this guy evidently hired to work for AD
I have seen plenty of posts about Devin Gardner's redshirt, but little discussion of how he might stack up in Borge's offense. Did I miss such a discussion? Unless I am crazy, only one or two of the current QB prospects hold a candle to the guy we've got in house who--presumably--could see the field next year.
Is there any chance, for example, that Gardner outplays Denard for the starting job? In theory, he could be better suited for the Gulf Coast etcetera than Denard, no? Everyone was so high on Gardner for so long and I'm curious about why the relative silence lately. . .
Aside from FB Joey Kerridge and the possibility of OT Graham Glasgow does anyone have info on likely preferred walk ons that we are pursuing? Scout has had several unranked "prospects" pictured on the front page of late including Trotwood QB Marcus Graham so perhaps these are possibles(one more Graham and I get a free cracker).
Report: Maryland might have contacted Rodriguez during bowl practices
The Detroit News
In a detailed story regarding Maryland's search for a football coach published Monday in the Baltimore Sun, the paper confirmed former Michigan coach Rich Rodriguez had been among those coaches contacted.
From The Detroit News: http://detnews.com/article/20110215/SPORTS0201/102150407/Report--Maryland-might-have-contacted-Rodriguez-during-bowl-practices#ixzz1E3jHp4bu
After browsing thru the Deinhart prediction thread, I think there is something worth pointing out. I know everyone knows we have 2 divisions now, but I think it is going to take time for people to understand we no longer have to have a better record than OSU and Wis to win the Big Ten.
We need to understand that we are in essentially a 6 team conference. I have been "Captain Optimism" about 2011 for 2 years now and I will consider Hoke's 1st year a pretty big downer if we are not playing a rematch against OSU in the BTC Game. Consider "our" conference next year.
Nebraska is welcomed to the Big Ten with a pretty brutal schedule next year and we play them at home. MSU also has a brutal early schedule. The other upper tier team in our conference is Iowa who I think is going to be in for some hard times this year. They lose a ton and have to break in a new qb, they are not a "reloading" type team. They get a break on the schedule, but I still don't see them as very good next year.
This thing is wide open for us. I think our side of the divisions will submit a team with 2 losses in conference and probably use a tiebreaker, but it is wide open. We can win this conference next year.
Just remember that in the back of your head when you start thinking about our prospects for next year.
Isaiah Bell was regarded as an average safety by Scout and Rivals, but ESPN* had him as a top 100 overall player, invited him to their all-star game, and wrote an over-the-top positive appraisal of his playmaking skills in the secondary. A sample:
...shows outstanding ball skills...rules the secondary as a free safety. Has great instincts and plays outstanding zone coverage especially in the three deep. Should be a solid halves player also in two deep zone...Breaks quickly on the pass with a burst to the football. High points the football and has great timing on the interception...magnificent kickoff return specialist; has good speed and can read his blocks. Has a second gear and can kick it in to blow by would-be tacklers....A good openfield tackler...has good foot agility and shows flexibility in the hips. Can change direction without loss of speed or balance...
Note the many comments about speed/agility.
Amidst other threads I often bring up Bell to a resounding chorus of confused shrugs. No one seems to know much except that he was converted to LB, and got a lot bigger. That move always seemed odd to me since we are so weak/thin at safety. (I do not mean weak/thin literally, as a shot at Vinopal--you know what I mean.)
So...commenters at Scout are now suggesting Bell is moving to DE. (!?)
The kid who was a "magnificent kickoff return specialist" is being pushed up to the line? Does that seem odd, especially with the new staff's presumed emphasis on defensive bone density?
This is a pretty bizarre positional evolution for this kid, no? Free safety / kick returner to DL? Can you really eat and lift your way across the positional ocean like that?
Please help me understand, so I can stop typing sentences with question marks.
*I know a lot of people think ESPN's rankings are generally sub-par or impacted by a conflict of interest since they also host one of the two all-star games. The first point is simply wrong (some discussion here). But there may be some merit to the second argument, and since Bell was an UA invitee, I am willing to give the rating an asterisk.