Support MGoBlog: buy stuff at Amazon
Diaries
MGoHistory - The Year In Review - 1989
[Previous MGoHistory: 1986, 1971, & 1997]
We now find ourselves on a strange planet, standing before a large, rocky arch that emits an eerie glow. Inside the arch scenes flash in rapid succession. “What the hell is that?”, one of us asks. Surprisingly the arch responds in a booming voice, “I am the Guardian of Forever! I can be your guide to any time and place you desire! Heed the instructions of the man next to you.” We turn to find a tall, lithe man, with pointed ears dressed in a tight blue shirt staring impassively at a small black box that hums. “When I tell you”, the strange man says, “step through the portal.” We turn to each other and shrug. His shirt isn’t red, so we must be in good hands. “Go now!” he instructs. We leap and hurl ourselves through time and space to find ourselves arriving in….1989.
The end of the 80’s kicks off with the end of the Reagan era, sort of. Reagan’s former Vice President, George HW Bush is inaugurated in January, becoming the 41stPresident of the United States. The Bush Administration starts off on a positive note when, in February, the Soviets withdraw the last of their troops from Afghanistan, ending their 9 year occupation. Things take a turn for the negative in March as Americans discover the inconvenient truth that drunk tanker captain, plus broken navi
gation system, equals bad; resulting in the Exxon Valdex running aground and spills hundreds of thousands of barrels of oil into Prince William Sound off the coast of Alaska. By spring, world attention turns to China as student protesters march on in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square dem
anding democratic reforms of China’s communist regime. The demonstration ends violently in early June as China’s hardliners deploy the military to disperse the protesters, resulting in thousands of injuries and deaths. Meanwhile throughout the year, the Iron Curtain starts to crumble as Soviet-supported regimes across Eastern Europe are deposed in numerous free elections. This wave of democracy propagates with astonishing speed and incredibly culminates, in late autumn, with the fall of Berlin Wall, symbolically ending the Cold War.
In other news, the American space probe, Voyager 2, makes the final planetary rendezvous of its mission when it flies by Neptune. Author Salman Rushdie discovers that it’s a bad idea to piss off Iranian clerics after Ayatollah Khomeini issues a fatwa for the publication of “The Satanic Verses”, forcing Rushdie to go into hiding for several years. Later, he’ll be compensated for this inconvenience by getting to sleep with Padma Lakshmi. Lastly, an anonymous computer scientist at CERN, Timothy Berners-Lee,
invents a revolutionary internet-based information management system that he calls the World Wide Web. The Web makes the internet accessible to virtually every person on the planet, revolutionizing the way humans communicate and eventually leading to mankind’s greatest achievement; blogs.
In sports, iconic players dominate the championship scenes of several leagues. Joe Montana wins the 3rdof his 4 Super Bowls by leading the San Francisco 49ers over the Cincinnati Bengals, 20-16, in S
uper Bowl XXIII, with the great Jerry Rice earning MVP honors. The Detroit Pistons “Bad Boys”, lead by Hall of Famer Isiah Thomas, end years of frustration against the Celtics and Lakers, by besting the LA Lakers in 4 games to finally win the franchise’s first NBA championship. In golf, British legend Nick Faldo wins
his first of 3 Masters titles by defeating American Scott Hoch. German tennis players dominate the pro circuit with Boris Becker being named the ATP Player of the Year after winning Wimbledon and the US Open. Meanwhile, on the womens side, Steffi Graf continues her rise to making a claim as the greatest female player of all time by following up her 1988 Grand Slam with victories in 3 of the 4 majors, coming in as a runner-up only in the French Open. In mid-October, the “Bay” Series between the Oakland A’s and San Francisco Giants is interrupted 30 minutes before Game 3 by the Loma Prieta earthquake. The Series is delayed 10 days before Oakland would complete a four game sweep of the Giants.
On the big screen, people flock to see Harrison Ford and Sean Connery quest for the Holy Grail in “Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade”. “Batman” is released and reinvigorates the superhero movie genre, which continues to thrive to this day. Kevin Costner and Michigan Alum James Earl Jones star in “Field of Dreams”, which teaches us that “If you build it, he will come”. And Morgan Freeman achieves mainstream stardom in the Oscar-winning “Driving Miss Daisy”.
