Ann Arbor, Mich. – The University of Michigan Men’s Lacrosse team will take the field next Thursday, December 10, when they participate in their annual East-West intra-squad scrimmage at Oosterbaan Fieldhouse in Ann Arbor. Action will kick off at 7:00pm EST as the split squads will battle for bragging rights for their respective regions. Assistant Coaches Ken Broschart and AT Bulus will guide the East team, while fellow assistants Mark Greaney and Ryan Demorest will lead the West squad. The game will mirror a regular-season contest with a complete officiating crew as the Wolverines take the field in their last organized on-field activity before the start of the New Year.
The Wolverines will then have the remainder of the semester to focus on their studies before returning to practice in early January in preparation for the defense of their back-to-back MCLA National Championships. The Maize and Blue will open their season with a pair of scrimmages before heading west for a tough, three-game road swing vs. Arizona State, Arizona, and Brigham Young.
For all your Michigan Men’s Lacrosse info before the start of the ‘10 campaign, please visit mgobluelacrosse.com.
The release isn't clear whether the ticket prices will be the same as regular season games, but the worst-case scenario is $6 for general admission, $3 for students with an ID. This is a great chance to catch a game for one of the most successful programs on campus, even though they're a club varsity team. Should be an interesting opportunity for the West squad to show that good lacrosse players don't just come from the East Coast.
First we have to remember that this is a good year to be in the Big Ten as it is an extremely deep and talented conference, and would be considered a power conference this year. This makes it possible to make the NCAA Tourney with 19 wins and a Big Ten tourny win, but 20 or 21 and add a BTT win would lock up a birth for them.
Secondly, their out of conference schedule this year is on par with last years. Last year they played UCLA, Duke (2), UCONN, and Maryland. This year they have played Creighton, Marquette, Alabama, Boston College, and Utah (4 of them away from home), and still play UCONN and Kansas. That is 7 quality opponents, now granted they are currently 1-4 in those games, but win 1 against either UCONN or Kansas and all of a sudden you have a 2nd quality OOC win. This would be the same as (corrected! sorry apparently counting to 2 was tougher today that I thought) last year. The tough schedule will help them with their RPI, and as dumb as the RPI is, it matters to the selection committee.
Last year after the Big Ten Tournament Michigan was 20-13 and drew a 9 seed.
So what would they have to do to make the tournament. Here is a scenario for you. # of wins in ( )
- First you must win the two cupcake games left: Detroit (5), Coppin St. (6)
- Beat UCONN (7) at home: They could have won on the road last year
- Take care of business against the Big Ten basement dwellers: Indiana (8&9), Iowa (10&11), Northwestern (12&13)
- Go 5-5 against Penn State (14) Michigan State (15), Wisconsin (16), Ohio State (17), and Minnesota (18)
- Beat either Purdue or Illinois (19)
- Win 1 BTT game (20)
Is 11 Big Ten wins tough? Sure. They could have accomplished it last year though had they beat Penn State and Iowa on the road. The toughest, and probably most important, thing to do is to sweep Indiana, Iowa and Northwestern. Every game you lose to those teams is another you have to win against the powers of the conference.
So when will we know if they have realistic tournament hopes? The 6 games between January 14th and January 30th. Home games against Indiana and Iowa bookend games vs. UCONN, at Wisky, at Purdue, and vs. MSU. They go 4-2 or 5-1 they could be on their way. Less than that and they could have a lot of work left to do come Big Ten Tournament time.
For those just joining us, it's a community service event (Mitch Albom's organization is involved) in which we go to two (used to be five) family homeless shelters in Detroit and throw the kids there a Christmas Party.
Before I posted that on the board (and Brian stapled it to an Unverified Voracity), this year's event was looking a bit grim. No one knows quite the reason. It could be that our head wasn't screwed on quite right. I could be, perhaps, that our cash was too tight. But I think that the most likely reason of all, may have been that the economy was two sizes too small.
But, whatever the reason, our head or our wallets, or too much yule lagers, it wouldn't have come off but for MGoBloggers.
Every kid in the shelters, the tall and the small,
might still have been singing, without any presents at all.
But we needn't have worried, YOU CAME THROUGH!
We went from little to plenty, and it was all thanks to you!
