Coaching Candidates Part 1: The Power 5 Comment Count

Brian

WELP. When you're a four point dog to Rutgers it's time to start keeping an eye on potential new head coaches.

Pipedreams

Jim Harbaugh, John Harbaugh, Kevin Sumlin, and various others are not discussed because you know who those people are and it's unlikely Michigan secures them. They're passed over primarily because they're obviously desirable. You don't need to be told Jim Harbaugh seems like a good idea.

Too old

It's not worth the risk to hire anyone approaching retirement except in very specific circumstances like "this is the only head coach we've ever been any good under"—looking at you, Kansas State. So out go David Cutcliffe (60), Mike Riley (61), Gary Pinkel (62), and, uh, Kirk Ferentz (59), because it would be ULTIMATE MICHIGAN to go after Kirk Ferentz. I'd take Art Briles in a hot second even though he's 58, but he's also lumped in here or pipedreams since he seems impossible to pry out of Waco. 61-year-old Les Miles is also in this group. If he had a time, it was 2007. I'm not saying there's no chance… but there isn't much of one. And you already know all about him anyway.

Gentlemen of note, then.

Power 5 Head Coaches

Look before we name a name you're going to be all like "oh what if Michigan is a poor cultural fit with the spread shouldn't we go get a pro-style guy or something"… there just aren't many to consider. I included the obvious guy.

10987976-large[1]DAN MULLEN, MISSISSIPPI STATE

BASICS: 40-28 in his sixth season in Starkville. SEC record 17-24, which is actually rather good for a Bulldogs head coach. Was Urban Meyer's OC before that, and his QB coach at BGSU and Utah. 42.

PROS: Turned previously inept MSU into decent program. Young. High level experience in recruiting wars and as national-championship-level OC.

CONS: Has acquired a great deal of his wins against tomato-can laden nonconference schedule and still struggles to win half his SEC games. Reaction to recent suspension of starting OL for multiple in-game stomping incidents was from the Dave Brandon school of PR.

OVERALL: Desirability on a knife edge right now. If he follows up LSU win with season that sees Mississippi State end up a solid top 25 program he will be a hot name. Slip down to the 7/8 win level he's been at and it's questionable.

 

 

Mike-Gundy[1]MIKE GUNDY, OKLAHOMA STATE

BASICS: Is a man. Is 47. In his tenth season at Okie State, 80-39 record with one Big Twelve championship and Fiesta Bowl win; two other ten-win seasons. Before that was Les Miles's OC.

PROS: Good coach who can insert any sentient being at quarterback and see that guy/spaceplant pass for 300 yards. Young for a guy with a decade as a head coach. Knows what he wants his program to be.

CONS: Availability questionable. Is currently at alma mater and has T. Boone backing him. Last time Michigan pried a dude away from his alma mater things went poorly, partially because of the reputation a man acquires when he leaves his home base. May not have left Oklahoma except for road games in 30 years.

OVERALL: If you can get him, hell yes. Probably can't get him.

[After THE JUMP: the last manball unicorn]

TODD GRAHAM, ARIZONA STATE

810436197[1]

BASICS: Been a head coach since 2006 at four different stops including one-year stints at Rice and Pitt. Had three ten-win seasons with Tulsa, guided ASU to a 10-4 season with an 8-1 Pac 12 record last year. 21-10 so far in his career. Before that was the DC at Tulsa. 49.

PROS: Successful everywhere he's been that he was at for more than a year. Despite defensive orientation, runs effective, high tempo offenses.

CONS: Wears Britney Spears mic on sidelines. Inveterate job-hopper. Bad haircut.

OVERALL: Bo would die again if Michigan had a guy with that mic.

628x471[1]DAVID SHAW, STANFORD

BASICS: 37-8 in three years as Stanford's head coach with three BCS appearances. was Harbaugh's OC for four years prior to that and his WR/QB coach at San Diego. Before that was an NFL assistant with the Raiders and Ravens. 42. Seems poachable what with Stanford's attendance struggles and his relatively modest salary.

PROS: The last manball unicorn. Literally the only successful pro-style college head coach who might be available. Great record, has plenty of experience coping with spread offenses, and in year four concerns that he's just riding Harbaugh's coattails are minimal. Operates in high academic environment; already proficient at selling the kind of guys who want to go to Michigan.

CONS: Punted from his own 29 in the midst of dominating USC and still losing to them, a Lloyd Carr callback I would prefer not to relive. Stanford alum experiencing great success at his alma mater, remember last time we poached guy from alma mater, etc.

OVERALL: Despite the punting thing and the boggling USC loss would be a hire that checks every last box. I'd live with the offense, assuming he could in fact implement it.

