this guy evidently hired to work for AD
Update 6/18: Removed MO WR Wes Kemp (Wisc), MD RB Josh Haden (down to BC, UF), CA WR Christopher Owusu (no M interest). Linked to articles on AZ RB Covaughn Deboskie (slight Cal lead, moved down to yellow from green), NJ TE Chris Pantele, NJ S Will Hill, OH LB Brandon Beachum (offered?), another on Beachum, OH RB Michael Shaw, TX CB Adrian Bushell. Two headers of note from always excitable GBW: TX WR Daryl Stonum visits; NJ S Brandon Smith sounds enthused.
Scout has updated their top 100. We like Rivals better this year.
Editorial Opinion: Another light week as far as news. The Michigan summer camp is now in full swing and should put an end to that (expect a couple of commits from guys you may or may not have heard of), but for now...
None of the guys who got dropped were strong M possibilities, but Covaughn Deboskie claiming a Cal lead is a negative development. Michigan will get the chance to impress, though:
Michigan is another school with a large and impressive stadium, but Deboskie admits he doesn't know much about the Wolverines yet. "I haven't really developed a relationship with their coaches yet," he said. "Hopefully I'll be able to learn more about them. I want to have a good relationship with my coaches and I want to be part of a team with unity. I need to feel like I could be comfortable there for the next four to five years."
Probably better he hasn't gotten familiar with the program if he says someone else leads.
Adrian Bushell has been listing Michigan among three or four leading schools for a little while now; this quote does not encourage:
"I know for sure I'll be visiting Florida, Tech, and OSU. I will probably visit Michigan as well, but those first 3 are the ones I know for sure. After I am able to see all the schools, I'll have a better idea of the place that is best for me."
Since he's talking about official visits, money and distance are not factors. We're probably trailing.
IL DT Garrett Goebel is visiting soon and then deciding a week or so thereafter. Buckeye Planet thinks he's in the bag for OSU; they're probably right.
Brandon Beachum says he has an offer:
"Michigan has amazing tradition and I actually know a few guys on the team already," Beachum said. "They are still on the rise and have some of the best academics in the Big Ten."
That article also contains high praise for Wisconsin; a second article from Allen Wallace the next day is pro-LSU. Sometimes offers get incorrectly reported due to miscommunication between school and player or player and media outlet, but since the second article specifically addresses the fact that he does not have an OSU offer and does not expect to get one, it's highly likely Beachum is in possession of a bonafide offer. He stopped at camp today; Michigan has a shot.
Michael Shaw is another Ohioan looking out of state. He gets off one of my favorite quotes of the year in a recent Scout article:
Shaw recently took an unofficial visit to Michigan. "It was amazing," Shaw exclaimed. "They are doing a great job with their program. They are always a winning team. Everyone there loves the team and there's a lot of team spirit. They don't have any pro teams there, so Michigan football is pretty much the marquee attraction."
Somone just got liowned.
Anyway: a couple commits should be forthcoming. Will post when they occur.
I has a a comeback. Youtube now possesses a clip reel from the monster Metrodome comeback of a couple years ago:
MGoVideo. This looks like it's still a work in progress, but there is now a dedicated torrent tracker for Michigan stuff at mgovideo.com. Huzzah.
(For those still banging together rocks and downloading from Kazaa: Bit Torrent is a new generation of peer-to-peer file sharing that is entirely distributed, which means it's hard to shut down. It also has performance advantages because everyone who is downloading a file is simultaneously uploading it to the other downloaders.)
Can we get a project together here? There is now a place that will organize and track uploaded torrents. I've been in contact with a couple emailers with large libraries of old games who were looking for a way to share those games amongst Michigan fans. As the kind of site that gets frequented by guys who know why I always use "==" when declaring two things equal, there must be a number of readers who can guide video librarians in the process of turning analog into digital; as the kind of site also frequented by students there must be some other readers out there with some really rippin' upload speeds. The ability to go back and watch old games would be awesome.
So, plan of attack: if you know all about codecs and ripping and such and can spread your expertise to people in possession of lots of old games, drop me a line. Ditto if you are in possession of said games. Hopefully we can get this up and running.
More BTN. The New York Times has an article with lots of interesting quotes from the partisans involved. Tremble at Jim Delaney explaining that they "take risks" because they would like to "stay competitive"! Wonder as he follows up that rousing explanation with this:
"I'm not confident of anything right now," said Delany, who can expect a bruising few months. "All I'll say is I have a hard time seeing many more offerings with more appeal than ours."
