The 2017 Schedule, Ranked Comment Count

Ace


Penn State is getting some dark horse playoff hype. [Bryan Fuller]

While we've entered the darkest days of the offseason, there's a beacon of hope: programs not named Michigan State now have a good idea of how their roster and depth chart will look this fall. Since I penned the opponent previews (save Ohio State, which was put in the ever-capable hands of Ross Fulton) for HTTV 2017, which you can preorder right here (or grab the digital version here), I figured I'd run down the 2017 schedule by expected difficulty.

This takes into account opponent quality, location of the game, time of the season (i.e. it's better to catch Florida early while Malik Zaire is still getting the offense down), and whatnot.

TIER I: THE EAST ELITES

1. Ohio State (home, Nov. 25)

While serious consideration was given to Penn State, The Game is The Game, and Ohio State's talent level remains ridiculous even after considerable turnover from last year's squad. The JT Barrett-Mike Weber backfield will be among the best in the country, and the offense will feature new wrinkles with former Indiana coach Kevin Wilson combining his light-speed approach with Urban Meyer's power spread.

Ohio State's defensive strength also happens to coincide with Michigan's greatest offensive concern. The Buckeyes boast four defensive ends who'd start—and star—on just about any team in the country: Tyquan Lewis, Sam Hubbard, Nick Bosa, and Jalyn Holmes. Hopefully, Michigan has figured out their right tackle situation by Thanksgiving.

2. Penn State (road, Oct. 21)

I understand the inclination to dismiss Penn State based on last year's 49-10 win. I really do. That said, PSU's offense took off last year under first-year coordinator Joe Moorhead, and I'd probably have them first on this list if top wideout Chris Godwin didn't move on to the NFL. Trace McSorley and Saquon Barkley may be as good, if not better, than the Barrett-Weber duo.

There are still reasons to doubt this team, chief among them an offensive line that remained awful at run-blocking last year and a defensive front seven that lacks star power. Also: James Franklin is still in charge of game management decisions. This offense is going to be tough to stop, though, and Michigan will have to do it in a road night game at Happy Valley.

[Hit THE JUMP for the rest of the schedule.]

----------------


Wisconsin needs more consistency from QB Alex Hornibrook. [Fuller]

TIER II: TALENTED BUT FLAWED

3. Wisconsin (road, Nov. 18)

The Badgers were a cut below the top of the Big Ten last year, losing to the top three teams in the East by seven points each. Their defense should once again be excellent despite the losses of TJ Watt and Vince Biegel; if last year's defense showed anything, it's that the Badgers have a seemingly endless stock of good linebackers, led by Jack Cichy. The D-line is stout and the secondary boasts a couple underrated talents in Derrick Tindal and D'Cota Dixon.

The offense, however, has been mediocre in two seasons under Paul Chryst, and they must replace their top two backs and first-round tackle Ryan Ramczyk from an uncharacteristically poor rushing attack. While there's talent in the receiving corps, QB Alex Hornibrook must show he can hold his own against elite defenses after struggling mightily against Michigan and OSU last year before losing the job to Bart Houston. It's telling that the Badgers made a play for Notre Dame grad transfer Malik Zaire, who instead wound up at...

4. Florida (neutral, Sep. 2)

If Zaire had more time to get comfortable in Florida's system, I'd probably have the Gators above the Badgers, but Michigan is fortunate to catch them early in the season—plus, Wisconsin is on the road while Florida is a neutral-site Jerryworld game. The two teams in this tier are quite similar; like the Badgers, UF has leaned on a talented defense while poor QB and O-line play hold back the offense.

Florida lost a lot of talent off last year's team, including early NFL Draft entrants at each level of the defense. Their best offensive player, playmaking receiver Antonio Callaway, could miss the Michigan game after an offseason marijuana citation. I'd like Michigan in this game regardless, but getting the Gators in the opener makes me like their chances even more.

----------------

I'll stop here to note there's a chasm between the top four teams on the schedule and the bottom eight. OSU and PSU are likely to be favored in those games, while upsets by Wisconsin and Florida are well within the realm of possbility. It'd take some weird stuff for Michigan to lose to the teams below. This is college football, of course, so weird stuff happens with alarming regularity, but four losses still looks to be the absolute floor unless M is hit with some catastrophic injuries.

----------------


Indiana's Richard Lagow needs to stop throwing to the other team. [Eric Upchurch]

TIER III: POTENTIALLY FRISKY

5. Indiana (road, Oct. 14)

Like I said: chasm. Indiana could be tricky; their defense took a huge leap under Tom Allen, who's now the head coach after Kevin Wilson was let go. That unit returns eight starters, including excellent linebacker Tegray Scales. It's beyond bizarre to type this, but Indiana should be able to rely on a solid defense this year.