MGoBloggers responded, from Detroit to L.A.
Heck, even a Buckeye sent donations our way.
165 clients at Booth Evangeline
Ate pizza and cake and talked Wolverine spleen
The ladies had their nails done, the boys played some ball
And then Santa arrived with presents for all
Though I don't think MGoBlog was really noticed by Mitch
We know why AAS '09 went off without a hitch
(You'll have to take thank-you's from organizer Marci Fitch)
So thank you to everyone who helped in some way.
This blog seriously made those kids' day.
For the other site, well, Ms. Kroflich had these words to say:
fin.Hello Seth,Could you post this on the MGoBloggers site? I'll send thank you letters (and receipts) to the people who donated, but we might get an even better turn-out next year if people know what happens (?). Thank you again for posting this event (it wouldn't have been nearly as successful with MGoBloggers help)!Thank you to the volunteers and donors who made the Christmas Party at Genesis II House* such a marvelous event!!
We got off to a slow start... but things really picked up from there. The students in Mrs. Val Tomich's class at Allen Park Community School provided us with the crafts to create decorations for the Christmas tree. It sparkled with the silver and gold garland and our glittery decorations. It looked so great that Santa Claus (Lonnie) came to visit, passed out candy, and sat for photos with the children. Once Santa was safely on his way back to the North Pole, the party started groovin' with Living Energy (248 926-9550). Rick and his crew gets everyone up and jumpin! They passed out hats, glasses, bead necklaces, and feather boas which made everyone feel extra festive. We got funky for about an hour and then did a conga line to the dining room for lunch. Sandee and Jessica made us a terrific lunch including hamburgers, chicken strips, tater-tots, baked beans, 3 bean casserole, and brownies. After lunch, we setup a Holiday store with all of the fabulous donations... coats, hat/mitten/scarf sets, clothes, toys, games, stuffed animals, books, make-up kits, toiletry sets, purses, and Payless gift certificates (cash donations were used to purchase gifts). There were more warm coats and dress clothes than ever this year. We had enough donations for every lady to receive 2 gifts and each child to receive 8 gifts! Our bravest volunteers, Kevin and Laura, stayed in the dining room and sang Christmas carols with the children while the rest of us made sure that everyone got the perfect gifts for Christmas!* For those who may not know, Genesis II House is one of Detroit Rescue Mission Ministries transitional housing shelters. They provide the ladies and children with a safe and stable environment, focusing on education, job-training, and parenting. The goal is to help the ladies obtain and keep a home of their own... One of the ladies told us that she would not be at Genesis II for our next party because she got a home of her own. Now that's a Merry Christmas!
Thank you all so much for making the Holidays happier!
After countless hours of work (ok, roughly 2-3) and hundreds of votes (or maybe closer to 15-20), it’s now time to present the first annual MGoAwards!
These awards are voted on by you the MGoUser. Votes are the total of the online poll votes, plus the original e-mailed in votes. I realize that some votes may have counted twice (poll and e-mail), but that’s the benefit you get from following directions the first time.
For a refresher on the nominees, go here.
Before we begin, I’d like to ask that the recipients limit their acceptance speeches to 2 minutes, and no Kanye-type interruptions please(unless it's funny).
The "Thank you for making us smarter" award for the Best Diary (Analysis) goes to:
Misopogon – Decimated Defense (Part I, Part II, and Post Perdue Update)
The "Laughter is the best medicine" award for Best Diary (Humorous) goes to:
Treehugger -Forcier/Barkley Chat Room
The "Future moderator" award for Best Diary/Post (recurring) goes to:
The Mathlete – By the Numbers
The "Laughter is the best medicine, jr." award for Best Post (Humorous and/or OT)
We have a tie between:
chitownblue2 – Members Only
GoMBlue – Very OT: Showering
The "Misopogon" award for Best Poster (so named because he damn near swept the voting) goes to:
The "Misopogon of commenting" award for Best Commenter goes to:
The "Redemption" award for Comeback Poster of the Year goes to:
The "Irish" award for Best Troll (see "Misopogon" award for genesis of name) goes to:
The "Visual Distraction" award for Best Avatar goes to:
Estours77 – Zoomed in Tom Hammond
Misopogon – Desmond to Helmet morph
The "Way too much time on your hands" award for Best Graphic Art goes to:
The Shredder (or The Shredded if you make a typo)– MS Paint
The "How did we get on this subject?" award for Best divergent conversation goes to:
Yet another tie.
