The Chappellbombing: Will It Happen Again? Comment Count

Brian

mike-martin-ben-chappell So the Indiana game was water torture interspersed with electric Japanese schoolgirl sex. The latter was great but the former was almost 75% of the game, and against teams with non-theoretical defenses a repeat will mean sad faces and rage. How likely is this? Eh… pretty likely at some point. But maybe not consistently.

Indiana is probably the most competent—and is definitely by far the most deployed—passing offense in the Big Ten. Last year Indiana was the only team other than Purdue to pass more than half the time. They did so at a 54% clip. This year they're up to 58% with the return of their entire passing offense, and that's despite a big chunk of the schedule being against tomato cans in which clock-killing runs are plentiful.

A look at Michigan's opponent and what they're likely to do to Michigan's secondary:

Michigan State

Pass Percentages: 50% in 2009, 40% in 2010.
Quarterback: Kirk Cousins, a senior redshirt junior returning starter.
Last year's performance: Cousins split time with Keith Nichol, with the two combining to go 20/29 for 220 yards and two interceptions.
Last year's run/pass split: 49 rushes and 29 passes, though a number of the MSU rushes were QB scrambles.

Cousins had a strong junior year, finishing 25th nationally in pass efficiency. He seems to have made the incremental improvement you'd expect him to; this year he's 13th and in two games against actual opponents he completed about two thirds of his passes for about 250 yards with a solid or better YPA. He also threw three interceptions.

However, State is an old-school I-form heavy conventional offense that looks almost identical to Lloyd Carr's and they set up a lot of their passing yards by running play action. Cousins isn't going to come anywhere near 64 attempts and MSU isn't going to pass 75% of the time. How the run defense holds up against this is an open question, but that's not what this post is about.

MICHIGAN SECONDARY : OPPONENT PASS OFFENSE :: bunny : somewhat unreliable wood chipper
CHAPPELBOMB RATING: 4 of 5. Michigan State was balanced last year, and that was with a terrible running game. This year they've got a stable of impressive backs and somewhat iffy hands in the receiving corps, so the bigger threat is probably getting gashed all day on the ground. Hurrah?

Iowa

Pass Percentages: 46% in 2009, 40% in 2010.
Quarterback: Ricky Stanzi, a senior returning starter.
Last year's performance: Found breathtakingly open tight ends but was erratic, going 20 of 38 for 284 yards and two TDs. Did deliver a Rick Six directly unto Donovan Warren.
Last year's run/pass split: 34 rushes, 38 passes. It should be noted that due to a Jewel Hampton ACL injury Iowa was thin at tailback oh wait that happened again this year except worse nevermind.

Stanzi's primary game of note this year was a 18/33, 278 yard 3TD-1INT game at Arizona where he was almost literally the Iowa offense. The Hawkeyes ran for 29 yards on 26 carries, and though plenty of sacks distort that the two tailbacks combined to average under 2 YPC. He was also efficient against PSU (16/22, 227 yards, 1TD-1INT) on a day when after a couple of quick touchdowns Iowa put it in neutral since they correctly believed Penn State could not score.

MICHIGAN SECONDARY : OPPONENT PASS OFFENSE :: raccoon : sports car with gore-smeared grill that spends a lot of time in the garage
CHAPPELBOMB RATING: 4 of 5. Stanzi may not be headed for NFL riches but he's been around the block and seems to have shaken his touchdown entitlement program. He's top ten in pass efficiency against a pretty decent schedule featuring Penn State, Arizona, and an Iowa State team that just won a Big 12 game (yay!!!). Here, it's the same story as Michigan State: they might be able to replicate it but the old-school coach is likely to split run and pass down the middle instead of letting fly most of the time.

And Now A Picture Of Denard For No Reason

denard-robinson-indiana

Penn State

Pass Percentages: 46% in 2009, 49% in 2010.
Quarterback: True freshman Robert Bolden.
Last year's performance: N/A
Last year's run/pass split: 40 runs, 27 passes as Darryl Clark had four touchdowns in just 27 attempts.

