"(I) think about 'The Lion King,' Simba gets hit over the head and (he's told) 'the past can hurt,' " Harbaugh said Monday afternoon. "'You can either run from it or embrace it and learn from it.'
Per Rivals depth chart for this week Cam Gordon is listed above Jake Ryan. I haven't looked at previous weeks depth charts for a couple weeks so I'm not sure if it has been this way or not. Does anyone have any information as to why Ryan has been moved down or is this perhaps just a situation where an "or" should be there but isn't?
It seems reasonable to bring this up every year, particularly when our next opponent is coming off of a bye week.
Teams that get a week of rest and an entire extra week to prepare have an advantage over their opponent because their opponent didn't get the extra rest or time to prepare.
Bye weeks seem to hurt more than they help. Since 2002 (to 2010*), teams of the six BCS conferences have an overall win pct of 0.480 when coming off of a bye week. The Big Ten teams in particular struggle when coming off of a bye. From 2002-2010* Big Ten teams are a combined 17-32 when coming off of a bye. This is good for a 0.35 win pct.
Ohio State went 56-10 in Big Ten play from 2002-2010* but was 1-3 when facing a conference opponent after a bye. This includes their 2004 loss to Northwestern, their only loss to the Wildcats since 1971
Penn State and Iowa are also 1-3 when coming off of bye weeks and playing conference opponents
37 of the 65 major-conference teams have a losing post-bye week record.
Under Mark Dantonio, MSU has a 1-1 record coming off of a bye week
In 2008, they lost to PSU 14-49
In 2010, they beat Purdue 35-31
[*This information was summarized from this article, read the full version from the Wall Street Journal; info current through Oct. 14, 2010]
This might shed some light on the debate of Robinson's status with the team stemming from posts last week.
per mspeedkills (pretty trustworthy):
I can't find a database online to help me on this one. Maybe someone has the data?
IIRC as of a few years ago, it was something very odd like 18 of the past 20 UM/MSU games was won by the team that had the greater rushing yardage. I don't know if that trend continued under RR. Does anyone know the current data for that trend?
Not that past performance is any indication of future results, but you have to think that we will outrush Sparty this weekend. Their OL is full of holes; if they are going to win it's on Cousin's arm. While their D has great stats, clearly we're faster than probably any team they've faced, including ND, and they lost that game. I don't see us rushing for 400 but maybe 250-250 is probable, but at the same time, I don't expect Sparty to rush for over 200.
Hence, I think if the rushing stat trend were to have continued viability, then we win this Saturday.
It just occurred to me this week that Michigan is one half of the top two rivalry games in the conference and they play those games every year. No other team has that kind of schedule. While we love it, embrace it, and take the challenge, it can be argued that year-in/year-out Michigan plays the toughest conference schedule because these super-heated rivalry games never go off their schedule.
Questions: Is there another Big Ten rivalry game not involving Michigan that is bigger than our two?
And, is it right for the schedule-maker to give Sparty a bye week heading into this game? (Ed. note: no excuses, we will beat the snot out of them regardless. But would the league ever dream of giving Michigan or Ohio a bye the week before The Game? I think not. Why not? Well, you know the answer.)
Michigan 24, State 17
The official BCS rankings come out next week, so Brad Edwards has a projected BCS lineup.
Michigan is 9th.
4- Oklahoma State
5- Boise St
10- Georgia Tech