The Chappellbombing: Will It Happen Again? Comment Count

Brian

mike-martin-ben-chappell So the Indiana game was water torture interspersed with electric Japanese schoolgirl sex. The latter was great but the former was almost 75% of the game, and against teams with non-theoretical defenses a repeat will mean sad faces and rage. How likely is this? Eh… pretty likely at some point. But maybe not consistently.

Indiana is probably the most competent—and is definitely by far the most deployed—passing offense in the Big Ten. Last year Indiana was the only team other than Purdue to pass more than half the time. They did so at a 54% clip. This year they're up to 58% with the return of their entire passing offense, and that's despite a big chunk of the schedule being against tomato cans in which clock-killing runs are plentiful.

A look at Michigan's opponent and what they're likely to do to Michigan's secondary:

Michigan State

Pass Percentages: 50% in 2009, 40% in 2010.
Quarterback: Kirk Cousins, a senior redshirt junior returning starter.
Last year's performance: Cousins split time with Keith Nichol, with the two combining to go 20/29 for 220 yards and two interceptions.
Last year's run/pass split: 49 rushes and 29 passes, though a number of the MSU rushes were QB scrambles.

Cousins had a strong junior year, finishing 25th nationally in pass efficiency. He seems to have made the incremental improvement you'd expect him to; this year he's 13th and in two games against actual opponents he completed about two thirds of his passes for about 250 yards with a solid or better YPA. He also threw three interceptions.

However, State is an old-school I-form heavy conventional offense that looks almost identical to Lloyd Carr's and they set up a lot of their passing yards by running play action. Cousins isn't going to come anywhere near 64 attempts and MSU isn't going to pass 75% of the time. How the run defense holds up against this is an open question, but that's not what this post is about.

MICHIGAN SECONDARY : OPPONENT PASS OFFENSE :: bunny : somewhat unreliable wood chipper
CHAPPELBOMB RATING: 4 of 5. Michigan State was balanced last year, and that was with a terrible running game. This year they've got a stable of impressive backs and somewhat iffy hands in the receiving corps, so the bigger threat is probably getting gashed all day on the ground. Hurrah?

Iowa

Pass Percentages: 46% in 2009, 40% in 2010.
Quarterback: Ricky Stanzi, a senior returning starter.
Last year's performance: Found breathtakingly open tight ends but was erratic, going 20 of 38 for 284 yards and two TDs. Did deliver a Rick Six directly unto Donovan Warren.
Last year's run/pass split: 34 rushes, 38 passes. It should be noted that due to a Jewel Hampton ACL injury Iowa was thin at tailback oh wait that happened again this year except worse nevermind.

Stanzi's primary game of note this year was a 18/33, 278 yard 3TD-1INT game at Arizona where he was almost literally the Iowa offense. The Hawkeyes ran for 29 yards on 26 carries, and though plenty of sacks distort that the two tailbacks combined to average under 2 YPC. He was also efficient against PSU (16/22, 227 yards, 1TD-1INT) on a day when after a couple of quick touchdowns Iowa put it in neutral since they correctly believed Penn State could not score.

MICHIGAN SECONDARY : OPPONENT PASS OFFENSE :: raccoon : sports car with gore-smeared grill that spends a lot of time in the garage
CHAPPELBOMB RATING: 4 of 5. Stanzi may not be headed for NFL riches but he's been around the block and seems to have shaken his touchdown entitlement program. He's top ten in pass efficiency against a pretty decent schedule featuring Penn State, Arizona, and an Iowa State team that just won a Big 12 game (yay!!!). Here, it's the same story as Michigan State: they might be able to replicate it but the old-school coach is likely to split run and pass down the middle instead of letting fly most of the time.

And Now A Picture Of Denard For No Reason

denard-robinson-indiana

Penn State

Pass Percentages: 46% in 2009, 49% in 2010.
Quarterback: True freshman Robert Bolden.
Last year's performance: N/A
Last year's run/pass split: 40 runs, 27 passes as Darryl Clark had four touchdowns in just 27 attempts.

Surprise! Penn State's quarterback situation is terrible. The Nittany Lions are 103rd in passer efficiency. To be fair they've gone up against the brutal defenses of Iowa and Alabama, but Bolden threw two interceptions against Kent State and a pick-six against Iowa on a day when people say he could have thrown four or five.

Their offensive line is really hurting, the tight ends are all injured, and Penn State will probably avoid passing too much as long as it remains relatively close.

MICHIGAN SECONDARY : OPPONENT PASS OFFENSE :: eucalyptus tree : koala bear
CHAPPELBOMB RATING: 1 of 5. Penn State's offensive line gets more hypothetical by the day and now they're down to freshmen or wide receivers at tight end. Meanwhile, Bolden is talented but error-prone, the perfect thing against a Michigan defense that is pretty good at watching others succeed or fail without having much impact either way. Expect gentle chewing.

