Big Ten Media Days: Troy Woolfolk Comment Count

Tim

safety Troy Woolfolk (29) plays during Michigan's 26-20 loss to Michigan State at Spartan Stadium on Saturday October 3, 2009 (ZACHARY MEISNER/Daily)

First up from my interviews with Michigan's three player representatives at Big Ten Media Days: Troy Woolfolk.

On The Question Everyone Asks First

  • Denard has been out for all the voluntary activities, regardless of whether he's hurting. Tate tries to come out, but he's not as consistent with his work ethic, which has let Denard get out ahead a bit. The upshot: "I think that Tate's gonna have to do a lot of work to catch back up to Denard in camp this year."

On Himself

  • Troy doesn't care which position he plays, as long as he gets to stick with one or the other. Switching back and forth between safety and corner helped Troy have a more complete understanding of the defense last year, but it hurt him to not be able to concentrate on one position or the other the whole time. Now that he's exclusively a corner, he'll be able to focus on that specifically.
  • At corner, there's more of a focus on speed, whereas at safety it's also about being big enough to take on running backs and tight ends.
  • There are no individual goals in terms of statistics, but Troy's personal goals are to not get beat deep and not miss any open-field tackles.
  • Growing up, Troy didn't really know how good a football player his dad had been. Butch didn't really talk about it much. Still, by the end of this year, Troy hopes it's "Troy Woolfolk's dad Butch" instead of "Butch Woolfolk's son Troy."
  • Vance Bedford would be shocked to know that Troy is one of the most knowledgeable players on the defense. He used to give him a hard time about not paying enough attention in film, but that's changed. Troy's no longer falling asleep in film room, nor is he "texting on my phone to my friends about how I'm about to go to sleep watching film."

The Defense

  • The main difference in this year's defense is that it's simpler. That will be a help because a lot of young guys will be able to catch on more quickly. This year's schemes have more of a zone emphasis than man.
  • It's a little difficult to switch defensive schemes so frequently. there's been a different scheme or coordinator every year Troy's been at Michigan. The players have to make an effort to forget some of the old stuff to absorb the new stuff.
  • A lack of defensive depth and injuries helped undermine the defense last year, but there are no excuses for how they performed. Troy had knee and shoulder injuries last year that might have hurt.
  • Stopping the ground attack will be important this year, and it's up to the big guys up front to help with that. There's enough size there to do it.
  • Everyone's "All-in for Greg Robinson," so the team will band behind him and perform well on D.

The Team

  • "The Team. All-in for The Team" is the rallying cry this year. The players have to play for each other, not worry about fans and other external pressures. There's also a "we can" attitude instead of a "we'll try" attitude. There are senior leaders at every position group except wide receiver. Roy Roundtree and Martavious Odoms have stepped up as the leaders there.
  • This is probably the best leadership group since Troy's been on the team. They're the last group of Lloyd Carr-era players, so it means even more that they've all bought in to the new regime.
  • There have been nice crowds for summer workouts. It's about the same as prior years, even though the coaching staff has been more explicit that they aren't mandatory with the NCAA stuff going on. The senior leaders have come up with some ideas to get guys to come out.
  • Obi Ezeh have gotten bigger in the offseason, but they're probably faster than they were before they added the weight. They're able to run with receivers deep, too. They "look like supreme athletes out there." Troy has confidence that they'll be able to put it all together this year, and be two of the best linebackers in the nation.
  • Last year, Jordan Kovacs was a surprise to everyone. He brings attitudes of calmness and confidence, which are important on defense. When Mike Williams went down in the Notre Dame game, Kovacs was a pleasant surprise.
  • Courtney Avery is the only freshman corner Troy's seen. He learns fast though, and when he gets beat deep he's able to forget about it and move on to the next play.
  • Cameron Gordon is confident, perhaps overconfident. He's also very physical, even though he's a former offensive player (Troy thinks they're all soft). He needs to learn a defensive mentality a bit more, but he's getting there.
  • Marvin Robinson has a natural gift at safety, and he's been playing the deep safety position.
  • Terrance Robinson has been good in 7-on-7 drills. He was hurt his freshman year, then wasn't quite the same as before in his redshirt freshman year. This year, he should be back to the way he was.

Rivalries

  • Troy was able to convince himself to prepare a bit more for rivalry games, such as ND, MSU, and OSU last year. Maybe he shouldn't focus more on them (and focus the same for the other games as well), but it helps him perform well.
  • The Michigan State game is a cool rivalry because it's like a state championship game.

[Ed.: Don't forget Woolfolk's burgeoning career as a stand-up comedian. Via the message board and Joe Schad:

"When I see 'O' shaped objects I get instantly angry. I don't eat Cheerios, Froot Loops or Apple Jacks."

]

Comments

MGoShoe

August 3rd, 2010 at 3:16 PM ^

...it back furiously.

TomVH RT @TWoolf29 A story was written about me putting Tate in a negative aspect. This was phrased wrongly and is not the truth

TomVH RT @TWoolf29 I think Tate is a greatplayer

No surprise here.  This is what's called an object lesson in media relations.

Needs

August 3rd, 2010 at 3:29 PM ^

Woolfolk went on to say, "We've got to play them one game at a time. I'm just happy to be here, hope I can help the team. I just want to give it my best shot and, the good lord willing, things will work out."

dcmaizeandblue

August 3rd, 2010 at 4:05 PM ^

I don't really see any way this can be a good thing to do.  Keep it within the team, I cannot remember one instance of someone calling out a teammate in public and it working out.  It should be the senior's job to defend their players to the public and let them have it in the locker room, that is what creates team unity.