! (Also marvel at superfluous "more"s inexplicably not excised by the interviewer.) Boggle at network President Mark Silverman's, um, acknowledgment of free will:
As for carrying the network in non-Big Ten markets at 10 cents a subscriber, he said Comcast would most likely make it available as a subscription service like Major League Baseball's Extra Innings out-of-market package.
"They have a right to do as they wish," Silverman said.
Yikes. Upon review, it kind of looks like the author of the article took every possible opportunity to juxtapose a weak-sounding quote with Comcast tough talkin' and scary precedent, but none of that sounds good at all.
The other side is presented by some Comcast suit who loves taking my irony measuring devices, smashing them into thousands of tiny little pieces, and hurling the irony-ometer confetti skyward:
Comcast is developing a campaign that will attempt to prove that the network is too expensive and too provincial to be broadly distributed.
"I have no doubt that the Big Ten will try to rile up their fans and alumni to say that big bad Comcast is denying their content to Big Ten fans and alumni," said David Cohen, an executive vice president of Comcast.
He added, "We'd like to make the network available to those who want to watch it and not force customers who have no interest in the content to have to pay for it."
...says the man who makes sure that my dial is full of things like "Not Without My Daughter: A Mother's Fight: All Movies On Lifetime Have At Least One Colon In Them... Er, In Their Title" and the Golf Channel. There is a reason Comcast sucks and everyone hates it and this is it.
(The bitchy, power-suit wearing quasi-MILF who snarks on satellite and ADSL is also a good reason. What is up with that woman? Why does she bob her head like she's about to say "oh no DirectTV di'in't"? Does Comcast really think getting nagged by a woman who seems the very embodiment of henpecked married life sells cable? Also there are those fake news ads in which fake talking heads also rip on satellite in the smarmiest way possible. They're atrocious, offensive ads possessed of the same smugness of Lily Tomlin at the phone company. Only a virtual monopoly could get away with it.)
Comcast is right: the Big Ten Network is a money grab. There is no other reason to do it. But unless they throw it on digital and tell me it will cost $1.10 for me to get it, I have no sympathy for their little public opinion pity party. And when the average cost of cable has gone up 93% in the past decade, you cannot possibly claim that it's the Big Ten who is aligned "against consumers."
Games you may or may not be at the bar for. The UM Alumni Club of Greater Boston declares that Michigan's games against Appalachian State, Northwestern, and Eastern Michigan will be sentenced to the BTN dungeon. FYI.
UV a couple days ago:
Also there is this [picture from the Carr Wash] in which Ryan Mallett looks like an extra from Top Gun with the callsign "Stork"
Today, Michigan Against The World provides:
Offsides needs to die. Hockey offsides, that is. It is sort of required in football and soccer. But it is not in hockey, and every time the rule is invoked a little part of me dies. Entertaining rushes are blown dead because one player strayed a fraction into the attacking zone. Power plays go from excitingly set up to regrouping because a defenseman can't hold the puck in the zone. Defenders can stack the blue line and enforce a dump and chase strategy that's about as interesting as watching the Spurs play basketball. And for what? I can't figure it out. It's true the rule gives a certain structure to the modern game, but what would the consequences be if offsides did not exist?
Cherry-picking is not likely. No team is going to voluntarily put themselves a man down in the defensive zone in the vague hope a long lead pass goes tape-to-tape and puts a player in alone. The continued existence of the two-line pass would make the offensive zone verboten until the defending team had cleared their zone with control of the puck. At that point, players could go where they pleased with incurring the wrath of a whistle and a boring neutral-zone faceoff. No, the framework for a penalty-kill-and-breakaway based offense has been in place since the NHL adopted the collegiate two-line pass rule, but no one has seriously attempted to deploy it save for some Swedes in the Olympics. Breakaway passes remain difficult, low-return things; removing offsides is not going to change that.
