Home
i'm an actor, not a reactor

Primary links

  • About
    • $upport (lol)
    • Ethics
    • FAQ
    • Glossary
    • Privacy Policy
  • Contact
  • MGoStore
    • Hail to Old Blue
  • MGoBoard
    • MGoBoard FAQ
    • Michigan bar locator
    • Moderator Action Sticky
  • Useful Stuff
    • Depth Chart By Class
    • Hoops Depth Chart by Class
    • 2017 Recruiting Board
    • Unofficial Two Deep
    • MGoFlickr
    • Diaries, Windows Live Writer, And You
    • User-Curated HOF
    • Where To Eat In Ann Arbor
  • Schedule/Tix
    • Future Schedules (wiki)
    • Ticket spreadsheet
Home

Navigation

  • Forums
  • Recent posts

User login

  • Create new account
  • Request new password

MGoElsewhere

  • @MGoBlog (Brian)
  • @aceanbender
  • @Misopogon (Seth)
  • @Aeschnepp (Adam)
  • @BISB
  • @EUpchurchPhoto
  • @FullOfTwitt (Fuller)
  • Hail to the Victors 2016
  • MGoFacebook
  • MGoPodcast
  • WTKA
  • Instagram

Michigan Blogs

  • Big House Blog
  • Burgeoning Wolverine Star
  • Genuinely Sarcastic
  • Go Blue Michigan Wolverine
  • Holdin' The Rope
  • MVictors
  • Maize 'n' Blue Nation
  • Maize 'n' Brew
  • Maize And Go Blue
  • Michigan Hockey Net
  • MMMGoBlueBBQ
  • The Blog That Yost Built
  • The Hoover Street Rag
  • The M Zone
  • Touch The Banner
  • UMGoBlog
  • UMHoops
  • UMTailgate
  • Wolverine Liberation Army

M On The Net

  • mgovideo
  • MGoBlue.com
  • Mike DeSimone
  • Recruiting Planet
  • The Wolverine
  • Go Blue Wolverine
  • Winged Helmet
  • UMGoBlue.com
  • MaizeRage.org
  • Puckhead
  • The M Den
  • True Blue Fan Forum

Big Ten Blogs

  • Illinois
    • Illinois Loyalty
    • Illinois Baseball Report
  • Indiana
    • Inside The Hall
    • The Crimson Quarry
  • Iowa
    • Black Heart, Gold Pants
    • Fight For Iowa
  • Michigan State
    • The Only Colors
  • Minnesota
    • GopherHole.com
    • The Daily Gopher
  • Nebraska
    • Corn Nation
    • Husker Max
    • Husker Mike's Blasphemy
    • Husker Gameday
  • Northwestern
    • Sippin' On Purple
    • Lake The Posts
  • Notre Dame
    • The House Rock Built
    • One Foot Down
  • Ohio State
    • Eleven Warriors
    • Buckeye Commentary
    • Men of the Scarlet and Gray
    • Our Honor Defend
    • The Buckeye Nine
  • Penn State
    • Slow States
    • Black Shoe Diaries
    • Happy Valley Hardball
    • Penn State Clips
    • Linebacker U
    • Nittany White Out
  • Purdue
    • Boiled Sports
    • Hammer and Rails
  • Wisconsin
    • Bruce Ciskie

Links of Note

  • Baseball
    • College Baseball Today
    • The College Baseball Blog
  • Basketball
    • Ken Pomeroy
    • Hoop Math
    • John Gasaway
    • Luke Winn/Sports Illustrated
  • College Hockey
    • Chris Heisenberg (Class of 2016)
    • College Hockey Stats
    • Michigan College Hockey
    • Hockey's Future
    • Sioux Sports
    • USCHO
  • Football
    • Smart Football
    • Every Day Should Be Saturday
    • Matt Hinton/Grantland
    • Football Study Hall
    • Football Outsiders
    • Harold Stassen
    • NCAA D-I Stats Page
    • The Wizard Of Odds
    • CFB Stats
  • General
    • Sports Central
  • Local Interest
    • The Ann Arbor Chronicle
    • Arborwiki
    • Arbor Update
    • Ann Arbor Observer
    • Teeter Talk
    • Vacuum
  • Teams Of The D
    • Lions
      • Pride of Detroit
    • Pistons
      • Detroit Bad Boys
      • Need4Sheed
    • Tigers
      • Roar Of The Tigers
      • Bless You Boys
      • The Daily Fungo
      • The Detroit Tigers Weblog
    • Red Wings
      • Winging It In Motown
      • On The Wings
    • Michigan Sports Forum

