Athletic Director Time: Stakes Comment Count

Brian

Previously: overview.

9700360519_02979a29f4_z

feeling that a ticket you have is a precious thing is good

More games should mean things

This is something that Brandon was moving towards getting right, save for the horrible contract that saw him eat an extra Notre Dame home game at the (hopefully temporary) end of that series. And that contract might not have been his doing.

This year's football schedule has one tomato can on it, UNLV, and three actual teams: BYU, Oregon State, and Utah. BYU and Oregon State are one-off home games. They're more expensive, but we've finally reached the point where spending an extra few hundred thousand dollars on an opponent like that has a clear ROI in ticket sales. (That is the reason Brandon was getting that right.) One of the smartest things he said during his tenure was about this.

Unfortunately, I have been able to google it to get the exact quote, but it was along the lines of "we have to get out of the business of scheduling games that feel like exhibitions to fans." He largely put his money where his mouth was in that department. Or tried to, anyway. It still galls that Michigan State landed a home and home with Alabama and Michigan was forced to play a "neutral" site matchup in Dallas against them.

But Brandon was right: repeated tomato can poundings make the fan look at his ticket and feel like a sap. The Product™ boils down to that: you look at the ticket that has a section and seat and opponent on it and you feel a certain way. For years many of these tickets have made you feel like it's another way to pay for the Ohio State game. That is going to remain true, but being less explicit about it is a first step on the road towards making fans feel like part of the enterprise instead of marks.

There's not much flexibility when it comes to college football. Michigan's going to play in their division and they've got three games a year (Indiana, Rutgers, Maryland) that aren't going to feel like much no matter what happens. They've been filling out the nonconference schedule with more respectable opponents; further additions have to happen a decade or more out. The wider landscape of college football will help here: double the number of teams in the playoff means double the number of late-season games that can impact the championship picture.

500x281[1]

Michigan's other two revenue sports could use some help. This year's hockey schedule was a textbook example of what not to do: a weird one-off at Ferris State before even the exhibition games, home games piled into the fall when most fans are busy with football, an almost two-month absence from Yost in January and February punctuated by a fiasco of an outdoor game taken in by fewer fans than would have been at a home game.

Meanwhile, basketball plays a lot of nonconference games against the Coppin States of the world. It was seven last year (they just happened to lose two): Hillsdale, Bucknell, Detroit, Nicholls State, NJIT, EMU, and Coppin State. I don't see a great solution there given the way college basketball works: you're going to have a preseason tournament, you're going to have a game just before Christmas no one wants to play, there's not enough room to do anything interesting.

The conference, though… the conference could use some tweaking. Here are a couple of concrete plans to make basketball and hockey games have more wow factor on the ticket.

Basketball: making 14 an asset

Wisconsin ran away with the Big Ten title this year. Their last seven games included matchups against 9-9 Illinois, 4-14 Penn State, and two against 6-12 Minnesota. What if their stretch run was nothing but the other three games—Maryland, Michigan State, Ohio State—and so was everyone else's? And what if you could never point to anyone's schedule and say that's why team X won?

This is possible, even in a 14-team conference if you're willing to rethink a conference schedule. You can have a true, fair, thrilling championship in 19 conference games:

  • FIRST 13: round-robin amongst all teams
  • LAST 6: split the league into top and bottom halves, have second round-robin within.

Everyone in each half plays the same schedule. The last three weeks of the regular season are an all-out brawl for a banner that means something it might not in a world where getting the wrong teams twice could knock you down a peg.

The downsides are real but not insurmountable. You would not know the last six games of your schedule until a few days before. With home sites that's not a huge problem. There will be demand for those games. And teams right around the cutoff could find their path to a bid get harder as teams just above it draw a bunch of tough games and teams below it lose the opportunity to knock off a Wisconsin. That effect is probably marginal (on average it's turning three games into somewhat harder or easier ones).

If they tried this I bet they would never even think about going back once they saw, say, Iowa, Michigan, Michigan State, Wisconsin, OSU, Indiana, and Illinois have a three-week war for a Big Ten title.

Hockey: a state championship

Wigan-celebrate-FA-Cup-wi-005[1]

The FA Cup: the only time anyone has ever believed in Wigan

There's not a whole lot Hypothetical Michigan AD can do about the Big Ten or NCAA's playoff format. (It does sound like the national tournament is in line for some long-overdue changes.) But he can probably get the Michigan schools together to provide early-season matchups some additional oomph.

