here's one vote for "John Beilein's head in a Futurama jar"
The weather forecast for Saturday at Notre Dame is "Showers" but also "plenty of sun":
If it does turn out to be a rainy day, or even a wet grass field, this will presumably affect Denard's ability to cut etc (but perhaps not his straightaway speed), somewhat neutralizing our best weapon. Anyone else with more expertise than I have thoughts on this?
He's back with this new video. Hopefully he makes another pre-Michigan video. Here is the video he made for Purdue.
Here is the video he made before last year's Michigan/Notre Dame game.
After the loss he dissapeared for a while and then came back with a bunch of videos accusing Michigan of bribing the referees.
This guy is such a train wreck it's almost sad. Check out his channel below for more hilarity.
As I was watching the game on Saturday, I couldn't help but notice how it seemed a lot of our guys got dinged up (the ones I remember are Carvin, Jonas, and D-Rob, but it felt like more), and not a lot of their guys did (there was one toward the end of the game that I remember).
I'm not bashing Barwis at all with this, he's obviously done a terrific job of getting our guys in elite shape, but I remember him saying that a big part of his program is about injury prevention. Can these injuries be pegged on him? Or are they more attributable to the fact that injuries just happen as a result of bad luck/some guys being more prone to injury? Maybe someone with more time on their hands could put together a diary comparing injuries at various programs over the past few years to see if the Barwis Effect is helping us.
obviously, and understandably, everybody is excited about denard. i get that. if he were my team's qb, i'd be giddy. his talent is undeniable and his performance against u conn was impressive. i won't be the slightest bit surprised if he scorches nd's defense this weekend. but, the expectations for denard are rapidly approaching the stratosphere of absurdity. while talking michigan football with a michigan fan (reasonable, skeptical. and has seen lots of practice) the upshot was that denard was like pat white...only faster...and a better passer. which is not that far removed from denard as the leading heisman candidate or denard as a combination of desmond howard's legs and tom brady's upper body...
what follows is going to sound like sour grapes/rain on the parade/trolling/denard bashing, etc. instead, its cautionary advice from an nd fan who has learned how even the most obvious appearances can be devestatingly deceiving in college football. i've been convinced either that our team or that a certain player was destined for greatness repeatedly and...its been a very long time since any of those convictions became reality.
a reminder of things that denard has yet to do as a starter:
1. Play a team with more than one 4 star recruit on defense
2. Play a team that has produces more than one nfl player/year over the last 5 years
3. Play a team in a major conference
4. Play a team that was in the top 50 in total defense last year
5. Play a team that had a decent run defense last year
1. Play a team that has seen meaningful game film of him
2. Succeed when a team actually takes away anything that is working
3. Succeed against a team that overloads the box to minimize the running game
1. Play when he's dinged up
2. Play from behind
3. Respond to a mistake
4. Play on the road
5. Play in a big game
and on and on...which is all to say that its only one game. it was a historically great game, but, of all the small sample size fallacies, nothing is more wrong than believing something to be true on the basis of one game.
of the many cautionary tales i could mention i'll go to the wayback machine...ron powlus. incredibly hyped both in recruiting and in practice. his first game against northwestern he went 18/24 for 291 yards and 4 tds for an offense that thought the entire purpose of the forward pass was to keep the safeties out of the box. it was probably the best game of his 4 year college career. at about this point, beano said he was destined for 3 heismans. powlus serves as a cautionary tale not only about how much we can be misled, but about how expectations may cause harm. did powlus just flop or was he drug down by the weight of impossible expectations. i've always thought it was a little of both.
proposed definition: "to beano" - to set expectations at such an impossibly high level that not only are fans disappointed regardless of performance but those expectations causally limit your ability to meet them.
so, don't beano denard. (alternatively, if you do beano denard make sure that the effect kicks in within the next 72 hours...) denard is almost certainly going to be good. he may turn out to be great. he may even win 3 heismans. but, you're not going to help his chances by setting expectations at impossibly high levels.
and with that i'll let the negging commence...
Six Zero, I love your shirts, but you are really, really asking for it from the Angry Michigan BLANK Hating God coming out with this shirt after one game. I'm shaking with fear right now.
Mark Schlabaugh today, when talking about the ND/UM game said, "A Michigan loss puts them further behind than they were last year, rember 4-0?" Then they start talking about ND winning 10 games and going to the Orange Bowl!" Someone said it in an earlier post, and I will paraphrase, but the longer we stay low profile this season, the better things we'll be. Maybe they should rebrand the show "The idiots".