While the offense could bounce back from a down year, they'll have to do so while replacing Kevin Wilson with Mike DeBord, who—I swear I'm not making this up—was brought in to continue running IU's up-tempo spread. They've got a pair of dangerous, big-bodied receivers in Simmie Cobbs Jr. and Nick Westbrook, and the passing game could be electric if Richard Lagow puts it together. Being in the East means the Hoosiers will lose more games than a couple of the teams below them, but if things break the right way they could be an upset threat on the road.

6. Maryland (road, Nov. 11)

While DJ Durkin had a pretty rough debut, there are some intriguing pieces in place for a potential year-two leap. After two years of terrible quarterback play, UNC transfer and former four-star recruit Caleb Henderson could provide stability to the position, and the run game was already dangerous last year with Ty Johnson and Lorenzo Harrison both cracking 7 YPC. The offensive line has plenty of young talent, most of which has some early playing experience.

The defense looks solid up front and potentially shaky in the secondary. That and lingering issues in the passing game—they're thin at receiver—will keep the Terps from competing with the top of the Big Ten East, but they'll battle with Indiana for fourth in the division and should look a good deal better than last year's team.

7. Minnesota (home, Nov. 4)

Replacing Tracy Claeys with PJ Fleck is a massive coaching upgrade, and while it may take a while for the total system overhaul to take hold, Michigan catches the Gophers relatively late in the year. With two quality running backs in Shannon Brooks and Rodney Smith, they have something to lean on while the rest of the team catches up. Fleck can't conjure a passing game out of thin air, though, so the Gophers project to be a limited offensive team this fall.

Last year's defense was good, but other than underrated DT Stephen Richardson, loses most of its top players. The secondary looks especially questionable after losing both starting corners and their top safety. Fleck started off slow at Western Michigan, and it's probably going to be a similar story at Minnesota, but he's working with more talent than before.

8. Michigan State (home, Oct. 7)

Even putting aside the legitimate, lingering questions about how this program will deal with a disastrous offseason, State has lost a good deal of its top-end talent and will be paper-thin at just about every position that isn't running back. The defense is down five of its top seven tacklers and could still lose its top returning D-lineman after Demetrious Cooper violated the terms of his plea deal. Brian Lewerke will be handed the keys to an offense that returns only one receiver with double-digit catches to his name. The O-line is a mess.

Honestly, MSU is only ranked this high because they'll treat the Michigan game like it's the Super Bowl. This team has significantly less talent and depth than last year's 3-9 squad, and a hopefully improved locker room culture can only go so far to make up for that.

----------------

TIER IV: NEVER SCHEDULE AIR FORCE

9. Air Force (home, Sep. 16)

Even by service academy standards, Air Force has a huge amount of turnover from last year's team; they return five starters on offense and just one on defense. On paper, Michigan should hardly break a sweat in this game.

But this is Air Force. They've spent decades refining a hurry-up option attack that best suits their personnel (and also endangers opposing defender's knees), and while they don't return much, they bring back two dangerous runners in QB Arion Worthman, whose insertion into the starting lineup turned last season around, and back Timothy McVey. Their chances of beating Michigan are slim; their chances of mounting a couple obnoxious scoring drives are high.

Oh wow I got through this section without mentioning this is another Dave Brandon scheduling special. Oh, crap, I'm still typing. Whatever.

----------------


Yep, still bad. [Patrick Barron]

TIER V: BODY BAGS

10. Cincinnati (home, Sep. 9)

Luke Fickell was a solid hire for Cinci; he's already recruiting at a level well above predecessor Tommy Tuberville. Tuberville let the team bottom out before his exit, however, and Fickell probably wishes he could add a couple of his 2018 commits to this year's team. The Bearcats were woeful on offense last year, especially on the ground, and I'm not sure they hit a home run with their hiring of Mike Denbrock, Notre Dame's primary playcaller the last two years, as offensive coordinator.

In a couple years, this program should be at a level where they put a scare into some high-level programs, but it's going to take some time.

11. Purdue (road, Sep. 23)

I'd probably have this game above Cincinnati if it came later in the year. Jeff Brohm is another huge coaching upgrade, and it didn't take him long to turn Western Kentucky into last year's best Group of Five team. There's a lot of new faces on offense, however, and the defense loses its linchpin in PFF All-American DT Jake Replogle. This is yet another game that'd be more worrisome if it occurred two or three years in the future.

