"Coach Mattison told me what the Ravens were about, what he thought," Beyer said. "He definitely encouraged me. I hold his opinion in high regard."
As we approach the third anniversary of the completion of the $226 million stadium expansion project, I have another web find to share with the community of some of the upgrades that went into it, as I have reported here periodically when I have come across the info on the web. This time, it’s on the PA and video systems. I'm not an audio or video technician, just a fact finder passing along perhaps some interesting information.
The PA system includes 28 Meyer Sound MILO 60 line array loudspeakers, eight SB-3F sound field synthesis loudspeakers, four MSL-4 loudspeakers, a Galileo loudspeaker management system with two Galileo 408 processors, and an RMS remote monitoring system.
See more about the PA system at http://www.meyersound.com/news/2012/michigan_stadium/
And for information on the video boards, go to http://www.telsystemsusa.com/our-work/projects?nid=60&field_categories_tid=All
Since the latest upgrades to Michigan Stadium, I continue to hunt and peck around the ‘net for tidbits regarding some of the processes that went into the $226 million “facelift” and came across this interesting piece on who and how the new signs and wayfinding were made, including the shields that outline the lower concourse.
I found enjoyable that the name of the company used to produce the graphics was 'Harmon Sign.' How apropos.
I like Maryland more already.
An analysis of the expansion from Maryland's SBNation blog, TestudoTimes, declares the following.
And if you think Maryland doesn't fit in because they're a basketball school, Indiana, Michigan State*, and Illinois say hi.
State has been better at basketball than they have at football for some time, but try telling a state fan that they're a basketball school and enjoy the livid, fuming tirade that ensues. Good show, Maryland. It's like prison. Shank a guy on the first day, and then things will be alright.
An article placed at cbs sports an hour ago says Maryland will vote as early as tomorrow on their invitation to join the Big Ten. Says that university's biggest donor backs the move. Hard to imagine that this is not a twofer deal, with Rutgers right behind.
The article notes that the $50 million exit fee might be a stumbling block for Maryland. But from what I've read elsewhere the league may take all or part out of future revenue to the school.
Perhaps it's been noted elsewhere, but this gives the Big Ten access to 35% of the nation's viewers, bringing in the DC and NY areas, and extends the league across a fairly contiguous--that is, plausible--swath of the country, from Nebraska to the Atlantic coast. I realize that Rutgers and Maryland aren't the most appetizing draws in an immediate sense, but I like having the league entering NY and DC, taking in part of the South now, too. (And there's no reason why those schools cannot get better, including in football.) Obviously, the expanded TV revenue is the big draw for the league itself. Will be interesting to see if the league uses the pretext of expansion to reconfigure the divisions, which are pretty unpopular, at least here.
Thought it was funny that Missouri would leak info that we were their knight in shining armor, but the SEC is okay too, they guess. I wonder about the rationale behind this line of thinking. Cash? They'd rather be an average team in-conference than a conference door mat? Cash? Better academics and less stigma about cheating (sans OSU)?Cash?
Anyway, just thought it was interesting that they would put out these feelers. Nobody in that University would leak this information if they did not want to test the waters with the Big Ten. If Missouri was a chick, I'd say she's flirting with another attractive guy to get our attention.
Didn't see this posted.
Yes, I am referencing a message board post from the NW Rivals site. Hence the RUMOR in the title, but this guy seems at least a little bit more credible than a random troll.
The gist of the article:
Earlier this evening, Notre Dame and Texas jointly presented the Big Ten Conference with their proposed terms of entry into the conference. These terms resulted from lengthy discussions among both schools and the Big Ten over the past several months.