The formation of the Big Ten is something college hockey needed if they were ever going to expand past two western conferences, but it broke up a bunch of 40-year-old rivalries that mean something to college hockey fans. Instead of having every Michigan team save Tech in a single conference, now they're spread across three. The GLI has tried to compensate by inviting a Michigan team for the foreseeable future, but that doesn't do much for the three teams that aren't invited in any particular year.

Nor does it have that much selling power. The GLI is a nice event, but it's always been a little silly that Michigan has a banner for years they won it. It's two games. The trophy doesn't have a name. It's not, say, a 40-pound bronzed cast of Red Berenson's head.

What if the first half of the season had a different competition in it? Soccer does this to excellent effect. A state championship competition that features World Cup/Champions League style groups would be a reasonable time commitment and a way to inject stakes into otherwise fuzzy early-season matchups.

A problem: there are seven Michigan teams, not eight. We will fill in the eighth spot with a guest program. This could either rotate between reasonably local programs (ND, OSU, BGSU, Miami, even PSU) or be permanent.

Hypothetical groups:

GROUP A GROUP B
Michigan Michigan State
Notre Dame Western Michigan
Michigan Tech LSSU
Northern Michigan Ferris State

Each team plays the others twice, whether that's home and home or not. The next year invert home/road and do it again; then switch the groups up. The only hard and fast rule is that Michigan and Michigan State are separate. The four teams in the bottom two rows are all WCHA members. They can either book an early-season conference series to count for the state championship or schedule bonus nonconference series, their choice.

After that's done, the top two in each group play for the Michigan Themed Hockey Trophy* at the Joe. (The other two also go to the Joe and play because everyone wants to know they've got X number of games booked.)

This is a commitment of eight games—six for teams currently in the WCHA. For teams in the Big Ten (20 conference games), Hockey East (22), or NCHC (24) that is doable. It does seriously restrict the flexibility of WCHA teams (28 games), but a lot of these games are the ones these schools would want to schedule anyway. For example, Ferris's nonconference schedule included two games against State, one against Michigan, and the GLI. Tech played Michigan and in the GLI. They would be signing up for another two or three games only. And the lack of flexibility is offset by the fact that they're locking in a Michigan or Michigan State series annually.

If you can pull this off then your early season, normally something without stakes other than the hope down the road your Pairwise ranking will be good, becomes three weekends in which you hope to qualify for a GLI that means you can print out shirts that say State Champs and kiss let's just say a 40-pound bronze cast of Red Berenson's head.

130624233204-stanley-cup-trophy-horizontal-large-gallery[1]

like this except with Red Berenson's head

Play for things. Give us stakes. A ticket that reads "Red Berenson's 40 Pound Head Tournament" is better than one that just says "Western Michigan."

*[Options: unearth the Ron Mason trophy that went kaput when the CCHA did, inaugurate a Red Berenson trophy for the former Michigan player and Detroit Red Wing, or go studiously neutral but somewhat silly by naming it after a guy who didn't play college hockey.

Gordie Howe played in the defunct minor-pro version of the USHL for a year, not the CHL, and he's Gordie Howe. So he's a good idea if you're going that route.]

Comments

FreddieMercuryHayes

April 21st, 2015 at 1:23 PM ^

I love the basketball idea.  But unless the rest of the country does it too, I just don't see it working.  You're just basically putting your best teams in worse positions in the NCAA tournament.  And it also precludes a bad team from making a second half of conference run to make it to the tournament (I think UM has some experience here).  I think Delany (with the advent of more a la carte TV options) just screwed the B1G.  There's just no good answers anymore with 14 teams that also doesn't screw your own league over when it comes to post-season stuff.

Also, while I appreciate the team playing actual teams in the non-conference, I also feel like it just puts the team in bad positions when it comes to post-season stuff.  No one cares about who you beat, as long as you win.  I guess the biggest argument against this was OSU this year, but then again, that was OSU with Urban Meyer as a HC.  The committee/TV will extend every effort to get them into the playoff because of viewership.

Muttley

April 21st, 2015 at 2:12 PM ^

That would be fun.  But it's the anti-Max Bielfeldt.  It has two achilles heels.

First, as FreddieMercuryHayes points out, net-of-all-things it would hurt the B1G come NCAA selection time.  Say you qualify for the 5th-7th spot of B1G Dog Group play.  You're probably on the good side of the bubble going into group play, but on the bad side at its end.  And of course this arrangement puts more losses on the top half of the league at the end of the season.  And while the 8th-10th teams in Little Dog  Group Play may pad their W/L record, I don't think the magnitude of their upside boost from the tourney committee would be equal to the downward hit of the B1G Dog Group Play victims.

