"You know how Kyle Flood still has a job? Yeah, all Jourdan."
I don't say this too often, but props, BTN. This time-lapse shot already looked great; then the director slowed it down for Jehu Chesson's kickoff return touchdown and the ensuing reaction. I could watch this all day.
Then again, Jim Harbaugh and his poor hat lurk after the jump, so...
You know, Matt was just like "if I sponsor this you have to do them all for the whole season" and I was like "okay but you know that was going to be likely since now I am not going to be overwhelmed with sadness two-thirds through" and then he made some sort of intimidating hand gesture. But his heart is in the right place?
FORMATION NOTES: At this point Michigan has few formation surprises. They're usually in a nickel. They alternate between three or four fronts. One is a three man line with the buck in a two point stance as a 3-4 OLB:
30 nickel slide
One splits the DEs a bit further and tucks the buck in behind the NT:
And then they run a lot of standard four man fronts.
Some of the four man lines will have the buck in a two point stance; I still denote those as four man lines based on the alignments of the DL.
Michigan swaps mostly between man under with one or two deep safeties and a cover three with a few different variants.
PERSONNEL NOTES: Standard rotation up front with Henry/Glasgow/Wormley in front of Charlton/Hurst/Godin. Henry got a lot of playing time after a couple weeks in which Godin was more prominent; Hurst probably played the best of anyone. Ojemudia got almost all the buck snaps until he was hurt, and from that point it was RJS.
LB was Morgan and Bolden with a scattering of 4-3 snaps that featured Ross. The secondary did not have Stribling so it was Clark/Peppers/Lewis/Wilson/Hill for the vast majority of the game. When in a 4-3, Clark left. When in a dime, Dymonte Thomas entered.
Michigan continued flipping Peppers and Lewis between outside corner and slot like they did last week.
[After THE JUMP: a defenestration]
The Question: Which big ten players are over/underperforming your preseason expectations?
Underperforming: While I didn't expect them to be world-beaters, I didn't see Michigan State's safeties being so inconsistent, like twice-benched Montae Nicholson, or inconsistent and injured, as is now the case with RJ Williamson. With Williamson now out for most of the season, that secondary is vulnerable, and there may only be so much their excellent defensive line can do to mask the weakness.
Overperforming: Ryan Glasgow, Chris Wormley, Maurice Hurst, Matt Godin, and Taco Charlton. I'd include Willie Henry, as well, but I was expecting big things out of him this year. Remember when Bryan Mone's injury looked to be a huge hit to the defensive line? They've coped pretty well. You could also throw Jeremy Clark and Channing Stribling in here, as they've very much exceeded expectations, too. The defense was supposed to be good with a couple of weak points; at the moment, it's great, and thus far they haven't shown a glaring weakness.
[Jump for not draftageddon (until Seth goes)]
Ryan Glasgow and Joe Bolden
How do you replace someone like Mario [Ojemudia]?
"It’s hard to replace a guy like Mario because obviously the way he plays, how he gets his job done. But the greatest thing about football is you've got somebody working just as hard pushing right behind you trying to take your spot, and it makes you better. I think we'll have somebody that will get in there and get the job done."
The streak now is 14 of 16 shutout quarters. As a defense that's got to be something you hang your hat on. Is that something you’re thinking about, or is that just a byproduct of success?
RG: "I think it's a byproduct. Our goal is just for them to get no yards on every play or negative yards. If they make a yard it's a failure for us. Every guy is trying to win their individual match up on every play. If you don't do that you are hurting the guy next to you and your hurting your defense. We have a lot of guys winning their individual battle on every play, so that's going to be a byproduct of it."
The defensive line has been especially dominant. Willie [Henry] with that sack on I believe Garman… What's been the key of you guys being able to get in the backfield so easily?
RG: "I think a lot of it starts in practice. There’s a lot of competition. I think we have a two-deep on the D-line that a lot of people would kill to have, and people are trying to take everyone’s spot every day and if you don’t perform in practice you’re not going to play in the game, so everyone’s pushing each other and I think the competition really helps that come out.”
Jim just pointed out that the two defenses on Saturday won’t actually face each other, but when you see the stats Northwestern’s coming in with, compared to yours [they’re] very comparable. Do you look at it as a way to kind of show them up in a sense, that your defense is better?
JB: “I don’t know. I played high school with a kid, Drew Smith, who’s a linebacker for them, so we’re always going back and forth and stuff and talking and hanging out. But I think coach Harbaugh hit the nail on the head saying the two defenses aren’t going to play against each other. Like Ryan said, they don’t get any yards on offense and they don’t get any points, you can’t win a football game without scoring points.”
[The rest after THE JUMP]
Upon Further Review has not yet lost its sponsor.
While you are not wearing pants you can just call Matt at Homesure Lending. You'll have his number. So if you are unsure about something or need something you can just call him up. Probably don't mention the pants, because that's weird.
FORMATION NOTES: Hello dime package. Michigan spent most of the day in it. This was probably the most common setup:
30 dime slide
Michigan has three guys in a three-point stance along the line with Ojemudia flanking them as a standup end; behind are Desmond Morgan and Jabrill Peppers. Most of the time Peppers went into coverage and left the front five to win one on one matchups, which they almost universally did.
The other very common formation was one that's pretty similar but again has the "buck" lined up just off the nose tackle.
Michigan would insert Ojemudia or RJS at various places along the line.
I called formations on which Michigan was clearly going into man coverage with another player while Peppers was added to the box "nickel 3-4."
Yes, those are two actual LBs. When BYU added their fullback Bolden would come in.
This with nobody backing the line on the snap was "5-0 dime":
I think that about covers it. Oh: I didn't get a shot but that first snap I dubbed "3-1-7" because Ojemudia is over the slot and there are legit 4 people in the box. About which more later.
PERSONNEL NOTES: Michigan spent almost the whole game in a dime package featuring all three corners plus Peppers, Hill, and Wilson. Morgan played the entire game except for the final drive; the DL rotation was the usual eight guys in the usual doses. If you ask me the starting lineup now includes Matt Godin instead of Willie Henry but that's a fine distinction.
Bolden got the few bonus LB snaps. These all came when BYU added an H-back to the equation. Ross was healthy after all: he got in at the end of the game.
[After THE JUMP: hhhyarrrrr it had eleven mouths and no bottom]
Nothing can possibly top...
Well then. This is going to be a tough vote.
[Hit THE JUMP for the rest of the BYU game in GIFs and many more angles of the two plays above.]