"It's not about last year or who's here or who's isn't here," says your head coach. "It's about getting out here and competing and seeing who is here, and that's where we're gonna go."
Just got this tweet from Tom
Michigan commit Kellen Jones was named 1st team all district, 1st team all state, and district defensive player of the year.
Quite the impressive resume. Can't wait to get this kid on campus.
From The Cedar Rapids Gazette, Iowa's leading receiver has been arrested for possession of a controlled substance.
Continuing the tradition started last year, a little holiday gift for those who use calendars on Outlook or Google rather than opening ESPN several times per day.
iCal link (.ics file)
For those of you who don't use google calendar, this is what it would look like. It's nice if you're into that sort of thing.
For those of you needing a refresher on how to add maps to google:
To add this to Google Calendar, under Other Calendars, choose Add > By URL. Not sure how to do this in iCal so if someone could help out that would be appreciated.
No, I don't believe Sagarin rigged his schedule ratings to help Oregon and prevent TCU from miraculously slipping by Oregon. But it is interesting to note that while I have heard plenty of talk about TCU and Boise St. lacking schedule strength, I hadn't really heard much regarding Oregon's.
Step in unnamed MGoBlogger* (**edit** named Drakeep) who pointed out that the Big Ten teams' schedules included an average of 7 winning opponents (while each SEC team faced an average of 5.8, and the PAC-10 something like 4...) This savvy blogger also pointed out that Oregon had only faced 3 teams with a winning record. I could barely believe it, and checked the stats myself. Such is true.
So I head over to Sagarin to see where exactly a schedule against 3 winning teams and a very much non-winning FCS school would rank. 20th. What was U of M's against 7 winning teams and a winning FCS school? 40th. Hmmm....
Next, I give Sagarin the benefit of the doubt and assume that although Oregon's opponents didn't all win a lot of games, the games they did win must have been meaningful. (In other words, Oregon's opponents must have combined to beat a lot of winning teams... as beating crappy teams and losing to good ones should not build a team's own strength.)
Oregon - Played 3 teams with winning records (out of 11, plus one losing FCS team.) The 12 teams Oreg played, combined to achieve 12 victories over "winning FBS opponents" and 7 victories over "winning FCS opponents." That equates to Oregon's opponents each beating ONE winning team.
Mich - Played 7 teams with winning records (out of 11, plus one winning FCS team.) The 12 teams Mich played, combined to achieve 32 victories over "winning FBS opponents" and 7 victories over "winning FCS opponents." That equates to Michigan's opponents each beating 2.67 winning teams.
These statistics are not even close, on either the primary or secondary level. Yet, there it is: Oregon's SOS at 20 and Michigan's SOS at 40.
For another reference point: Mich St. played 5 teams with a winning record, and MSU's opponents combined to haul in 19 wins against "winning FBS opponents." They lie between Michigan and Oregon on both the primary and secondary levels, and have a SOS rated 65th.
In conclusion, based on the ranking of Michigan and MSU schedules, Oregon's schedule should probably rate somewhere between 70 and 80. This has placed me in the odd position of questioning the legitimacy of Sagarin's rankings... if any mathematician out there can point out how strength of schedule might use something more meaningful and direct than opponent's wins and opponents' wins against winning teams to rank schedules, let me know. Until then, I'm going to have to believe that Sagarin is off his rocker.
*Unnamed MGoBlogger - my apologies, but I went in search of your forum and could no longer find it. If you (or anyone else) would care to link to your post, I will gladly edit the above content to include your name and a link.
The Twitters are blowing up over this but just a nice reminder that Desmond is being honored with a reception tonight in NYC and the dinner fully complimenting his accomplishments tomorrow:
"It's a tremendous honor to be in this class," Howard said. "You think about the guys who helped you get here, this is a team sport, and I had some tremendous coaches. My favorite coach at any level was Bo Schembechler. I always strived to make a guy like that proud. I don't know if you come across a person like that, who is outside of your biological family, often. But many of us, as players, once in awhile, we come across a special coach or a special person like that, and for me, it was Bo Schembechler.
"To go into the Hall of Fame, to represent the University of Michigan and not only coach Schembechler but coach Gary Moeller, who had the nerve, on fourth-and-2, to go for a pass play against Notre Dame and have that type of faith in our offense, that propelled me to have the season that I had, was tremendous. I had some great coaches, some great teammates and some great people around me at the University of Michigan, so it's definitely a great honor to go into the Hall of Fame as a member of the University of Michigan football family."
Remember to live your life like he suggested in The Rivalry DVD: When someone tells you that you suck, it's possibly just a flattering jealousy prevailing. Or, in tl; dr format: Haters Gonna Hate.
Congrats again to Desmond.
Michigan offered kicker Connor Loftus from California. He is a 3 star on espn and hasn't missed a field goal from within 40 yards this year. He's also made two from over 50! Other offers include Boise State, NC State, North Carolina and Navy. If we could get this kid, that sure would end our kicking problems!