Surprise! Penn State's quarterback situation is terrible. The Nittany Lions are 103rd in passer efficiency. To be fair they've gone up against the brutal defenses of Iowa and Alabama, but Bolden threw two interceptions against Kent State and a pick-six against Iowa on a day when people say he could have thrown four or five.

Their offensive line is really hurting, the tight ends are all injured, and Penn State will probably avoid passing too much as long as it remains relatively close.

MICHIGAN SECONDARY : OPPONENT PASS OFFENSE :: eucalyptus tree : koala bear
CHAPPELBOMB RATING: 1 of 5. Penn State's offensive line gets more hypothetical by the day and now they're down to freshmen or wide receivers at tight end. Meanwhile, Bolden is talented but error-prone, the perfect thing against a Michigan defense that is pretty good at watching others succeed or fail without having much impact either way. Expect gentle chewing.

Illinois

Pass Percentages: 40% in 2009, 33% in 2010.
Quarterback: Redshirt freshman Nathan Scheelhaase.
Last year's performance: N/A
Last year's run/pass split: 11 passes, 56 runs, dead kittens all over the state.

Illinois was already wildly run-biased but they've managed to slide further away from the mean despite graduating half-Desmond, half-duck quarterback Juice Williams. A man named Scheelhaase might sound like a 6'5" pocket passer with a background in soccer and the mobility of John Navarre, but he's actually a highly-rated dual-threat quarterback with FAKE 40 times in the 4.5 range. The play distribution makes some sense.

It also makes sense because in three games against I-A competition Scheelhaase's best outing is 8 of 16 for 70 yards against Northern Illinois. In his first start against Missouri he put up an amazing, amazing stat line: 9 of 23 for 81 yards, a TD, and three INTs. If Michigan gets shredded by Illinois it won't be in the air.

MICHIGAN SECONDARY : OPPONENT PASS OFFENSE :: confused goat : equally confused goat.
CHAPPELBOMB RATING: 0 of 5. If Michigan can contain one passing offense this year, it will be this one.

Purdue

Pass Percentages: 54% in 2009, 47% in 2010.
Quarterback: Redshirt freshman Robert "Rob" Henry, at least until such time as Angry Purdue ACL-Hating God gets bored.
Last year's performance: N/A
Last year's run/pass split: 39 passes, 29 runs as Joey Elliot went for almost 400 yards.

Henry is Purdue's second-stringer, and to add injury to injury (to injury) he'll be operating without his top receiver, top tailback, and possibly his third option at WR if Justin Siller can't make it back from a badly sprained ankle. Information on him is limited. In most of a game against Toledo he was 17 of 31 for 140 yards, a TD, and an INT. He's probably not that good if he was behind Robert Marve to start the year, especially since he's apparently a much better runner.

MICHIGAN SECONDARY : OPPONENT PASS OFFENSE :: chicken : fox with three peg-legs and eyepatches over both eyes hyyyarrr.
CHAPPELBOMB RATING: 2 of 5. Purdue is still a passing spread but their offensive line is in shambles and by the time the Michigan game rolls around they might be starting Random Student somewhere.

Wisconsin

SCOTT-TOLZIEN1-thumb-537x409-16132

AnnArbor.com

Pass Percentages: 37% in 2009, 35% in 2010.
Quarterback: Senior returning starter Scott Tolzien.
Last year's performance: Fire and brimstone falling from the sky as Tolzien averaged 10 YPA on 24 attempts, throwing 4 touchdowns to one INT and causing me to swear bloody revenge on Jay Hopson. Yes, again.
Last year's run/pass split: 52 rushes, 24 passes.

This was a complete debacle last year, causing me to fear Wisconsin even after they almost blew it against Arizona State; I'm still swallowing hard at the idea of going up against them again. Tolzien was awful against MSU but very good against ASU. In the games against patsies he's been efficient… and seldom used… kind of like he was last year against Michigan.