Illinois

Pass Percentages: 40% in 2009, 33% in 2010.
Quarterback: Redshirt freshman Nathan Scheelhaase.
Last year's performance: N/A
Last year's run/pass split: 11 passes, 56 runs, dead kittens all over the state.

Illinois was already wildly run-biased but they've managed to slide further away from the mean despite graduating half-Desmond, half-duck quarterback Juice Williams. A man named Scheelhaase might sound like a 6'5" pocket passer with a background in soccer and the mobility of John Navarre, but he's actually a highly-rated dual-threat quarterback with FAKE 40 times in the 4.5 range. The play distribution makes some sense.

It also makes sense because in three games against I-A competition Scheelhaase's best outing is 8 of 16 for 70 yards against Northern Illinois. In his first start against Missouri he put up an amazing, amazing stat line: 9 of 23 for 81 yards, a TD, and three INTs. If Michigan gets shredded by Illinois it won't be in the air.

MICHIGAN SECONDARY : OPPONENT PASS OFFENSE :: confused goat : equally confused goat.
CHAPPELBOMB RATING: 0 of 5. If Michigan can contain one passing offense this year, it will be this one.

Purdue

Pass Percentages: 54% in 2009, 47% in 2010.
Quarterback: Redshirt freshman Robert "Rob" Henry, at least until such time as Angry Purdue ACL-Hating God gets bored.
Last year's performance: N/A
Last year's run/pass split: 39 passes, 29 runs as Joey Elliot went for almost 400 yards.

Henry is Purdue's second-stringer, and to add injury to injury (to injury) he'll be operating without his top receiver, top tailback, and possibly his third option at WR if Justin Siller can't make it back from a badly sprained ankle. Information on him is limited. In most of a game against Toledo he was 17 of 31 for 140 yards, a TD, and an INT. He's probably not that good if he was behind Robert Marve to start the year, especially since he's apparently a much better runner.

MICHIGAN SECONDARY : OPPONENT PASS OFFENSE :: chicken : fox with three peg-legs and eyepatches over both eyes hyyyarrr.
CHAPPELBOMB RATING: 2 of 5. Purdue is still a passing spread but their offensive line is in shambles and by the time the Michigan game rolls around they might be starting Random Student somewhere.

Wisconsin

SCOTT-TOLZIEN1-thumb-537x409-16132

AnnArbor.com

Pass Percentages: 37% in 2009, 35% in 2010.
Quarterback: Senior returning starter Scott Tolzien.
Last year's performance: Fire and brimstone falling from the sky as Tolzien averaged 10 YPA on 24 attempts, throwing 4 touchdowns to one INT and causing me to swear bloody revenge on Jay Hopson. Yes, again.
Last year's run/pass split: 52 rushes, 24 passes.

This was a complete debacle last year, causing me to fear Wisconsin even after they almost blew it against Arizona State; I'm still swallowing hard at the idea of going up against them again. Tolzien was awful against MSU but very good against ASU. In the games against patsies he's been efficient… and seldom used… kind of like he was last year against Michigan.

MICHIGAN SECONDARY : OPPONENT PASS OFFENSE :: abdomen : scalpel
CHAPPELBOMB RATING: 4 of 5. Yes, this again: efficient senior game manager who carved up Michigan's crap defense a year ago and has a good shot at doing it again.

Ohio State

Pass Percentages: 36% in 2009, 40% in 2010.
Quarterback: Terrelle Pryor, junior returning starter.
Last year's performance: Did virtually nothing: 9/17, 67 yards, 1 TD, 1 INT.
Last year's run/pass split: 53 runs, 17 passes.

That line from last year might have been more interesting if Tate Forcier wasn't busy throwing the game ball at various members of the Ohio State pass defense. As it was OSU had the Tresselball on full throttle. This year Pryor's nuked the patsies (though he did throw a couple interceptions against Ohio) and been somewhat limited against real opposition. Take out a shovel pass to Dan Herron that went for 47 yards and Pryor was 11 of 26 for 186 yards against Miami, with 62 of those on a single bomb to DeVier Posey. Last week against Illinois Pryor had another epic Tresselball stat line: 9/16, 76 yards, 2 TD, 1 INT. Apparently it was windy or something.

While I can totally see that Posey bomb happening against Michigan, I'd rather this defense give up a big touchdown and then a bunch of nothing than get Chappelbombed.