Beveled Guilt

Site Search

Diaries

  • New
  • Popular
  • Hot
  • This Month in MGoBlog History - April 2008: No Spring Game at the Big House! Hockey loses to ND in the Frozen Four!
    Maize.Blue Wagner - 2 days ago
  • Thirteen unlucky minutes (TL;DNR-This is a bit of rant about the refs)
    docwhoblocked - 2 weeks ago
  • Fan Satisfaction Index End of Season Bball Survey
    OneFootIn - 2 weeks ago
  • How likely are we to revert to the mean?
    Bo Glue - 3 weeks ago
  • It's time to avenge Villanova's 1985 NCAA tourney upset over Michigan
    Communist Football - 3 weeks ago
  •  
  • 1 of 2
  • ››
more
  • This Month in MGoBlog History - April 2008: No Spring Game at the Big House! Hockey loses to ND in the Frozen Four!
    Maize.Blue Wagner - 939 views
  • It's time to avenge Villanova's 1985 NCAA tourney upset over Michigan
    Communist Football - 11 comments
  • This Month in MGoBlog History - April 2008: No Spring Game at the Big House! Hockey loses to ND in the Frozen Four!
    Maize.Blue Wagner - 7 comments

MGoBoard

  • New
  • Recent
  • Hot
  • New in-state offer: 2020 CB Enzo Jennings
    15 replies
  • New in-state offer: 2020 TE/DE Braiden McGregor
    11 replies
  • META : Drupalgeddon2. Unpatched Drupal servers being hacked
    11 replies
  • UCF Knights unveil 2017 championship banner
    89 replies
  • OT: Whose shirt did I buy? Also, thanks for the shirt
    43 replies
  • OT - LSU Spring Game Currently on ESPN/SEC Network
    33 replies
  • Baseball's win streak at 19 after 11th inning walkoff over PSU
    16 replies
  • OT: RIP Verne Troyer
    58 replies
  • OT: Record Store Day 2018!
    38 replies
  • Notre Dame Spring Game: analysis from M n B, video
    119 replies
  • Michigan Mercies Maryland, Softball Wins 12-1 (5 inn.)
    18 replies
  • Michigan Football Hype Video 2018-19 Season
    32 replies
  • Nebraska football
    105 replies
  • Lacrosse Falls to #7 Hopkins 10-9
    23 replies
  • This Week/Weekend's Football Visitors
    56 replies
  • ‹‹
  • 2 of 7
  • ››
  • Crootin': Joey Velazquez
    65 replies
  • Michigan Vs Notre Dame in 131 days
    73 replies
  • A piece of U-M broadcast history ends tonight.
    7 replies
  • Pep Hamilton on Shea: Can extend the play, make all the throws, plus other QB's
    124 replies
  • Pep and Partridge Pressers
    9 replies
  • OT: College Football video games coming back
    79 replies
  • LaMarr Woodley Opening K-8 School in Saginaw
    37 replies
  • Elysee Mbem-Bosse apologizes
    66 replies
  • UCF Knights unveil 2017 championship banner
    89 replies
  • Baseball's win streak up to 20; beats PSU 14-2 for series sweep
    18 replies
  • OT: Tigers at the 1/8th point
    47 replies
  • WBB Hello: 2020 G/W Makailah Griggs-Zeigler
    11 replies
  • Beaubien No-Hitter Clinches Sweep of Maryland, 8-0 (6 inn.)
    13 replies
  • Chris Partridge Presser From This Afternoon, video
    16 replies
  • OT: Map of college stadiums that sell alcohol
    96 replies
  •  
  • 1 of 7
  • ››
  • Belleville coach Jermain Crowell mad at UM again
    244 replies
  • Police investigating Elysee Mbem-Bosse for death threat against Harbaugh
    224 replies
  • "Being Not-Rich at UM" Guide
    168 replies
  • Semi-OT: What sports would you fix?
    158 replies
  • Elysee Mbem-Bosse disturbing tweets
    157 replies
  • Whats the Best Way to Make Flight Arrangements?
    149 replies
  • The Evolution of Commerce - What Industries are Dying, What's Thriving?
    148 replies
  • Pep Hamilton on Shea: Can extend the play, make all the throws, plus other QB's
    124 replies
  • OT - Jalen Hurts possibly looking to transfer
    121 replies
  • OT: best-selling musical artists by state of birth
    120 replies
  • Notre Dame Spring Game: analysis from M n B, video
    119 replies
  • No additional protest of Shea Patterson appeal by Ole Miss
    113 replies
  • NCAA changes rules to restrict James Doug Foug's super power
    107 replies
  • OT: MSU digs hole deeper, Engler adviser: Nassar survivor's claims of payout 'fake news'
    106 replies
  • Nebraska football
    105 replies
  •  
  • 1 of 7
  • ››

Support MGoBlog: buy stuff at Amazon

On Being An Old Man With A Precious Lawn

By Brian — June 9th, 2011 at 1:19 PM — 212 comments
Filed under:
  • 2011 notre dame
  • column-type things
  • dave brandon creates the future
  • get off my lawn you kids
  • uniforms
  • uniformz

Tomorrow at 8 PM Adidas and Michigan and Notre Dame will have an under-the-lights unveiling of the uniforms both will wear when the first night game in Michigan Stadium history goes down. That's odd: marketing 101 is "when you have bad news, release it on Friday at 5 PM." Michigan is treating their great unveiling like they're firing their coach for massive NCAA violations.

On the other hand, maybe it's not so odd. Yesterday the M-Den momentarily posted what looked like the official thing:

If that's what you're deploying, 8 PM isn't late enough. Broadcast the announcement from the Chinese factory where they'll be made at 4 AM Eastern.