So, then, what are the negatives? The ability of a team to remove pressure around its own goal by desperately poking the puck out past the blue line has always seemed a cheap maneuver, and there's nothing I hate more in hockey than the whistle that disrupts an interesting rush for no reason. (Except the delay of game penalty you get when you accidentally fling the puck into the stands in your defensive zone. Worst rule in sports? Other than "Anderson Varejao is allowed to participate in them"?) Those are the ways offsides inflicts itself on the sport. Removing both of these things would improve the game
The benefit is obvious: hockey gets to play to its strengths. It's always been a game of flow up and down the ice, players approaching and retreating. One of my favorite sequences in all of hockey came in Michigan's 3-2 overtime loss to BC in the NCAA tournament a few years ago. Michigan had been dominated the entire game until a gorgeous nine minute-plus stretch of nonstop end-to-end action unsullied by whistles. Michigan started to emerge. You could feel the momentum shift. The Wolverines re-asserted themselves as equals, and you could feel the tenor of the game change. By the time it ended and the freaked out network cut to commercial, the tension drained from the room and real-life reasserted itself after what seemed like a lengthy ten minute vacation. (This being Michigan sports in the past half-decade, Boston College would bat in a rebound off the offensive zone faceoff and go on to win in overtime; yea, Angry Michigan Hockey Hating God was wroth that day.)
Dropping offsides would not turn all games into that ten-minute pressure wave but it might do that for some. It would reduce whistles, kill deadly dull neutral zone faceoffs, and make it harder to stand up offenses at the blue line with impunity. It would make hockey awesomer.
Okay, okay: while I would be happy to see offsides disappear entirely, I do realize most observers of the game would file that under lunacy and move on. But there are less radical alternatives:
- Widen the blue line, which is actually part of the offensive zone when you want it to be -- holding a puck in or gaining the zone -- and a part of the defensive zone when you want it to be -- skittering along the edge of the zone with one skate precariously onside.
- A more extreme version of same: make the "blue line" functionally extend all the way to the red line. Once you have gained the zone the puck must pass the red line for it to be lost. When you are taking the puck up ice, once you pass the red line you are permitted to pass to anyone.
Any of these suggestions would be somewhere between a moderate and a drastic change, but... um... they're embiggening the nets in a desperate attempt to increase scoring. Drastic measures are called for.
Everybody loves Rutgers. Good find by Varsity Blue to plumb the depths of the San Antonio Express-News for this scheduling morsel:
Michigan has a hole in its 2008 football schedule, preferring an opponent for the first or fourth weeks of the season. The Wolverines likely won't play a Mid-American Conference school after already booking two games with teams from that conference.
Wonder if a Big 12 team would be willing to accept the challenge of playing at the so-called "Big House?"
The most likely team would be KSU, particularly as OSU already has a tough home game assured with Georgia as the return from their game this season.
But Michigan athletic director Bill Martin told the Detroit News that his preferred opponent would be Rutgers, particularly if a return game could be arranged to play the Scarlet Knights at the Meadowlands in a later season.
(Somehow I missed that News article.) That's an encouraging indication that Michigan will not go for three patsies and ND after this year's anomalous Oregon game goes by the wayside. If the road games end up in 80k pro stadiums instead of 40-60k mid-level college ones, that's fine with me as long as we get the stench of I-AA off of us, especially because tomato cans are becoming less attractive options. The Georgia Sports Blog has an interesting look at the increased demands of patsies. The near future will hold such oddities as Texas at Central Florida, Michigan State and Minnesota at Florida Atlantic, and Virginia Tech at East Carolina (four times!) as a result; hopefully the not-so-near future will be filled with more interesting games as a result.
Sidenote: It's somewhat surreal that Rutgers is suddenly being bandied about as a potential schedule upgrade after years and years of being one of those teams you pick in Dynasty mode when you want to spend a few years toiling before your eight national championship run. When Michigan State managed to coug it against Rutgers a few years ago, everyone laughed at the Spartans for falling to lowly Rutgers. Now the shoe would be on the other hypothetical foot.
NCAA. The game, that is. The revamped dynasty mode will rope me into buying it, though I still harbor severe EA-related suspicions about it. Are my fears assuaged or reinforced by the first quarter of this Michigan-OSU game?
I'm not exactly sure. I didn't notice any linebackers leaping tall buildings in a single bound to knock down what should be complete passes, and finding a fullback open on a crossing route tantalizes. I am tenuously encouraged. There is more if you are so inclined.
Jimmah! I was going to write something about the Jimmah's-hurt-no-he-ain't-then-why-surgery thing, but both SMQB...
