1941

[Ed-Seth: Dr. Sap found the archival footage at 2 a.m. last night and we threw this together today]

398a09861293e64248eab77184f8de8c--michigan-michigan-state-michigan-state-university

[via UM Bentley Library’s program database, which is currently offline for some reason]

If you think Michigan State and Michigan hate each other now, you should see how ugly it got 75 years ago. Michigan and Michigan Agricultural formed an early rivalry. It was a big enough deal by 1907 that when the Big Ten banned its members from playing nonconference games, Yost (for this and other reasons) preferred to remove Michigan from the conference entirely rather than agree to never play Michigan State, Ohio State, or Notre Dame (or in a Rose Bowl) ever again.

The series was of course dominated by (and nearly always played at) Michigan but for a four-year stretch from 1934-’37. 1930s-40s MSC was the Ole Miss of its day. In a time when conferences did most of the (and not a particularly great job of) regulating amateurism, State’s non-conference affiliation was a massive loophole. Jim Crowley, one of Notre Dame’s “four horsemen” and his successor, another Domer named Charlie Bachman, brazenly flouted NSC (the predecessor to the NCAA) rules to put MSC on the national stage. Michigan fans, of course, pointed this out at every opportunity, though Harry Kipke was no saint before Yost finally reined him in (Michigan went 12-22 after winning back to back national championships in ’32 and ’33).

Fast forward to September 1941. With Europe deeply embroiled in World War II and the United States feeling the inevitability of getting drawn in, tensions were quite high, not just around the world, but in the state of Michigan. It’s a huge and probably false step to claim that Michigan-Michigan State mirrored the urban/rural political battles of the day; it’s not one to say that a lot of fans on both sides perceived reasons to hate each other.

Although Pearl Harbor was yet a few months in the future, despite strong political opposition from a largely anti-war nation, America had begun its mobilization.  Students and players were already enlisting, and football players were allowed to transfer between schools (with immediate eligibility) to assist those colleges and academies. Already the great football programs of the 1930s were hemorrhaging men to the military. Army went 1-7-1 in 1940; in 1941 they went 5-3-1 and tied Notre Dame. In just a few years the service academies would be perennial national powers and Michigan State wouldn’t even field a football team.

On September 4, 1941, a German U-Boat, unprovoked, fired upon the USS Greer. A week later, President Roosevelt declared any German warship in “waters which America deems vital to its defense” to be fair game, and ordered the U.S. Navy to shoot any perceived threat on sight. On Friday, September 26th, the Military Police Corps was founded. On Saturday the 27th, Michigan hosted Michigan State College.

With the game tied 7-7 at the half, things got a little ugly as it appears that some of the fans and students poured onto the Michigan Stadium field and decided to mill around. One thing led to another and before you knew it, a donny-brook ensued! Fisticuffs and haymakers were thrown and then it was all out bedlam. It looked like this:

(found this on one of my DVDs)

Michigan ended up winning the game, 19-7.

-------------------------------

Much changed in the following year. The U.S. entered war on December 7, and opposition quickly melted into patriotic duty. The students and players were enlisting and football players were allowed to transfer between schools to assist those colleges and academies that were supporting the war effort. Michigan successfully lobbied to be one of those host schools.

From Brian Williams at the Bentley Historical Library:

"Football was a sport short on manpower, even with significantly relaxed eligibility rules. Many colleges were forced to drop intercollegiate football during the war, including Michigan State, which canceled its 1943 season."

"The government even asked Michigan to consider moving its games to Detroit for the 1942 season to conserve resources. As Michigan prepared to play its first wartime season in 1942, the application sent to prospective players reflected the new reality. The application asked candidates if they were registered under the Selective Service Act, what their classification was, and most important for the coaching staff, “When do you expect to be called?”

"One significant change for the 1942 football season was an overhaul of eligibility rules. Prompted by a loss of manpower through enlistment and the Selective Service draft, the freshman eligibility rule was waived. The rule revision that allowed freshmen to play also enabled soldiers and sailors stationed at military training bases to be eligible regardless of their previous experience. Many of the players on the military base teams had completed their college eligibility and a few had even played professionally."