The other problem that might be even more of a deal-breaker for the B1G administration would be the impact on ticket sales.  Yes, you are adding excitement in the effective "NCAA Tourney Level" Big Dog Group.  But those teams are probably already doing well w/ ticket sales.

On the other hand, you create the "wait-until-next-year" Little Dog Group, with tickets to sell against only non-NCAA tourney-bound teams.  These are the teams that have ticket sale issues, and this arrangement just made that problem worse.

JJJ

April 21st, 2015 at 8:50 PM ^

Heck Yeah,

I've been wishing for this exact scenario for years. Maybe somebody could get Wayne State to start up a program again to get to 8 teams or we could get a Div 3 team to come in like Adrian or Finlandia (think Hoosiers the movie)...that would be awesome!

 

 

JJJ

April 21st, 2015 at 9:14 PM ^

Just extend the GLI a day and you could do this to accomodate 8 teams. Double headers on Thursday, Friday and Saturday and championship on Sunday. If you absolutely need to avoid 3 games in a row you could start on Wednesday!

I'm sure Hollis would be game

mgob-rad

April 21st, 2015 at 1:39 PM ^

Is there anyway we can fix the scheduling to go back to having one MSU/OSU home game and one away game? The years that both of them are away games (plus the fact that we no longer play ND) means every other year we will have no home rivalry game, and that blows.



Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad

cutter

April 21st, 2015 at 2:56 PM ^

I'm shocked Brian actually wrote something complimentary about David Brandon.  I suppose now that Brandon is no longer Michigan's Athletic Director, he can afford to let up a bit on the vitriol.

That said, what Brian discussed on this post is correct--Brandon was moving towards having a more compellling non-conference schedule (in part by eliminating MAC teams and replacing them with Mountain West and American Athletic Conference programs).  He was also doing this prior to the first four-team college football playoff, so he couldn't have had a solid sense of what non-conference scheduling strategy would work best in terms of the post-season.

It will be interesting to see what Jim Hackett and Jim Harbaugh do regarding the non-conference scheduling.  Brandon scheduled two home-and-home series with Washington and Virginia Tech in 2020/1.  So not only will the non-conference portion of the season be fairly compelling those years, it will also mean the probable loss of one home game over that two year period (UM will likely have six home games those two seasons).  

UM has one open date in 2018 when the Wolverines open with Arkansas and then play Southern Methodist two weeks later.  In 2019, UM opens the season in Fayetteville against the Razorbacks.  That means Hackett/Harbaugh have to schedule one game for 2018 and two for 2019.  Will they do what Brandon did in 2020/1 and have a second Power Five team on the schedule?  Or will they "schedule" down" and have a couple of pay for play games.

As far as the Michigan State/Ohio State set up is concerned, the people you need to direct your attention to are the ones in the Big Ten office.  When Maryland and Rutgers joined the conference, it was pretty obvious that the B1G wanted two of Michigan, Michigan State, Ohio State and Penn State to play either at Maryland or at Rutgers each season.   Once the rotation of teams playing UMd and RU was figured out, the next step was figuring out how the four remaining eastern division opponents per team was going to be set up.

In the case of Michigan, it looks like the conference took the same relative strength rankings they had when Nebraska joined and kept them in place.  That meant for UM, it was 1. Ohio State, 2, Penn State, 3. Michigan State and 4. Indiana.  So if you have 1 and 3 in one schedulng rotation, then 2 and 4 goes in the other one.

While I can appreciate the longstanding rivalry with Michigan State, I imagine the Big Ten (and perhaps the television networks) still see Penn State as a blue chip program (despite the fact that MSU has recently recaptured the glory it once had back in the 1960s).  That could be the rationale why they had PSU > MSU for conference scheduling purposes.

Frankly, if PSU and MSU had their relative forturnes reversed right now, I imagine the criticism about how the schedule panned out would be somewhat muted.  I remember when Penn State joined the Big Ten for competitive purposes in 1993 and no one put the Spartans on any sort of par with the Nittany Lions at that time.

I can live with the idea that Ohio State/Michigan State is in the opposite schedule rotation with Penn State/Indiana as long as the Big Ten maintains its practice of pairing up Michigan with the top programs in the western division over a four year stretch starting in 2016.  From 2016 to 2019, UM plays Wisconsin each year.  If this sort of scheduling practice continues, one of the top programs from the west will play the Wolverines over the next four year time period (2020 to 2023, probably Nebraska).