MICHIGAN SECONDARY : OPPONENT PASS OFFENSE :: abdomen : scalpel
CHAPPELBOMB RATING: 4 of 5. Yes, this again: efficient senior game manager who carved up Michigan's crap defense a year ago and has a good shot at doing it again.

Ohio State

Pass Percentages: 36% in 2009, 40% in 2010.
Quarterback: Terrelle Pryor, junior returning starter.
Last year's performance: Did virtually nothing: 9/17, 67 yards, 1 TD, 1 INT.
Last year's run/pass split: 53 runs, 17 passes.

That line from last year might have been more interesting if Tate Forcier wasn't busy throwing the game ball at various members of the Ohio State pass defense. As it was OSU had the Tresselball on full throttle. This year Pryor's nuked the patsies (though he did throw a couple interceptions against Ohio) and been somewhat limited against real opposition. Take out a shovel pass to Dan Herron that went for 47 yards and Pryor was 11 of 26 for 186 yards against Miami, with 62 of those on a single bomb to DeVier Posey. Last week against Illinois Pryor had another epic Tresselball stat line: 9/16, 76 yards, 2 TD, 1 INT. Apparently it was windy or something.

While I can totally see that Posey bomb happening against Michigan, I'd rather this defense give up a big touchdown and then a bunch of nothing than get Chappelbombed.

MICHIGAN SECONDARY : OPPONENT PASS OFFENSE :: London : V1 rocket
CHAPPELBOMB RATING: 2 of 5. Tressel will probably Tressel it, leaving Pryor a spectator and runner most of the day. Also… wind or not, his stats are not indicative of a guy who anyone is going to put a game on in a Chappell sort of way. Doubt he even gets to 25 attempts against M.

Comments

Logan88

October 5th, 2010 at 4:19 PM ^

I've been trying NOT to think too far ahead, but I believe if UM makes it to one of the Big 10 vs. SEC bowl games, LSU would be the most favorable matchup for UM followed closely by South Carolina.

I firmly believe that, even with UM's sh*tty defense, they could beat LSU and S. Carolina. I'm not nearly as confident that they could beat Florida, Auburn or Arkansas.

Dan Man

October 5th, 2010 at 1:33 PM ^

A pessimist (or perhaps a realist?) would say that, although Indiana is the most pass-heavy Big 10 team (which presumably would better enable them to take advantage of Michigan's weaknesses on D), their pass-heaviness also makes them one dimensional.

If a one dimensional offense can destroy our D like Indiana did, I would think a better balanced offense like Michigan State could REALLY put a hurting on us.

Just saying...

OregonWolverine

October 5th, 2010 at 1:34 PM ^

I think the Chappellbombing was something of a one-off, in which IU's lack of a running game, and Chappell's lack of mobility, allowed Michigan to rush 3 and play very conservative coverages the whole game. That accounts for the reasonable YPA number in that game, and the fact that M actually managed to keep them from scoring on 6 of 11 real possessions (discounting the last Hail Mary thing).

The dynamic I worry about is not another 65 attempt Chinese water torture scene, it's teams like MSU forcing riskier coverages with their run game, then exploiting the serious lack of individual cover skills for big plays off of play action. The worry is fewer attempts, but more YPA, and more points PA. In that light, I think the opposing receivers are every bit as important as the QBs.

Blue in Seattle

October 5th, 2010 at 3:46 PM ^

And probably the reason Brian specifically stated he was ignoring this aspect for the post.  But it is the key point in looking at the MSU matchup.  One thing I would compare against Indiana is that I doubt MSU will put 4 obvious receivers into formation and then send a 5th into the mix.  To have a successful power running approach you need  a run blocking tight end, and a fullback.  My hope is that GERG found a few LB/hybrid candidates to cover the middle routes, because I'm less worried about corners and safeties covering the deep routes.  I'm most excited that Jibreel Black was on the field so much last Saturday as well as Coach Rodriguez's statement that Patterson filled in well for Mike Martin.