Both teams once again squared off in Ann Arbor, literally and figuratively. Despite Michigan benefitting from the same wartime transfers that were ravaging MSC, the game was just as close as the year before, with the halftime score knotted at 0-0.

It seems like the students and fans once again poured onto the field, but this time things started out a little more amicably.

After trying to perform some sort of locomotion script, emotions got the best of everyone, even as the Michigan State band tried to continue their halftime performance.

Some of the Michigan cheerleaders tried to get everyone to chill, but to no avail.

The scene was this:

Michigan once again was the victor, winning the football game, 20-0.

The following year, with so many young men leaving East Lansing for more patriotic pursuits, Michigan State didn’t even field a football team, and the rivalry settled down.

Just seven members of the 1942 squad would still be in Ann Arbor by 1943, however they were replaced by an embarrassment of other teams’ riches coming to Michigan to train in the Navy’s V-12 program on campus. Among them were Minnesota star Bill Daley, and ten players from Wisconsin, including All-American Elroy “Crazy Legs'” Hirsch.

After the War, State dramatically expanded to accommodate G.I. Bill students. In 1947 they hired Biggie Munn, one of the pioneers in national recruiting, who quickly turned the rechristened Michigan State University Spartans back into a national elite. The Spartans would join the Big Ten in 1953 and Michigan’s star would fade for decades.

So while we celebrate the 75th anniversary of "The 1942 Backyard Brawl," let's try and have cooler heads prevail—especially with Saturday's game being played at night.

I'm ignoring this Boston business. Should I have to mention this? Probably not. Rest assured that when the zombie apocalypse comes I'll be here speculating about how it affects Michigan's roster when the starting quarterback bites his center.

Anyway: stuff.

Fritz Crisler's advice to Walter. Eat plenty of ruffage, young man.

image

This is apparently a new find from user Messenger Puppet. The message board sleuths have identified "Walter" as a missing Brown student Walter Freihofer, who had quite a life. The timing fits: he graduated high school in 1940 and died about a year ago; the letter was probably uncovered as someone was going through his things.

Yes, Wilton. Wilton Speight provides MLive with a picture of him hellaciously stiffarming a hapless fool who dares approach Speight's aura:

12594166-large[1]

That's in an article about Speight's high ranking on ESPN. I was not aware that he'd reclassified after a serious collarbone injury in the first game of his junior season. In general that's a good thing—experience is everything for quarterbacks, who don't approach their ceilings until they're 35.

I should mention that I missed MO LB Kyron Watson in my rundown of Michigan targets in the ESPN 150. He's 100th.

Hated Chad Ford, man, you just don't get it. Hated Chad Ford is mostly a joke about how Chad Ford is all like taking my peoples from me, but come on man:

"His decision to return, considering his age (he turns 21 before the draft) and high draft stock at the moment, is a puzzling one -- I'm not sure his draft stock will ever be higher. A potential first-round pick in 2014."

There are things other than draft stock in life, like being the man on a very good college basketball team.

2014 looms. It appears that Michigan's got a one-year reprieve here from GRIII and McGary. Paste these two items together

"We're like brothers," McGary said. "Coach says we're joined at the hip, I don't think it's that serious. But (part of my decision relied on) what he was doing.

"We just kind of wanted to come back together, make a run at it and play the way we play."

"It was 50-50," McGary said. "I might have been leaning a little bit toward (leaving at first), but I talked it over with my family, and I thought this was what was best.

"I kind of want to be a kid for one more year."

...and you get both guys planning on leaving after next year. This is fine. It gives Michigan time to replace them. It does mean that the 2014 recruiting class will burgeon to at least 5 players, more if there is a transfer or Stauskas blows up into a lottery pick. Or Spike, I guess.