MICHIGAN SECONDARY : OPPONENT PASS OFFENSE :: London : V1 rocket
CHAPPELBOMB RATING: 2 of 5. Tressel will probably Tressel it, leaving Pryor a spectator and runner most of the day. Also… wind or not, his stats are not indicative of a guy who anyone is going to put a game on in a Chappell sort of way. Doubt he even gets to 25 attempts against M.

Comments

DefensiveOverhaul

October 5th, 2010 at 9:24 PM ^

Seriously, am I the only one who thinks that our defensive coordination and coaching and personnel decisions are terrible?  

I think these coaches get paid a ton of money to figure out how to develop a scheme that works. 

Brian points out that the numerous times Obi misses his gap fill or gets blocked 8 yards behind the LOS every single game.  Yet, he still plays.  I have watched Demens and JB Fitzgerald...they can not do worse.  And, yet, Obi still plays.

We are 120th in pass defense...the worst in Div. 1...we do the same scheme 85-90% of the time...we don't mix things up nearly enough.

I'm sorry but our coaches need to be held accountable.  You give our defensive personnel over to Bo Pelini and we are a Top 25 defense...no questions asked.

 

Steve in PA

October 5th, 2010 at 4:16 PM ^

Their QB passed 8 times the entire game to beat Texas.  Any good coach will come up with a plan to exploit another team's negatives.  I think that we will see teams pass much more than typical until we show that we can stop their passing game.  I don't think we'll see someone throw it 64 (68?) times again this season however.

 

GBFE!

NCWolverine

October 5th, 2010 at 4:27 PM ^

Denard and Company are going to have a huge impact on the opposition's offensive game plan, and/or in-game adjustments.  It will be interesting to see how the Big 10 teams adjust to getting behind 14-7 or 21-7 by the end of the 1Q (with little to no sign of slowing down UM's Off).  So far Indiana and Notre Dame have been able to "keep up" with our scoring due to their ability to pass the ball.  The question that I am most interested in seeing answered over the next two games is what do the "old school" thinking HC do when Denard and Company shred the Def gameplans and the offenses HAVE to keep up.  Being able to pass the ball as a compliment to a good running game is much different than having the pressure of needing to pass and score to stay in the game.  That decision will be made by the opposing coaching staffs and executed by QBs not necessarily suited for it...think Iowa's Offense against AZ.  The next two games, win or lose, will tell us a lot about what to expect for the rest of the season.  Because of Denard and the offensive scheme, I am less worried about Wisconsin and MSU running games.  UI was perfectly suited to take advantage of this situation, but no one else in the Big 10 seems to be.

True Blue In Ohio

October 5th, 2010 at 4:55 PM ^

I hope that Japanese schoolgirl is of legal age....

Maybe over time, our defense will mature like that Japanese schoolgirl.  At a later date, we will see the fruits of some good recruiting and development.  With GERG's new hair gel, he will have it done by next week.  Go Blue!!!!!

lablue

October 5th, 2010 at 5:11 PM ^

that schoolgirls in japan are sexually exploited? if so, i'm a bit disgusted. maybe I'm reading this wrong. not to get all serious or anything, but it's actually a big problem in japan of high school and younger age girls being molested and exploited by older man....

lablue

October 5th, 2010 at 5:30 PM ^

i guess it's hard for me to laugh at that line having met a lot of woman who were sexually exploited and abused as children(schoolgirls) in japan.  it's easy for us to laugh at brian's joke until we actually see there is too much truth behind it.

anyway if you want to neg me for trying to hijack the thread, go ahead.

i still love brian(no homo) and this blog regardless. go blue!

dahblue

October 5th, 2010 at 5:14 PM ^

Am I crazy to think that a balanced attack presents more problems for us?  Our defense, knowing a pass is coming, still can't stop it.  So...what do we do when we don't know whether to expect a run or pass?

Frankly, and maybe this is the crazy part, I think we're better off if State passes a lot.  Cousins is prone to making mistakes and if we can get some pressure on him, we can force turnovers.

greenphoenix

October 5th, 2010 at 5:44 PM ^

That's because the LBs can drop into coverage or rush forward for the the run pretty much evenly.

A 4-2-5, on the other hand, is a little more susceptible to the run because there's one less linebacker to plug the gaps. A 4-2-5 needs very good, very big linebackers, because they become even more important against the run. This is my biggest concern about the grassroots movement to put Kovacs (ALL HAIL KOVACS) in the middle of the defense, where he will turn into Mr. Bill on run play after run play.