The M-Den twitter feed later posted a three-part item expressing regret for the "mistake" that obviously failed to address whether or not those were the real McCoy. They likely are. Tom pointed out the close-up teaser image has the exact same M the mistakenly posted jersey does. If they're different, they're not much different.

Tomorrow we'll enter the ranks of schools that dress up like clowns for a little bit of money from a shoe company. Notre Dame will as well. I'll make some sarcastic comments, privately think anyone I see wearing one of the jerseys is a total sellout, and move on. This September we'll watch Clownz Faceoff 2011 and life will go on. It's not really a big deal. Everyone does it, and traditionalists sigh, and recruits say they're excited.

So why does this make me want to buy a shotgun, rocking chair, and lifetime supply of lawn fertilizer?

Well, there was a way to do this that would not give people hives. It did not require the assistance of a crack team of uniform designers, and it didn't have stripes conjured from one of their fever-dreams.

mel-anthony

The numbers on the helmets (and the different wing pattern on them), block Ms on the socks and shoulders, and overall retro stylings of the mid-60s (like gray face-masks) would have provided a distinctive, historically accurate look. (Doctor Saturday pointed out that it would have been a look from an era when Michigan and Notre Dame were in one of their periodic snits, but whatever.)

It wouldn't have been much different. It would have been cool, though:

bill-yearby

It would have been a genuine callback to another era of Michigan football. They could have brought out some former players, celebrated a Rose Bowl win, whatever. If they're going to do that in the Franken-uniforms they'll have to bring out a nighmarish assemblage of Horace Prettyman's arms and shoulders stapled to Bill Yearby's torso and head; the lower body will be a cyborg entity from 2211 that shoots postgame celebration laserz. The legs will stop at the knees because bony undead horror robots of 2211 come hovering or they don't come at all.

This bothers me because it makes it obvious that honoring the program's past doesn't crack the top several reasons they'll put the stripes on this fall, falling behind at least "money," "making Adidas happy," and "allowing Dave Brandon to 'create the future'." My money teat is easy to milk, but not that easy. I won't put on a Big Chill shirt with an Arby's logo on it and I'm not buying whatever that is above.

This makes me an old man but it also strikes me how stupid the corporate culture Dave Brandon comes from is. At a consumer-facing, mid-sized, publicly-traded corporation it's all about three months from now when you report your numbers and the stock price goes up or down and you're a hero or an idiot. Once companies go public they slowly lose the distinctive characteristics that made them successful in the first place and become a collection of generic suits*. The suits get paid exorbitant amounts of money to trade long-term goodwill for numbers that will allow another set of suits to increase the exorbitant amount of money they are getting paid.

The best example of how this doesn't have to happen is privately-owned Chik-Fil-A, which is still closed every Sunday for religious reasons and is so loved by Southerners that when the corporation bought the naming rights to the Peach Bowl it was generally regarded as an improvement. These are correlated factors.

These days a lot of tech companies are remaining private longer than they would have in the past—Facebook is the best example—in order to avoid the relentless make-your-numbers effect of being a public company. It seems like Michigan is announcing its IPO Friday night.

*[Once you get to the behemoth side of the scale you can maintain identity via monopoly: Google and Apple are distinctive entities that appear to have ethoses (ethii?) other than making money hand over fist; they can probably have these because they are making money hand over fist.]

(HT on the 60s uniform picks to "cutter," denizen of Michigan messageboards everywhere.)

  • Login or register to post comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
June 9th, 2011 at 2:28 PM
(Reply to #49) #102
Seth
Seth's picture
Joined: 10/14/2008
MGoPoints: 94461
Ref to last night's South

Ref to last night's South Park, wherein everything starts look (literally) like dookie.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
June 9th, 2011 at 3:40 PM
(Reply to #99) #103
M-Wolverine
M-Wolverine's picture
Joined: 10/04/2009
MGoPoints: 42199
What? They don't look happy to you?

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
June 9th, 2011 at 2:07 PM
#104
mmiicchhiiggaann
Joined: 01/31/2010
MGoPoints: 2138
Is there anything this

Is there anything this fanbase won't complain about? Angelique Chengelis reported yesterday that the players liked the design, shouldn't that be important to us? Also, recruits are always eating up how Oregon has so many uniforms-those are f***** ugly-so who cares just accept it.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
June 9th, 2011 at 2:13 PM
(Reply to #42) #105
profitgoblue
profitgoblue's picture
Joined: 09/01/2009
MGoPoints: 19557
Accept yourself

Don't tell me what to accept.  Its great that the players like them.  However, they aren't shelling out hundreds of dollars every year on tickets and clothing.  A sh-tty design is a sh-tty design, regardless of how much the fan base complaints or not.  Its a sh-tty design and is going to look stupid.  Its a shame and its all corporate mentality driven, just like Brian points out.  Its a sell-out and its sad.