The Worldwide Leader - on the heels of Log's Blog [courtesy The Wizard of Odds, as usual] - goes the anonymice route to confirm Clausen had a "procedure" performed on one of his elbows, backing up the Miami Herald report in January that Clausen had bone spurs in his right/throwing elbow and Father of Jimmy's interview with the Chicago Sun-Times in March, when he said Jimmy was "losing velocity" at the end of his senior season due to a vague arm injury. It directly contradicts Charlie Weis' spring assurance that Clausen was "full go," much to The Wiz's consternation, and the hopes of the many, many partisans expecting Clausen to start from day one against Georgia Tech.
...and the Wiz...
Weis was miffed when asked about Clausen and interrupted a reporter:
Question: "You say everyone is full to go, and last time we talked, you said Clausen ..."
Weis: "He's full to go. Contrary to recent reports, he's full to go, too. By the way, just so we can clear that one up, the only one who will answer for the health of our players will be me. So next time, we can just keep it that way, because I'll do the answering for the health of our players."
So there you have it. Can you believe anything Weis says from now on?
...beat me to it. Generally you take the prognoses offered up by schools at face value, but ND has established that they might be something less than truthful when it comes to the golden calf. My money is on Demetrius Jones against Michigan.
Etc.: Naked guy w/ strategically placed sock runs around Michigan Stadium for reasons best described as obscure.
Sorry: late. My laptop keeps shutting off unprompted. I think the heat disagrees with it. Or it's just tired of letting me inflict pain on Michigan sports teams. Either way.
I have received a number of concerned emails about the Big Ten Network's potential failure to exist this fall; some of these have relayed information that may help clarify the situation. Go, readers, go:
Speculation but a reasonable one: it's highly likely that the "40 companies" have all the reach of Earl Boykins.
One of the many, many Andrews/Anthonys to comment asked Chicago Comcast about the potential of adding the network and got this response:
Thank you for contacting Comcast Cable. Currently, there are no plans to
carry the Big Ten network at this time. However, when new programming
and products become available, we will notify Customer's via DCT
messaging, bill inserts, and direct mailers.
Thank you for choosing Comcast.
I love "thanks, go to hell" answers. I have read elsewhere on the internet that this is the standard response Comcast and other cable companies offer whenever anyone asks about any new channel, whether or not they end up carrying it, so Andrew's supplement to the Comcast response...
I'm sure you have received a lot of these, but here is info directly from Comcast's mouth when I submitted a question about the Big Ten Network last night. I live in Chicago, where the BTN is, like, based and all, and things look very, very dim in getting it on cable here. I would assume the response below would be the same for the large number of Comcast subscribers in Michigan. I also called to ask and the Comcast representative I talked to had not even heard of the BTN.
I also received a message on my digital cable that Comcast Chicago will be carrying CSTV soon, albeit on their pricey Sports and Entertainment digital tier. In the meantime, keep up the drumbeat against the BTN.
...may be a little pessimistic, but the whole calling-and-not-even-having-heard-of-it is disturbing.
Mike Brennan has something more hopeful:
I just spoke with Bill Martin on the phone. I'm going to be in touch with Mark Silverman of the Big 10 Network tomorrow. My gripes against the channel arise from your analysis (along with that of the other U-M blogger that addressed this) and aren't so much focused on the possibility of my cable rate going up a few dimes, but rather that there's a chance that this extra channel might result in me being unable to watch some Michigan football games. Judging from the general tenor of your replies and the message board threads, it seems that most people are with me on this.
So he started to explain about how it won't raise cable rates so much before I stopped him and explained that we don't care about a small rate hike; we just want to be sure we'd have the games available on basic cable. At that point he completely and unequivocally assured me that, before the season begins, all the major cable providers will be on board and that the Big 10 Network will absolutely be a basic-cable channel. He said the lawyers have told him that this will go down to the final days before a deal is struck, but that a deal will absolutely be struck.
I feel a lot better. He said they're talking about a monthly boost of $.75 to the cable bill, but this is a small price to pay considering that I would actually watch this channel a lot all year.
Hope this is useful to you. Let me know if you have any questions.
So... hurray? We can expect brinksmanship on the part of both sides as they try to work out a deal; Bill Martin insists a deal will get done. If it does, I get to retract all the nasty stuff I said this summer. This I will gladly do if the reward is a Big Ten Network I can watch, preferably one with lots of hockey. Clarification: road hockey games.
Mike's email makes me feel a little better, but waiting for this eleventh hour deal will be at least mildly nerve-wracking. Only mildly? Well, the network kicks off with its two Ohio State games: Akron and Youngstown State (via SMQB). Expect our riveting clash with Eastern Michigan to be one of our two featured, um, contests.