DanRareEgg

October 5th, 2010 at 6:04 PM ^

Hopefully this is coherent.  The following is Michigan's 2009 (Baby Seal excluded) and YTD 2010 schedules showing opponents' yards rushing/passing, followed by the score (UM first):

2009:

WMU - 38/263, 31-7
ND - 154/336, 38-34
EMU - 179/106, 45-17
Indiana - 197/270, 36-33
MSU - 197/220, 20-26
Iowa - 83/284, 28-30
PSU - 166/230, 10-35
Illinois - 377/123, 13-38
Purdue - 127/367, 36-38
Wisconsin - 229/240, 24-45
OSU - 251/67, 10-21


2010:

UCONN - 138/205, 30-10
ND - 154/381, 28-24
UMASS - 217/222, 42-37
BGSU - 32/251, 65-21
Indiana - 88/480, 42-35

These data indicate that while giving up 400+ YPG is awful regardless, Chappellbombing is much more terrifying than a balanced attack.  In 2009 Michigan gave up 30+ points in 6 games.  In those 6 games, only the horrific Juice Williams Experience saw the opponent net more yards rushing than passing, and the Wisconsin game was the only team that was relatively balanced.  So far this year we've ceded 30 points twice, with UMass going balanced and Indiana...well, you know the rest. 

FYI, I went with 30 points because I figure we'd all be happy holding teams under 30 this year, right?  Right.

So then, Chappellbombing will almost certainly happen again and it will probably lead to a loss unless the Chappellbomber throws several INTs and/or gets thoroughly Denarded.  Hopefully both happen a lot.

Is this news good or bad?  I have no freaking idea, and after writing all that, my belief that Michigan will win this weekend is really rooted in one simple fact:  While MSU would really love to win this game, Michigan needs to win this game.  All the coaches and players know it, and I think that will be enough.

jmblue

October 5th, 2010 at 6:50 PM ^

The "MICHIGAN SECONDARY : OPPONENT PASS OFFENSE" analogies = pure Colombian awesome.  Not just any pure Colombian awesome, but picked by Juan Valdez himself pure. 

I think "confused goat : equally confused goat" is the winner. 

cjpops

October 5th, 2010 at 7:05 PM ^

Just the right amount of info balanced with humor. Thanks for bringing the funny!
<br>
<br>I love the tendency to say, "This is what their defense did, but let's see how they do against a higher level of competition in the Big Ten."
<br>
<br>Isn't it clear that our defense is not a higher level of competition? Whatever these teams did against their weak Pre-Big Ten opponents is pretty much what they will do against UM...or worse.
<br>
<br>Luckily, we have one of the most exciting and high producing offenses in college football which features the most dynamic player in the country to counteract this trend.

mGrowOld

October 5th, 2010 at 7:17 PM ^

The M defense vs their offense literaly made me start laughing out loud.  And how do you explain the humor contained in "expect gentle chewing" to somebody not familiar with Michigan's vaunted pass defense?

And the analogies were dead on.  Thanks Brian.

mgowin

October 5th, 2010 at 7:47 PM ^

I disagree with Brian's baseline for our defense. I honestly think that Betty White going against our D is CHAPPELBOMB RATING 2 of 5. I don't think a 0 or a 1 is even an option. Every time they take the field on D my brain queues up some Yakety Sax.

gwrock

October 5th, 2010 at 9:58 PM ^

Last year we took MSU into overtime, on the road, without this year's version of Denard.  Yeah, we lost -- but we could also have easily won.

Is there anyone who doesn't think this year's team is better than last year's team?

Has MSU improved more in the past year than Michigan has? I doubt it.

It may end up being a shootout this weekend, but I definitely don't feel Michigan is overmatched.  Stop all the worrying.

SpartanDan

October 6th, 2010 at 12:02 AM ^

Michigan's offense is better this year than last. That is emphatically not true for the defense.

Other than the scoreboard reading "TILT" by halftime, I don't know what to expect. Michigan is going to score a lot of points. MSU is going to score a lot of points. If Cousins can avoid his typical once-a-game brain fart of throwing into triple coverage, I think MSU escapes with the win. (And it will be difficult for Cousins to throw into triple coverage if there's no one in the same zip code as the receivers.) If MSU shoots itself in the foot more than once on offense, that might be too much to overcome against Denard.

We'll see on Saturday.

Big Blaze

October 6th, 2010 at 12:13 AM ^

Weirdly comprehensive in a hysterical sense.

Maybe it's the beer but "CHAPPELBOMB" made me lol everytime I read it.

ROFL


GO BLUE!  

 

(this site is awesome)

Noleverine

October 6th, 2010 at 4:05 AM ^

I think Indiana's O was one of the worst we will see this year.  Don't get me wrong--OSU, Wiscy, etc are better offensively, but more to the style we can handle.  Trust MM and company to do relatively well (relatively is the key word) against power running games.  Their lines may be bigger, and you will see that in the games towards the beginning, but once the fatties start to tire, our Barwisized gents will still be running at near-full.  Get excited, guys, because we are poised to make a statement.