CBS sports' College Football Page has as their first top headline:
"Ohio St.-Michigan for home-and-home in '14-15"
Which I thought was a good plan considering we're such big rivals.
Sadly, it's only a link to the newly declared MSU-Oregon series. I can't imagine this makes anyone in Spartyland happy....
I know you all do this too. During the offseason, I like to seek out my favorite Michigan football videos, just to give me a tiny slice of Michigan until September returns to us. So I thought I'd start this thread off with this video I've found from Under the Lights. Enjoy. Can't wait to see what you all post to see if anyone has any of the same favorites.
EDIT: Embed didn't work. Here's link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c9QfGEAKHbM&feature=related
I wanted to put this in mgo.licio.us, but had no clue how. Sorry mods.
Michigan with USC?
Not real exciting stuff on this slow day. Didn't realize he had interest in PSU until I saw this. They may be a decent fit for him with Coach O'brien having his experience with Tom Terrific. He has two years eligible and may help PSU in their battle with ohio.
Visited PSU last weekend, going to Wisky soon.
Maybe it's just me, but general whining about X recruits' ratings on X sites seems to be on the rise. 98% of this whining is coming from posters with no experience evaluating football talent. The overwhelming number of complaints fall in one of following categories:
- outlier service X is CRAZY to have commit x ranked so low (they are an outlier, after all)
- the only service that gets commit x is outlier service X which has him ranked highly (my advanced highlight film scouting skills put this on good authority).
- commit X has offers from schools X and Y, it is CRAZY that they haven't been given X stars.
If you find yourself making these arguments stop. It's embarrassing.
Recruiting services or people like Magnus who are experienced evaluating talent are evaluating talent independently and will naturally come to different conclusions sometimes. If they all copied each other or coaches' evaluations they'd have no reason to exist.* So conclusion 1: learn to accept differences in evaluations.
Between now and signing day talent evaluators will gain the benefit of summer camps, combines and senior year film. Players will emerge, players will fail to develop and scouts both coaches and not will have more material and time to evaluate. On these bases recruits will move up and down. So conclusion 2: there are 11 months until sigining so don't get worked up about where a recruit stands on a site today.
This may all seem obvious, but it hasn't been observed and it's a point on which I'd like to see this forum distinguish itself from the general internet rabble.
*When there's a discrepancy between a site's ranking and an offer sheet, I'll side lean towards the coaches, but that doesn't mean a site's evaluation is wrong or of no vaue.
(Click the image to view full size)
That glorious time of year for football fans when the torch is passed
to a new set of leaders, the hunger for gossip is well fed, and
optimism is recharged, renewed, and rewarded.
This spring we have ample reason to be excited, most obviously because
we're once again coming off a successful season with a BCS win under our belt.
But, those victories are now the past, and it would be wise not to dwell on them
much longer with the national champions looming just beyond our horizon.
Still, with the sounds of pads hitting sleds echoing through the
Al Glick Fieldhouse, there's plenty of reason to be enthused. Go Blue.
OnThursday we'll look to the ice, where East Pneumonia's favorite Michigan family will gear up for Hunwick and company as they attempt to return to the Frozen Four.
THE BLOCKHAMS™ runs (typically) every Tuesday here at MGoBlog, and at least
every Thursday on its official home page. Also, don't forget to check out our newest
feature, Friday Roughs, a spontaneous low-end comic based on trending
Michigan events, available on Twitter and Facebook every Friday.