Television sees the premier of several programs that will be archetypes of the 90’s such as “Seinfeld”, “The Simpsons”, and “The Arsenio Hall Show”. We also see the premier of such Satu
rday morning cult favorites “Saved By The Bell” and “American Gladiators”. The year sees the departure of mainstay programming that had endured for decades prior. “American Bandstand” and the original “Doctor Who” air for the final time. TV in the 80's gets a symbolic farewell when “Miami Vice” airs for the last time. In addition to TV programming, people amuse themselves with next generation video game consoles such as Sega Genesis and Ninetendo comes out with the GameBoy.
In other entertainment, more and more of America’s youth are listening to rap an
d hip hop. Acts such as Public Enemy and “Fear of a Black Planet”, and N.W.A with their album “Straight Outta Compton” gain mainstream acceptance. Former Michigan student Madonna continues to be pops biggest draw with her hit “Like A Prayer”, Poison releases the definitive hair metal power ballad, “Every Rose Has It’s Thorn”, and boy band pioneers New Kids on the Block strike it big with their album, “Hangin’ Tough”.
In Michigan football, Bo Schembechler’s 21stMichigan team opens the 1989 season with a #1 vs #2 showdown against Notre Dame in Ann Arbor. On a dreary, rainy September day, Michigan outplays the defending National Champions but the Irish still prevail 24-19 on the strength of two Raghib Ismail kickoff returns; leaving fans to this day wondering, “Why the {BLEEP} did we kick to
Rocket Ismail again?!!” Michigan would go on to win the remainder of their games that season, including a 28-18 victory over Ohio that clinched the outright Big 10 title and Michigan’s 10thRose Bowl berth under Bo. The ’89 Wolverines featured All-American safety Tripp Welborne on defense. The offense was lead by quarterback Michael Taylor along with what is arguably the best backfield in Michigan history in tailbacks Tony Boles and Leroy Hoard and fullback Jarrod Bunch.
The Ohio victory and conference championship proves bittersweet when fans and alumni are shocked in mid-December with Coach Schembechler announcing that the 1990 Rose Bowl would be his last game as head coach. Stating that “Giving up my football team is the hardest thing I’ve ever had to do”, a teary-eyed Schembechler names Assistant Coach Gary Moeller his successor. Schembechler’s coaching career ends on a sour, but not unfamiliar, note when the #3 ranked Wolverines are defeated by the #12 ranked USC Trojans 17-10 in the Rose Bowl. Bo’s last team finishes 10-2 and ranked 7th. After 21 years as Michigan’s head coach, Bo leaves as the winningest coach in program history with a record of 194-48-5, accruing 13 Big 10 titles, 2 Rose Bowl titles, and 10 Rose Bowl appearances, and 17 bowl appearances overall.
While one coaching dynasty was coming to an end in 1989, another was gaining steam. The 1988-89 Wolverine Hockey team posted their second straight winning season under Coach Red Berenson. The team, lead by All-American defenseman Myles O’Connor, finished the season 22-15-4 overall and 17-11-4 (4thplace) in the CCHA. The Wolverines also picked up the first of 13 Great Lakes Invitational titles under Berenson, defeating the Fighting Sioux of North Dakota. While Berenson's program was still two seasons away from returning to NCAA Tournament play, Red makes one of Michigan hockeys most enduring contributions by introducing the winged helmet as part of the team's uniform on the eve of the CCHA playoffs, a design cue that seems impossible for hockey to go without today.
The 1988-89 Michigan basketball team starts the season expecting to compete for the Big 10 conference championship. Lead by Coach Bill Frieder, the Wolverines feature a talented roster that includes seniors Glen Rice, Mark Hughes, and Mike Griffin, as well juniors Loy Vaught, Rumeal Robinson, Terry Mills, and Sean Higgins. The Wolverines have a solid but underwhelming season finishing 24-7 and 12-6 in conference, 3rdbehind Indiana and Illinois and ranked 10thin the polls. Entering the tournament, Michigan is a 3 seed in the Southeast Region and expectations are modest.