In any case, Michigan's next basketball recruiting class is huge for the continued program upswing. It currently consists of Florida big man Ricky Doyle and Indiana wing Austin Hatch, if Hatch can get back on the court. That's kind of a big if; it seems likely Michigan signs the guy and puts him on a medical scholarship. They'll probably add four additional players: another post-ish guy who will be around (Michigan will have just Doyle, Donnal, and Bielfeldt in 2015), a couple wings, and then a wild card.

Michigan's caught the eye of Milwaukee five-star Kevon Looney:

In an interview with ChicagoHoops.com earlier this week, Looney listed Michigan as one of a handful of schools firmly on his radar.

Looney, who said his recruitment was still "pretty wide open," also listed Michigan State, Tennessee, Florida, Duke, Georgetown and Wisconsin as schools he's hearing the most from.

At 6'9", Looney is a Kevin Durant-style wing with range.

Putting him at the four in Beilein's system would be almost unfair. Let's hope that "Michigan" coming out of his mouth first means something down the road. One and done? Uh… probably. Don't tell Beilein.

Meanwhile, Sam Webb told his WTKA audience this morning that if Trevon Bluiett and Vincent Edwards were to pick today, they would both be headed elsewhere. (I'd guess those destinations would be Butler and Purdue.) That wasn't a lock or anything, but just a feeling from a connected guy. They seem to be leading for Devin Booker despite heavy attention from powers, but Booker isn't rushing towards a decision.

Michigan's going to see their options expand; this AAU circuit will see a half-dozen new prospects on the radar. The three guys mentioned in the previous paragraph are their only current offerees right now. That'll change in the next few months. UMHoops has some additional information on who they might offer.

While Beilein wasn't gung-ho about the possibility after Trey's departure…

"I don’t think we’re in a position where we have to use (Trey’s scholarship)," Beilein said. "But if there’s the right situation – last year Caris was more of a redshirt, was going to be."

…they could take a swing at a 2013 kid if one they like pops up. They've got two scholarships available. Assuming GRIII and McGary are gone after this year, if you can get a guy who you think you can be a four-year contributor more along the lines of Caris LeVert than Colton Christian that's a move you may want to make. There's a shaky rumor about Michigan reaching out to former Hofstra commitment Gabe Levin, so they're poking around a bit.

Okay, not just me. I was wondering if what I saw from Delonte Hollowell in the spring game was a hallucination or wishful thinking. Apparently not:

Defensive coordinator Greg Mattison indicated there's more to it than that -- that Hollowell had a terrific spring, and could force his way into the rotation come fall.

“I think you probably thought it was rhetoric when we first got here and you heard me say it before -- you’re evaluated every day in practice," Mattison said when asked about Hollowell's start. "The thing that Brady (Hoke) does such a good job of is that we have competitions in practice. Competition means it’s a game.

"How you react in that competition is going to decide who’s going to earn the right to play the next day and be where they are the next day in the depth chart. So that depth chart can change day to day."

Hollowell played in 11 games last season, but mostly on special teams. He played in three games as a reserve defensive back, recording one tackle.

I brought this up on 'TKA yesterday tentatively and got the same vibe from Sam. While Hollowell isn't going to start over Taylor or Countess, hopefully they'll be comfortable enough to put a third cornerback on the field this fall if someone goes down. Now someone get him tweeting again.

Amara to the rescue. Another guy pushing his way up the depth chart is a key one for Michigan's next couple years, what with the receiver depth looking shaky. He's Amara Darboh:

"I knew Darboh was going to catch the ball," Gardner said. "We knew what was going to happen. We were planning to call that play (the day before the game), and Coach Borges just said get it up and give him a chance.

"That's what I did. He performed." …

"He can do everything well," Gardner said. "He can shake guys in the short-range game, and he can go deep."

That bomb was quality: Darboh got a release that gave him space to the outside and adjusted to a less than perfect ball comfortably. That takes skill.