Adrian Witty is Qualified – Math Discussion
Good Idea, Bad Idea – 12 Weeks of Michigan
The "Father of k06em01" award for Biggest Meltdown/Negbang goes to:
Congratulations to all the winners! I hereby present you…nothing really, except our respect (in most cases). May your username live on for eternity.
As of now, the plan is to do this again near the beginning of next season (the offseason awards). Hopefully I'll be better at this and it'll go more smoothly.
Opening disclaimer: I already thought Rittenberg was... non-thorough, this is but the latest confirmation. If there was a chance Brandon Graham was in this discussion, I would be doing such an analysis for him, too. Graph credit to EDSBS.
I've been beating this drum for a little while, but a recent post by ESPN's Big Ten blogger Adam Rittenberg really steamed me, so I can't help but post about it. Forgive me. Here's the offending passage:
Ingram and Spiller sparkled in the spotlight Saturday, and both men have had huge performances all season long. Nebraska defensive tackle Ndamukong Suh also stepped up in the biggest game of his season, and it was great to see him get an invite to New York City. But in the end, my decision came down to the player who consistently produced week in and week out against top competition.
We'll ignore the fact that Ingram wasn't even always the best back on his team (he was pulled from a couple contests for lack of production, and Trent Richardson had to step in), and look at the accusation of Suh.
So, he didn't step up "against top competition," eh? That's thinly veiled code for "A team that loses 4 games should not produce the Heisman winner." While that may occasionally be true, it's not like any of Nebraska's 4 losses were really Suh's fault. Here they are:
Virginia Tech 16, Nebraska 15
In their home stadium, the Hokies were held to 278 total yards, and would have lost but for a miracle 81-yard pass late in the game that Suh cannot be held accountable for. Only Alabama and North Carolina held the Hokies to fewer offensive yards. Without that pass, Virginia Tech is held to 197 yards, and Nebraska starts the season 5-0.
In that game, Suh had 8 total tackles, including 1 sack. He also broke up 4 passes (this is a defensive tackle, people!).
Texas Tech 31, Nebraska 10
The Red Raiders were the only team to score more than 20 points on the Huskers. In scoring 31, however, they were held to just 259 total offensive yards, as Nebraska was the only team to hold them below 350 yards offense, and one of a select few to hold them below 400 (something Texas couldn't do). In that game, Nebraska fumbled inside the Texas Tech red zone, and the Red Raiders returned it for a score. That's a 10-14 point swing on a single play, and with the momentum it created (Texas Tech led 21-0 before Nebraska scored a single point), it could have meant the difference in the game. The Huskers also missed a field goal in this game, in addition to their 2 turnovers.
In that game, Suh had 4 total tackles, including 2 for loss. Every stop he made was solo. He also added 4 QB hurries.
Iowa State 9, Nebraska 7
The Cyclones notched only 239 yards of total offense, but won the game due to 8 turnovers for the Nebraska offense. The Cyclones' scoring drives covered 4 and 83 total yards. Without a 4-yard scoring drive for the opponent, Nebraska wins this game. If Nebraska doesn't fumble the ball on the opponent's 38-, GOAL-, GOAL-, and 5-yard lines (yes, they fumbled into the endzone twice, and another time in the redzone), or even throw picks on three possessions, including one in the red zone, the Huskers should have run away with this game. It is CLEARLY Suh's fault that Nebraska lost.
In that game, Suh had 8 total tackles, including a solo sack for a 6-yard loss. He also hurried the quarterback 3 times, and blocked 2 FUCKING KICKS IN ONE GAME.
Texas 13, Nebraska 12
This game was like, 3 days ago, so it should be fresh in all of our minds. Texas gained 202 yards, by far their season-low offensive output. But for an unfortunate kick out of bounds and a horse collar penalty on the final Texas drive, Nebraska would have knocked the Longhorns out of the National Championship discussion. This is clearly not what Rittenberg meant by performing against top competition.