Michigan’s chances in the tournament seemingly take a turn for the worse when, days before the opening round, Coach Frieder is dismissed by Michigan Athletic Director Bo Schembechler. Upon learning that Frieder has accepted the job at Arizona State, Schembechler canonically declares, “A Michigan Man will coach Michigan” and installs Steve Fischer as interim coach. Inspired by fiery pep talks from Schembechler and record setting scoring by Rice, Michigan wins games against Xavier, South Alabama, Nort
h Carolina, and Virginia to earn a spot in the Final Four. In the semi-final Michigan upsets 1 seed Illinois 83-81, forever earning the ire of the Illini and cementing Michigan as Illinois’ main rival, unbeknownst to most Michigan fans. In the finals, Michigan battles Seton Hall to an 80-79 overtime win, the final margin being provided by two free throws from Robinson with just seconds to play, earning Michigan its first National Championship ever in basketball and Glen Rice is named the tournament Most Outstanding Player.
The 1989 Michigan basketball team was considered to be a group of talented underachievers heading into the NCAA Tournament, only to finally have all the pieces fall into place and go on an epic tournament run. Many comparisons have been made between this years squad and that historic bunch. With the conference championship just slipping through our grasp and our post-season journey about to begin, let us hope that the Wolverines of 2013 find some of the magic that struck in 1989. Go Blue.
Goal-by-Goal Analysis: Northern Michigan at Michigan 3/8/13
A cursory glance doesn't reveal many similarities between Michigan basketball and Michigan hockey these days. After all, one team took the court this weekend with a share of the B1G title on the line and fans that lined up something like 22 hours before tip-off. The other team took the ice this weekend with no title on the line and not even a live televised feed of their games.
Take a closer look, though, and some broad similarities appear. Basketball and hockey are both games of runs. It's just the way the game goes when there are no pre-established offensive and defensive turns. You hit and you'll get hit back. You exert pressure and that pressure will eventually be exerted on you. Michigan basketball ended on the wrong side of a run, suffering a knockout punch that was one part bad luck and two parts missed opportunity. Michgan hockey, on the other hand, survived the inevitable pressure Northern Michign exerted after Michigan took a 3-0 lead.
A 3-0 first period lead wasn't something the Wolverines could rest on. Too many times this season they've taken an early lead only to be swept away by the undertow of another team's run, late goals and late pressure that were too much to overcome. With their postseason hanging in the balance Michigan responded on Friday, doing what was sufficient and holding serve in the third period to weather the storm and in the process made that dim glimmer of hope we hold that Michigan can extend its NCAA tournament streak to 23 consecutive seasons a little brighter.
1st Period
















I'll try to get a GBGA of Saturday's game up....sometime. Not sure when, but I'm working on it. Look forward to more pictures, more laughs, and most importantly moooooooooore goals.
(Burke photo cred: Julian Gonzalez, Detroit Free Press)
Revisiting The AP Poll's Behavior Towards Michigan
REVISITING AP POLL BEHAVIOR: HOW MICHIGAN FARED
We’re quite used to following the polls week after week around here, but now that it has been about two months since I last did this and the regular season has come to an end, I thought it might be of some interest to revisit some of the trends in the AP poll voting.
SUMMARY TABLE:
TOTAL VOTES |
1233 |
AVERAGE RANK (ALL VOTES) |
3.973 |
MEDIAN |
3 |
MODE |
2 |
STD. DEV. |
2.221 |
VARIANCE |
4.933 |
HIGHEST VOTE |
1 |
LOWEST VOTE |
17 |
Even though we are #6 in the AP Poll right now, you can see from the summary statistics that we averaged higher in individual voting throughout the season, and that a good portion of those votes fell within a relatively narrow range of values. That would tend to speak to our performance being seen as extremely good overall, if nothing else, at least by the voters in the poll.