We're Texas. That means our administrators specialize in sounding like twits. Multi-year scholarships are now legal, but the baton is being picked up slowly despite those press conferences in the immediate aftermath of that rule's passage where every coach in the country said they would offer four-year rides. Full numbers are hidden behind a paywall, but the Chronicle of Higher Ed reports that multi-year deals are rare:

Nearly two-thirds of the 56 most powerful Division I public universities now offer multiyear awards, according to a Chronicle review of public records. Yet few of those institutions do so for more than a handful of athletes.

Among the holdouts are some of the wealthiest programs, including the University of Texas at Austin, the University of Oregon, and Texas A&M. At the University of Arizona, Georgia Tech, and the University of Louisville, this year's NCAA men's basketball champions, you can count the multiyear beneficiaries on one hand.

Here's the bit where someone from Texas sounds like a twit:

"Who gets a four-year, $120K deal guaranteed at age 17?" Christine A. Plonsky, women's athletic director at the University of Texas, wrote in an e-mail to The Chronicle. "The last thing young people need right now is more entitlement."

This is an athletic department that has an entirely separate athletic director for their womens' teams talking about how young people are entitled. I wish I had a magic poverty wand I could wave at people.

SPANG

Christine A. Plonsky finds herself in the kitchen of Taco Bell. She somehow knows her car is now a 1979 Yugo, her home a double-wide, her husband a machinist. She still makes more than 30k a damn year.

PLONSKY

Sing to me, o fate, a tale of entitlement—

FATE

Shut up and make me 12 soft tacos.

/scene

Anyway. John Infante argues that this sort of inconsistent application of the new multi-year rule is actually a good thing. First, a few numbers he pulled out:

But even colleges that have moved toward the longer agreements have done so modestly. Six institutions signed at least two dozen multiyear agreements this academic year. They include the University of Florida (60), Ohio State University (47), North Carolina State University (40), Michigan State University (30), Arizona State University (27), and Auburn University (27).

But multiyear awards still account for less than one-tenth of all athletic scholarships at most of those institutions.

IIRC OSU and MSU were amongst the schools that promised all of their football folks would be on multi-year scholarships, which clearly isn't happening. Meanwhile, Michigan doesn't even appear on this list of moderate adopters. On the other hand, Infante mentions that Illinois is giving out multi-year deals to virtually everybody.

Infante's argument:

Recruits are beginning to understand their power in the negotiation as well as the tools they can use to get the best deal. Hopefully as the market in recruiting and athletic scholarships continues to mature, more recruits and schools will understand their bargaining positions. This encourages the best situation for athletes: when the agreement they sign is the same one that both they and their coach intend and understand.

Contrast this with setting scholarships at any one length. Under the old one-year maximum, coaches were flat out lying to prospects and their families. They would say that a one-year agreement was really for four years, and that as long as the athlete stayed eligible and out of trouble, the scholarship would be renewed. Then when the athlete was injured or did not live up to expectations, the grant-in-aid would be nonrenewed.

Requiring four- or five-year scholarships creates a similar situation. The coach assures the athlete that they have a four-year agreement, because look, there it is in a written contract. Then when the athlete does not pan out, the coach begins looking for ways to get out from under the commitment. That leads to deliberately confusing scholarship agreements and team/department rules which are inconsistently enforced.

As long as the guarantee remains in place—and the roster spot occupied—even when a guy is booted, that's about all they can do. But it'll be interesting to see if recruiting reporters start asking kids about the details of their "offers." Is Illinois explicitly using a longer-term promise as an incentive? Is, say, Western Michigan guaranteeing four-star commit Chance Stewart four years, and is that why he's headed for the MAC instead of the Illini? Shouldn't Da'Shawn Hand demand any school he signs with guarantee him four years?

It feels like a lot of stakeholders in the recruiting game are trying to downplay the existence of the multi-year rule. That can't last, and then things get interesting.

Etc.: Sap on Russell Davis. Baseball still cruising. Desmond Howard counter-sues photographer guy. Burke #1? With Marcus Smart out, maybe? Probably not. Rothstein on Gardner.