 

20ee92f8b9b904d9835584952a5e411e[1]BUTCH JONES, TENNESSEE

BASICS: Took over for Brian Kelly when he left CMU for Cincinnati, then took over for Brian Kelly when he left Cincinnati for Notre Dame. Improved both of those programs, with CMU having an undefeated MAC season en route to a 11-2 record and taking Cincinnati to two Big East Championships. 5-7 in his first year at Tennessee, currently 2-2. 46.

PROS: Age. Michigan native. Good amount of experience at places that are not naturally successful. Seems to have made Tennessee a lot better this year—they just about beat Georgia.

CONS: RR/Kelly associations may poison well both ways. Leaving Tennessee after two years would be a hard sell. Vols could match any offer.

OVERALL: If he is amenable to courting, I would court. Relying on M's historical place in the firmament over Tennessee's somewhat more dubious place in the cutthroat SEC to do so.

Kevin-Wilson[1]KEVIN WILSON, INDIANA

BASICS: Longtime OC at Miami (Not That Miami), Northwestern, and Oklahoma got the Indiana job in 2011. After 1-11 opener has turned IU into a chaos team that can win or lose any game with their lightning speed offense and horrendous defense. 52.

PROS: Indiana's offense.

CONS: Indiana's defense.

OVERALL: I'm not seeing it. Offense is pretty gimmicky, hasn't actually gotten to a bowl game. While I'm usually skeptical of arguments that the things that happen when your defense is off the field have a major impact on it, the extreme tempo that Indiana uses to be competitive is an exception.

OTHERS

NW's Pat Fitzgerald seemed more attractive four years ago. So did TCU's Gary Patterson. If Paul Chryst could actually put together a nice season for Pitt he'd be a guy to look at, but he hasn't so far. Randy Edsall might not be the worst idea in the world and how depressing is that? Al Golden might get sick of Miami, but his tenure so far isn't amazing. If Gary Andersen's amenable I'm interested; don't think that's likely. Oregon's Mark Helfrich is only paid 1.8 million dollars so Michigan could sniff around to secure him a nice raise. Bret Bielema… nevermind.

*shudders*

Comments

stephenrjking

October 1st, 2014 at 11:27 AM ^

This is plausible, especially if Brandon is running the search.

It's also a terrible, terrible, terrible idea. He was a complete failure in the pros, and while Rutgers had a good year or two, he still wasn't all that great over there. And the best success he had at Rutgers was basically riding the back of its star running back.

The running back was Ray Rice.

No to Schiano.

7jacks

October 1st, 2014 at 11:08 AM ^

"Jimmy Harbaugh!  How the heck are ya?  Have you seen the news lately?  How would you like the chance to coach this team for these fans?  They'll love you if you win!  And if you lose?  Well...you see it.  Sure, they'll question your coaching competence.  But they'll also ridicule your overall intelligence, even though you're clearly much more successful than most of them could even dream to be.  They'll ridicule everything about you beyond that.  They'll even question  your integrity as a human being.  They'll riot in the streets.  They'll wear OSU gear, you know, in support of the players.  But, hey, win games and none of that happens.  So...4 years sound good?"

westwardwolverine

October 1st, 2014 at 11:13 AM ^

I'll look at this from a positive light: From a race relations standpoint, I feel like calling a peaceful protest by a predominantly white crowd a riot is progress. So there's that. 

SalvatoreQuattro

October 1st, 2014 at 11:17 AM ^

crappy football by paying exorbitant prices of tickets. Just ignore the phrase "leaders and best" because that clearly does not matter. You ought to continue to support a crap product because...well, just because.

Signed,

7Jacks Morans

EGD

October 1st, 2014 at 11:43 AM ^

You mean the post in which you mocked fans for criticizing the intelligence and integrity of a coach who claimed not to see his QB sustain a concussion that everyone else watching the same game saw, then lied about it afterwards in an amateurish cover-up attempt?

7jacks

October 1st, 2014 at 12:01 PM ^

1) because we can prove he lied.   2) because the protest was about the lying.  And for the safety of the players.  We know this because we called for Harbaugh, for the sake of safety for our players, not wins and losses.  We wore red, and want to wear red to the games, to support our players.  Yes.  This.  And also, the concussion thing was CLEARLY the start of questioning Hokes intelligence.  Yes again.  By calling the fans out, I'm somehow supporting Hoke and Brandon.  I'm not.  They should, and almost certainly will, be fired.  What I'm saying is that we don't need to make ourselves look like spoiled brats by trying to speed the process up. If the protest was about player safety, fine.  But it wasn't.  It was the catalyst that let a bunch of fans get away with throwing peaceful tantrum about not winning.  I commend the above poster for his rebuttal, where he only mentioned a crap product.  That's fine.  Just don't hide behind the veil of a concussion gate to get what you really want.  What's going on right now is in no way supporting the players, which is what we should all be doing.  Wearing OSU sweatshirts?  You gotta be fucking kidding me. 