You will note from the graph of average rankings below that we reached our zenith in the ranking (#1) in the Week 13 poll on January 28th. At that point, we were 19-1, coming off the win against Illinois in Champaign. After this, of course, we went 6-5 for the remainder of the season, and you can see the steady decline save for a spike at Week 17, which was the February 25thpoll. At this point, we were 23-4 and coming off wins against Illinois and Penn State at Crisler. I was working visually off of the schedule to compile this (so hopefully the record week-to-week is accurate), but it should show give you an idea of the sensitivity of the poll’s results to our performance.
AP POLL WEEK |
WON |
LOST |
CHANGE IN AVG.FROM PREVIOUS WEEK |
1 |
Preseason |
0 |
|
2 |
1 |
0 |
0.26 |
3 |
3 |
0 |
0.94 |
4 |
5 |
0 |
0.51 |
5 |
7 |
0 |
0.71 |
6 |
9 |
0 |
0.01 |
7 |
11 |
0 |
1.18 |
8 |
12 |
0 |
0.12 |
9 |
13 |
0 |
-0.06 |
10 |
15 |
0 |
0.09 |
11 |
16 |
1 |
-2.12 |
12 |
18 |
1 |
1.91 |
13 |
19 |
1 |
1.10 |
14 |
20 |
2 |
-1.86 |
15 |
21 |
3 |
-0.95 |
16 |
22 |
4 |
-2.52 |
17 |
23 |
4 |
2.26 |
18 |
24 |
5 |
-2.63 |
19 |
25 |
6 |
-0.16 |
Not including the Preseason, of course, the remaining 18 weeks of polling saw 11 weeks where we experienced in upward movement in our average and 7 weeks of a downward turn. What is interesting here, of course, is that the average movement of, well, the average in the weeks of upward movement was 0.83, and the average downward turn was -1.47. I only did this calculation for Michigan, but it would be interesting to do the same analysis for other teams.
MORE DATA AND STUFF:
Here is what the total votes per rank looked like for us in the regular season -
It is interesting to see it this way - following the weeks in isolation, I don't think we get the sense of what this trend actually looks like, but it looks pretty good as the largest numbers of votes over the course of the season went to 2nd and 3rd place in the poll (if it were a running history and not a snapshot).
Here are the percentages of the grand total by poll ranking. As you'll see, nearly half of the votes cast for Michigan in 19 polls were for 2nd and 3rd place. Really, the same essential information as above, but a slightly different way to see how we stacked up across all the polls.
Here's the running average ranking for each week. Sadly, you can see February on this one, but considering that we maintained an overall average rank in the raw voting totals of 3.97, it doesn't seem as bad as it might look here.
Here are the weekly distributions in isolation. Apologies for the somewhat varied scaling on these.
Exhausting, I know.
IN SUMMARY:
As I mentioned, some of this has been seen on the blog before, but in isolation, like the weekly poll itself. The idea here was to take the whole body of data and see how Michigan fared in the entirety of the AP voting, and hopefully you agree that we did not do too badly for ourselves at all when looking at it like that.
Blind Resumes Part II - The 1 Seeds
Welcome to Part II of the blind resume game. Multiple people in my last post asked me to make one for the 1-2-3 seeds, and here it is! The original post was comprised solely of "bubble teams" and can be found HERE. I have made a few slight changes to the game and criteria.
- Because conference record can be misleading (see: St. Mary's), there is a RPI number in parenthesis after the conference record. That is simply the addition of the RPI of every in conference team for every game they've played, divided by the amount of conference games they have played.
- I also got rid of the teams in the "good wins" and "bad losses" section, and replaced them by the RPIs of the teams. (@ means away game, vs means neutral nothing for home). This should make the game as blind as possible, taking out all possible biases, and making it tougher to guess the teams without looking.
- I also made my standards higher on what constitutes a good win or bad loss. In the bubble teams section I pretty much said anything under 75 was a good win, and over about 125 a bad loss. Now, (because let's face it- these are ONE SEEDS) anything in the top 50 is a good win, and anything below that is a bad loss. I realize losing to the #51 RPI team isn't a bad loss. It's more of an OK loss. But nonetheless, I put them in there. Consider them what you want. It's just a bunch of information.