12. Rutgers (home, Oct. 28)

Let's look at Rutgers' quarterback situation, from the HTTV preview:

Last year, Chris Laviano ceded the job midway through the year to Giovanni Rescigno, and the two posted equally terrible marks of 4.2 yards per attempt. When SBNation’s Bill Connelly created an overall percentile ranking for QBs in 2016 using weighted stats, both fell in the bottom eight out of 178 qualifying players.

While Laviano graduated, Rescigno exited the spring as the starter, but his hold on the job is tenuous. Ash said there will be a “complete, open competition” in the fall, and he’s adding plenty of competitors. Senior Zach Allen, the third-stringer last year, is rehabbing a torn ACL instead of undergoing surgery so he can play this year; three-star dual-threat true freshman Johnathan Lewis and Louisville grad transfer Kyle Bolin will make it a four-player race; Kill even added a walk-on transfer from Temple and a grad transfer from D-II Southern Connecticut State to bolster depth. The message is clear: Rutgers is trying anything they can to avoid even another half-season of Rescigno. Most alarmingly, it may not work.

Yup, still Rutgers.

Comments

funkywolve

June 16th, 2017 at 12:29 PM ^

I get the point on Zaire, but at the same time I'm guessing Gator fans might be glad to get UM early in the season since UM is going to be breaking in a ton of new starters.  I expect UM to be a much better team in November than the one we see in early September.

EGD

June 16th, 2017 at 1:24 PM ^

I imagine Florida fans are viewing this game in a way similar to how M fans felt when the Alabama game at Jerryworld was looming in 2012: you try to make yourself believe there's a chance, but deep down inside, you know you're doomed.

1VaBlue1

June 16th, 2017 at 2:15 PM ^

I doubt it.  They know they've won the SEC East two years in a row.  As sad as that offense is, they believe the defense will carry them again.  They put no stock in the bowl game beat down two years ago, and see this game the same way we do - tough opponent, but shouldn't present an insurmountable problem.

Sadly, I occasionally listen to some CFB talk radio (not Pete) on my way home from work.  UF fans are *almost* as optimistic in thier team as we are in ours.  The difference?  We're right...

swdodgimus

June 16th, 2017 at 12:31 PM ^

Wisconsin loses key pieces, yes, but they will still excel on defense, and Chryst has been able to manufacture enough points to stay in games.  More importantly, the road record with Harbaugh isn't that bad, but significantly worsens when venturing out West.  Minnesota was as close a call as possible, Iowa was the worst prepared a Harbaugh team has been, and though not in the Big Ten, the Utah loss was to a team similar to a tough-minded BTW team.

With Penn State, people like Phil Steele and Bill Connoly point out how luck greatly boosted their success last year.  They'll be a 9-3 type team, but they won't be the juggernaut people are expecting, particularly due to a defense that struggled at all points of the year (42 to Pitt, 49 to Michigan, 31 to Indiana, 31 to Wisconsin, 52 to USC).

I might put Maryland over Indiana simply due to the Debord factor, but that's just my nit-picky opinion.  Love these pieces to tide us over.

jdemille9

June 16th, 2017 at 3:32 PM ^

Penn State's offense is what I worry about. They put it all together after we curb stomped them and while they may give up a ton of points they are very capable of scoring even more. Joe Moorhead knows what he's doing and is hopefully not long for Happy Valley.

Our entire defense is basically new AND it's on the road at night... plus they come right after #chaosteam and a potential scare. Honestly, I think I'd be less surprised if we lost to PSU and beat OSU than the other way around. Yeah, James Franklin is garbage but McSorely and Barkley are better in my eyes than Barrett/Weber.. 

Wisconsin is good but they're offense is NOT scary at all. High powered offenses are what worry me about next year as we break in essentially 9 new starters and countless back-ups. 

mGrowOld

June 16th, 2017 at 12:47 PM ^

9-3

Will lose two of the OSU, PSU, Florida  & Wisconsin games ( my guess is PSU & Wisconsin) and one of the Indiana, Maryland, Minnesota games (Maryland worries me most here).  

I think we drill MSU, finall beat OSU but still fall short in the east to PSU and have to wait another year for our first trip to Indy.

mGrowOld

June 16th, 2017 at 12:53 PM ^

They're more than pretty good this year and playing there at night has NOT gone historically well for us.  In fact it has been a pretty consistent shitstorm of biblical proportions.

FWIW it would not surprise me to see Spreight start the season at QB but get a quick hook if he struggles in the Florida game.  The toughest part of our schedule starts in Happy Valley the end of October.  If a change was needed Peters would have 5 relative cupcake games before playing PSU.

NittanyFan

June 16th, 2017 at 1:19 PM ^

Only 4 Michigan @ PSU night games over the years.