This game will be the toughest test on the Run Defense to date, but I don't worry as much about deep plays on play action as I do the dragging tight end dump offs and QB scrambles that are so good at keeping long drives going.

In fact I think offensive play calling would try to NOT throw the deep ball, because it's just going to mean the Michigan offense is coming back onto the field.  And if the short stuff is unstoppable, why call the long stuff?

BornInAA

October 5th, 2010 at 1:37 PM ^

pix is disturbing - with the QB rising up out of a poor tackling pumpkin patch.

I don't remember the falling-down-5-point-exploding-heart-technique being used as a sucessful tackling technique.

Don

October 5th, 2010 at 1:44 PM ^

I have infinite faith in our defense's ability to turn QBs of every level of talent into Ben Chappel for a day, which means I expect Scheelhaase, Henry, Tolzien, and Bolden will have career days against Gerg's All You Can Eat Buffet defense.

And I hope those girls are over 18, cuz if they're not, Brian won't be able to move anywhere without flyers being put up on telephone poles in his neighborhood.

pete-rock

October 5th, 2010 at 1:48 PM ^

But it doesn't mean our season is lost by any stretch, as long as the offense keeps Denarding.

I did a stats check of BCS conference teams over the last five years that gave up 400+ ypg in total defense.  There were 56 teams since 2005 that fit the bill.  Of those, 19 finished .500 or better.  Furthermore, 9 finished with 8 or more wins:

2009 Arkansas (8-5)

2009 Stanford (8-5)

2008 Oklahoma State (9-4)

2008 Missouri (10-4)

2007 Tennessee (10-4)

2006 Purdue (8-6)

2005 Wisconsin (10-3)

2005 UCLA (10-2)

What distinguished those teams? A high-powered offense, of course.  Seven of the nine had offenses ranked in the top third nationally (2007 Tennessee and 2005 Wisconsin missed the cut).  Two of the nine had unstoppable spread offenses that ranked in the top ten nationally: in 2008 Okie State's offense was #6, and Mizzou's was #8.  That year both teams ate up more than 480+ ypg, and surrendered more than 405+ ypg. 

At this point, UM is certainly on pace to equal both those totals; if it comes with similar results that would exceed my pre-season expectations.

BTW, those Okie State and Mizzou teams were senior-laden that lost quite a bit after that 2008 season.  UM is far younger and can expect improvement even if they have similar results.

Wolvmarine

October 5th, 2010 at 1:51 PM ^

Its ok!  Denard just ran into the future and attended the Michigan vs Michigan State then he ran back to speed up our Defense on what MSU's Offense will try to do on Saturday.  

Those of you who are going to the game be on the look out for a fan in a hoodie that looks like Denard Robinson.  Don't be alarmed, its just the Denard from the past, before he heads back to the Future.   

severs28

October 5th, 2010 at 2:01 PM ^

I just keep hoping they will miraculously turn it around.  Obviously reality then sets in and just prays that Denard will keep on Denarding everyone.

Feat of Clay

October 5th, 2010 at 2:15 PM ^

I just keep combing these entries for the sentence that reads "Everything is going to be okay.  No, really."  I did not like the way I felt watching that Indiana game.  I am not looking forward to week after week of the same.

I like Denard photos.  Going forward, I also request kittens.

bigmc6000

October 5th, 2010 at 2:21 PM ^

This bit had me almost spew my drink on my computer screen - "MICHIGAN SECONDARY : OPPONENT PASS OFFENSE :: chicken : fox with three peg-legs and eyepatches over both eyes hyyyarrr."

 

Pure columbian awesome...

MMB 82

October 5th, 2010 at 2:22 PM ^

TOP of opposing offenses is greatly reduced if you can watch the game on delay. I did this for the Indiana game, fast-forwarding through commercials, time outs and half-time, then eventually the Indiana offense. It worked wonders.....