 

 

UMgradMSUdad

April 23rd, 2015 at 8:56 AM ^

Maybe reality is setting in with the perception of Dave Brandon.  It's amazing how rapidly he went from hero to villian in the eyes of some (I don't think Brian ever bought into the hero worship given that Brandon fired RR, but others on the board certainly did).  And when the scenario flipped, boy did it flip.  There's even one poster claiming Dave Brandon was essentially running the football team.

As time goes by, I do think there will be more acceptance that while Brandon had some definite blind spots and failures, there were also a lot of great accomplishments as well.

JeepinBen

April 21st, 2015 at 1:41 PM ^

For the basketball, you just really need one, overarching stakeholder who could hype the hell out of it enough to make teams follow suit... the WWL. If ESPN bought in to this, guaranteed marquee matchups, even if they don't know where or when right away, it would happen.

The Mad Hatter

April 21st, 2015 at 1:41 PM ^

Needs to get rid of the divisions.  It would be nice to play Wisconsin, Nebraska, and Iowa more than once every decade or so.  Keep the title game in place for the two teams with the best records, but scrap the divisions.  Mixing the schedule up a bit would be good for the big players and the also-rans.  

Also, without divisions our fight song would make sense again.

cutter

April 21st, 2015 at 3:13 PM ^

Michigan is scheduled to play Wisconsin each year between 2016 and 2019.  Iowa is on the schedule in 2016 and 2019.  Nebraska appears again in 2018.

2016 is the year when the conference goes to the nine-game conference schedule, i.e., six games against Big Ten East opponents and three games against Big Ten West opponents.  The conference also opted to pair up teams from each division and have them play for each of the next four years, i.e., 2016 through 2019.  In the case of Michigan, that program will be Wisconsin.

Here's the rotation of Big Ten West teams Michigan will be playing from 2014 to 2019:

2014 - Minnestoa, at Northwestern

2015 - Northwestern, at Minnesota

2016 - Wisconsin, Illinois, at Iowa

2017 - at Wisconsin, at Purdue, Minnesota

2018 - Wisconsin, Nebraska, at Northwestern

2019 - at Wisconsin, Iowa, at Illinois

I think you can see that starting in 2016, Michigan will play six of the seven Western Division teams once over a three-year period.  The seventh team (in this case, Wisconsin) will be played each season over a four-year period.

If this were to continue over the 2020 through 2023 period and Nebraska replaced Wisconsin as the Big Ten West team Michigan would play each season, then I imagine the rotation would go something like this:

2020 - Nebraska, Purdue, at Minnesota

2021 - at Nebraska, at Wisconsin, Northwestern

2022 - Nerbraska, at Iowa, Illinois

2023 - at Nebraska, at Purdue, Minnesota

And FWIW, our fight song only made sense when Michigan was in the Western Conference and the Pac 12 didn't exist.

WolverBean

April 21st, 2015 at 3:14 PM ^

They actually can't do this. The NCAA rules for having a championship game stipulate that your conference must (1) have at least 12 teams and (2) have those teams split into divisions, with the winner of each division meeting in the championship game. I personally agree that it would be nice to have a championship game without divisions, but it's not actually an option under current NCAA rules.

oldhackman

April 21st, 2015 at 1:43 PM ^

Fill in that 8th spot with Adrian...they have become an instant DIII powerhouse.  Besides incredible excitement for a small school, now you have a state championship!

gwkrlghl

April 21st, 2015 at 1:58 PM ^

and I had thought Adrian would be an awesome addition. Finlandia is the only other DIII school in state and a) they're usually bad and b) I bet 99% of people in Michigan don't know where Finlandia is.

I say you do the 7 Michigan schools + Adrian and I suppose BGSU if Adrian isn't an option. Setup something reasonable so everyone is getting even home and away games and have it finish at the Joe (or Van Andel I suppose).

If you really wanted to plant a flag for "Michigan is Hockey State", time it with a Michigan ACHA tournament and have that wrap up at the Joe same weekend (say Thurs-Sunday for all parties). I know Davenport, Oakland, and Adrian all field competitive teams. Plenty of other MI schools have em too.

I dream of the day this happens, but I doubt it comes to fruition

In reply to by JJJ

gwkrlghl

April 22nd, 2015 at 12:44 PM ^

is that I think all the games the D1 teams play against them would count as exhibitions. Not sure anyone would want a much of deadweight games vs. Adrian.

Now if Adrian moved up to D1 and joined the WCHA...