2006: Michigan won.  They were clearly the better team.

2008: PSU won.  They were clearly the better team.

2010: PSU won --- I think they were overall the better team, though.  The 2010 S&P+ statistics bear that out.  I know at the time getting roasted by Matt McGloin seemed horrific.  In retrospect though, Nathan Scheelhaasse and Illinois would put up 24 more points than PSU did, and McGloin actually made the NFL.  Fundamentally flawed U-M team, PSU wasn't great either but at least played some defense.  

2013: PSU won --- this is the case where Michigan blew the game, they were the better team (S&P+ bears that out as well).

Anyway, it's really just 2013 - and the cast of characters responsible for that (most notably Brady Hoke) aren't in Ann Arbor anymore.

Don't know who wins - but I'm fairly confident the 2017 game will not really be decided by white-outs or night games or intangible stuff like that.

mGrowOld

June 16th, 2017 at 1:44 PM ^

It's ANYBODY we play at night on the road.  For reasons unknown we tend to shrivel up into a ball of nothingness when faced with super-scarey fans, lights and what-not.

2016: Beat Rutgers - lost to Iowa and Florida State (1-2)

2015: Beat Indiana (OT), Beat Minnesota (needed stop on last play of game) - lost to Utah (2-1)

2014: Lost to Notre Dame, lost to Rutgers (0-2)

2013: Beat U Conn - lost to PSU (1-1)

2012: Lost to Alabama, lost to Notre Dame, lost to Nebraska (0-3)

2011: Beat Nothwestern (1-0)

2010: Lost to Iowa, lost to PSU (0-2)

So in the last seven seasons we're an impressive 5-11 in road night games.  Now do you see why I'm less than confident in the game?

NittanyFan

June 16th, 2017 at 2:09 PM ^

we'll see if in 2017 Michigan plays better football in the 2nd half (of the season) vs. the 1st half.  That --- more than the night game thing (IMO) --- is the long-term trend that needs to be bucked.

At Stanford --- those Cardinal teams didn't really improve over the course of 2007 (the USC win was in early October) or 2008 either.  But the 2009 and 2010 teams improved significantly over the course of the year.  2009, of course, JH's 3rd year in Palo Alto - similar to 2017 and Ann Arbor. 

LKLIII

June 16th, 2017 at 2:40 PM ^

I don't know about the Stanford teams, but to what extent does in-season improvement correlate to the seniority of the squad? What I mean is--I could see a scenario where freshmen or sophomores tend to improve more significantly over the course of a 3 month season than a junior or senior, simply because as a percentage of game experience, 3 months is a much bigger chunk of time compared to a junior or senior. Not only in terms of snaps, but just the game day schedule, being in hostile environments or tough end of game situations, etc. I'd love to see a diary or statistical UFR analysis of that.

NittanyFan

June 16th, 2017 at 4:10 PM ^

have to get a team's S&P+ for the first half of a season, and S&P+ for the second half of the season, see if there's a correlation between the difference and team age.

To be fair to Michigan, the team's S&P+ was sky-high in mid-October of both years.  May have been #1 at some point both years, as I recall.  That's tricky to maintain (much less improve).

M-Dog

June 20th, 2017 at 10:20 AM ^

TING!

OSU has been a juggernaut over most of the last decade.  Yet they always struggle in night white-out games at Happy Valley.

That has more to do with PSU getting geeked up for those games than OSU suddenly becoming mediocre for just one evening.

PSU plays on another level in those games.

Somewhere there is a lesson in there for us.  

I heard we play pretty well in night home games.

 

Stringer Bell

June 16th, 2017 at 2:33 PM ^

I mean, a lot of those losses came with Rich Rod and Hoke.  Utah was a darn good team and that was our first game with Rudock, and FSU was a damn good team as well (plus losing Peppers and Butt hurt).  So really it's just Iowa that was an inexplicable loss, where we had the better team and better coaching and simply couldn't get it done.

mGrowOld

June 16th, 2017 at 2:58 PM ^

Michigan historically has not played well on the road at night.  They just havent.  Didnt happen often with Bo (usually just Notre Dame or a bowl game) but guess what?  We lost most of them.  Lost most of them with Lloyd.  Lost almost all (maybe all) with Rich.  Lost most with Brady and so far have lost as many as we've won with Harbaugh.

It never ceases to amaze me how the board can completely reject almost a half century of data points on a particular topic.  

Protip: It's how I was able to accurately predict the Iowa loss last year.  And I was generally considered to be nutz in thinking so prior to the game.  Because I looked back ove 50 years of Michigan football and saw we generally LOSE playing at night on the road.