 

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
June 9th, 2011 at 2:54 PM
(Reply to #51) #106
mmiicchhiiggaann
Joined: 01/31/2010
MGoPoints: 2138
Your right they aren't

Your right they aren't shelling out hundreds of dollars on tickets, they are dedicating hundreds of hours of their lives instead...hmmm..And its BS that we say the design is corporate mentality based-if the design was solely created to make money they would have designed the most radical yet LOVED design so every single fan had to own it.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
June 9th, 2011 at 4:24 PM
(Reply to #51) #107
Deep Under Cover
Deep Under Cover's picture
Joined: 08/24/2010
MGoPoints: 830
Are they requiring you to buy

Are they requiring you to buy a jersey? Are you somehow not getting a hundred dollars worth of entertainment when you buy a ticket because of the jerseys they wear?  If its ugly, the accounting will show, but I don't see why people feel like they are losing financially with these new jerseys.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
June 9th, 2011 at 2:15 PM
(Reply to #42) #108
Bando Calrissian
Bando Calrissian's picture
Joined: 07/02/2008
MGoPoints: 60183
That's cool and all, but how

That's cool and all, but how do you explain Penn State still remaining successful with uniforms that haven't changed since about 1902 and a coach who was around to implement them?  In fact, PSU's uniforms got even plainer for this season with the removal of the trim.

The claim that we need to do stuff like this to "attract recruits" and such, to enter into the Oregon arms race, is just silly.  We're Michigan.  We don't have Phil Knight in a box at Autzen listening to the playcalls on a headset, diagramming plays for his guests on a dry erase board.  Plenty of schools do just fine without crazy WR gloves and space-age everything.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
June 9th, 2011 at 2:24 PM
(Reply to #54) #109
MI Expat NY
Joined: 07/24/2008
MGoPoints: 7495
Really, Penn State got rid of

Really, Penn State got rid of the trim?  That's a rather radical change, all things considered.

To add to your point, plenty of great players are also lining up to play for Nick Saban and his boring old-school uniforms.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
June 9th, 2011 at 2:30 PM
(Reply to #67) #110
Bando Calrissian
Bando Calrissian's picture
Joined: 07/02/2008
MGoPoints: 60183
http://pennstatermag.files.wo

http://pennstatermag.files.wordpress.com/2011/04/dsc_0234.jpg

Turns out the trim was only introduced because there were questions of whether they could get the trim in the exact same color as the rest of the jersey, as the trim was a different fabric and necessary for the way in which the jerseys were designed.  They've since found they can do without the trim with advancements in fabric and design, so when given the option, PSU decided to ditch the trim.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
June 9th, 2011 at 2:42 PM
(Reply to #75) #111
MI Expat NY
Joined: 07/24/2008
MGoPoints: 7495
Wow.  It's been like 30 years

Wow.  It's been like 30 years with that design.  Seems to me that the trim became the new "traditional look."  

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
June 9th, 2011 at 3:36 PM
(Reply to #54) #112
jmblue
Joined: 11/07/2008
MGoPoints: 56299
Of course, the only

Of course, the only traditional thing about PSU is its uniforms.  The Beaver Stadium experience is NFL-lite.  PSU now plays the Zombie Nation song after TDs.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
June 9th, 2011 at 3:41 PM
(Reply to #42) #113
M-Wolverine
M-Wolverine's picture
Joined: 10/04/2009
MGoPoints: 42199
Thanks for the advice

Bobby Knight.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
June 9th, 2011 at 2:12 PM
#114
Hoke_Floats
Joined: 09/21/2010
MGoPoints: 2226
Not really a big deal

Things change, this is just one thing changing for 1 game

The entire idea of a night game is crazy to old timers anyway, so why not double dip with a wacked out jersey

Its not the nickname, its not the fight song, its not the helmet, its just some goofy stuff on the arms

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
June 9th, 2011 at 2:30 PM
(Reply to #48) #115
2plankr
Joined: 03/13/2009
MGoPoints: -433
THIS. If youre for the

THIS.

If youre for the night game, you cant really complain about this IMO.  "Toe meets leather at noon".  I dont recall Bo saying anything about uniforms.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
June 9th, 2011 at 2:55 PM
(Reply to #74) #116
PurpleStuff
PurpleStuff's picture
Joined: 04/21/2009
MGoPoints: 15963
That makes zero sense

People aren't pissed about the uniform change simply because the current look is the way we've always done things (or because they just don't like staying up late).  Playing at night is about making your product (to use Brandon-speak) available to a wider audience (you're just going to reach more viewers in primetime).  It is the same reason we played during the day for decades (most people can't see in the dark). 

Tinkering with some of the best uniforms in college football (Notre Dame is equally ridiculous for doing this) is about changing the product itself, a product loaded with meaning/identity/history for countless people.  If Zingermann's opens a new location, that is a positive (or at least not a negative to anyone who isn't just bitching for the sake of bitching about the good old days).  If they start selling McDonald's-quality burgers instead of their current fare, then people are (justifiably) going to be upset about it.  The fact that these fashion abortions would make a dirty Big Mac look delicious only exacerbates the problem.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
June 9th, 2011 at 3:51 PM
(Reply to #105) #117
Hoke_Floats
Joined: 09/21/2010
MGoPoints: 2226
zingermans - mcdonalds

to take your example

if we can't stop the pass in awesome uniforms it doesn't matter if we can't stop the pass in good uniforms

 

What if the devil made you a deal.  UofM wears these uniforms all season long and they win a MNC?

would you take it?