JJJ

April 23rd, 2015 at 9:32 PM ^

I bet there would be quite a few Adrian fans, even those that just like to root for an underdog might show up. So what if it counts as an exhibition, Michigan already plays a few of those every year.

But whatever it takes to have all 7 Michigan Hockey teams compete in some sort of tournament, make it happen Hackett and Hollis...

mi93

April 21st, 2015 at 1:49 PM ^

is great.  Basketball is tougher.  When B1G can get more than 7 teams in the NCAA tournament, teams 8-10, who are desperately fighting for NCAA life (maybe even NIT), would suffer immensely via dismantling their potential to get a late season win to improve RPI and SoS.  That is a serious blow, and teams 8-10 could all have the same record as 5-7.

In principal, without the specter of the NCAA tournament in the balance, it's a great idea - the basketball would be incredibly exciting.  But between the harm inflicted on the lower half and the stress it could put on a team in the stretch run (which could affect the gas in the tank left for the two tournaments), it's too tough a sell.

ScruffyTheJanitor

April 21st, 2015 at 1:54 PM ^

would be SUCH a money maker, I would have to think.

 

Plus: the only real danger is if, say, team #7 goes 0-fer and just looses all hope of entering the tourney. On the plus side, if team number 8 went undefeated, it seems like it would do as much to boost to them. 

 

My question is: how would this effect the B1G tourney seeding?

 

FreddieMercuryHayes

April 21st, 2015 at 2:02 PM ^

I don't think it would be a huge marginal money-maker.  Most of the teams in the top 7 are still going to sell out already.  And I don't know how it would affect TV contracts at all.  All it really would do is provide more value for the people who already have tickets, which is what Brian seems concerned with in this post.

WolvWild

April 21st, 2015 at 2:01 PM ^

I am not sure I entirely agree with the premise that there isn't a great solution given the natural setup of CBB.

 

Certainly, there are some unavoidable low-end matchups, such as those that tend to fall around Christmas; however, many teams are able to put together better OOC matchups than Michigan.  I have consistently noted since I was a freshman at Michigan (2007) that our OOC is fairly weak.  

 

I like the solution to the conference side of things, but I think Michigan could do with more mid-range matchups in the OOC.  Part of why KU has consistently high SOS measures is that they schedule a fair number of mid-range teams, such as Utah, Temple, Florida, Georgetown, etc.  Many of these teams are teams with a name to generate interest but are not necessarily elite year in and year out.  

 

Scheduling more mid-range teams from other power conferences (as well as the Big East) makes a massive RPI/SOS difference if you are replacing teams like EMU, NJIT, Detroit, etc. 

LucaAkhtar3

April 21st, 2015 at 2:05 PM ^

I make up to $90 an hour working from my home. My story is that I quit working at Walmart to work online and with a little effort I easily bring in around $40h to $86h… Someone was good to me by sharing this link with me, so now i am hoping i could help someone else out there by sharing this link... Try it, you won't regret it!......
 

Tater

April 21st, 2015 at 2:25 PM ^

Unfortunately, especially in football, a few tomato cans are necessary.  Until every major conference champion is guaranteed a spot in the season-ending playoff, teams in conferences not named "SEC" can't afford more than one loss in a year.  

I love the idea of scheduling tough non-conference games, but it only works if every major conference is doing it.

Smoothitron

April 21st, 2015 at 3:47 PM ^

This is my dream scenario.  One auto-bid for every conference in America, multiple byes and home games for the highest ranked teams. WHY YES I DO HAVE A CHART SHOWING HOW THIS WOULD HAVE GONE LAST YEAR I'M GLAD YOU ASKED:

 

Notre Dame can join a conference or die. Now the whole season is a tournament.  Lose your conference?  Better luck next year. Don't think NIU deserves to be there?  If they beat, Memphis, OSU, Baylor, Alabama, and the other side of the bracket, who's going to say they don't belong?

This has serious issues, but the solutions would be things that I would personally like to have happen. Smaller conferences probably, also-rans might defect back to lesser conferences if the exposure from the tournament is big enough.

There's a bunch of other issues too, but you can't tell me this wouldn't make a load of money and I CAN DREAM CAN'T I?

meechiganman14

April 21st, 2015 at 2:52 PM ^

I like everything you spell out here Brian, especially the Michigan hockey "state championship." I think it would be a huge hit with fans. 