It doesn't matter whether comments like these are true, as soon as they are made a public opinion begins to form even though we really have no idea what is really going on.  Just bring on real football so we have good things to discuss!

arod

August 3rd, 2010 at 4:21 PM ^

had not said this publicly, but it is hard to be sympathetic to guy who is *from all available evidence* not working as harm as his teammates think he should.  I don't like criticizing players harshly for not understanding schemes, or for not being fast/strong/good in coverage, or even for saying dumb shit in interviews.  But being a poor teammate is inexcusable, and if Troy is speaking truthfully, that's what Tate is doing.  If the criticism from RR and Co seems harsh, image what Bo would have told him.

WorldwideTJRob

August 3rd, 2010 at 5:13 PM ^

I feel as a Senior leader that Troy has the right to call out Tate if his work ethic and/or ledarship has been lacking in the off-season. Maybe the seniors and the coaches have called out Tate behind doors and this might just be a last ditch effort to get him on board. Its possible they feel that embarrassing him in public may help Tate get angry which in turn could fuel him to work harder.

JimBobTressel-0

August 3rd, 2010 at 6:43 PM ^

what was that Forcier said after his abortion of a performance in the Ohio State game? "This offseason, I'm going to make sure that everyone works as hard as they've ever had. I'm going to push this team"

 

Something like that.

dahblue

August 3rd, 2010 at 7:41 PM ^

I love that Woolfolk comes from an understanding of Michigan history:

The record that we have -- that's a record that should never be associated with Michigan.

 

..It's a little bit embarrassing to come from the past that we've come from ... to see that we haven't had a winning season is embarrassing
I hope the entire team is embarrassed and that they play every game remembering what Michigan football should be.  Troy wants a minimum of 8 wins...I think that's about right.
 
As for the QB stuff, I don't find much to worry about.  The guy who leads the team in games will have the respect of the rest of the team.

Section 1

August 3rd, 2010 at 9:07 PM ^

And, as with Braylon, Manningham, Trent, etc., it appears that Woolfolk realized, within hours, that they were dumb things to say.

Dumb.  What are these guys thinking?

Memo:  To the next current/former Michigan player thinking of saying something stupid like this.

Don't.

Section 1

August 3rd, 2010 at 10:33 PM ^

He's begun to walk back the comments.  As he shlould.  But geeze.  A senior, handpicked to go the the annual Big Ten Press Hoopla.  And to think; there were jokes about Tressel's not taking Terrelle Pryor to the meetings, for the supposed reason that Tressel was fearful of a Pryor performance in front of the press.  Tressel's sensible reason was that he takes Seniors, mostly, to the meetings, and that is what he did. 

Obviously, Troy didn't think it was so dumb when he said these comments, but now he surely understands that it was dumb.  Just like Braylon, like Manningham and like Trent.  They all ended up trying to work their way out of their comments.  It's all self-inflicted and unneccessary aggravation.  Four cases' worth now.  That's enough for "an object lesson in press relations."

JimBobTressel-0

August 4th, 2010 at 5:06 AM ^

I still don't see anything stupid about it. If Forcier wants the glory and the fame of being Michigan QB, he needs to put in the work. For all I know he could be working privately, but it doesn't sound like it. It seems the bad taste of losing seven straight (not counting Del State) hasn't stayed in his mouth. In that case, I'm officially gunning for Denard to take his job, because competition will only help this team, not hurt it.

Section 1

August 4th, 2010 at 9:44 AM ^

It doesn't matter if Troy was right.  Or wrong.  It doesn't have anything to do with who is working hardest, or who is the best quarterback.  This has nothing to do with the substance.

The problem is that saying stuff like this, whether it is correct, or incorrect, or in between, is a dumb idea because of the problems it causes.  It is a public relations disaster.

We're not talking about a radio program taking a call "from Troy in Ann Arbor."  We're talking about a Senior, a team leader, selected to travel to the Big Ten Media Days in Chicago.  This isn't a seminar on free speech or a group encounter session.  Troy Woolfolk is there because he is a representative of an institution.  This is the press relations equivalent of fumbling the ball, without being touched, on your own 2-yard line.

TG7782

August 4th, 2010 at 8:40 AM ^

Why does it seem that whoever UM uses to prep anyone giving an interview is always asleep at the switch and something bad gets said?  Once or twice, ok maybe the person just didn't follow what the media relations people said but it seems to happen way too much. 

BlueGoM

August 4th, 2010 at 9:08 AM ^

It doesn't sound like he was bashing Tate as much as the MDaily article suggests, based from the tone of how he said what he said.   He said that Denard might be "a little" ahead (IIRC) of Tate.   He did say, however, as we all now know, that Tate wasn't as consistent as Denard as getting to summer workouts.

I assume the audio portions will available on WTKA's podcasts at some point.

Section 1

August 4th, 2010 at 10:39 AM ^

Because I am such a regular critic of the Free Press.  And I think the Free Press has earned every bit of that criticism.  It would be unfair of me to turn around and give the Michigan Daily a pass under possibly similar circumstances.

What should the Daily have done with the Woolfolk quotes?

Did the Daily do anything wrong in obtaining the Woolfolk quote?

What did the Daily do that was wrong?