Michigan4Life

October 5th, 2010 at 2:26 PM ^

QBs are prone to make bad decisions which means that there's good opportunities for defense to get INT which is just as good as a stop.  Cousins and Stanzi is prone to make stupid throw.  Pryor may be a Heisman candidate but he's not a good passer and Tressell put a leash on him in passing because he doesn't trust his arm nor his decision making.

buckeyejonross

October 5th, 2010 at 2:46 PM ^

Tressell put a leash on him in passing because he doesn't trust his arm nor his decision making.

I disagree witht his statement. Tressel has unleashed (for him anyway) the passing offense so far this season because he realizes that Pryor is our whole offense. In fact, until Illinois, Pryor threw it 25, 27, 29, and 26 times. Tressel reigned in Pryor against Illinois not because of a lack of trust but because he wanted to get the hell out of there as quickly as possible and Pryor was already hurt from earlier. Jim wen't into total shutdown mode. So far this year Tress has actually trusted Pryor implicitly and allowed him to throw a lot relative to last year.

That being said, he is not going to pass for 400 yards against Michigan, but he is probably not going to have to.

buckeyejonross

October 5th, 2010 at 5:43 PM ^

He does trust his decision making, I don't see how you think he doesn't. You can't just watch the last 20 mins of the Illinois game and make generalized statements while ignoring the last 5 games Terrelle has played, including the Rose Bowl, which was Jim Tressel realizing that TP is our only hope at scoring points against the best teams.

zlionsfan

October 5th, 2010 at 2:27 PM ^

PIRATE FOX!

And the remaining receivers will likely catch like Captain Hook.

FWIW, I suspect that some blogs across the Big Ten are discussing the possibility that Robinson's development will accelerate to the point where he turns pro during the season. Given the way some teams' offenses played Sunday, there are obviously openings for any sort of competent QB, with or without dilithium.

That would certainly be easier to write. The alternative would be something like

Denard Robinson : <team's> Defense :: TGV : Mr. Bill

msoccer10

October 5th, 2010 at 2:33 PM ^

looks like it will be the best and most balance offense we face for the rest of the year. Thankfully, I think their defense is not great. I am not really afraid of Stanzi, Pryor or Tolzien and I think our defense of tight ends (Rudolph's 95 yarder not withstanding) has improved.

The real question is what will our running defense do against a good running attack.

Xerxes

October 5th, 2010 at 2:39 PM ^

You guys ever wonder what it looks like when our #1 O goes up against our #1 D in practice? I'm thinking something along the lines of 'Week 2 Shoelace' x 2....

MGlobules

October 5th, 2010 at 4:06 PM ^

that we had a chance even against Indiana (hey, we won!). The bad news is that at 120th in the nation out of 120 schools in pass defense a really well-balanced attack that keeps the D on its heels, mixing it up really well. . . could pose even bigger problems. (Our three-man front, MSU's really good rushing attack. . .) 

I like our chances against MSU, for some reason. I think the D plays better and the O reaches new heights. I think we'll see more of the 4-man fronts we saw experimentally against BGSU, some good stops, an interception or two, and some, but not enough, huge plays from their O.

We all just have to swear a blood oath not to commit suicide when the bad game(s) come. 

DefensiveOverhaul

October 5th, 2010 at 4:14 PM ^

I really don't understand our defensive philosophy.  As long as Denard stays healthy, we can score every time we get the ball if we execute, avoid penalties and don't turn the ball over.

So, it makes zero sense not to be super aggressive on defense.  This entire bend-dont-break philosophy is so flawed.  When you can score at will, then why would you incorporate a defense that keeps the opposition on the field for 5-6 minutes at a time?  Why wouldn't you blitz and stunt and mix coverages...play press zone (I realize our DBs can not play man...but they don't have to play 15 yards off coverage).  Why would you only rush 3 men and give the QB all day to find an opening in the zone.  Anyone playing pick-up football can find an open guy if they have all day to throw...I don't care if you put 10 men back there. 