But Johnathan Toews? Couldn't find a picture of Lidstrom?

karlfink18

April 21st, 2015 at 3:25 PM ^

There's nothing worse than those September games against CMU that get your hopes up only to have them ripped away when the Big Ten schedule hits. It's time to eliminate the walkover games and start playing teams that will interest the fans and actually prepare them for the conference schedule. Back when we were winning Big Ten titles we played good teams early in year. Even though we lost many of those games, they were exciting and we could still rebound with a conference title. Especially with the playoff in place, a Big Ten title with one loss against an elite nonconference opponent should still get you into the playoff.

Lasell

April 21st, 2015 at 4:17 PM ^

Probably would not fly, but why not only have the Michigan College Hockey Playoff with 6 teams. Round robin, then the top 4 teams play in a playoff at the Joe. Team with the worst record of the 6 takes is relegated-- does not play next year's tournament-- with the 7th Michigan team rotating onto the schedule for the next year. Every game matters, and the cost of losing is not like much else in college athletics, and might add intrigue?

Jack Be Nimble

April 21st, 2015 at 4:59 PM ^

“We want to get out of the business of scheduling games that feel like scrimmages to our fans.”

I agree with this sentiment and I'm quite pleased with the schedule this year.  One of the best things about it is being able to cut down a bit on speculation and conjecture in the early season.  It's always a little frustrating when we destroy some terrible team in our first game and we're left wondering, "Are we actually good?"  Then we spend a couple weeks trying to mine these games for evidence that we can stack up against better opponents.  Utah is a tough team.  After week one, we'll know where we're at.  I appreciate that and I would expect the aggressive scheduling to continue. 

 

25dodgebros

April 21st, 2015 at 4:49 PM ^

The hockey idea is novel and I admit it is growing on me.  But, I think I'd still rather see us schedule good teams from outside Michigan.  Why not North Dakota, Denver, Minnesota State, Minn-Duluth, UNO, Miami, even Notre Dame?  Keep BU and BC like we have been doing or swap them out for others from Hockey East.  We had New Hampshire this year and BU and BC on the road.  That was great even though we embarassed ourselves one night against a horrible UNH team.  But get rid of Rennsalear and American int'l and their equivalents.  Beating them doesn't help much in the pairwise and I think it would help attendance and team development to play some higher quality teams from around the country.  If we schedule a Michigan tournament that will essentially leave us playing all teams from Michigan, Ohio, Wisconsin, Minnesota and Pennsylvania.  We need more exposure to try to get back to being a perennial tournament team.  

Blue Durham

April 21st, 2015 at 5:41 PM ^

I don't think the hockey plan needs to invite Notre Dame nor need a playoff. For 60 years there has been an informal association of basketball teams in Philadelphia known as the Big 5 (Penn, Villanova, La Salle, St. Josephs and Temple). The teams take the games very seriously and are very attended. Standings used to be posted in the Philadelphia Inquirer, championships and stats recorded, but the Big 5 creed says: "They say there's no trophy for winning the Big Five. They must not be from Philadelphia." I think a similar Michigan 7 association in hockey would be great. It is only a commitment of 6 games for each team, so each team would get 3 home and 3 away games. At the very least, this would be a good transition to Brian's idea, but would not require Notre Dame. I am sure most of the other Michigan Schools would be for it. And yeah, I'd have a trophy for this one.

JJJ

April 21st, 2015 at 9:02 PM ^

That's another approach that is much better than what we have now. I could care less about playing New Hampshire or Nebraska-Omaha. I do like the idea of watching every hockey team in the Wolverine State compete at the Joe. In fact we could change the name from Great Lake Invitational to Wolverine State Cup! Way more exciting than a Bean Pot!

InterM

April 22nd, 2015 at 1:59 PM ^

I'm just spitballing here, but for the champion of the Michigan hockey tournament, maybe the trophy could be . . . wait for it . . . a 40-pound bronze cast of Red Berenson's head?

cali4444

April 22nd, 2015 at 7:55 PM ^

Brian, Your basketball format is awesome!  The NCAA tournament is great of course, but the regular season definitely needs a boost like this.  The reguar season right now is basically seeding for the big dance....too many meaningless games!  Of course, the bottom seven in your scenario play 3 weeks of REALLY meaningless games.

yiyerina

April 23rd, 2015 at 7:17 AM ^

Start working at home with Google! It's by-far the best job I've had. Last Wednesday I got a brand new   BMW since getting a check for $6474 this - 4 weeks past. I began this 8-months ago and  immediately was bringing home at least $77 per hour. I work through this link, go to tech tab for  work detail.
 
----------------------> http://www.incomejoin70.com