Other than those three things, it works exactly the same! Just look over the chart, pick the team you think is most deserving of a 1 seed, and then click the link below the charts to find out who was who. I have made 4 tables of three teams, so you will be picking all four one seeds! All stats are as of 3/11/13.
Blind Resume Table #1:
Criteria |
Team A |
Team B |
Team C |
---|---|---|---|
Overall Record |
27-4 |
26-5 |
23-7 |
Conference Record |
14-4 (RPI: 90.3) |
14-4 (RPI: 97.2) |
13-5 (RPI: 63.4) |
RPI |
1 |
6 |
14 |
BPI |
2 |
7 |
10 |
Strength of Schedule |
1 |
25 |
5 |
Non-Conference SOS |
1 |
20 |
154 |
Home |
16-0 |
16-1 |
16-2 |
Away |
5-4 |
7-3 |
5-5 |
Neutral |
6-0 |
3-1 |
2-0 |
Record vs. RPI Top 25 |
7-1 |
5-2 |
5-4 |
Record vs. RPI Top 50 |
10-2 |
11-3 |
6-7 |
Record vs. RPI Top 100 |
15-4 |
13-4 |
10-7 |
Last 10 games |
8-2 |
7-3 |
7-3 |
Good Wins |
RPI #s: 3,4,14,18,@18,23,25, 29,36,50 |
RPI #s: @14,19,@21,21, @24,vs27, 34,35,36,@47 |
RPI #s: @5,7,12, 23,42,43 |
Bad Losses |
RPI #s: @66,@83 |
RPI #s: @61,@226 |
NONE |
Click HERE to find out which teams are in Blind Resume Table 1.
Blind Resume Table #2:
Criteria |
Team A |
Team B |
Team C |
---|---|---|---|
Overall Record |
23-7 |
25-6 |
26-5 |
Conference Record |
14-4 (RPI: 71.8) |
14-4 (RPI: 95.6) |
14-4 (RPI: 66.5) |
RPI |
10 |
21 |
5 |
BPI |
18 |
30 |
3 |
Strength of Schedule |
14 |
79 |
10 |
Non-Conference SOS |
97 |
156 |
48 |
Home |
16-0 |
16-1 |
17-2 |
Away |
5-6 |
7-3 |
7-2 |
Neutral |
2-1 |
2-2 |
2-1 |
Record vs. RPI Top 25 |
2-4 |
2-5 |
8-3 |
Record vs. RPI Top 50 |
7-5 |
5-6 |
8-5 |
Record vs. RPI Top 100 |
10-6 |
7-6 |
12-5 |
Last 10 games |
8-2 |
8-2 |
7-3 |
Good Wins |
RPI #s: 9,16,@40,40, 43,44,45 |
RPI #s: 8,24,@35,35,47 |
RPI #s: 7,@7,9,12,@12, @14,18,23 |
Bad Losses |
RPI #s: @51,@161 |
NONE |
NONE |
Click HERE to find out which teams are in Blind Resume Table #2.
Blind Resume Table #3:
Criteria |
Team A |
Team B |
Team C |
---|---|---|---|
Overall Record |
26-5 |
25-6 |
24-6 |
Conference Record |
14-4 (RPI: 72.8) |
12-6 (RPI: 71.8) |
15-3 (RPI: 96.1) |
RPI |
3 |
12 |
4 |
BPI |
1 |
6 |
16 |
Strength of Schedule |
7 |
49 |
4 |
Non-Conference SOS |
31 |
197 |
3 |
Home |
15-1 |
17-1 |
14-1 |
Away |
8-3 |
5-5 |
10-3 |
Neutral |
3-1 |
3-0 |
0-2 |
Record vs. RPI Top 25 |
3-3 |
4-4 |
4-2 |
Record vs. RPI Top 50 |
9-4 |
8-5 |
6-2 |
Record vs. RPI Top 100 |
12-5 |
11-5 |
14-4 |
Last 10 games |
9-1 |
5-5 |
7-3 |
Good Wins |
RPI #s: 10,@16,@17,vs32,40, 44,@45,46,50 |
RPI #s: 7,14,vs21,@23,29,vs40, @42,42 |
RPI #s: 1,7,@18,18,@29,39 |
Bad Losses |
RPI #s: @51 |
RPI #s: @182 |
RPI #s: vs73,@94,126,@164 |
Click HERE to find out which teams are in Blind Resume Table #3.