Philosophically, if we can score at will, we should be playing super aggressive on defense.  Aggression and pressure can overcome our weaknesses.  The 3-3-5 makes no sense with our personnel.  We should employ a 4 man front, completely shut down the run and blitz a 6th man on passing downs.  Use Black and Roh as rush-ends, Martin and RVB in the middle, and sub in Patterson/Sagesse/Campbell as interior lineman.  Then, we should take out Obi and Leach on all plays and put in Demens and Mouton in the middle.   Put either Herron/Carvin/T Gordon as outside LBs.  Cam and Kovacs at safety/hybrid.  Floyd and Avery as CBs.

Rodriguez saying we don't have enough experience or talent on defense is completely wrong.  Martin and Mouton are NFL players, Roh likely, Black raw but talented, RVB is solid, Kovacs are best run tackler, Cam is talented but raw, Floyd is average (good #2 CB), Avery is fast with great instincts, and Demens plays downhill.

Sure, some of these guys are seeing there first few game minutes (Cam, Avery, Black), but we have more talent than most Top 25 defenses.  The problem is 100% coaching and scheme.  You can't run a 3-3-5 without great safeties, corners and linebackers.  That is our weakness, yet we are running the scheme anyway.  As much as an offensive guru Rich is, he's inept at defensive coordination.  And, Greg Robinson is not a good coach either otherwise he would insist on changing the scheme to the correct one and be able to explain to Rich why this year it makes no sense.  Greg Robinson is responsible for personnel decisions, and as long as Obi plays instead of Demens, Greg Robinson will be considered a terrible coach in my opinion.

The reason our defense sucks is because our coaching and scheme suck.  It is not too late to change it up and play more aggressive, with the right players.  I am convinced that our defensive coaches don't watch film.  Otherwise, they would see all of the things that is posted so often on this blog:  mistake after mistake after mistake by our defense.

It is time for our defensive staff to be held accountable.  They are getting paid a ton of money to have answers.  If they don't, they should resign.

MileHighWolverine

October 5th, 2010 at 6:43 PM ^

definitely believe that we should be much more aggressive in our schemes even if it means exposing the secondary to the possibility of getting hit with a big play.  The only time our D was able to stop anyone this year has been those rare instances where the 3-3-5 gets some pressure on the QB.   I almost wonder what a reverse stack (5-3-3) would be like with our stud lineman.  Can you imagine the havoc Martin would be able to unleash if he wasn't double and triple teamed every play?  I feel like being able to consistently put 2 guys in the backfield would be enough to limit the big play risk and get us off the field quickly. 

Then, after Dilithium does his thing and we are up by 3 TD's, play all the soft zone you want.

jlbockUM

October 5th, 2010 at 7:36 PM ^

I have to agree that GERG can do more with the dynamic Craig Roh.  Roh playing in space is not as instinctive when playing near/at the line.  Roh and Black should both be rushing the QB on most passing downs (hand on the ground or not).  You’re taking your best pass rusher away from rushing the passer.

Another curious use of personnel was the blitzing of JT Floyd, meaning you ask a freshman DB to cover.  You’re taking your best DB out of coverage.  The Indiana TD at the end of the first half was the result of a misplayed zone by Talbott.  Does JT Floyd play that correctly?  Maybe. Hopefully yes.

With only so many capable defenders, you have to maximize their abilities.  Roh consistently in zone coverage and Floyd in a blitz does not utilize your defensive playmakers.  Showing different looks is important, but so is putting your players in the best position to succeed.

Lastly, when we bring delayed blitzes it would be good to see our DBs press up on the WRs a bit.  Chappell threw into the blitz, as a good QB will do, and the WRs were open on short routes.  When we dial-up a blitz the coverage has to be tighter, knowing the WRs will shorten routes.  JT Floyd, at least, has the ability to re-direct the WR off the line and still get into his zone drop.

GERG is working with an inherently flawed unit, but it would be good to see Roh and Floyd schemed to their strengths, like he has been able to do with Martin and Mouton.

I cannot agree that we have Top 25 talent defensively, or that GERG should resign.  A little realism and pictures of Denard will go a long way...