In that game, Suh had 12 total tackles (10 of them solo). He made 4 solo tackles for a loss and assisted on 2 others, for a total of 22 yards. He made 4 solo sacks and assisted on another, for a loss of 21 yards.
The Whole Package
For the year, Suh made 50 solo tackles and 82 total tackles, leading the team. He is a defensive tackle. He led the team in total tackles. He plays on the interior of the defensive line. I will keep repeating this until it gets in Adam Rittenberg's unintelligent little brain. He made 19.5 tackles for loss (tied for 14th in the nation), and 12 total sacks (9th in the nation). He made an interception. He defended 10 passes (from the defensive tackle spot, people!), forced a fumble, hurried the quarterback 21 times(!), and blocked 3 kicks. None of Nebraska's losses, except maaaybe the Texas Tech game, can be attributed to some deficiency by the Huskers' defense that Suh could have prevented.
He obviously did this against inferior competition, as well. Let's look at Nebraska's opponents this year:
- Florida International: #22 nationally in total offense (held to 3 points)
- Arkansas State: #95 nationally in total offense
- Virginia Tech: #55 nationally in total offense
- Louisiana-Lafayette: #74 nationally in total offense
- Missouri: #32 nationally in total offense (held to 12 points)
- Texas Tech: #7 nationally in total offense
- Iowa State: #75 nationally in total offense
- Baylor: #86 nationally in total offense
- Oklahoma: #28 nationally in total offense (held to 3 points)
- Kansas: #26 nationally in total offense (held to 17 points)
- Kansas State: #86 nationally in total offense
- Colorado: #105 nationally in total offense
- Texas: #20 nationally in total offense (held to 13 points)
Nebraska's defense was #11 nationally against the run, #3 nationally in pass efficiency, #9 in total defense, and #2 in scoring defense. Suh was its unquestioned star. If you wonder about his role in the #3 pass defense, remember his 10 PBUs, 12 sacks, and 21 QB hurries.
What does a guy have to do to earn the Heisman defensively, Rittenberg? And why do you make an argument ("production against top competition") that is the EXACT OPPOSITE of what the truth is?
last, and most importantly, his name is HOUSE OF MOTHERFUCKING SPEARS.
The conclusion (see analysis below): The task of getting back into the top 25 in the national rankings is daunting, since to do so, we must change and improve our Sagarin ratings more than any other B10 team did from last year to this year.
The good news: Only one B10 team improved last year more than UM did (Indiana).
Also, I would guess that we had as many key Freshmen playing in 2009 as in 2008. That won’t be the case next year. Thus, in 2011 and 2012, there should be a lot more upperclassmen added to the UM lineup, compared with other teams. So, things are definitely looking up. But the progress may not be as fast we’d like.
Summary of details (based on the Sagarin Predictor ratings--which unlike the ones used in the BCS that ignore point spreads--are the best predictors of actual game results).
UM gained about 3-3.5 points in the Sagarin ratings from last year.
Just improving by 3-3.5 points again next year (from 2009-10) would move us clearly above Purdue into 6th place alone in the B10 (assuming that, for each B10 team that improves next year, there is one that declines equally),
But improving by only 3.5 points next year would move us up no further, since there was a big gap this year between the 1-5 teams and the 6-11 ones in the B10. In fact, to move into the top 4 in the B10 and the top 25 teams in the nation, we would need to improve by about 10-11 points—at least three times the improvement made from 2008-9.
Is that doable? I think so but it would be the biggest jump either way in the past 2 years for a B10 team. To put it into perspective, note that from 2008-9
PSU lost 10 points
NW lost 8.5 points.
Iowa and Illinois lost 7 points (surprising since Iowa’s now in a BCS bowl).
MSU lost 2.5 points
OSU, Minn and Purdue and were unchanged.
(OSU did not improve, despite Pryor going from being a Fresh to Soph probably because they lost Wells).
Wisc was only one of two teams to gain as much as UM did: 3.5 points.
Only one team, Indiana, gained more than us: 8 points.
So, to gain 10-11 points next year in the Sagarin ratins, we must gain more than any B10 team did this year. We must change slightly more than any other team changed in either direction (PSU made the biggest change by losing 10 points).