Big Ten Announces Plans For New Student-Athlete Benefits Comment Count

Ace

If you're in search of good news, look no further. The Big Ten just announced their intention to, among other protections for student-athletes, ensure that scholarships cover the full cost of attedance and are guaranteed for the duration of a S-A's undergraduate studies. The full statement from the Big Ten follows (also posted on the official Big Ten site with PDFs of the statements referred to in the second paragraph):

ROSEMONT, Ill. – The Big Ten Conference announced today that it has notified the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) of initial recommendations designed to provide enhanced benefits for student-athletes that are members in good standing with their individual universities as part of the NCAA’s new autonomy governance structure. 

For the past two years, the conference has publicly stated its desire to continue providing student-athletes with an unmatched educational and athletic experience, including comments made by Commissioner James E. Delany at the July 2013 Big Ten Football Media Days, at the Collegiate Commissioners Association meeting on September 25, 2013, at the July 2014 Big Ten Football Media Days, and in statements issued by the Big Ten Council of Presidents/Chancellors on June 1, 2014 and June 24, 2014.

The Big Ten will work to implement the following proposals through individual institutional action, conference-wide action or under the NCAA autonomy governance structure:

  • Cost of Education: Redefine full grant-in-aid to meet a student-athlete’s cost of education, as determined by the federal government.
  • Multi-Year Scholarships: Guarantee all scholarships. If a student-athlete is no longer able to compete, for whatever reason, there should be no impact on institutions’ commitment to deliver an undergraduate education.
  • Lifetime Educational Commitment: Ensure that scholarships are available for life. If a student-athlete leaves a university for a professional career before graduating, whether the career materializes, and regardless of its length, the scholarship will be honored after his or her playing days are complete.
  • Medical Insurance: Provide improved, consistent medical insurance for student-athletes. 

The Big Ten has also agreed to address additional student-athlete welfare issues including, but not limited to, health and safety, time demands and comprehensive academic support by way of a “Resolution” that creates a specific pathway and timeline for implementation.

The Big Ten Conference is an association of 14 world-class universities committed to the pursuit and attainment of athletic and academic excellence. Big Ten institutions feature broad-based athletic programs which provide nearly $200 million in direct financial aid to almost 9,500 student-athletes on 350 teams in 42 different sports.

We look forward to working with the ACC, Big 12, Pac-12 and SEC through the NCAA autonomy governance structure toward adoption and implementation of these proposals.

This is huge news and a big step forward for the rights of student-athletes. In addition, that's quite a loaded last line of the statement—the attention now turns to the other Power 5 conferences and the NCAA.

Comments

Wolverine In Exile

October 1st, 2014 at 2:27 PM ^

This is a pretty good first blow. Full cost of attendance, honoring it for life (no more shipping off to North Alabama Tech for you son!), and *all* athletes, not just revenue sports. Score one for decency (and for Jim Delaney World Domination)

justingoblue

October 1st, 2014 at 10:22 PM ^

I agree with you and it's definitely a Title IX issue, but it's not something the Big Ten can do on its own. If they just unilaterally say that your sport is now getting 28 head count scholarships instead of 7 equivalency scholarships the NCAA isn't going to let them compete in tournaments and other conferences aren't going to schedule games either. 

Again, I agree with you, but realistically this is either an NCAA or maybe Power Five solution at the minimum. The Big Ten can't realistically go it alone on scholarship numbers.

Hannibal.

October 1st, 2014 at 2:30 PM ^

The one I'm not too thrilled about is the guarantee for the guys who leave early for the NBA and the NFL.  If you are a one-and-done basketball player, the university shouldn't be forced to honor its commitment to you if you only played basketball there for one year.  If you quit voluntarily and it doesn't work out for you, then tough shit.  You should have stayed in school.

This is going to increase the likelihood that anyone that is wavering on staying vs. leaving early leaves early. 

Wolverine In Exile

October 1st, 2014 at 2:34 PM ^

You get a Kevin Durant who makes bokoo bucks for your university in the one year he's there, you promise him to come back at any time to finish his degree, that's marketing you can bank on with not just future athletes, but with alumni who want feel good stories about how their school cares. It's minimal cost compared to what the university banked in merchandise sales and potential NCAA tourney money. Think if LSU was able to show Shaq getting his degree there instead of Shaq doing commercials for Univ of Phoenix?

allmichiganath…

October 7th, 2014 at 12:46 PM ^

Not just Michigan Athletics, but the entire Big Ten. Not a chance the NCAA hears this case. Scholarships are given to talented student-athletes that are recruited based on what they can bring to the program. Scholarship distribution is a way to excerise selective recruiting. It's going to ruin not only Michigan Athletics, but the entire collegiate athletic world. 