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
June 10th, 2011 at 9:45 AM
(Reply to #137) #118
tubauberalles
Joined: 06/30/2008
MGoPoints: 1101
Or how about

If they wear these uniforms and everyone here gets paid a million dollars?  Of course we'd take it.  But there's no correlation in either case.  Are you trying to say we're a bunch of prostitutes and are simply haggling over price?

 

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
June 9th, 2011 at 2:14 PM
#119
MGlobules
Joined: 11/17/2008
MGoPoints: 16432
ask the people at the Ipad factory where the spate of suicides

occurred about whatever virtue Apple retains by remaining private (to work there you now have to sign a promise you won't commit suicide); ask the kids picking up cancer as they pick through piles of discarded computer parts in various parts of Africa and India; ask those of us who suffered through two bouts of rampant motherboard failure with early maclappies (why we're not mcslappies); or--hell--ask Linus Torvalds, who says that when he met Steve Jobs the guy had no interest whatever in talking computing, programming, or innovation, just sales figures (Torvalds' conclusion--he's a flapping idiot). 

This is about as cranky--and self-contradictory--as Brian gets. (Why were you happy when a corporate CEO was installed in the first place? That was the time to piss and moan, not when--predictably--he does what CEOs do.)

The Adidas design is much nicer than the utterly generic unis in the photos. Denard is gonna make it shine.

I will buy Brian on a lot of fronts but as fashion maven--not.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
June 9th, 2011 at 7:34 PM
(Reply to #52) #120
03 Blue 07
03 Blue 07's picture
Joined: 07/01/2008
MGoPoints: 3494
Apple isn't private

It's a publicly traded company. Symbol: AAPL

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
June 9th, 2011 at 9:31 PM
(Reply to #183) #121
Picktown GoBlue
Picktown GoBlue's picture
Joined: 01/21/2011
MGoPoints: 2904
and Foxconn

suicide rates are actually below the general population rates as noted here.  When you have more employees than the population of Detroit, and you even provide the towns for the employees to live in, then you're likely to have all stories and problems that population can generate.  I believe this is the company that you're trying to talk about with the "will not off oneself pledge" and yes, they are the contract manufacturer for some of Apple's most popular products, but they are not AAPL.  Foxconn is secretive, but it is not a private company, traded on the Hong Kong and Taiwan exchanges.  Not trying to let them off for some of their business practices and how they treat employees, but they really don't fit the example here.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
June 9th, 2011 at 2:17 PM
#122
badjuju81
badjuju81's picture
Joined: 07/10/2009
MGoPoints: 259
The case for a patch

Michigan is supposed to be different, but all too often we are the same.  Like we need money to fuel good things, including expanding our number of varsity sports to include lacrosse.  New revenue streams, like selling special jerseys, are helpful to that end.  That means is not eggregious in and of itself.  However, in this particular case, the execution is hideous.

We will forever wish to have celebrated this event in our traditional uniforms, with perhaps a tasteful and discrete commemorative patch, a la the 100th game vs tsio.  That would have been cool.  People would buy those and wear them proudly.  If they sold jerseys with 100th game patches now, people would buy them.

Why is this not a win-win?  Why wouldn't his make the athletic dept., adidas, and the fans all happy?

Kids are welcome to run on my lawn, but not to take a dump on it!

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
June 9th, 2011 at 2:18 PM
#123
Six Zero
Six Zero's picture
Joined: 09/05/2008
MGoPoints: 10549
So Brian

Do you like 'em?

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
June 9th, 2011 at 3:43 PM
(Reply to #56) #124
M-Wolverine
M-Wolverine's picture
Joined: 10/04/2009
MGoPoints: 42199
The question is

When is legoman going to sport one?

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
June 9th, 2011 at 2:18 PM
#125
321goBLUE
321goBLUE's picture
Joined: 05/09/2011
MGoPoints: 74

At least the facemasks are gray

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
June 9th, 2011 at 2:22 PM
#126
cutter
Joined: 07/07/2008
MGoPoints: 814
Thanks for the shout out . . .

Thanks for the shout out, Brian.  I largely agree with everything you have to say about not only the throwback jerseys, but also about some of the less then enviable workings of corporations everywhere.

I think one of the problems here is that there's a difference between a throwback uniform and a throwback jersey.  The uniform includes everything from head to toe and as Brian points out, there were some distinctive features on the mid-60s uniform that would have made it a throwback to the teams of that era.

The problem is that you can't readily sell that entire look unless there's a major market out there for white socks with block M's on them or mini-helmets with numbers on them.  The main item that Michigan, Adidas and M-Den will sell will be the jerseys and they have to look distinctive enough for the common fan (or more specifically, the demographic that buys these things) to be interested in purchasing.  Quite frankly, a simple blue jersey with number on the front and back and no name probably doesn't meet that objective.  Maybe adding a block M on the sleeves would do it, but that's evidentally not the direction the Athletic Department is going at this time. 

