i would find this more credible if it was about Tom Crean
So, Stanford football drew 2,000 fans a game less this year than they did in 2006 when Stanford was 1-11. What's surprising to me is not the tepid support this year, but that those asshats managed to draw 40k in 2006.
LOL at the reasons advanced by the writer here. One of them is "inconsistent" starting times make group sales difficult. I'll clear things up for folks right here and now: 97% of the people associated with Stanford are pansies, wussies, sissies, and/or candy asses.
I didn't label this OT because it relates to Michigan's offense, IMO. I also didn't put this in the lions open thread because it is something different from the game itself.
And on we go. Has anyone else noticed the Lions have been using a ton of spread elements this year? I have seen them run the zone stretch out of the shotgun, use a TE coming across the formation to block an unblocked DE on a belly play like Michigan used to do with Minor all the time, and just today the Lions did a freaking read option with Stanton.
I find this interesting for so many reasons. First of all, for all those who say the spread is dead, then why are NFL teams using it. Also, this has to give ammo to RR and other spread coaches who probably face a lot of negative recruiting about how their system doesn't prepare guys for the NFL. Well, it would seem that isn't true anymore either. I am firmly in the keep RR camp and I think this only strengthens the argument against all the would be "this system can't work in the Big Ten" because apparently it can work in the NFL. And before we get any jokes about the Lions and obviously it doesn't work, I have seen other pro teams do similar things.
<Sunday: The calm before the finals>
MORE DAYS UNTIL MICHAEL SHAW SHANKS ANOTHER DEFENSE!
I was leaving Detroit on I-75 Northbound yesterday and I saw a billboard with the score of the MSU-Wisky game and a rose underneath. I assume that MSU or an alum paid for it, but it didn't make sense.
Is this supposed to be a way of awarding MSU a rose even though they were shut out of the Rose Bowl? Or was it part of their advertising campaign back before the bowl selection process? I'm just confused. Has anyone else seen these billboards around the state?
From 1991 to 1994 I did some unofficial recruiting for Michigan here in Northern Ohio. Bob Chimel was the recruiting director and was a close friend and neighbor of my sister. She told him about me and where I lived and he asked me if I would check out some players Michigan had targeted on an informal basis. Because of NCAA rules I was restricted to watching games and talking to the friends of the players we were watching (back channel communication) but I knew the players we wanted here locally and I had a pretty good idea which way they were leaning on any given day. And that lean seemed to change, day to day in some cases, right up to signing day in February. So I learned to not get too excited over what the kids told us they were going to do until they actually had to sign something and make it official.
Because of that experience I have often wondered why there is such a high level of excitement over early recruiting commitments, especially given the uncertainty surrounding the coaching staff right now. Early commits really didn't exist in the early 90's so I had no first hand experience in dealing with them but even in a completely stable coaching environment recruits say one thing and then do another because....well...their 17 year old kids and that's what 17 year old kids do. At best commitments made before the February signing period seem to be directional - "I'll PROBABLY go to school <fill in name on hat> next year but don't rush out and buy a jersey or anything because I still might change my mind".
Look at Hart for example or better yet Justice Hays as good examples. The board went nuts when Hart said he was going blue before the MSU game, had a meltdown when the rumor he was decommiting was floated and then sort of relaxed when it was proven to be false. Except Hart himself has said if RR goes, he goes - so what does his early commit really mean? Hays, on the other hand, goes Irish and they are overjoyed but then he changes his 17 year old mind, decommits and we party. And there's still 2.5 months left for him to change his mind again.
Tom V does an absolutely unbelievably good job of identifying the kids who are most likely going to sign with us and those that most likely aren't. I am VERY impressed with his ability to gain the confidence of the recruits and be one step ahead of seemingly every other official service in knowing what is probably going to happen. But I would ask that everyone take a deep breath and remember that with CC in discussion it is very likely that recruits we think we are getting will go elsewhere if there is a change made and recruits we think we aren't getting might go blue if a new HC is brought in.
Florida defensive coordinator Teryl Austin may become available because of the head coaching change there. He was an assistant here for three years under Carr and has solid NFL experience as well. A name to keep in mind once the major CC is decided.