Blind Resume Table #4:
Criteria |
Team A |
Team B |
Team C |
---|---|---|---|
Overall Record |
24-5 |
30-2 |
24-7 |
Conference Record |
14-4 (RPI: 66.6) |
16-0 (RPI: 168) |
13-5 (RPI: 60.1) |
RPI |
9 |
11 |
7 |
BPI |
17 |
5 |
9 |
Strength of Schedule |
23 |
78 |
5 |
Non-Conference SOS |
174 |
39 |
55 |
Home |
16-1 |
15-1 |
17-1 |
Away |
6-3 |
10-1 |
6-5 |
Neutral |
2-1 |
5-0 |
1-1 |
Record vs. RPI Top 25 |
4-2 |
2-1 |
4-6 |
Record vs. RPI Top 50 |
8-3 |
5-2 |
8-7 |
Record vs. RPI Top 100 |
12-4 |
11-2 |
11-7 |
Last 10 games |
9-1 |
10-0 |
7-3 |
Good Wins |
RPI #s: 3,10,16,@16,vs31, @44,@45,@46 |
RPI #s: 21,24,@33,33,35 |
RPI #s: vs6,12,14,23,37, 42,43,@43 |
Bad Losses |
RPI #s: @51,@130 |
NONE |
NONE |
1986 UM Indiana flashback - Knight on Canham
(If you want to skip my reminiscing, scroll to the end and click on the link for Bobby Knight good naturedly ripping into Don Canham after the final game of the 85-86 basketball season, Indiana at UM)
We won the Big Ten hoop title outright in 1984-85, and I wanted to see the games the next season.
Cheap bastard that I am, I asked a friend in the athletic department how he could get me in for free.
Well, I could assist another of his drinking buddies and guard the press parking lot, making sure only those with proper passes entered the reserved section. The requirement was to be there at least an hour before gametime, then we could watch the game from the tunnel.
This was after the first Fab Five, Paul Jokisch, who went exclusively to football, Robert Henderson, Butch Wade, RIchard Rellford, and Roy Tarpley.
Both title teams went on to disappointing second round exits in the NCAA tournament, but enough of that.
Bill Frieder emphasized offensive efficiency, and we set a second consecutive record for team field goal percentage, 51.6%.
The Scott Skiles led MSU team swept us, the home loss ending a 24 game home win streak, and we lost one other conference game, at Minnesota, which ended the still record 10 game road winning streak.
But, Indiana came in with the chance to tie us for the title with a win.
For the only time in my memory, standing room tickets were sold, so the paid attendance was over 14,000 at a time when Crisler sat 13,609.
We crushed them. The outcome was never in doubt. We even had a five on zero fast break.
I had a video camera, the early edition, about two feet long, not counting the protruding microphone.
With the demise of Dr. Strange Hayes, Bobby Knight was the reigning Big Ten villain.
I was hoping for some fireworks after the game, so I brought my camera, with tripod, and set it up in the room then used for post-game pressers.
Believing it is easier to get forgiveness than permission, I shared my plan with no one.
My pass entitled me entrance to the room, and I just tried to make sure none of the media bumped into my camera.
As luck would have it, during Knight's remarks, Don Canham entered the room and stood almost right behind the camera.
When Knight noticed him, he directed some pointed comments his way, that, well, look at the tape, put on line by the inestimable Wolverine Historian.