I think that's unfortunate because one of the major marketing points about Michigan is tradition coupled with innovation.  We certainly see that in the stadium renovations, and for those responsible for it (including David Brandon), I say congratulations--well done.  But these uniforms--which look like a composite of a late 19th century look coupled with a varsity football "M" sweater--misses on both counts.  While I will withhold final judgement until we actually see the entire "look" unveiled tomorrow, right now I have to say that they don't look very appealing.

When properly done, throwback uniforms can be pretty neat, but there's always an urge to tamper with what's classically good.  I thought it would present a pretty fun (and easily marketable) narrative for both Michigan and Notre Dame to play this first night game in Ann Arbor in replica uniforms from the 60s--certainly both team's helmets would be different looking (different wings and numbers for Michigan, shamrock for Notre Dame).  It appears to me that U-M is going in a different direction with this.

One final thought.  David Brandon did say words to the effect that the version of the uniform first provided in the Detroit Free Press was inaccurate.  In actuality, they do have a lot more in common than Brandon might have led us to think--and that's unfortunate on his part.  By and large, I've agreed with most of the things he's done during his tenure and I applaude him for the way he handled the NCAA investigation into Michigan's football program (if you want to see how not to do it, cast your eyes to Columbus, Ohio).  Later this month, he'll be publicly presenting the FY 2012 UM Athletic Department budget and he's stated in the papers that he'll be putting together a long-term strategic plan to grow Michigan athletics.  It's a big responsibility and I wish hiim well on it.  My only point is this--there's no need to get cute about some things, and that includes the throwbacks.  When all else fails, go back to what works best--that's why UM hired Brady Hoke, isn't it?

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
June 9th, 2011 at 2:22 PM
#127
WalterMitty
WalterMitty's picture
Joined: 07/03/2008
MGoPoints: 921
I like em

I shall buy one. Might get laid in it, too.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
June 9th, 2011 at 2:34 PM
#128
profitgoblue
profitgoblue's picture
Joined: 09/01/2009
MGoPoints: 19557
Chick-fil-A

I'll take a #1 with Chick-Fil-A sauce over that sh-tty "throwback" jersey every day.

 P.S.  I suspect that those of you that know what I mean likely agree whole-heartedly.

 

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
June 9th, 2011 at 2:46 PM
(Reply to #69) #129
Six Zero
Six Zero's picture
Joined: 09/05/2008
MGoPoints: 10549
Amen to that, brother

If you put Chick-Fil-A sauce on the Geico gecko (sitting just to the left as I type this), I'd eat the little green punk alive.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
June 9th, 2011 at 3:03 PM
(Reply to #69) #130
aenima0311
aenima0311's picture
Joined: 11/21/2008
MGoPoints: 717

Amen. Chick-fil-a is one of the few positives of traveling to the south. I've never had the sauce though, I haven't been near a CFA in a few years though....

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
June 9th, 2011 at 3:03 PM
(Reply to #69) #131
aenima0311
aenima0311's picture
Joined: 11/21/2008
MGoPoints: 717

Amen. Chick-fil-a is one of the few positives of traveling to the south. I've never had the sauce though, I haven't been near a CFA in a few years though....

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
June 9th, 2011 at 2:35 PM
#132
BlueTimesTwo
BlueTimesTwo's picture
Joined: 06/30/2008
MGoPoints: 3439
Meh

I don't think the throwbacks (or retros, if you prefer) are great, but I also don't share in the wailing and gnashing of teeth over them.  Despite their apparent disconnection with Michigan history and their rugby styling, my Michigan degrees are not going to burst into flames because of them, nor are they going to cause people to point and laugh when I wear the rest of my Michigan gear.  The brand and the tradition extend far beyond what the team wears for any one game (or say, our record over the last three seasons).

If you hate the jerseys, don't buy one.  Flood DB's inbox with complaints.  That is your right as fans and alumni.  Since the concern is that DB is too corporate, do your part to make sure that the ROI on this project is underwhelming.  At the same time, if people snap up the jerseys like crazy, and the recruits love them, then maybe we have to accept that not everybody shares our sense of nostalgia.

Just out of curiosity, did any of the get off my lawn folks ever own one of those starter jackets with 15 different Michigan logos on them?

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
June 9th, 2011 at 2:48 PM
(Reply to #84) #133
Hoke_Floats
Joined: 09/21/2010
MGoPoints: 2226
Well done sir

Looking forward to your lawn party

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
June 9th, 2011 at 3:15 PM
(Reply to #84) #134
leu2500
Joined: 01/22/2011
MGoPoints: 1068
The width of the stripes

Makes all the difference. And I seriously doubt that any of those stripes were highlighter yellow.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
June 9th, 2011 at 4:24 PM
(Reply to #135) #135
gbdub
gbdub's picture
Joined: 02/16/2010
MGoPoints: 12685
Are the block Ms shirts

Are the block Ms shirts really "jerseys"? I think they're varsity sweaters - when they played they wore the leather vests (possibly over shirts with stripes!). Note that in the 1901 photo, the shirts with shoulder pads (presumably game wear) don't have a block M. In none of those photos do you see block M chest and sleeve stripes on the same man.