Blue In NC

October 1st, 2014 at 4:15 PM ^

I assume this does not apply if you are able to play but choose not to do so.  E.g. basketball player plays for one year, voluntarily quits team (no health reasons) and just wants to stay in school for free.  I assume the scholarship cuts off.  If not, I see a big potential for abuse.

LKLIII

October 1st, 2014 at 2:45 PM ^

I disagree as well.  The lifetime undergrad scholarship offer I think also gives a competitive leg up on some of the other conferences, at least for kids who have their priorities right.  You get injured? You can still make something of yourself with the scholarship.  Leave early and blow out your knee in your first NFL mini-camp?  Come on back, finish that degree, and become a local sports hero with a solid white collar job.

Compare that to some of the pressure cooker SEC teams with the full "up or out" mentality after just a year or two in the program.  

Could the system still be gamed?  I suppose so.  The kid is a perpetual 4th stringer, maybe the coach urges him to be "too injured to play" and they drop him from the roster but the kid still gets to get his degree--that sort of thing.

But overall it's a good step forward.  Very few kids get to play ball at a big time D1 program.  Even fewer get to play in the pros.  Even fewer still last in the pros long enough to bank enough income so that they can retire off it when they quit the sport at age 30 or 35 or whatever.

The durable scholarship offer is a benefit that any kid (if he has the maturity to take advantage of it), can use to improve his life in lasting and substantial ways that will far outpace his basketball/football career in most circumstances.

Ender

October 1st, 2014 at 2:45 PM ^

I hear you, but I think it's a good policy, as it fits in with the theme of the universities making a full, up-front commitment to educating the athlete regardless of the path of his or her athletic career.

My question is, does anyone know how this plays in with NCAA schlarship limits?  

Michigan Difference

October 1st, 2014 at 3:05 PM ^

I don't have a problem with having a safety net for those that leave to pursue their dreams and it doesn't work out.  This offers players a benefit that -- although available to everyone -- will be used mostly by those that earn the most money for the school.  It strikes me as an appropriate balance between recognizing the reality that a handful of players are essetially funding the entire athletic department while still treating everyone ostensibly equally (which I think is necessary to maintain the spirit of college sports and possibly Title IX).

funkywolve

October 1st, 2014 at 4:16 PM ^

I've never been a fan of the one and done rule in bball.  A lot of these guys who are one and doners probbably only complete a semester of college.  They keep themselves eligible through the NCAA tourney and then once that is over they focus on getting ready for the draft. 

Football I don't mind as much because they have to be 3 years removed from high school so hopefully they are well on their way to completing their degree if they leave early.

MaizeAndBlueWahoo

October 1st, 2014 at 3:08 PM ^

In addition, that's quite a loaded last line of the statement—the attention now turns to the other Power 5 conferences and the NCAA.

Way ahead of you, says the ACC:

http://espn.go.com/blog/acc/post/_/id/75285/acc-outlines-autonomy-prior…

I'd expect that the conferences aren't working in a vacuum (that is, they pretty much know what the others have been talking about), and that this isn't a gauntlet throw to the other conferences so much as a "we're totally united about this you guys" kind of message.

bigmc6000

October 1st, 2014 at 9:37 PM ^

Is it really that big though? They already got a stipend on top of room and board so it's still up in the air how much "true cost" actually is. The four year scholarship thing is big but we could have already been doing that since the NCAA ok'd it last year, they already have ridiculous health benefits playing football. The lifetime scholarship thing is big for the guys who try to leave early and bust but how many of those people are actually out there? You think Charles Woodson can't afford to pay for a semester of school to finish his degree? (Can't remember if he has or not). So, I just don't see it as huge news at all just another little stepping stone.


Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad

bronxblue

October 1st, 2014 at 5:30 PM ^

This is awesome. The lifelong scholarship alone is worth so much to most athletes. Also glad that there will be improved medical care.

Will be interesting to see how this applies to sports with split scholarships. I presume most of those athletes exhaust their eligibility properly, but it would be interesting to know if this applies the same to everyone.

funkywolve

October 2nd, 2014 at 10:27 AM ^

that if a player goes pro and then comes back, his scholarship/benefits wouldn't be the same as if he was on the team?  I'm guessing they would pretty much be a regular student in that they wouldn't have access to the tutors/help that the players in the program would have?  They'd essentially just be a regular student who is getting a full ride.

Alton

October 2nd, 2014 at 11:35 AM ^

Hockey.  Most other hockey schools are not in "Big 5" conferences (Boston College and Notre Dame are just about the only non-Big Ten hockey schools in a major conference). 

If the six teams in the Big Ten are the only ones offering career scholarships with full cost of attendance and the option to return after a pro career, that gives them a huge advantage over both the rest of Division I hockey and over the CHL as well.  Although one wonders whether a Big Ten player who defects to the CHL (but does not play "true" professional hockey) will be able to go back to the Big Ten school and re-claim the scholarship.