It sucks but we do.

Stringer Bell

June 16th, 2017 at 3:00 PM ^

I can, when it's been proven that those guys are not good head coaches, and thus the reason we lost those games is because of inferior coaching.  I'm curious what your explanation is.  That teams that wear winged helmets can't win road night games, or teams with maize and blue color schemes are doomed to always fold under the lights?

Rabbit21

June 16th, 2017 at 4:17 PM ^

Teams with a history of responding poorly to pressure in unfriendly environments will continue doing so, until that dynamic is changed(often through good coaching, but it takes time to effect a change in mentality). 

So far the Harbaugh teams haven't been exactly awesome at night on the road:  Utah, Minnesota, Iowa were ALL terrible games and that to me indicates that there is still some Hoke/Rodriguez psychic leftover that Harbaugh may or may not be able to change.  I hope he does, but there is something about this that seems baked in.

Stringer Bell

June 16th, 2017 at 4:36 PM ^

We'll have to disagree that the Utah and Minnesota games were terrible.  Utah was a darn good team and that was our first game with a grad transfer QB who was still familiarizing himself with a new system.  There is absolutely no shame in losing that game.  It's also been proven that there was a degree of bad luck involved in the Minnesota game, combined with that being the game after we got our hearts ripped out by MSU and Minnesota actually being a decent team (26th in S&P+ despite only going 6-7), a close game there isn't a big deal.  And most importantly we won the game with a big goal line stand at the end.

 

This idea that Michigan has always been terrible on the road at night under every coach going back to the beginning of time is nothing more than feelingsball.  We were notoriously bad on the road, regardless of time or place, under Hoke, and we were just notoriously bad under Rich Rod.  That says more about the coaches, not the program itself, and the trend of folding on the road has not kept up under Harbaugh except for one game that people are having a very difficult time moving on from.

The FannMan

June 16th, 2017 at 3:19 PM ^

I think it is because we so totally beat the crap out of them in 2016.  We broke PSU to the point where they gave up trying to win and tried a FG to make the score look better.  (I think they missed the FG too.)

Somehow, they ended up being really damn good, but I couldn't respect them after that.

jdemille9

June 16th, 2017 at 3:36 PM ^

Normally, I'd agree. But after we beat the shit out of them they were a completely different team. That offense is no joke. James Franklin is a joke of a coach but Joe Moorhead is legit, he's a lock to be a HC somewhere else very soon. Not to mention a night game in Happy Valley is very scary. When was the last time Michigan went into a hostile environment and beat a good team? Definitely not anyone on the current roster.

ak47

June 16th, 2017 at 12:54 PM ^

yay content.  I don't dismiss psu because of 49-10, my problem is their offense was mcsorley getting chased out of the pocket and throwing prayers to goodwin.  Thats not a recipe for long term success.  On the road at night in happy valley blows but the team isn't that scary.

Bambi

June 16th, 2017 at 12:54 PM ^

I hope I'm wrong but I see 9-3. OSU, PSU and Wisky all seem like loses to me.

PSU and Wisky are teams I think we beat on an even playing field. But at Happy Valley at night makes me think we lose that game, and the same goes for at Camp Randall (which I would guess is going to be a night game, but the point stands even if it's not).

Until we beat a good team on the road, I can't predict a win there. Especially after we lost to Iowa at night on the road.

JFW

June 16th, 2017 at 2:12 PM ^

I think at some point we have to have that signature win, the one that means the program is coming of age under Harbaugh. I honestly think that happens this year, and that the momentum gives us what we need to beat OSU. 

I might be too optimistic, but there it goes. I just have a feeling that by the end of the year the O line will start getting dialed in and the Defense will start blossoming. 

Romeowolv

June 16th, 2017 at 12:56 PM ^

I see no issue scheduling service academies.  Not sure why the hate.  Rather have them than Delaware State or UCF, or some bum sun belt team.

mGrowOld

June 16th, 2017 at 1:05 PM ^

Thre reasons for the most part:

1. They force you spend a week game-planning your D for an offense they won't see again this season.  Stopping an uptempo wishbone is WAY different than anything else we're gonna face so you've got to spend a whole week learning and then another week unlearning defensive assaiginments.

2. They cut-block like mo-fo's to compensate for their lack of size & weight.  Knee injuries are very much "in play" when you're playing a team that cut blocks on virtually every. single. play.

3. We'll likely win but win ugly.  So no style points for the victory and no advancement in the eyes of the polls.  Your basic "everything to lose and nothing to win" type game.

Nothing wrong with the players, the coaches or the school itself.  Mad props and respective for all three of the acadamies but PLEASE dont schedule them again.