Yost Ghost

October 1st, 2014 at 12:50 PM ^

The protest was about how Dave Brandon is taking the football program towards more commercialization and away from the things that made it great. His attempts to squeeze every last ounce of profit out of every facet of a proud tradition not concussions. Wins and losses and player safety are part of the debate but not the core.

 

P.S. No true Michigan fan could ever intentionally wear OSU gear.

Kermits Blue Key

October 1st, 2014 at 11:53 AM ^

My comprehension of your comprehension of this situation:

"The fans here don't know how to develop or prepare players, run a competent offense, win on the road, or handle sticky PR situations. Why would any coach want to be the figure-head for these imbeciles?"

7jacks

October 1st, 2014 at 12:22 PM ^

Hey man, if you're willing to admit that the protest was more about wins and losses, then I'm on board.  I don't disagree with wanting heads fired for the product on the field.  I think protesting until it happens makes us look a bit spoiled, but that's fine.  Just don't call it something it's not.  And certainly don't say it's for the sake of the players while asking people to wear OSU gear.  That's all.  This is currently an embarrassment on all levels at Michigan.  From the top on down, and the fans are included.  Not all, maybe not you, but plenty of others for sure. 

Kermits Blue Key

October 1st, 2014 at 12:44 PM ^

Anyone who says this protest is only about player safety is most likely not being honest with themselves. On the other hand, anyone who says this is only about wins and losses hasn't been paying attention the last four years. The fans have lots of reasons to protest right now, and who's to say what's the right or wrong way to vent that frustration as long as it remains peaceful?

Yes, this is definitely an embarrassment to all involved, but as Lyle Robideaux from The Waterboy said, "Everybody already 'is' laughing at us."

blueinuk

October 1st, 2014 at 1:07 PM ^

I think you are angry because you feel like people are saying the main issue is the concussion when you know that's not true.  

But most people are not saying the main issue is the concussion!  People are saying that the main issue an incompetant administration who will not admit when they have made a mistake but lie and try to cover it up...and the concussion is just the latest example.  

 

 

7jacks

October 1st, 2014 at 1:18 PM ^

I'm glad we're moving on.  I have no problem with wanting an incompetent administration out.  That wasn't what most (not all) were saying yesterday, so I'm glad it's changing and getting to the core of the problem.  I still don't see any evidence of lying or covering up.  More incompetence, sure.  Not necessarily anything malicious, though.  I think that having a protest about the rising prices and bad product would have been actually productive.  A distraction that we probably don't need, but productive still.  Short term, we need a new coach and AD.  Long term, we need this place to be a place that recruits, coaches, and directors want to be a part of.  Even if this gets Hoke and Brandon fired,  I don't think anything that is happening now is helping the long term at all.

WestSider

October 1st, 2014 at 11:13 AM ^

it's actually quite functional, and not massive like some of the Motorola behemoths. Why criticize a headset/microphone, I would like to see that on our headcoach, no matter what version it is.

Magnus

October 1st, 2014 at 11:53 AM ^

Yeah! Tradition! Let's go back to facemask-less helmets! Let's play through concussions because that's what the tough guys used to do! Let's make sure gay people don't feel comfortable playing the sport! Let's do away with instant replay! 

TRADITION.

The Baughz

October 1st, 2014 at 11:14 AM ^

I think the best guys on that list would be Shaw, Gundy and Jones. I wouldnt mind Les Miles, either. I dont care how old he is. He will come in here and instill an attitude and toughness that Michigan hasnt had since 2006. Either way, Hoke will not be around much longer, so might as well start searching now.

Brodie

October 1st, 2014 at 12:23 PM ^

here's why I think Shaw is the dude to watch... Stanford is in a moderate decline, they're certainly not getting better. The line on Shaw from people in the Bay Area press is less that he's the world's most dedicated alum but rather that he's always on the lookout for an NFL gig. If Stanford has the kind of down year I expect they will (I'm talking relative, 8-4 or 9-3), he may conclude that he's treading water toward his ultimate goal. Enter Michigan with all the moneyz and the chance to build his own legacy somewhat free from Harbaugh and that's tempting.

 

Plus he went to high school in the state in the 80's glory days and worked for Harbaugh for years and years so there's maybe a chance he holds us in high esteem.

robpollard

October 1st, 2014 at 11:16 AM ^

As Brian noted, he checks off all the key boxes for the power-brokers, including man ball.

One big con for Mike Gundy is that whole SI story about academic fraud, paying players, etc. Some of that allegedly occurred before Gundy (hello Les Miles!) but some of it allegedly did. I know there was some sketchiness to the reporting, but it's not great that OSU's promised "intensive review" of the allegations by a top ex-NCAA official, which was kicked off in September 2013 still has produced nothing more than a year later -- not exoneration, not confirmation -- just nothing. So in effect their response was, "Hey, he's winning football games, isn't he?" Not sure that will fly at UM.