Danny Hope's Team Is Organized And Supervisory

snide remark? I was asking a question about "things I don't know about", but thats fine.  I was actually asking with the hope UM's general studies majors would be a lower % than purdue's  which would have added an entire new level to his newly built glass house.

but all the fun has been taken out of it

No need to back away... just read the posting more carefully next time.  The meat is out front and hard to miss.

While I disagreed with your original comment, I didn't reply...the reason I am to this is the disingenuous responses. If you had, as an opposing fan, fairly took a cheap shot, hey, that's part of the game.  And if you missed the point, and are called on it, turnabout. But as Chitown said...at least OWN it.  Say, I took my shot, it didn't go over well, and wasn't even a good dig, because it doesn't logically work...but don't try and play it off as knowledge seeking, or over sensitive reactions. Because the blame the victim thing doesn't hide what you tried to do.

nm

"deserves" isn't the right word.  But the coach has a point (in that case), even if he's being a dick for pointing it out.

IF ITS A LEGIT CRITIQUE, I actually like the way he went about indirectly digging another school.  Adds to the rivalry and what not and its a not-that-subtle indirect jab that I'd expect form Lloyd Carr (though he wouldn't do it to another b10 school, probably).

It seems the MGoRage should be restrained here unless we can convincingly argue that UofM is comparitavly equal (or better than) Purdue in declared-major-intergrity.

on the consulting side of construction so most of my colleagues have engieering degrees.  A CM degree won't get you very far in consulting since you can't get licensed as a Professional Engineer.  For those that choose a career path on the Contracting side of construction, a CM degree might be the way to go.  A PE license gives you some credibility but, unless you work for a design-build firm, it isn't really necessary.

yeah I think it was the "technology" part that threw me off, it sounded more like a business type major but the "technology" had is straddling 2 different categories in my head,

I'll try to give some insight, as I assume it's the parallel to my major at Georgia Tech, which was called "Building Construction". At GT, there were exactly 0 athletes (of any nature, not just football) that I ran into in any BC classes. Actually, that's not true...there was a guy who ran track in one of my classes. It wasn't as reputable as an engineering degree, for obvious reasons, but still pretty well-respected. You still had to take physics, calc I and II, and two semesters of statics, so it was no cake walk. It was essentially 50/50 engineering and business in terms of class structure.

Don't get me wrong it's no CHBE (Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering), pretty widely regarded the hardest degree at GT, but it was not a joke.

Since you admitted you were winging it, just wanted to comment on the "those who can't design are construction managers" comment. Owners and developers pay millions of dollars for people other than those who designed the building to actually build it. A lot of the time in my experience most of what is designed is either inadequate to construct or physically impossible to construct.

Also worth noting that from my experience, 95% of athletes  were in the management program at GT, and the others were sprinkled in other areas (International Affairs; History, Technology, and Society; and Literature, Communication, and Culture).

It must be tough.

thanks nice post up there too ^^^^