The night game jersey is an unfortunate conglomeration of the styles, I think. Just stripes or just the block M would look better (Plus there will be helmet numbers from the 60's too!) As it is, too busy.

I actually kind of like the photos with the wide striped sleeves and a padded leather vest with a block M above the left breast. That would be a good look I think - wide stripes on the shoulders with a block M above and to the left of the chest numbers, where the number is on the as-designed jersey. Basically, swap the numbers and the block M on the chest and make the stripes wider.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
June 9th, 2011 at 4:26 PM
(Reply to #149) #136
MI Expat NY
Joined: 07/24/2008
MGoPoints: 7495
I'm not sure how

I'm not sure how representitive of the game jerseys those old team photos are.  I'm not sure the tradition of being photographed in your game uniforms had taken hold yet.  

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
June 9th, 2011 at 5:43 PM
(Reply to #152) #137
gbdub
gbdub's picture
Joined: 02/16/2010
MGoPoints: 12685
Well, they are wearing padded

Well, they are wearing padded knickers, cleats, and shoulder pads in many of the photos - I'm assuming those items were part of the uniform. But the block  M turtleneck sweaters lack the features of "equipment" - no padded shoulders in the early 1900's photos, no vest in the 1890's photos (however in 1892 and on the guy in the top left corner of 1895, it does look like the block M is being worn over some degree of padding). I'd guess those were varsity sweaters. Then again I think "uniform" wasn't that uniform back then (e.g. different players may have worn different gear based on position / personal preference).

The main point I was making is that "large Block M on chest" and "rugby striped sleeves" have never appeared on the same uniform, and combining them looks lousy. I think one or the other would look a lot better.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
June 9th, 2011 at 5:32 PM
(Reply to #149) #138
Rasmus
Rasmus's picture
Joined: 07/02/2009
MGoPoints: 2201
Not sure, but

in the 1901 photo, at least one of the players is wearing the M sweater over a padded shirt. I think it's possible they did wear the M as warmups, over the padding, etc.

We need some game photos from that era! Here's one from 1902:

Don't see any block Ms. The caption at Bentley is:

Michigan captain "Boss" Weeks about to stop Ohio for a short loss. 1902 game at Regents Field, Ann Arbor

Notice Ohio is wearing striped jerseys under the leather vests (like the Michigan captain in the 1899 team photo, see below) -- gotta think it was a common away-game look.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
June 9th, 2011 at 5:52 PM
(Reply to #158) #139
gbdub
gbdub's picture
Joined: 02/16/2010
MGoPoints: 12685
Interestingly, the mix of

Interestingly, the mix of vests/sweaters seems a common theme in team photos from this era. Here is 1890 Harvard:

Stripes were also common. Here's John Heisman (YTH) in his 1891 uniform:

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
June 9th, 2011 at 6:40 PM
(Reply to #158) #140
Rasmus
Rasmus's picture
Joined: 07/02/2009
MGoPoints: 2201
And here's the 1901 team in the first Rose Bowl (1902)

Michigan looks to be running the same play as Ohio in the above, just a lot more effectively:

Still no Ms visible. They are wearing them in the photos from the parade (before the game, I think), but not on the field. Kind of a "dress uniform," I guess.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
June 9th, 2011 at 4:31 PM
(Reply to #135) #141
Rasmus
Rasmus's picture
Joined: 07/02/2009
MGoPoints: 2201
Notice the striped socks in the 1895 photo

Yikes!

Notice also the striped lines of stitching on the shoulder padding of the 501-0 (1901) team -- probably also part of the inspiration for the stripes.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
June 9th, 2011 at 4:16 PM
(Reply to #84) #142
wile_e8
wile_e8's picture
Joined: 06/30/2008
MGoPoints: 6033
To say that this is is

To say that this is is unprecedented is simply accurate, because I don't see this jersery used in any of the pictures you posted. Sure, it has elements from previous uniforms, but this exact jersey hasn't been worn before. Therefore it's unprecedented.

I think if the jersey was an exact replica of one of the jerseys in your pictures, instead of kludging together multiple elements from multiple eras, you would have more people on your lawn.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
June 9th, 2011 at 4:45 PM
(Reply to #151) #143
MI Expat NY
Joined: 07/24/2008
MGoPoints: 7495
I agree with you, it's just

I agree with you, it's just they did too much.  If they insisted on having stripes and the block M, they should have gone with the vest look where only the sleeves had stripes and the rest was a solid Navy Blue, since the only era where we see striped sweaters coincided with players wearing vests.  