Blind Resumes
This is by far the best part of college basketball season, and the brackets and selections are my favorite. One thing that I always love doing is looking at the blind resumes of teams that are on the bubble. ESPN shows graphics that the announcers play this game with, but it doesn’t leave enough time to actually see what the tournament criteria of the teams are. So I decided to take 18 teams that the experts (Lundari, Palm, and Crashing the Dance) have just in or just out of the bubble, and make my own blind resumes. The idea is that it takes all of the possible bias out the equation, because you don't know who the teams are. Just click the link after each chart to see which teams were represented in that chart. All stats are as of 3/8/13.
Blind Resume Table #1:
Criteria |
Team A |
Team B |
Team C |
---|---|---|---|
Overall Record |
20-10 |
20-10 |
20-9 |
Conference Record |
9-8 |
11-6 |
8-7 |
RPI |
94 |
54 |
43 |
BPI |
65 |
46 |
47 |
Strength of Schedule |
133 |
82 |
79 |
Non-Conference SOS |
286 |
74 |
218 |
Home |
15-4 |
15-2 |
13-1 |
Away |
4-5 |
4-7 |
5-8 |
Neutral |
1-1 |
1-1 |
2-0 |
Record vs. RPI Top 25 |
2-1 |
0-3 |
2-5 |
Record vs. RPI Top 50 |
4-4 |
1-4 |
3-6 |
Record vs. RPI Top 100 |
6-8 |
6-9 |
7-7 |
Last 10 games |
4-6 |
6-4 |
6-4 |
Good Wins |
Colorado, UCLA, California, @ Colorado |
Missouri, @ Ole Miss |
@ Creighton, UNLV, Colorado State |
Bad Losses |
Depaul, @ Utah |
@ Georgia |
@ Utah, @ Nevada |
Click HERE to find out which teams are in Blind Resume Table #1.
Blind Resume Table #2:
Criteria |
Team A |
Team B |
Team C |
---|---|---|---|
Overall Record |
20-10 |
21-7 |
22-8 |
Conference Record |
10-7 |
11-4 |
11-4 |
RPI |
70 |
39 |
42 |
BPI |
43 |
45 |
64 |
Strength of Schedule |
134 |
98 |
88 |
Non-Conference SOS |
302 |
121 |
87 |
Home |
17-1 |
11-2 |
11-1 |
Away |
3-8 |
8-5 |
9-6 |
Neutral |
0-1 |
2-0 |
2-1 |
Record vs. RPI Top 25 |
2-2 |
1-1 |
0-3 |
Record vs. RPI Top 50 |
4-2 |
2-2 |
0-4 |
Record vs. RPI Top 100 |
7-3 |
5-6 |
3-7 |
Last 10 games |
5-5 |
8-2 |
6-4 |
Good Wins |
@ Wisconsin, NC State, UNC, Duke |
Villanova, Butler, @ VCU |
Denver |
Bad Losses |
Delaware, @ George Mason, vs. Old Dominion, @ Wake Forest, @Clemson |
Central Connecticut State |
@ Marshall |
Criteria |
Team A |
Team B |
Team C |
---|---|---|---|
Overall Record |
22-8 |
22-8 |
20-10 |
Conference Record |
10-5 |
11-6 |
8-9 |
RPI |
40 |
57 |
86 |
BPI |
57 |
44 |
54 |
Strength of Schedule |
72 |
162 |
123 |
Non-Conference SOS |
68 |
294 |
298 |
Home |
13-3 |
16-1 |
16-3 |
Away |
8-4 |
5-6 |
3-6 |
Neutral |
1-1 |
1-1 |
1-1 |
Record vs. RPI Top 25 |
1-3 |
0-2 |
1-4 |
Record vs. RPI Top 50 |
3-3 |
1-3 |
2-4 |
Record vs. RPI Top 100 |
9-5 |
6-6 |
3-8 |
Last 10 games |
8-2 |
5-5 |
5-5 |
Good Wins |
vs. Syracuse, La Salle, Saint Louis, @ Villanova |
Missouri, Tennessee 2x |
NC State, Duke |
Bad Losses |
Duquesne |
@ South Carolina, @ Mississippi State |
@ Boston College, @ Georgia Tech |
Click HERE to find out which teams are in Blind Resume Table #3.
