcast of any game ever. What a joke. The ESPN and FOX message boards were abuzz with it all... and I commented that those two guys would be better off doing War and Peace for books on tape. And then, of course, I reminded everyone that Michigan buried St. Tim and his followers in the Cap 1 bowl last year. GO BLUE!