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
June 9th, 2011 at 4:47 PM
(Reply to #151) #144
wile_e8
wile_e8's picture
Joined: 06/30/2008
MGoPoints: 6033
That's not my point. I

That's not my point. I understand that they aren't going to wear turtlenecks and vests, my point was about kludging the design elements from different vests and turtlenecks. Precedented would be taking the design of one jersey worn by one person in one of those photos of one of those teams that won a shit ton of national and Big Ten/Western Conference championships and when the coach was FMFY, doing the best to fit it onto a modern jersey, and adding numbers.  I think this would get more support than putting stripes on the sleeves like one team did (1920), but making them wide stripes other teams wore for an entire jersey (1884/1889), and then adding a block 'M' like other teams did (1891/1892/1895/1901).

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
June 9th, 2011 at 6:17 PM
(Reply to #84) #145
BlueTimesTwo
BlueTimesTwo's picture
Joined: 06/30/2008
MGoPoints: 3439
If the players all grow

If the players all grow mustaches like the ones in the pictures, and Hoke comes out in a suit and a bowler hat, then it would totally make the old-timey design elements worthwhile.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
June 9th, 2011 at 2:39 PM
#146
Yostal
Yostal's picture
Joined: 06/30/2008
MGoPoints: 4457
Two things:

1). To those of you saying "It's just one game", I would politely counterpoint that many see "just one game" as a means of opening the pathway to a slippery slope. 

2). I was pushing for 1957, Ron Kramer-era throwbacks, where the longsleeves could come from a compression shirt, grey facemasks, and numbers on the helmets, so the 1965 look is very close to that:

And if that doesn't work for you, how about 1940 Tom Harmon style throwbacks...

And lastly, if that doesn't work, further honor Desmond and the 20th Anniversary of the catch:

And for those of you thinking this is a lot of to do about uniforms, politely, uniforms are a critical common thread that links the three men above together.  So if we're bent out of shape about it, maybe it's because symbols are imbued with meaning.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
June 9th, 2011 at 3:11 PM
(Reply to #104) #147
CWoodson
CWoodson's picture
Joined: 09/15/2009
MGoPoints: 1455
The fact that stripes have

The fact that stripes have existed on Michigan uniforms in the past does not justify these abominations.  They're ugly as sin, a pure money grab, and most notably, nothing like them has ever been worn by a Michigan football team.

If you want to justify them as no big deal, or they actually look great, or it'll pay for XYZ, that's certainly your right.  I don't think it's something a team with iconic uniforms and our tradition should be doing, but that's just my opinion and it's far from gospel.

Just don't call them "retro" or "throwback" and justify them that way, because intermittent long-sleeve stripes of varying width doesn't make that true.  This is RAWK MUSIC jersey design at its worst.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
June 9th, 2011 at 9:26 PM
(Reply to #104) #148
Yostal
Yostal's picture
Joined: 06/30/2008
MGoPoints: 4457
Fair Enough...

I know, I know I'm weird about this.  As an historian and a uniform afficiando, I should be all over this.  But I have an explanation.  My four sports passions are Michigan football, Red Wings hockey, Tigers baseball, and Michigan hockey.  Leaving aside the last one, which rolls through jersey styles like Italy went through post-war governments, the previous three all basically have had the same uniform since 1938.  There are slight tweaks, but the Red Wings, Tigers, and Wolverines have all basically had the same uniform framework for nearly three quarters of a century* means that they have traditions largely unparalleled in American sport.

Honestly, if it were a genuine effort to move a real template of a Michigan jersey past on to a modern template, I'd be more likely to not care.  But because this is clearly such a naked money grab, and so clearly an effort by adidas to sublimate their corportate symbol on to the MIchigan brand, I find it disturbing.

*--So is everyone looking forward to the 75 years of "our helmet has wings" celebration for the 2013 season?

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
June 9th, 2011 at 2:39 PM
#149
AmaizinBlue
Joined: 01/08/2011
MGoPoints: 12
No context

If these are the unis, then they contradict all of the branding verbage that we've been hearing so much about since RR was fired.

They make me think of raccoon skin coats, straw boater hats, the charleston, ukeleles and a pending stock market crash.

They do not reinforce all of the michigan man, tradition, he gets it, man ball, toughness, finger pointing and podium thumping talk we've had to listen too since January.

There is nothing Michigan about them other than color.  The crackly 'M' and striping are faux design.  We've been Disneyfied.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
June 9th, 2011 at 2:42 PM
#150
Rasmus
Rasmus's picture
Joined: 07/02/2009
MGoPoints: 2201
Franken-uniforms

Most likely the 1899 photo is the key used by the designer. The finished version combines three elements of the photo: [1] the classic block M jersey; [2] the striped jersey worn by the team captain in the photo (I'd like to see game photos, but this was likely worn for some games, maybe away?); [3] the stitching motif on the M is probably a reference to the stitched padding on the shoulders of some jerseys from that time (seen second from the right in the 1899 photo).

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
June 9th, 2011 at 2:54 PM
(Reply to #90) #151
BlueTimesTwo
BlueTimesTwo's picture
Joined: 06/30/2008
MGoPoints: 3439
There is something to be said

There is something to be said about being able to have throwbacks that go back over 100 years.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
  • « first
  • ‹ previous
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • next ›
  • last »
Powered by Drupal, an open source content management system
Theme provided by Roopletheme; sidebars adapted from Chris Murphy.