Blind Resume Table #4:
Criteria |
Team A |
Team B |
Team C |
---|---|---|---|
Overall Record |
19-12 |
17-13 |
18-11 |
Conference Record |
10-8 |
9-9 |
10-7 |
RPI |
52 |
77 |
56 |
BPI |
59 |
90 |
63 |
Strength of Schedule |
17 |
57 |
49 |
Non-Conference SOS |
144 |
29 |
49 |
Home |
12-4 |
11-3 |
12-3 |
Away |
6-7 |
4-9 |
4-7 |
Neutral |
1-1 |
2-1 |
2-1 |
Record vs. RPI Top 25 |
4-1 |
1-1 |
1-2 |
Record vs. RPI Top 50 |
5-7 |
3-5 |
2-3 |
Record vs. RPI Top 100 |
7-10 |
7-6 |
8-9 |
Last 10 games |
6-4 |
4-6 |
7-3 |
Good Wins |
Louisville, Syracuse, @ Connecticut, Marquette, Georgetown |
vs. Miami (FL), @ Wichita State, Creighton |
Wichita State, Florida, Massachusetts, Kentucky |
Bad Losses |
Columbia |
@ Morehead State, @ Southern Illinois, @ Missouri State, Drake 2x, @ Bradley |
Georgia 2x |
Click HERE to find out which teams are in Blind Resume Table #4.
Blind Resume Table #5:
Criteria |
Team A |
Team B |
Team C |
---|---|---|---|
Overall Record |
20-10 |
18-10 |
20-10 |
Conference Record |
10-7 |
8-7 |
12-6 |
RPI |
50 |
55 |
49 |
BPI |
39 |
95 |
53 |
Strength of Schedule |
54 |
62 |
37 |
Non-Conference SOS |
148 |
80 |
70 |
Home |
16-1 |
10-4 |
11-5 |
Away |
3-8 |
7-4 |
6-5 |
Neutral |
1-1 |
1-2 |
3-0 |
Record vs. RPI Top 25 |
1-4 |
0-2 |
2-2 |
Record vs. RPI Top 50 |
3-7 |
1-6 |
5-5 |
Record vs. RPI Top 100 |
6-8 |
7-8 |
8-9 |
Last 10 games |
6-4 |
5-5 |
8-2 |
Good Wins |
Kansas State, Oklahoma, Oklahoma State |
@ La Salle, Ohio |
Oregon 2x, @ Arizona, UCLA, Colorado, @Denver |
Bad Losses |
@ Texas Tech |
George Washington |
Harvard |
Click HERE to find out which teams are in Blind Resume Table #5.
Blind Resume Table #6:
Criteria |
Team A |
Team B |
Team C |
---|---|---|---|
Overall Record |
18-11 |
26-5 |
17-13 |
Conference Record |
11-6 |
14-2 |
8-9 |
RPI |
62 |
34 |
69 |
BPI |
67 |
32 |
49 |
Strength of Schedule |
85 |
124 |
30 |
Non-Conference SOS |
78 |
138 |
43 |
Home |
12-3 |
16-1 |
11-5 |
Away |
4-8 |
9-2 |
4-7 |
Neutral |
2-0 |
1-2 |
2-1 |
Record vs. RPI Top 25 |
0-1 |
0-2 |
0-5 |
Record vs. RPI Top 50 |
0-4 |
1-2 |
1-5 |
Record vs. RPI Top 100 |
7-7 |
5-3 |
4-10 |
Last 10 games |
6-4 |
9-1 |
3-7 |
Good Wins |
vs. Villanova, Kentucky |
Creighton, BYU 2x |
Oklahoma State, @ Kentucky, BYU |
Bad Losses |
Tulane, @ Auburn, Mercer |
vs. Pacific, vs. Georgia Tech |
Northwestern, Charleston |
Click HERE to find out which teams are in Blind Resume Table #6.
I hope this game was fun, and maybe opened your eyes to some teams that you might not have considered as tournament contenders. It feels great knowing Michigan won't be sweating out these last few games like they have had to do in previous seasons. Thanks for reading, and go blue!